Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread IX (Please read OP before posting)

1189190192194195330

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 498 ✭✭BobbyBobberson


    Enzokk wrote: »
    Once again he is trying to shift the blame to the EU. If the EU doesn't change the WA then the UK will be forced to leave without a deal and it will be the EU's fault.

    Also, they will have £39bn extra apparently if they leave without a deal.

    Youtube link to Sky News Live, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siyW0GOBtbo

    It will be 33bn not 39bn, that figure was based on a march leave date.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,396 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    BoJo is on fire already, deflecting blame and making irrational promises on his first day in office. Interesting times ahead!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    trellheim wrote: »
    I'd expect a quick statement soon in the House on a Brexit offer


    on live now

    https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/05844a50-a0d9-4d16-bd19-e9e3df717acb

    time limit not enough, backstop must be abolished.

    OH FFS

    Back to 'other arrangements' .... strap in boys its gonna be rough
    This is probably good for us as it will completely remove any lingering ideas in EU capitals that if Ireland would only bend a bit we'd have a deal.

    We can't appease these lunatics in London. We prepare as best we can for no deal and a hard border and hope that it is removed later through a UI when the coffers start to run dry in Whitehall and NI is sacrificed first for "causing all this".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,269 ✭✭✭amacca


    Gove doesn't look happy at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,989 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    It will be 33bn not 39bn, that figure was based on a march leave date.


    Only reporting what he said. He has a magic money forest, not just a tree. There will be money for everything, health and police and social services and investments. Either the previous governments were holding back, of which he was part of, or he is going to borrow money to pay for these. Looking back at his record, £40m wasted on the garden bridge, if he stays as PM for a while it is going to hurt the UK.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,396 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    amacca wrote: »
    Gove doesn't look happy at all.

    A lot of faces shown so far look bemused.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    IF the border hardens.

    If Boris is not bluffing and goes for No Deal and gets it past Parliament somehow, the channel ports collapse, no food on the shelves, the Government collapses , there's an election and the new PM puts the backstop in place to try and get an emergency deal from the EU. Say January next year.

    In the meantime, the Irish Governments low key border enforcement wont piss anyone off.

    But Boris probably is bluffing, and may be counting on Parliament to block his No Deal bluff, in which case he will be forced (sadly and much against his will) to ask for another extension. The EU should just make it two years and forget the Brits for a while.
    Make it contiguous with the EU 7 year budget cycle. If they ask for the extension we should give one that suits the rest of the EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,076 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Can't recall where I read it but I think the plan is as follows:

    Johnson demands Backstop is removed.
    To get into cabinet each member must sign up to 31 Oct No deal scenario.
    Johnson waves some silly 'concession' at the EU (the rumour is something to do with EU citizens rights) in the knowledge they will reject it, but it will be painted as the UK being willing to negotiate.
    PR people out everyday claiming that the EU must be willing to compromise, nothing is ever said about the many concessions the UK already received or why they should get further concessions. Simply that they must.
    Stalemate, Johnson claims everything is being done, but he cannot avoid No Deal because of the Backstop.
    No Deal happens 31 Oct.
    Everything remains the same. (perception wise)
    Johnson calls a snap election. BP is sidelined as Brexit is delivered. LibDems the same. Labour in complete disarray.
    Johnson wins the election, and it is only after a few months that the real extent of No Deal becomes apparent (planning, stock piling, borrowing, stiff upper lip etc).
    Johnson cannot be removed for at least a year, and next GE a further 5 years away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,269 ✭✭✭amacca


    He's just doubling down on the brexit bluster so he will be blocked and can then shift the blame on those that stopped him etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Can Johnson call a GE that soon given the Fixed Term Parliaments Act?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    If we enter another recession do you think the Government will come up smelling of roses?


    The situation would be even worse if we are cut off from the Single Market. There are no winners in Brexit.


    Just on the border - it was sealed off pretty damn quick during for the duration of the Foot & Mouth in 2001 (and it worked).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,172 ✭✭✭trellheim


    theres a brilliant photo today of Bojo walking into No.10 with Dominic Cummings applauding just wearing a tshirt in the corner. Cant find it, scrolled past on twitter


    https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1154092109907091456


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Can't recall where I read it but I think the plan is as follows:

    Johnson demands Backstop is removed.
    To get into cabinet each member must sign up to 31 Oct No deal scenario.
    Johnson waves some silly 'concession' at the EU (the rumour is something to do with EU citizens rights) in the knowledge they will reject it, but it will be painted as the UK being willing to negotiate.
    PR people out everyday claiming that the EU must be willing to compromise, nothing is ever said about the many concessions the UK already received or why they should get further concessions. Simply that they must.
    Stalemate, Johnson claims everything is being done, but he cannot avoid No Deal because of the Backstop.
    No Deal happens 31 Oct.
    Everything remains the same.
    Johnson calls a snap election. BP is sidelined as Brexit is delivered. LibDems the same. Labour in complete disarray.
    Johnson wins the election, and it is only after a few months that the real extent of No Deal becomes apparent (planning, stock piling, borrowing, stiff upper lip etc).
    Johnson cannot be removed for at least a year, and next GE a further 5 years away.

    Johnson confirmed this morning that EU citizens' rights will be guaranteed in all eventualities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭og2k7


    Been following this thread for months (first time posting here - there are people more in the know than myself) but f*ck me - we are going for a No-deal by the looks of things

    I have been following the UK politics more than anything else (more than the US ones now) and I think we are in for a tough ride the next couple of years - considering stockpiling on rice etc

    "Boris Johnson says he wants to make UK greatest country on earth in first statement to MP" Boris Johnson - Donald Trump

    Where is he going to get the cash for the below:

    Johnson says he is absolutely committed to delivering Brexit.

    There are many officials in the EU would be be better placed working on trade deals in the UK.

    He says the UK will not nominate a new European commissioner for after October.

    He says he will not wait until 31 October before rebuilding Britain. He will start on this straight away.

    He says NHS money will go to the frontline as soon as possible.

    He has asked officials to work on plans to reduce waiting times and to speed up GP appointments.

    He says the government will start hiring 20,000 more police officers as a priority.

    He says he wants to ensure serious offenders serve their sentences on full.

    The minimum level of per pupil fundings in schools will increase, he says.

    And he will level up every area in the country.


    I am getting worried now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,076 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    murphaph wrote: »
    Can Johnson call a GE that soon given the Fixed Term Parliaments Act?

    It needs the support of parliament which they will get since Corbyn has long demanded a GE. Even he couldn't fail to vote for that.

    The FTPA is designed to avoid having a GE each and everytime the government loses a vote.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,989 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Can't recall where I read it but I think the plan is as follows:

    Johnson demands Backstop is removed.
    To get into cabinet each member must sign up to 31 Oct No deal scenario.
    Johnson waves some silly 'concession' at the EU (the rumour is something to do with EU citizens rights) in the knowledge they will reject it, but it will be painted as the UK being willing to negotiate.
    PR people out everyday claiming that the EU must be willing to compromise, nothing is ever said about the many concessions the UK already received or why they should get further concessions. Simply that they must.
    Stalemate, Johnson claims everything is being done, but he cannot avoid No Deal because of the Backstop.
    No Deal happens 31 Oct.
    Everything remains the same. (perception wise)
    Johnson calls a snap election. BP is sidelined as Brexit is delivered. LibDems the same. Labour in complete disarray.
    Johnson wins the election, and it is only after a few months that the real extent of No Deal becomes apparent (planning, stock piling, borrowing, stiff upper lip etc).

    Johnson cannot be removed for at least a year, and next GE a further 5 years away.


    I don't know how accurate the bold part is regarding the LibDems. I agree the Brexit Party will be done as a one policy party, but the LibDems could run on a manifesto of getting the EU back in the EU and it will drain Labour of votes.

    I am also not sure why he would be safe for a year, surely a no-confidence vote can be called in the HoC at any time? I know the Tory party rules are that if a motion is defeated against the leader they cannot act in a year, but is there a rule in the same vein in the HoC?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    No Deal happens 31 Oct.
    Everything remains the same.
    2 problems here -

    Firstly, why would Parliament allow No Deal this time when they don't support it? Several Tories have gone on record recently saying No Deal is insane and they will stop it, and it only takes a few with the tiny majority Boris has.

    Secondly, everything would not remain the same. The stock exchange will crash, Sterling will fall off a cliff, capital controls will be needed to stop flight, the ferries will stop taking lorries on the stroke of Brexit and by next day the traffic jam will reach London, UK airlines will cancel a all flights in Europe which do not start or stop in the UK etc. etc.

    The effects will be instant and unmissable.

    In fact, the second point may itself prevent No Deal. If we are in mid October and Boris is still bluffing, capital flight, a sterling crash and a stock market sell off may all start in advance, and scare the crap out of the Government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    I think BJ / Cummings are planning to go to Brussels and ask for a goods only simple FTA. They will offer not to send anything that doesn’t meet EU standards to NI or send everything via Dublin port where it’ll be checked. Then NI goods flow easily West and South. But the Britain / NI direct ferries have a few more checks or only allow trusted trader.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,076 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    og2k7 wrote: »
    Been following this thread for months (first time posting here - there are people more in the know than myself) but f*ck me - we are going for a No-deal by the looks of things

    I have been following the UK politics more than anything else (more than the US ones now) and I think we are in for a tough ride the next couple of years - considering stockpiling on rice etc

    "Boris Johnson says he wants to make UK greatest country on earth in first statement to MP" Boris Johnson - Donald Trump

    Where is he going to get the cash for the below:

    Johnson says he is absolutely committed to delivering Brexit.

    There are many officials in the EU would be be better placed working on trade deals in the UK.

    He says the UK will not nominate a new European commissioner for after October.

    He says he will not wait until 31 October before rebuilding Britain. He will start on this straight away.

    He says NHS money will go to the frontline as soon as possible.

    He has asked officials to work on plans to reduce waiting times and to speed up GP appointments.

    He says the government will start hiring 20,000 more police officers as a priority.

    He says he wants to ensure serious offenders serve their sentences on full.

    The minimum level of per pupil fundings in schools will increase, he says.

    And he will level up every area in the country.


    I am getting worried now

    And yet he was in the last governments that stood over all the reasons why those things are now necessary.

    They all sound great, and perfectly reasonable. But how, when, what cost?

    The man doesn't do detail, doesn't do facts. He is great at soundbites. There is a position now that Johnson wil surround himself with the best, that he is a CEO type figure. But he has no history of that. Was he a success in Foreign Office? London Mayor he overspent massively on a number of big projects.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Valhallapt wrote: »
    I think BJ / Cummings are planning to go to Brussels and ask for a goods only simple FTA. They will offer not to send anything that doesn’t meet EU standards to NI or send everything via Dublin port where it’ll be checked. Then NI goods flow easily West and South. But the Britain / NI direct ferries have a few more checks or only allow trusted trader.

    But the EU have emphatically rejected any micro deals. Or cakeism if you will. It's the WA or nothing.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 498 ✭✭BobbyBobberson


    Johnson babbling breathlessly and at high speed.


  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No there is no such restrictions on holding a confidence vote again.
    The main one is politics - the opposition calling one can galvanize recalcitrant government backbenchers.

    They have to be pretty sure they have the numbers.
    How many labour MPs would rebel in a vote at the start of September?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,076 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    The effects will be instant and unmissable.

    In fact, the second point may itself prevent No Deal. If we are in mid October and Boris is still bluffing, capital flight, a sterling crash and a stock market sell off may all start in advance, and scare the crap out of the Government.

    Well in terms of the ForEx and stock market, that happened after the Ref result and it was simply laughed off as the markets lacking faith etc. Most people won't be effected.

    IN terms of the deliveries etc, EU has already said that Flights will continue, transport etc. There will be a period of time to allow both sides to adjust.

    Not that it won't happen, but IMO the plan will be that people won't notice. At least not in time to vote in a GE. A GE where Johnson can claim to have delivered the 'Will of the People'. Cue posters of Johnson akin to Chruchill etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    But the EU have emphatically rejected any micro deals. Or cakeism if you will. It's the WA or nothing.

    I’m not talking of a set of mini deals. One FTA which I think was previously on the table. Aka Canada type deal, goods only.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    Valhallapt wrote: »
    I think BJ / Cummings are planning to go to Brussels and ask for a goods only simple FTA.


    EU response: Sounds cool, ratify the WA and we will discuss an FTA, should be able to negotiate something we like in just 5 or 7 years!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Valhallapt wrote: »
    I’m not talking of a set of mini deals. One FTA which I think was previously on the table. Aka Canada type deal, goods only.

    Yeah but that means ditching the WA and doing what Johnson wants. Can't be seen to happen.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,957 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Mod: Posts deleted. No more insults and one-liners please.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,076 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    EU response: Sounds cool, ratify the WA and we will discuss an FTA, should be able to negotiate something we like in just 5 or 7 years!

    Yes that is my understanding. Maybe someone on here can clarify as I have heard this point about what the EU offered a number of times from MP's.

    As I understand it, the EU are saying that they are open to different options depending on the UK wish list (red lines). TM gave the red lines which meant that the backstop was required.

    Any FTA agreement is dependent on a WA. So it is wrong to suggest that a FTA was every available in isolation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    No there is no such restrictions on holding a confidence vote again.
    The main one is politics - the opposition calling one can galvanize recalcitrant government backbenchers.

    They have to be pretty sure they have the numbers.
    How many labour MPs would rebel in a vote at the start of September?

    How many Labour MPs would rebel to prop up a very right wing Tory government? Only those who were charlatans all along.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,989 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    98 and a half days until Brexit and we have Johnson babbling away at the dispatch box like there is no rush. He has not answered a question and this is what people like about him, talking quickly and incoherently about vaguely on point references to what he is supposed to be discussing and so avoiding scrutiny.

    He will win support for this style but it will not win any friends in other countries when serious situations will come up.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement