Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Brexit discussion thread X (Please read OP before posting)

1258259261263264316

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 667 ✭✭✭lola85


    Infini wrote: »
    I honestly hope she does reopen it just as a subtle way of saying "piss off" to Boris for his shenanigans.



    This whole excersice from the start has been based solely on lies, deciet, corrupt money, russian trolling and poisonous idiots with no interest in anything except themselves. It would be epic on so many levels if this ultimately leads to an A50 withdrawal and a significant investigation into all this as well as serious reform of their political structures AND reigning in deceptive media outlets to prevent anything like this happening again but the more this goes on the more I get the feeling there wont be a Brexit as it looks like the whole corrupt house of cards is starting to disintegrate under the weight of its own deception.
    Not forgetting David Cameron’s fathers dodgy dealings in the panama papers and suddenly Cameron calls a referendum.

    All very sisnister.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,136 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Call me Al wrote: »
    If it does reopen on the back of this ruling it wili be a real kick in the ar$e for Johnson's SPADs.

    Aside from this it's fascinating to see the Brexit nationalists on Twitter turning their arrogant focus, spite, and insults from Ireland and its citizens over to Scotland, its people and its laws.

    And let us not forget that denizen of UK constitutionality that is JRM. The man talks a great game about the Queen and the constitution but in his first senior political office is has potentially lied directly to the Queen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,392 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Its not that deep , seems to be at most 150-200m between NI and Scotland

    http://fishing-app.gpsnauticalcharts.com/i-boating-fishing-web-app/fishing-marine-charts-navigation.html?title=Irish+Sea++Western+Part+boating+app#10.25/54.9833/-5.5013

    but anyways, its still an insane idea especially when one looks at HS2 or new nuclear plants that over ran in UK

    To reiterate, it will cost more than Trump's wall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,052 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    I think this confirms a lot of people's opinion of the work from Laura Keunssberg,

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1171713664392597505?s=20

    If you look at her tweets after this one it seems like she is always behind on this story today and just reporting what is coming out and not really on top of it. This was the first tweet but her retweets and her tweets themselves seems so behind and it does feel like she is either slow or not following the correct people, especially as it pertains to this story today at least. She seems to rely on statements instead of focusing on the story here, the PM basically has been found in the courts to have lied to the Queen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,943 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    I see Luke Pollard (Labour, Plymouth&Devon) has gone back into the HoC.

    https://twitter.com/LukePollard/status/1171757980481654784


    Must admit I assumed after prorogation that it would be in some weird sort of lockdown, possibly guarded by a strangely named regiment with swords and 18th century battledress.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,213 ✭✭✭trellheim


    there is unfortunately a ton of buried explosives between NI and GB. See https://www2.gov.scot/uploads/documents/ae08beauforts.fh10.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,170 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    trellheim wrote: »
    there is unfortunately a ton of buried explosives between NI and GB. See https://www2.gov.scot/uploads/documents/ae08beauforts.fh10.pdf


    The irony of that is quite beautiful


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    Enzokk wrote: »
    I think this confirms a lot of people's opinion of the work from Laura Keunssberg,

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1171713664392597505?s=20

    If you look at her tweets after this one it seems like she is always behind on this story today and just reporting what is coming out and not really on top of it. This was the first tweet but her retweets and her tweets themselves seems so behind and it does feel like she is either slow or not following the correct people, especially as it pertains to this story today at least. She seems to rely on statements instead of focusing on the story here, the PM basically has been found in the courts to have lied to the Queen.

    Or she is being honest...

    There are many possibilities now, and tweeters are just laying them out but it is completely accurate to say ts hard to say what hapens from here;
    it could be as simple as the SC upholding the appeals, and nothing happens.
    Or they dismiss the appeals, and we are in full constitutional crisis mode
    Or Boris cancels the prorogue
    Or parliamentarians go back in and start voting on motions and legislation between now and Tuesday (would be interesting to see if they go in and vote on a motion to hold a referendum and see if the Tories go in to vote against....)
    Or even the Queen recalls the prorogue
    Or a million other things

    All are possible, just different degrees of likelihood


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,806 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    Lord Ashcroft poll on NI - 51% would vote for a united Ireland, 55% would rather remain in the EU than the UK, and 60% support the backstop:

    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/09/my-northern-ireland-survey-finds-the-union-on-a-knife-edge/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,052 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    drkpower wrote: »
    Or she is being honest...

    There are many possibilities now, and tweeters are just laying them out but it is completely accurate to say ts hard to say what hapens from here;
    it could be as simple as the SC upholding the appeals, and nothing happens.
    Or they dismiss the appeals, and we are in full constitutional crisis mode
    Or Boris cancels the prorogue
    Or parliamentarians go back in and start voting on motions and legislation between now and Tuesday (would be interesting to see if they go in and vote on a motion to hold a referendum and see if the Tories go in to vote against....)
    Or even the Queen recalls the prorogue
    Or a million other things

    All are possible, just different degrees of likelihood


    The Prime Minister involved the Queen for political gain and he lied to her. That is the story here, not what could happen but that a court of law found that he misled her to ask for prorogation. I will happily apologize if the Supreme Court finds that the Scottish Court was wrong in their ruling on the facts of the case, but it will only probably rule on whether there is recourse through the courts for remedy (opening of parliament again) or not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    Enzokk wrote: »
    The Prime Minister involved the Queen for political gain and he lied to her. That is the story here, not what could happen but that a court of law found that he misled her to ask for prorogation. I will happily apologize if the Supreme Court finds that the Scottish Court was wrong in their ruling on the facts of the case, but it will only probably rule on whether there is recourse through the courts for remedy (opening of parliament again) or not.

    Sure, but everyone knows that already. Its hardly news.

    Whats news is whether the courts find that it was unlawful; and the answer to that will only be found out on Tuesday.

    Edit: to be pedantic, Boris probably didn't explicitly lie; probably more of a case of being economic with the truth; it is accurate to say that he advised the Queen to prorogue parliament to allow for a Queen's speech and all the usual stuff; that was indeed accurate, so not a lie per se; what he of curse omitted was that he was also asking her to do it to bypass parliamentary scrutiny; so 'misled' is probably the better characterisation!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭AngryHippie


    SNIP.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,947 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Mod: Serious discussion only please.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,334 ✭✭✭MarinersBlues


    Lord Ashcroft poll on NI - 51% would vote for a united Ireland, 55% would rather remain in the EU than the UK, and 60% support the backstop:

    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/09/my-northern-ireland-survey-finds-the-union-on-a-knife-edge/

    It would be very interesting to see the breakdown of those answers for the
    50% who don't indentify as Nationalist or Unionist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭dublinjock


    What a total mess brexit has become.
    I was asked to vote in a referendum and i did, i voted to leave the EU and i have to admit i was a little surprised when the leave vote won.

    Then we had a general election with both the main parties telling us they would deliver brexit and do as the people had instructed.
    All i am able to do is vote to change things, now it seems that what i was told is true.
    "If democracy was to change anything then it would be got rid of"

    I really do worry about the state of Democracy in the EU, hence i voted to leave. Now im worried about Democracy in the UK and house of commons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    trellheim wrote: »
    there is unfortunately a ton of buried explosives between NI and GB.
    This was covered in a great letter written by a retired offshore engineer to The Times:
    Boris Johnson airily proposes building a bridge from Britain to Northern Ireland. As a retired offshore engineer, I know this is about as feasible as building a bridge to the moon.

    Many long bridges have been built, but none across such a wide, deep and stormy stretch of water. For a great part of the 22 mile route the water is more than 1,000ft deep. It would require about 30 support towers at least 1,400ft high to carry the road deck across the deepest part and above the shipping channel. In total the bridge would require 54 towers, of heights never achieved anywhere in the world.

    In addition, the trickiest section, Beaufort Dyke, was used for many years from 1946 to dump obsolete munitions. The Ministry of Defence estimates the total dumped at more than 1.5m tons. There are no maps of their locations.

    No sane contractor or responsible government would consider building such a bridge, and because of the weather conditions it would probably have to be closed for considerable periods if it did.
    It's not new for Johnson to propose spending large sums of money on a bridge. After all, he spent £43 million on a bridge that was never built.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,952 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    trellheim wrote: »
    there is unfortunately a ton of buried explosives between NI and GB. See https://www2.gov.scot/uploads/documents/ae08beauforts.fh10.pdf
    It's actually closer to 1.5 million tonnes. And includes incendiaries (phosphorous), explosives and chemical weapons (mustard gas).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    dublinjock wrote: »
    What a total mess brexit has become.
    I was asked to vote in a referendum and i did, i voted to leave the EU and i have to admit i was a little surprised when the leave vote won.

    Then we had a general election with both the main parties telling us they would deliver brexit and do as the people had instructed.
    All i am able to do is vote to change things, now it seems that what i was told is true.
    "If democracy was to change anything then it would be got rid of"

    I really do worry about the state of Democracy in the EU, hence i voted to leave. Now im worried about Democracy in the UK and house of commons.

    When you voted to leave who suggested no deal would realistically be the outcome?
    Both major parties ruled out no deal at the last election .
    https://scramnews.com/leading-anti-brexit-campaigner-femi-oluwole-tricks-nigel-farage-into-debating-with-him/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    Must admit I assumed after prorogation that it would be in some weird sort of lockdown, possibly guarded by a strangely named regiment with swords and 18th century battledress.
    Well, not quite by a strangely-named regiment, but by an individual with an unusual title - the Serjeant-at-Arms. The current holder of that title is Mohammed Amal El-Hajji.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    dublinjock wrote: »
    What a total mess brexit has become.
    I was asked to vote in a referendum and i did, i voted to leave the EU and i have to admit i was a little surprised when the leave vote won.

    Then we had a general election with both the main parties telling us they would deliver brexit and do as the people had instructed.
    All i am able to do is vote to change things, now it seems that what i was told is true.
    "If democracy was to change anything then it would be got rid of"

    I really do worry about the state of Democracy in the EU, hence i voted to leave. Now im worried about Democracy in the UK and house of commons.

    You have to realize that a referendum is undemocratic. Its a snapshot of peoples views on a particular day. The fact that in this case it turned out 52/48 and there was a lot of shenanigans taking place around social media and blatant lies being told to push more people over the threshold made it even less democratic. I am not surprised people are angry and the middle has been severed from UK politics. It was always going to happen.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,088 ✭✭✭theguzman


    From my own reading of the current situation would it be fair to say that a No Deal Brexit is now off the table? Or can Boris Ignore the motion passed and plough on breaking the law?

    I can't see why the Conservatives don't just jettison off Northern Ireland and agree to a Northern Ireland only backstop, keeping NI in the Customs Union and thus avoiding the need for a hard border. This would effectively create a border down the Irish sea, I am baffled that Boris hasn't secretly reached out to Jeremy Corbyn and let them jointly pass this motion before dissolving Parliament.

    The whole thing is mind boggling or does the default hard brexit seem more likely. The Northern Ireland backstop would effectively create a hard brexit for the mainland UK anyway if I read it correctly. Boris lost his majority so why he doesn't dump the DUP and reach out on a cross party basis to get Brexit done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,213 ✭✭✭trellheim


    it should be reminded that much as the NI bridge is being mentioned some of it is to push exactly that 43 million failure of the London bridge down in the Google search rankings


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Would be interesting to see him knocking on No 10 some day, for either Johnson or Cummings to come with him to Parliament to answer questions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    You have to realize that a referendum is undemocratic. Its a snapshot of peoples views on a particular day.
    But then general elections are also snapshots of people's views on a particular day. Are they also undemocratic?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭dublinjock


    When you voted to leave who suggested no deal would realistically be the outcome?
    Both major parties ruled out no deal at the last election .
    https://scramnews.com/leading-anti-brexit-campaigner-femi-oluwole-tricks-nigel-farage-into-debating-with-him/


    No one suggested deal or no deal at the time. The question was leave or remain.


    I am really starting to think what do we vote for, what is the point of voting.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,558 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    theguzman wrote: »
    From my own reading of the current situation would it be fair to say that a No Deal Brexit is now off the table? Or can Boris Ignore the motion passed and plough on breaking the law?

    I can't see why the Conservatives don't just jettison off Northern Ireland and agree to a Northern Ireland only backstop, keeping NI in the Customs Union and thus avoiding the need for a hard border.
    This would effectively create a border down the Irish sea, I am baffled that Boris hasn't secretly reached out to Jeremy Corbyn and let them jointly pass this motion before dissolving Parliament.

    The whole thing is mind boggling or does the default hard brexit seem more likely. The Northern Ireland backstop would effectively create a hard brexit for the mainland UK anyway if I read it correctly. Boris lost his majority so why he doesn't dump the DUP and reach out on a cross party basis to get Brexit done.
    Because the NI part was simply an easy excuse to pin the resistance to; the actual resistance is any deal in any form because that would block their friends from benefiting from laxer rules and getting contracts. However they can't stand up and state they want to outsource NHS or rip up working legislation as a reason to block a deal; hence "Oh our friends in NI would be abandoned and we can't have that".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,170 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    dublinjock wrote: »
    No one suggested deal or no deal at the time. The question was leave or remain.


    I am really starting to think what do we vote for, what is the point of voting.


    No offense but it sounds like you were not paying attention to the debates around it or fully fell for "project fear".


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,227 Mod ✭✭✭✭DOCARCH


    theguzman wrote: »
    I am baffled that Boris hasn't secretly reached out to Jeremy Corbyn....

    After today's events, I think Boris may be reaching out for his slippers quite soon!

    I am sure moderate Tories are horrified.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭dublinjock


    You have to realize that a referendum is undemocratic. Its a snapshot of peoples views on a particular day. The fact that in this case it turned out 52/48 and there was a lot of shenanigans taking place around social media and blatant lies being told to push more people over the threshold made it even less democratic. I am not surprised people are angry and the middle has been severed from UK politics. It was always going to happen.


    I think your right about referendums being undemocratic. Im so so learning this.
    I know there was much lies and shenanigans went on but this is the way with politicians.
    But i have never been happy with the way the EU is run and how undemocratic it is. What i didnt know and i am also learning is how undemocratic the UK house of commons is. Voting it seems changes nothing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,952 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    But then general elections are also snapshots of people's views on a particular day. Are they also undemocratic?
    They're not snapshots in the same way as referendums. A GE is a vote for your representative in parliament. And you have the right to remove them at the next election.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement