Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fire in Douglas - See Mod note in post #506

1161719212238

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,796 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    mean gene wrote: »
    I worked there up to last week I know the footfall where do you work there

    I'm the bald lad who wears the Vince McMahon suits


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭pwurple


    None.

    If walking 5 or 10 minutes to the shops a few times a week is deemed impossible for people with children, then we are rightly fcuked regarding traffic and transport.

    I was just wondering what basis you were pontificating, and if you were just having a dig at someone for going about their normal business.

    Sure, it's not impossible at all if you are not working, or have no commute and have the time to do it, or are living in the 1950's.


    Here's a fairly typical set up for working parents these days.

    You're out of the house at 6:30am to do your drops and commute, work all day, home around 7pm, have creche or childminder drop offs and pick up, have to sort dinner for the whole family, check homework, and maybe talk to your own kids. Put them to bed, read the stories. And then generally can't leave the house when the kids are in bed.

    You do a "big shop" once a week, and have to be fairly organised to manage to get enough food to cover breakfast, lunch, dinner, fruit for 7 days for 4, 5 or 6+ people. But you think nipping to the shops multiple times a week to haul back the 30 apples and bananas the blighters go through, gallon or so of milk and multiple loafs of bread is easy peasy. Maybe pay a babysitter is it?


    I hear what you're saying about transport, and here's what we do. Dry food and basic groceries (milk, loo roll etc) is delivered once a week to our house, evening time, no rush hour pressure. Then we do a fresh food trip to the butchers, small shops etc on the weekend... bus, on foot, cycle, whatever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭beer enigma


    pwurple wrote: »
    I was just wondering what basis you were pontificating, and if you were just having a dig at someone for going about their normal business.

    Sure, it's not impossible at all if you are not working, or have no commute and have the time to do it, or are living in the 1950's.


    Here's a fairly typical set up for working parents these days.

    You're out of the house at 6:30am to do your drops and commute, work all day, home around 7pm, have creche or childminder drop offs and pick up, have to sort dinner for the whole family, check homework, and maybe talk to your own kids. Put them to bed, read the stories. And then generally can't leave the house when the kids are in bed.

    You do a "big shop" once a week, and have to be fairly organised to manage to get enough food to cover breakfast, lunch, dinner, fruit for 7 days for 4, 5 or 6+ people. But you think nipping to the shops multiple times a week to haul back the 30 apples and bananas the blighters go through, gallon or so of milk and multiple loafs of bread is easy peasy. Maybe pay a babysitter is it?


    I hear what you're saying about transport, and here's what we do. Dry food and basic groceries (milk, loo roll etc) is delivered once a week to our house, evening time, no rush hour pressure. Then we do a fresh food trip to the butchers, small shops etc on the weekend... bus, on foot, cycle, whatever.

    Fairly similar to ours and I am just off the Well Road. To feed a family of 5 with school lunches and both of us working all day means we have to do a weekly main shop

    I've really felt the pinch since the fire as it was on my was home. I know Dunnes is there but I'm so used to Tesco it seems to take an age to find things in there!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,800 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    New update from the centre this morning: "it may be summer 2020 before the centre is rebuilt and ready to open".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,321 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    New update from the centre this morning: "it may be summer 2020 before the centre is rebuilt and ready to open".

    I'd say even that is optimistic.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,441 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    New update from the centre this morning: "it may be summer 2020 before the centre is rebuilt and ready to open".

    Yup

    https://twitter.com/douglasvillage/status/1172798369678483457?s=21


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    Surprised at that. The car park is essentially a different structure to the original part. I would have thought that once it was made safe the shops could reopen.

    I wonder is it insurance reasons. The pharmacy and nail bar on the street with no connection to the rest of the centre opened the day after the fire but they were told to shut because they were technically part of the same property and the public couldn't be let in because insurance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    New update from the centre this morning: "it may be summer 2020 before the centre is rebuilt and ready to open".

    I’ve no idea of the extent of the damage but isn’t the damage to the shopping area mainly smoke damage which although very pervasive could surely be sorted in a few month with a major clean up and restoration?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    By sounds of the reports, you wouldn't even walk on the floor of level 2 so it's a very uncertain situation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    TheDriver wrote: »
    By sounds of the reports, you wouldn't even walk on the floor of level 2 so it's a very uncertain situation

    That’s in the car park right?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭Chuck Noland


    Can’t see those store owners hanging around 8 or 9 months waiting for the Centre to re open


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,572 ✭✭✭kub


    TheChizler wrote: »
    Surprised at that. The car park is essentially a different structure to the original part. I would have thought that once it was made safe the shops could reopen.

    I wonder is it insurance reasons. The pharmacy and nail bar on the street with no connection to the rest of the centre opened the day after the fire but they were told to shut because they were technically part of the same property and the public couldn't be let in because insurance.


    There is just butt covering going on there in wholesale measures, it is a joke that the chemist and nail bar and indeed the Bank out on the street side cannot open.
    Considering that there were articulated trucks parked alongside the side door of Marks ( on the car park side ) yesterday with guys in and out of M&S loading up the stock into the trucks.
    These people were humans just like the rest of us and were a hell of lot closer to the dangerous part of the car park.
    Pity common sense cannot be measured.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Whole thing sounds like overkill but I’ve not seen the damage firsthand


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Acosta


    ''Mr Love revealed that the plan is to rebuild the car park as it was before the fire.''

    Should they not use it as an opportunity to fix what has to be one of the most badly designed car parks in the country?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    Acosta wrote: »
    ''Mr Love revealed that the plan is to rebuild the car park as it was before the fire.''

    Should they not use it as an opportunity to fix what has to be one of the most badly designed car parks in the country?
    Go on...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 449 ✭✭PreCocious


    road_high wrote: »
    Whole thing sounds like overkill but I’ve not seen the damage firsthand

    I'm not an engineer, or don't know anything on the subject and I too haven't seen the damage firsthand, but, I think you could be right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭pwurple


    PreCocious wrote: »
    I'm not an engineer, or don't know anything on the subject and I too haven't seen the damage firsthand, but, I think you could be right.

    :pac::pac::pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭beer enigma


    The concern is that even though the car park is a seperate structure, it's in danger of collapse and it if does it could cause untold damage to the shopping centre. For that reason insurers won't allow the centre to open.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,441 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    The concern is that even though the car park is a seperate structure, it's in danger of collapse and it if does it could cause untold damage to the shopping centre. For that reason insurers won't allow the centre to open.

    The centre will be lucky to have tenants left at this stage, i wouldn't be surprised if there was a get out clause in contracts for a situation of long term closure like this. Douglas loss could be the gain of other places as a result of this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,814 ✭✭✭Darc19


    The centre will be lucky to have tenants left at this stage, i wouldn't be surprised if there was a get out clause in contracts for a situation of long term closure like this. Douglas loss could be the gain of other places as a result of this.

    There would be a get out clause for such an event and standard retail insurance would cover loss of trade and wages for a period of up to six months and in some cases 12 months.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,618 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Darc19 wrote: »
    There would be a get out clause for such an event and standard retail insurance would cover loss of trade and wages for a period of up to six months and in some cases 12 months.

    Depends on what type of loss.

    Loss of trade due to fire has a much higher limit than loss due to denial of access.

    Most shops are well able to trade, they just can't get in the front door.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭beer enigma


    Darc19 wrote: »
    There would be a get out clause for such an event and standard retail insurance would cover loss of trade and wages for a period of up to six months and in some cases 12 months.

    Most tenants have loss of profits up to 12 months as part of the tenancy agreement. The only one I know of who didn't is the car valet, but they can probably relocate easily


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭Mardyke


    Acosta wrote: »
    ''Mr Love revealed that the plan is to rebuild the car park as it was before the fire.''

    Should they not use it as an opportunity to fix what has to be one of the most badly designed car parks in the country?

    What's wrong with it? Curious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 387 ✭✭Dermo123


    Well Fire Engines can't get in there.
    Blackpool multistory they can.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,441 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    Dermo123 wrote: »
    Well Fire Engines can't get in there.
    Blackpool multistory they can.

    I was laughed out of it over saying this on here recently in connection with a similar post i put up on twitter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    The concern is that even though the car park is a seperate structure, it's in danger of collapse and it if does it could cause untold damage to the shopping centre. For that reason insurers won't allow the centre to open.

    Why not make the car park secure via partial demolition or whatever then re open the shopping centre


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    I was laughed out of it over saying this on here recently in connection with a similar post i put up on twitter.

    Because it's typically standard. Unless you're (previous poster) saying most car parks are the most out designed in the country.

    Is Blackpool tall enough for trucks to drive around in? Maybe the ramps but I don't think the rest is tall enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    The concern is that even though the car park is a seperate structure, it's in danger of collapse and it if does it could cause untold damage to the shopping centre. For that reason insurers won't allow the centre to open.
    That makes sense that they would wait until i's safe, for the areas near the fire, but they're not planning on reopening until the rebuild is complete according to that last announcement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭beer enigma


    TheChizler wrote: »
    That makes sense that they would wait until i's safe, for the areas near the fire, but they're not planning on reopening until the rebuild is complete according to that last announcement.

    Its a very loose statement based on the timeline for the car park rebuild. I would imagine they still don't know what they are facing until the demolition starts


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    Dermo123 wrote: »
    Well Fire Engines can't get in there.
    Blackpool multistory they can.
    What fire engine is ever going to drive in there? I have that vision of Steve mcQueen in towering Inferno when they look up and see the skyscraper on fire.


Advertisement