Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread IX (Please read OP before posting)

1211212214216217330

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,376 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    KildareP wrote: »
    The Telegraph comment sections are like a parody-fest, spotted this comment on the Varadkar story a few minutes ago:
    486664.png
    So the potato famine was really our fault all along because we were exporting so much food, entirely of our own free will, clearly!

    I mean - how do you even debate comments like that?

    He tries to understand.

    Reminds me of the story of the Eton boy asked to write an essay about a poor family.

    He started:
    The Family were poor. The father was poor. The mother was poor. The children were poor. Even the butler was poor. .....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    KildareP wrote: »
    The Telegraph comment sections are like a parody-fest, spotted this comment on the Varadkar story a few minutes ago:
    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=486664&stc=1&d=1564405877
    So the potato famine was really our fault all along because we were exporting so much food, entirely of our own free will, clearly!

    I mean - how do you even debate comments like that?


    I wonder does that commenter live in an apartment that smells of rich mahogany? :pac:

    If he was as well read as claimed to be - he wouldn't refer to it as the potato famine, and might understand who was doing the exporting.


    If all this wasn't so serious you'd think it was a dystopian netflix docco being played out live.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,241 ✭✭✭Nate--IRL--


    That comment reads to me to be from an Irish person being sarcastic.


    Nate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭KildareP


    That comment reads to me to be from an Irish person being sarcastic.


    Nate
    I just don't know what sarcasm is anymore in relation to Brexit :(

    Maybe it is, maybe it isn't - I couldn't even hazard a guess.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    They've a tendency to forget that from 1801 until 1922 they were the Irish Government. It was nominally a nation but in reality a part of a unitary British state known as the UK. There was no devolution beyond what power was held by county and city councils (or their equivalents at the time).

    They (the British Government) made the decisions and they refuse to accept any responsibility for them. Instead you've commentators imagining that Ireland had some serious say in its affairs because it had the notional title of a nation, just without any powers of self determination or control over any of its affairs. It wasn't even comparable to modern Scotland or a US state in terms of autonomy. It had none.

    It was very much a case of force integration of another country into the English political system, which in effect disenfranchised it.

    Before that you'd Ireland as a British colony and all sorts of insanity with disenfranchisment based on religion and so on.

    If someone wants to go read a few books and then revise history, I'm not quite sure where to even begin to argue.

    Irish history until 1922 and Northern Irish history, including the troubles is UK / British history. I find it bizzare that they claim to be unionists, yet disown that.

    The reality is the famine occured in the UK, at the time the richest and most powerful country in the world, yet millions of its citizens had to flee to the US and elsewhere as refugees of poverty and hunger. That's British 19th century history. Don't try to disown it! It's yours. Those people who boarded famine ships and arrived starving in the US were at that time British citizens leaving UK ports because of failed British government policies that led to mass starvation. That's the rather unpalatable reality of it.

    Even in modern times the average UK commentator seems to think Northern Ireland is some foreign place. The troubles happened in the UK, not in the Republic of Ireland (other than a couple of isolated incidents of spill over) It's absolutely mindbogglingly levels of cognitive dissonance and sheer hypocrisy that allows people to rant and rave about the union and then in the same breath disown the deeply troubled history of that place.

    And now they're going to leave the EU and blame the EU for the consequences of their decision to leave!

    By the end of this the rest of Europe will know precisely why Irish - British (at least the jingoistic nationalist types) relations are so bad for so long. They punch you in the face and then claim you hurt their hand with your unreasonably hard cheekbones!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Amazing that paper that blames all British woes on the EU hosts an article about Irish people blaming their problems on Britain.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,955 Mod ✭✭✭✭DOCARCH


    In that time UK will need some sort of deal with the EU and they will just tell the UK they need to sign up to the backstop in order to get a deal.

    ....and post on bank draft for E39,000,000,000.00.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,444 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    The government should be countering with their own narrative. Britain will not be allowed to drag Ireland out of the Custom Union.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,699 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    BluePlanet wrote: »
    The government should be countering with their own narrative. Britain will not be allowed to drag Ireland out of the Custom Union.

    The government shouldn't be rising to the bait(it's low level stuff)...let the EU appointed negotiators do the talking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,979 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    The government shouldn't be rising to the bait(it's low level stuff)...let the EU appointed negotiators do the talking.


    The government should be ignoring it but Sinn Fein and Fianna Fail should be reiterating continuously their support for FG's stance as well as explaining to the electorate what the brit's are attempting to do with their new massive wave of propaganda


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    These idiots need a good hard “no deal” with all the trimmings ie massive separate queues at airports for UK passport holders, VISA bureaucracy and every kind of disadvantage a third party non deal third country would face. Absolutely no compromise until they want to talk- of not then so be it. European trade will adapt fairly quickly and we will all move on with our lives


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,756 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Sterling just short of a one year high - 29th Aug 2018 had a blip of 90.08p - now it is at 90.06p.

    Market moving towards pricing in No Deal.

    a one year high or one year low?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    VinLieger wrote: »
    The government should be ignoring it but Sinn Fein and Fianna Fail should be reiterating continuously their support for FG's stance as well as explaining to the electorate what the brit's are attempting to do with their new massive wave of propaganda

    I've a feeling the parties here will all be stupid enough to take the bait. The British and American parties have been and I doubt we will be much better. Someone's just hunting around for the cracks and the trigger topics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,290 ✭✭✭ZeroThreat


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Lots of claims on Twitter today that the British electorate voted for No Deal in 2016. This hard Brexit crowd are really hijacking the narrative

    Not surprising when a supposedly broadsheet publication has put up headlines such as these in the past 2 days ...

    'It is democratic sabotage to oppose a no deal'

    or

    'Varadkar can blame Britain all he likes - but he is the real threat to peace'

    I don't know which is more worrying, if the nitwit english 'journalists' are stupid enough to believe this drivel, or they're devious enough to know it's b***ox yet still pump it out for their non-resident tax dodging owners...

    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,839 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Well the first crack is Johnson contradicting what Gove said yesterday. Gove said No Deal was likely but Johnson says today it's a million to one shot. What, with Raab caught in the headlights on ITV.
    Cummings is going to have a hard job keeping them all, on message. They're already shooting off in all directions. Like herding a flock of turkeys.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Water John wrote: »
    Well the first crack is Johnson contradicting what Gove said yesterday. Gove said No Deal was likely but Johnson says today it's a million to one shot. What, with Raab caught in the headlights on ITV.
    Cummings is going to have a hard job keeping them all, on message. They're already shooting off in all directions. Like herding a flock of turkeys.

    How could it be a million to one? Im only dipping in and out of this farce and can’t see anything other than No deal especially with their carry on the past
    Week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,839 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Well it just goes along with the rest of Aleaxander Johnson's BS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,780 ✭✭✭✭ninebeanrows


    Until these Brits cant go on their cheap holidays to the costas, eat cheap food and feel it in the pocket they will allow their nationalistic emotion get the better of them.

    They need to be shown what the EU gives them.

    EU should pull the plug early. Agreeing 31 October has given Boris time to ramp up the rhetoric and us bersus them propaganda.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Until these Brits cant go on their cheap holidays to the costas, eat cheap food and feel it in the pocket they will allow their nationalistic emotion get the better of them.

    They need to be shown what the EU gives them.

    EU should pull the plug early. Agreeing 31 October has given Boris time to ramp up the rhetoric and us bersus them propaganda.

    Yep- if he so badly wants to reopen the agreement then the leaving date is also up for alterations ie end August
    Why wait til end October now to suit a no deal? If it’s happening let it happen immediately


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Until these Brits cant go on their cheap holidays to the costas, eat cheap food and feel it in the pocket they will allow their nationalistic emotion get the better of them.

    They need to be shown what the EU gives them.

    EU should pull the plug early. Agreeing 31 October has given Boris time to ramp up the rhetoric and us bersus them propaganda.

    Spot on. Until the cold hard reality of no deal are felt on the ground then it’s going to be the same farce as the past 3 years- I honestly think some of them seem to think brexit has already happened and it’s all good


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Laois_Man


    road_high wrote: »
    How could it be a million to one? Im only dipping in and out of this farce and can’t see anything other than No deal especially with their carry on the past
    Week.

    I cant wait to see what happens when the HoC votes (again) against a no-deal. How is Johnson supposed to square that conundrum?

    Although I can a general election coming first!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    road_high wrote: »
    Yep- if he so badly wants to reopen the agreement then the leaving date is also up for alterations ie end August
    Why wait til end October now to suit a no deal? If it’s happening let it happen immediately

    Whilst I completely understand the need to just get on with it and tell the UK to go stuff themselves, please remember that the UK population are people too and most don't want any of this.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,955 Mod ✭✭✭✭DOCARCH


    Laois_Man wrote: »
    I cant wait to see what happens when the HoC votes (again) against a no-deal. How is Johnson supposed to square that conundrum?

    Although I can a general election coming first!

    Yip, you have answered your own question!

    All the bull**** bluster now, in my opinion, is simply part of a (yet to be called) GE campaign.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    robinph wrote: »
    Whilst I completely understand the need to just get on with it and tell the UK to go stuff themselves, please remember that the UK population are people too and most don't want any of this.

    Do they not? Roughly 50% of them are voting for it.
    The internal politics of the Uk is of no interest to me or any other European so TS basically


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,072 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    robinph wrote: »
    Whilst I completely understand the need to just get on with it and tell the UK to go stuff themselves, please remember that the UK population are people too and most don't want any of this.

    They have been given 3 separate occassions to democratically make their voices heard. They have failed. They voted for BRexit, they voted for parties that promised to deliver Brexit and they voted in the BP in the recent EU elections based on Hard Brexit.

    At least the 37% that bothered to turn up to vote did.

    So whilst they may well be plenty of people opposed to it, they simply are not that worried about to actually do anything about it in large enough numbers to make a difference.

    The polls have a bounce for the Tories since Johnson became leader!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,410 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    robinph wrote: »
    Whilst I completely understand the need to just get on with it and tell the UK to go stuff themselves, please remember that the UK population are people too and most don't want any of this.

    I dont think anyone is thinking otherwise, But until that same population get a hold on what their government is doing. External parties can do nothing.

    The long and short of it is that there is a narrative going around that the EU is holding them in. In fact they could leave tomorrow. The EU needs to start countering that narrative and tell them they can leave tomorrow if they want.

    We will then see what the will of the people is.............


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 727 ✭✭✭InTheShadows


    robinph wrote: »
    Whilst I completely understand the need to just get on with it and tell the UK to go stuff themselves, please remember that the UK population are people too and most don't want any of this.

    Which is a problem because the people do want it as shown by the vote. Hopefully Boris can get it over the line so we can all move on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Laois_Man wrote: »
    I cant wait to see what happens when the HoC votes (again) against a no-deal. How is Johnson supposed to square that conundrum?

    Although I can a general election coming first!

    I can see an election being an even more hard Brexit outcome and nothing else. Too many of them want to leave (and of course keep all
    benefits) so so be it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,870 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Which is a problem because the people do want it as shown by the vote. Hopefully Boris can get it over the line so we can all move on.

    Exactly. They’ve had ample oops to reject Brexit but I’ve seen nothing of the sort. It’s what they want - let them have it with all the trimmings


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,927 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Laois_Man wrote: »
    I cant wait to see what happens when the HoC votes (again) against a no-deal. How is Johnson supposed to square that conundrum?

    Although I can a general election coming first!

    The Commons needs to actually vote FOR something this time though. Voting against no deal at this stage is meaningless. They need to either agree to call a GE so the EU will grant an extension, a People's Vote for the same reason or withdraw Article 50.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement