Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M50 Congestion

11617181921

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    MJohnston wrote:
    Attacking the supposed use of buzzwords is just as petty. If you don't think carpooling would be effective in congestion reduction, instead just say so and say why. Otherwise you're not adding anything useful to this thread, only trolling.


    Car pooling would have negligible impact on the M50. Nobody's journey starts and finishes on an orbital motorway.

    I'm totally in favour of car pooling, public transport, bicycles and the rest but none are realistic alternatives to the role played by the M50.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,271 ✭✭✭sdanseo


    First Up wrote: »
    Agree - its infuriating but in the jam yesterday all 3 lanes were bumper to bumper and crawling.

    Yes, but a middle lane hogger 10km ahead may have caused the accident which in turn caused your tailback.

    Cause and effect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    sdanseo wrote:
    Yes, but a middle lane hogger 10km ahead may have caused the accident which in turn caused your tailback.
    Don't get me started on middle lane hoggers.
    sdanseo wrote:
    Cause and effect.
    Yes, ALL accidents are caused


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,127 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Thargor wrote: »

    If it's any consolation the air inside the metal box is worse...

    It's not.

    That's self-inflicted.

    People, especially children, on the outside don't have any say in this slow war on their health.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    I admire your persistence MJ, it can't be easy arguing with posters who think that the M50 congestion is caused by bad driving.

    Yeah it’s bizarre. This is my last post here though, unfollowing because nobody is actually looking for realistic solutions. Leave the trolls to their thread (and their M50).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    I admire your persistence MJ, it can't be easy arguing with posters who think that the M50 congestion is caused by bad driving.

    Some congestion due to volume is inevitable. I've said that repeatedly. What isn't inevitable is traffic at a standstilI due to accidents.

    I used the M50 yesterday while going from the airport to Blessington at 6pm. It was congested all the way but no accidents. We moved slowly but constantly. The full journey took an hour; that's less than it has taken me to cover 3 exits on the M50 after an accident.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    Not everyone wants to be on a bus or a bicycle. People complain about commutes all the time but maybe a bit of comfort can go a long way to making them bearable?

    Not everyone wanted to use those new sewers they were building in the past. Luckily the majority had enough of a selfish minority making their **** everyone else's problem and banned them just throwing it out a window


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Not everyone wanted to use those new sewers they were building in the past. Luckily the majority had enough of a selfish minority making their **** everyone else's problem and banned them just throwing it out a window


    Do you see buses or bicycles as the solution to congestion on an orbital motorway?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    First Up wrote: »
    Do you see buses or bicycles as the solution to congestion on an orbital motorway?

    Part of the solution, yes. I know plenty of people making trips from Finglas to Coolock via the M50 for example.

    Also the NTA seem to agree with me and they are playing to run a bus on the M50 as part of Bus Connects


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Part of the solution, yes. I know plenty of people making trips from Finglas to Coolock via the M50 for example.

    Also the NTA seem to agree with me and they are playing to run a bus on the M50 as part of Bus Connects

    A bus alternative sounds great as long as users have a way to get to the M50 to catch it. Where will the bus stops be?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,440 ✭✭✭cdaly_


    Not everyone wants to be on a bus or a bicycle. People complain about commutes all the time but maybe a bit of comfort can go a long way to making them bearable?
    However, neither Dublin city nor the environment in general can afford everyone being in a car instead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Nijmegen


    Took the bus this morning rather than drive. Apart from the mystery bus that was due, due, due and then never came I had 2 further buses rock up at the same time, both packed to the rafters. My missus takes the train and it's packed every morning. If we had a national everyone-get-off-the-M50 day I suspect it wouldn't go particularly well (and no, I couldn't cycle this journey). It's difficult to justify forcing people out of their cars when you probably couldn't accommodate them. Meanwhile, over in the Bus Connects thread I note that the plan is being ripped apart one good idea after another.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Nijmegen wrote:
    Took the bus this morning rather than drive. Apart from the mystery bus that was due, due, due and then never came I had 2 further buses rock up at the same time, both packed to the rafters. My missus takes the train and it's packed every morning. If we had a national everyone-get-off-the-M50 day I suspect it wouldn't go particularly well (and no, I couldn't cycle this journey). It's difficult to justify forcing people out of their cars when you probably couldn't accommodate them. Meanwhile, over in the Bus Connects thread I note that the plan is being ripped apart one good idea after another.

    Crowded buses and trains are part of urban life but at least there are buses and trains serving the routes you want to go.

    I don't see that being replicated for those using the M50 as an orbital route.

    I have described trips I made from Stillorgan to Clondalkin (half an hour on an accident free M50) and Dublin Airport to Blessington (an hour via M50), both at evening rush hour. These journeys would have taken several hours on public transport - to the point of being impossible.

    Replicating the M50's role with public transport is just ideological nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    First Up wrote: »
    Crowded buses and trains are part of urban life but at least there are buses and trains serving the routes you want to go.

    I don't see that being replicated for those using the M50 as an orbital route.

    I have described trips I made from Stillorgan to Clondalkin (half an hour on an accident free M50) and Dublin Airport to Blessington (an hour via M50), both at evening rush hour. These journeys would have taken several hours on public transport - to the point of being impossible.

    Replicating the M50's role with public transport is just ideological nonsense.

    If we built metro west instead of the m50 upgrade it would be extremely easy by PT


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    If we built metro west instead of the m50 upgrade it would be extremely easy by PT

    We didn't. Any other ideas?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    First Up wrote: »
    We didn't. Any other ideas?

    Convert a lane into a bus lane


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Convert a lane into a bus lane


    And where do people catch the buses?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    First Up wrote: »
    And where do people catch the buses?

    Just off the Junctions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Just off the Junctions

    How do people get to them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    First Up wrote: »
    How do people get to them?

    You heard of these things called Buses right? Walking do know about walking ? What about Cycling ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,207 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I think the question was how do the buses load and unload since pedestrians aren't allowed on the motorway itself. I guess the bus has to come off the motorway at every junction though I imagine that would get very frustrating for people commuting on it.

    Edit: I guess looking the proposed route map, it's not a huge deal. Seems to be just one orbital route utilising the M50 which enters at J6, leaves at J7. Would be interesting to see how an orbital route using the full length of the M50 would work. I imagine you could make it work by building partially segregated bus stop infrastructure alongside the M50 but that would require changing from M to N status.

    Edit2: misinterpreted the original question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,440 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    The simple answer to the above is Park n'ride bus pick up stations from major hubs such as from Ballymun near Ikea, Sandyford Ind., Naas Rd. Luas, people can either drive or get feeder buses to the P N'R hubs...
    At least then you don't have as much single occupancy cars flooding onto the M50, and with a dedicated bus / car pool lane too that could work...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    You heard of these things called Buses right? Walking do know about walking ? What about Cycling ?

    So buses going to and from the M50 so people can catch another bus to go along the M50 for a bit and then catch another bus towards where they wanted to go in the first place. Same on the way home.

    Or you cycle to the M50, lock your bike and hope there's a bike available at the other end so you can cycle the rest of the way. And hope your own bike is still there when you get back.

    Sounds good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    First Up wrote: »
    So buses going to and from the M50 so people can catch another bus to go along the M50 for a bit and then catch another bus towards where they wanted to go in the first place. Same on the way home.

    Or you cycle to the M50, lock your bike and hope there's a bike available at the other end so you can cycle the rest of the way. And hope your own bike is still there when you get back.

    Sounds good.
    Doesn't it , almost European


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Doesn't it , almost European

    Europeans understand the difference between mass transport and an orbital motorway.

    You don't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    First Up wrote: »
    Europeans understand the difference between mass transport and an orbital motorway.

    You don't.

    I understand a orbital motorway can be used for the mass transport


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭sharper


    Stark wrote: »
    I think the question was how do the buses load and unload since pedestrians aren't allowed on the motorway itself. I guess the bus has to come off the motorway at every junction though I imagine that would get very frustrating for people commuting on it.

    Running buses along the M50 was looked at as part of bus connects and was dismissed for that reason.

    https://twitter.com/humantransit/status/1025133847208321024

    https://twitter.com/humantransit/status/1026900207550705665

    https://twitter.com/humantransit/status/1027563742593089536


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,247 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    First Up wrote: »


    Yes, ALL accidents are caused

    Let's stop calling them accidents so. They are crashes or collisions, as used by the Gardai and the RSA and anyone who wants to stop letting bad drivers off the hook for the damage they cause.

    https://crashnotaccident.com/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Let's stop calling them accidents so. They are crashes or collisions, as used by the Gardai and the RSA and anyone who wants to stop letting bad drivers off the hook for the damage they cause.


    Agreed. An accident is unintenional, not the opposite of deliberate


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    sharper wrote:
    Running buses along the M50 was looked at as part of bus connects and was dismissed for that reason.

    The same reason they don't run on orbital motorways in Europe.


Advertisement