Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BusConnects Dublin - Big changes to Bus Network

Options
1170171173175176411

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Phibsboro: I'm happy enough with, it's an improvement that can be further improved upon in the future.
    Kimmage: not sure what that's about tbh
    Terenure: happy enough although it's a long stretch to be depending on bus only signals.

    Stoneybatter: Well this is a bit of a clustereff. Aughrim street will become one way but no provision for how this will impact the N2, and more importantly, this will create yet another barrier to cycling; south bound cyclists will instead be diverted from Aughrim st (a pleasant cycle at the moment) to get pinched onto NCR and then a dangerous right turn to Prussia street.

    The layout seems to suggest that north bound cyclists on Manor st, wishing to go up Prussia st should turn left onto a short cycle lane and the right again onto a 'shared space and then left to get onto Prussia street, when they can just continue straight. How can this be a serious proposal?

    The pinch point between Fancy times and Centra is shown as having a bus lane 2 traffic lanes and a cycle lane, as well all know, the current cycle lane and bus lane are just free parking at the moment, there needs to be some enforcement measures here.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    I'd missed it back when they tweeted it, but the NTA are waiting on legislation to take over the running of traffic enforcement cameras. This should result in a more effective enforcement regime, as it seems the Guards have absolutely no interest in traffic enforcement.

    https://twitter.com/BusConnects/status/1115157869933076480


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Qrt


    Kimmage is...???

    I mean, you could bulldoze the area around the Kimmage Road/Sundrive Road junction and it would be an improvement but this???

    At least with Templeogue I see bus priority lights, but nothing for Kimmage. Let’s just hope that “work in progress” stamp means just that.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,818 Mod ✭✭✭✭BeerNut


    Qrt wrote: »
    Let’s just hope that “work in progress” stamp means just that.
    Maybe the next draft will have bus lanes in it. I think that's part of the project brief.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,665 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    CatInABox wrote: »
    I'd missed it back when they tweeted it, but the NTA are waiting on legislation to take over the running of traffic enforcement cameras. This should result in a more effective enforcement regime, as it seems the Guards have absolutely no interest in traffic enforcement.

    https://twitter.com/BusConnects/status/1115157869933076480

    Why would the NTA be better at this? Haven't they enough to be doing/re-doing?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭D14Rugby


    These days with AI most of the stuff cameras are needed to do can be automated. It would be really easy to connect everything up to the car registration db and tell cameras what to look up for then automatically send out fines and points. It's just pure laziness to not do it properly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 891 ✭✭✭alentejo


    What I see in Kimmage with on street parking, slightly wider footpaths. Bus speeds will still be the normal very slow.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭D14Rugby


    Further up that Kimmage route just where it meets Harold's Cross they're running it up a road that's just about wide enough for the two lanes it currently has with no real gardens in front of the houses so god knows how well that's going to work


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Qrt


    D14Rugby wrote: »
    Further up that Kimmage route just where it meets Harold's Cross they're running it up a road that's just about wide enough for the two lanes it currently has with no real gardens in front of the houses so god knows how well that's going to work

    Between Sundrive Road and Harold’s Cross by Mount Argus? That section isn’t being touched, just made bus only.

    EDIT: Christ are they actually proposing no bus gate there????? It just disappears after the first option.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    Based on the new Kimmage proposals, has the NTA now decided Bus COnnects should forget about improving Bus and cycling infrastructure and instead refocus, spending the money on beautifying and expanding Dublin's on-street parking?

    Original plan:

    486766.JPG

    New "work in progress":

    486767.JPG


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭D14Rugby


    Qrt wrote: »
    Between Sundrive Road and Harold’s Cross by Mount Argus? That section isn’t being touched, just made bus only.

    EDIT: Christ are they actually proposing no bus gate there????? It just disappears after the first option.

    They're calling it a "shared surface for buses, cyclists, taxis and local traffic" easy to implement I'd say in any semi competent country, here though I'm not convinced it'll work


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    D14Rugby wrote: »
    "shared surface for buses, cyclists, taxis and local traffic"

    Don't we have this already?

    In fact, isn't this arrangement exactly why Bus Connects was proposed??


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 68,015 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Local traffic as in residents on the streets. Straight through in under a reasonable time to have actually been two journeys could be fined but I doubt they will and will just rely on very rare AGS enforcement


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭D14Rugby


    L1011 wrote: »
    Local traffic as in residents on the streets. Straight through in under a reasonable time to have actually been two journeys could be fined but I doubt they will and will just rely on very rare AGS enforcement

    It would be relatively simple to set time limits allowed on the road between certain points and have cameras at each entrance to/exit from the road, scan licence plates, check it's registered address, if its that street its good, if its not then check when it leaves, if its under the time limit that's good, if not send out a fine. You could even have a system in place to allow home owners to add other plates that are coming to the house to pick up/drop someone off or staying there temporarily. All this would be pretty easy to implement but I doubt they'll bother and give it a few months and every user of that road will be complaining about each other.


  • Registered Users Posts: 41,010 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    cgcsb wrote: »
    That's all the radials and orbitals done.

    Where does the new 11 start and does it goto Shopriver?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    Where does the new 11 start and does it goto Shopriver?

    Wouldn't surprise me if they kept the 185 but probably with a new number. The 11 seems to be a replacement for the 44 and the NTA were saying they were looking at solutions for the Kilgarron area.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,383 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Oh lord. I just seen the proposals for Kimmage. Tbh I don't understand why the NTA would now propose to not at least put through a shared bus & cycle lane through Kimmage in the last 2 options of this plan. I would give the impression here that these proposals for Kimmage actually defeat the purpose of BC in the first place by not giving any bus passengers any more credible incentives to use the buses more often in the area. They are really taking a big risk for putting these revised plans out to the public which, in theory, could spread more anger from residents by giving them the potential to have a much slower bus service. It's not a good idea in my book. The NTA should stick to implementing Option 1 for Kimmage after the consultation as it is the best looking plan out of a bad lot for maintaining an improved bus service.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,913 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    As a walker, (with a car that I never take into the city), I hope people like me are catered for too. Just saying.

    The city needs to look after pedestrians too. The footpaths in the city are rammed. It is not pleasant at all.

    Honestly, you just have to look at the Greenway projects. It is (well to my mind) all about cyclists, which is fine, but walkers and families with buggies and maybe wheelchairs etc. need a voice too in all this. Every forum I look at about the Greenways seem to be concentrated on cyclists now. NO. We are all equal. Thank you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,506 ✭✭✭john boye


    They are really taking a big risk for putting these revised plans out to the public which, in theory, could spread more anger from residents by giving them the potential to have a much slower bus service.

    I'm going to guess you don't have local knowledge. The only reason they've come up these alternatives is to placate the residents( with their community not corridor placards in every window of the house), they couldn't care less how slow the buses are.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Qrt


    john boye wrote: »
    I'm going to guess you don't have local knowledge. The only reason they've come up these alternatives is to placate the residents( with their community not corridor placards in every window of the house), they couldn't care less how slow the buses are.

    Has anybody pulled up the people on the stretch between Sundrive and Harold's Cross for objecting to the bus gate? i.e. objecting to less traffic on their road?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    john boye wrote: »
    I'm going to guess you don't have local knowledge. The only reason they've come up these alternatives is to placate the residents( with their community not corridor placards in every window of the house), they couldn't care less how slow the buses are.

    Indeed, the "Kimmage Residents Association" are obnoxious and transparently pro-car on Twitter. Hopefully they'll get the seized up road network they've demanded, it's just a shame they'll have ruined things for the vast majority of silent residents.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,559 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    Why not put together a boards.ie representation group? Put together lists of suggestions and present them on the same footing as residents. Cycling Ireland were doing that I believe.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,818 Mod ✭✭✭✭BeerNut


    Piece on Kimmage in today's Irish Times. The bus gate zone in the revised plan runs from KCR to Harold's Cross Park.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/south-dublin-trees-and-gardens-could-be-saved-under-new-busconnects-design-1.3972336?mode=amp


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭sharper


    Why not put together a boards.ie representation group? Put together lists of suggestions and present them on the same footing as residents. Cycling Ireland were doing that I believe.

    There is the Dublin Commuter Coalition which is a similar idea https://www.dublincommuters.ie/
    https://twitter.com/DublinCommuters


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Qrt


    “Fianna Fáil city councillor Deirdre Conroy said while the NTA had gone to more effort than previously, it did not appear there were sufficient improvements for cyclists, as they would be sharing the bus lane.”

    I’d never thought me and Deirdre would get along so well.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    BeerNut wrote: »
    Piece on Kimmage in today's Irish Times. The bus gate zone in the revised plan runs from KCR to Harold's Cross Park.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/south-dublin-trees-and-gardens-could-be-saved-under-new-busconnects-design-1.3972336?mode=amp

    Saw that earlier, the plans make more sense now.
    The NTA said the bus gate would be governed by signage, but it would consider seeking camera enforcement if the system was not respected.

    Considering how much "respect" is shown to the College Green bus gate, I'd guess that the camera would be in place sooner rather than later.

    I also wonder if they'll start to restrict taxis from these bus gates. College Green is consistently blocked up with taxis, which is just not sustainable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 551 ✭✭✭Evil_g


    Has anyone asked how getting people out of cars and into taxis solves anything?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    That's some length of bus gate though


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Qrt


    Evil_g wrote: »
    Has anyone asked how getting people out of cars and into taxis solves anything?

    Less parking needed. Also, I think the aim is to get them onto buses...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭D14Rugby


    No cameras just signs? I now give it 3 months before there's complete uproar about it. God love anyone that lives in any of the roads around there, going to be mayhem when this comes in.


Advertisement