Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

Odhinn · 16-07-2019 07:59PM

Seth Brundle wrote: »

Jesus H!
Could you imagine being married to her?

I can imagine the drug and alcohol abuse before remembering divorce is legal allright.

Stop moaning ffs · 16-07-2019 08:01PM

Seth Brundle wrote: »

Jesus H!
Could you imagine being married to her?

The videos further down the thread

Gold

Harvey Weinstein · 16-07-2019 08:02PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Im not a leftist lol, that's just a childish label you wisj to use because i disagree with some things you believe.

If you wish me to answer your question then please answer mine 1st.

Youtube terms and conditions are entirely arbitrary, they can decide on a whim whether something is categorised as 'hate speech' or anything else and you know this.

So now we have the truth - you are not a leftist/socialist of any sort.
You support big business and you support the ability of transnational capitalism to interfere in political discourse.

Fake left indeed...

Stop moaning ffs · 16-07-2019 08:04PM

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

Youtube terms and conditions are entirely arbitrary, they can decide on a whim whether something is categorised as 'hate speech' or anything else and you know this.

So now we have the truth - you are not a leftist/socialist of any sort.
You support big business and you support the ability of transnational capitalism to interfere in political discourse.

Fake left indeed...

Myes and conditions are standard across YouTube google twitter etc

Second accounts aren’t allowed. This is standard

They’re not allowed here on boards either by the way

Timberrrrrrrr · 16-07-2019 08:05PM

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

Youtube terms and conditions are entirely arbitrary, they can decide on a whim whether something is categorised as 'hate speech' or anything else and you know this.

Their house their rules.

So now we have the truth - you are not a leftist/socialist of any sort.
You support big business and you support the ability of transnational capitalism to interfere in political discourse.

Fake left indeed...

No, again thats just you trying to label me based on what you think i believe.

Gemma's on FB now ranting, she mentions several times that her TWO accounts have been shut down, maybe go listen to her waffle for a while before embarrassing yourself again.

Harvey Weinstein · 16-07-2019 08:11PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Their house their rules.

No, again thats just you trying to label me based on what you think i believe.

Gemma's on FB now ranting, she mentions several times that her TWO accounts have been shut down, maybe go listen to her waffle for a while before embarrassing yourself again.

You have argued in favour of tech censorship a hundred times..who's 'right wing' here?
Clearly its you

Timberrrrrrrr · 16-07-2019 08:13PM

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

You have argued in favour of tech censorship a hundred times..who's 'right wing' here?
Clearly its you

Any chance you might answer this?

"should Gemma be allowed to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up?"

ohnonotgmail · 16-07-2019 08:13PM

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

You have argued in favour of tech censorship a hundred times..who's 'right wing' here?
Clearly its you

you keep using that word like you understand what it means

Acosta · 16-07-2019 08:15PM

I try to avoid her rants and posts as much as possible, but when I do come across it she seems even more unhinged than before. I detest her views on nearly everything, but she really doesn't sound well at all.

Harvey Weinstein · 16-07-2019 08:16PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Any chance you might answer this?

"should Gemma be allowed to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up?"

You're a Capitalist shill fronting as a progressive, its as clear as day.
Others should take note..

Timberrrrrrrr · 16-07-2019 08:20PM

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

You're a Capitalist shill fronting as a progressive, its as clear as day.
Others should take note..

Why the refusal to answer a simple question? You can keep abusing me and adding childish labels if you wish but honestly,

by refusing to answer that one simple question you're showing everyone that you believe she shouldnt be able to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up.

Stop moaning ffs · 16-07-2019 08:22PM

She was at the door of YouTube’s owners ranting as her channels had been taken down. The day before.
That’s all.
You’re reaching here Harvey.

Harvey Weinstein · 16-07-2019 08:30PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Why the refusal to answer a simple question? You can keep abusing me and adding childish labels if you wish but honestly,

by refusing to answer that one simple question you're showing everyone that you believe she shouldnt be able to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up.

Contact youtube and ask them what exactly it was she was banned for..then I will answer. Be specific.
Because you don't know do you?

Stop moaning ffs · 16-07-2019 08:33PM

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

Contact youtube and ask them what exactly it was she was banned for..then I will answer. Be specific.
Because you don't know do you?

Well all know. It’s a conspiracy against her to silence her

Wooooooooooooooo!

Timberrrrrrrr · 16-07-2019 08:38PM

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

Contact youtube and ask them what exactly it was she was banned for..then I will answer. Be specific.
Because you don't know do you?

She was dropped for

"violations of its policies aimed at protecting against hate speech"

So now you will have no problem answering my question? Or will you evade again?

For Forks Sake · 16-07-2019 08:40PM

n97 mini wrote: »

That's one of Leah Doherty's Twitter accounts I think?

https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151203723387047937

Nope. Here's Gems approaching the Newsworthy person.

n97 mini · 16-07-2019 08:54PM

For Forks Sake wrote: »

https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151203723387047937

Nope. Here's Gems approaching the Newsworthy person.

How do you know? That video doesn't identify anyone.

Harvey Weinstein · 16-07-2019 09:02PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

She was dropped for

"violations of its policies aimed at protecting against hate speech"

So now you will have no problem answering my question? Or will you evade again?

Hate Speech?
And yet there are literally thousands of videos spewing hate speech against Whites, Blacks, Catholics, Muslims, LGBT, Trans, Infidels you name it and they are still up and running.

Like I said youtubes idea of what constitutes hate speech is entirely arbitrary and totally inconsistent.
This is nothing more than a political move to shut down and silence Gemma likely at the request of the Irish establishment/Media and anyone should be very worried indeed at this development regardless of whether you support Gemma or not.

Unless of course you are a member of the establishment or on the establishment gravy train which I strongly suspect you are

batgoat · 16-07-2019 09:04PM

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

Youtube terms and conditions are entirely arbitrary, they can decide on a whim whether something is categorised as 'hate speech' or anything else and you know this.

So now we have the truth - you are not a leftist/socialist of any sort.
You support big business and you support the ability of transnational capitalism to interfere in political discourse.

Fake left indeed...

So it's as if it's a company that they own and can define rules for? Shocking...

n97 mini · 16-07-2019 09:05PM

For Forks Sake wrote: »

https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151203723387047937

Nope. Here's Gems approaching the Newsworthy person.

The irony isn't lost on me that a pro Brexit MP was recently lambasted for a comment about any fishing vessel caught in UK waters after Brexit should be given "the Belgrano treatment", and whoever is running that Twitter account has the infamous front page of The Sun about the sinking of the Belgrano as their profile picture.

Timberrrrrrrr · 16-07-2019 09:10PM

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

Hate Speech?
And yet there are literally thousands of videos spewing hate speech against Whites, Blacks, Catholics, Muslims, LGBT, Trans, Infidels you name it and they are still up and running.

Maybe contact them and tell them that?

Like I said youtubes idea of what constitutes hate speech is entirely arbitrary and totally inconsistent.
This is nothing more than a political move to shut down and silence Gemma likely at the request of the Irish establishment/Media and anyone should be very worried indeed at this development regardless of whether you support Gemma or not.

Ahhhh here we go down the conspiracy rabbit hole

Unless of course you are a member of the establishment or on the establishment gravy train which I strongly suspect you are

I don't even live in Ireland anymore, what
part of the "establishment gravy train" do you believe i am a member of?

I also can't help but notice that you have yet again managed to avoid answering my simple question. What has you so flummoxed that you can't give me an honest reply?

16-07-2019 09:21PM

Don't do the whole social media thing, this place would be the closest thing to it, but from a professional perspective the only people I know who go the dual/multiple accounts route are professional hackers and even then just for work.

Outside of that can't see the point of having multiple accounts unless you are a complete ****, someone with a dubious mental health status, or just a troll.

batgoat · 16-07-2019 09:25PM

DubInMeath wrote: »

Don't do the whole social media thing, this place would be the closest thing to it, but from a professional perspective the only people I know who go the dual/multiple accounts route are professional hackers and even then just for work.

Outside of that can't see the point of having multiple accounts unless you are a complete ****, someone with a dubious mental health status, or just a troll.

Or if a big old bigot. Although likely falls under ****.

16-07-2019 09:28PM

batgoat wrote: »

Or if a big old bigot. Although likely falls under ****.

It does.

FartyBlartFast · 16-07-2019 09:47PM

Stop moaning ffs wrote: »

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

Irish times article was up mere minutes after Gemmas channel was deleted...hmmmmm

Please do elaborate

Soros.

Fin.

Sir Guy who smiles · 16-07-2019 09:56PM

FartyBlartFast wrote: »

Soros.

Fin.

Read an interesting snippet in a Sunday paper, David Crosby thought a lady whose affections came between messr. Stills and Nash was an agent of Richard Nixon sent to break the band up because of its counter culture revolutionary potential.
His manager replied that Nixon probably didn't know who David Crosby was.

Annasopra · 16-07-2019 10:38PM

Do Gemmas supporters support the attempted assault on google staff?

batgoat · 16-07-2019 10:39PM

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Do Gemmas supporters support the attempted assault on google staff?

Only if milkshakes involved.

ILoveYourVibes · 16-07-2019 11:15PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

She was dropped for

"violations of its policies aimed at protecting against hate speech"

So now you will have no problem answering my question? Or will you evade again?

I reported several of her videos.

musiknonstop · 16-07-2019 11:52PM

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

I reported several of her videos.

I reported several of her channels

Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

Comments