Skip to content
  • Register
    • Advertisement
    If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
    Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

    Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

    1…3536384041…333

    Comments

    • #1112
      For Forks Sake
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,881 For Forks Sake
      ✭✭✭✭


      Joeytheparrot wrote: »
      This is good news. Its about her vile racist hate speech was deplatformed.

      https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/youtube-terminates-gemma-o-doherty-s-account-over-breach-of-hate-speech-policy-1.3958500?mode=amp

      She's taking it well


      https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151166667776561154


    • #1113
      Stop moaning ffs
      Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 Stop moaning ffs
      ✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      Irish times article was up mere minutes after Gemmas channel was deleted...hmmmmm

      Please do elaborate


    • #1114
      listermint
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,438 listermint
      ✭✭✭✭


      hatrickpatrick wrote: »
      Deplatforming is never good news. Not only does it fundamentally go against the spirit of democratic freedom, it'll also give her and her conspiracy minded followers a huge amount of fuel for their conspiracy mindedness.

      The internet is being totally ruined by the editorialisation of communication platforms. Sure, they have the right to do it, but they're still scumbags for choosing to.

      She , nor you nor I have the democratic right to a platform


      The fact that nonsense is now a thing that lunatics like to spread is gas.



      Let me spell it out.


      You have no right to a platform.


      The end


    • #1115
      Timberrrrrrrr
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,873 Timberrrrrrrr
      ✭✭✭✭


      hatrickpatrick wrote: »
      Deplatforming is never good news. Not only does it fundamentally go against the spirit of democratic freedom, it'll also give her and her conspiracy minded followers a huge amount of fuel for their conspiracy mindedness.

      The internet is being totally ruined by the editorialisation of communication platforms. Sure, they have the right to do it, but they're still scumbags for choosing to.

      Why? Do you think she should be allowed to post whatever she wants in a clear breach of the T&C's she agreed to when signing up?

      Should anyone be allowed post whatever they like?


    • #1116
      Harvey Weinstein
      Closed Accounts Posts: 536 Harvey Weinstein
      ✭✭✭


      Stop moaning ffs wrote: »
      Please do elaborate

      Its quite simple, Gemmas channel was deleted and minutes later an article appeared in the Irish times saying as much.

      Clearly they knew in advance.


    • Advertisement
    • #1117
      Stop moaning ffs
      Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 Stop moaning ffs
      ✭✭✭


      She's refused the biggest platform in the country. She could have easily made her point.
      If they only had enough pages to print her incoherent nonsense

      ‘A number of attempts have been made by The Irish Times this evening to speak to Ms O’Doherty, so far without success.’


    • #1118
      batgoat
      Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 batgoat
      ✭✭✭


      hatrickpatrick wrote: »
      Deplatforming is never good news. Not only does it fundamentally go against the spirit of democratic freedom, it'll also give her and her conspiracy minded followers a huge amount of fuel for their conspiracy mindedness.

      The internet is being totally ruined by the editorialisation of communication platforms. Sure, they have the right to do it, but they're still scumbags for choosing to.

      She doxxed a woman who regularly receives death threats.... She targets children for racist tangents... So yep, get over it. She deserved to be banned.


    • #1119
      Stop moaning ffs
      Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 Stop moaning ffs
      ✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      Its quite simple, Gemmas channel was deleted and minutes later an article appeared in the Irish times saying as much.

      Clearly they knew in advance.

      What time was her channel deleted at?

      Is she not delighted with this now cos she’s been ‘silenced’.

      Surely that will help her ultimate goal no?


    • #1120
      batgoat
      Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 batgoat
      ✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      Its quite simple, Gemmas channel was deleted and minutes later an article appeared in the Irish times saying as much.

      Clearly they knew in advance.

      She was banned days ago....


    • #1121
      n97 mini
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 n97 mini
      ✭✭✭


      For Forks Sake wrote: »
      She's taking it well


      https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151166667776561154

      That's one of Leah Doherty's Twitter accounts I think?


    • Advertisement
    • #1122
      Harvey Weinstein
      Closed Accounts Posts: 536 Harvey Weinstein
      ✭✭✭


      For Forks Sake wrote: »
      She's taking it well


      https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151166667776561154

      Newsworthy doxxed a mans young child earlier in the week, why would you post scum like newsworthy?


    • #1123
      Stop moaning ffs
      Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 Stop moaning ffs
      ✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      Newsworthy doxxed a mans young child earlier in the week, why would you post scum like newsworthy?


      Gemma published a picture of a class of school kids in Longford that had some immigrant children in it. Without asking their parents. But that’s ok is it


    • #1124
      Harvey Weinstein
      Closed Accounts Posts: 536 Harvey Weinstein
      ✭✭✭


      batgoat wrote: »
      She was banned days ago....

      One of her channels was banned, the other was up and running. She was live streaming last night.
      Both channels were deleted entirely today and the Irish Times had a preprepared article which appeared almost immediately after her channels were deleted.

      At least we now know that which we knew all along...that big tech and the media in Ireland are colluding.

      I wonder if some enterprising journalist (Gemma perhaps) can do some digging and find out just how deep this collusion goes. Perhaps there was collusion when tech companies interfered in the Abortion referendum. Perhaps there was some illegality.

      Very sloppy by the IT in any case.


    • #1125
      Harvey Weinstein
      Closed Accounts Posts: 536 Harvey Weinstein
      ✭✭✭


      Stop moaning ffs wrote: »
      Gemma published a picture of a class of school kids in Longford that had some immigrant children in it. Without asking their parents. But that’s ok is it

      She published a picture which had already featured in the media. She did not publish names.

      Whoever the lowlife scum Newsworthy is...they published a picture of the child, including the names of the parents and the workplace address of the parents.


    • #1126
      Timberrrrrrrr
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,873 Timberrrrrrrr
      ✭✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      One of her channels was banned, the other was up and running. She was live streaming last night.
      Both channels were deleted entirely today and the Irish Times had a preprepared article which appeared almost immediately after her channels were deleted.

      At least we now know that which we knew all along...that big tech and the media in Ireland are colluding.

      I wonder if some enterprising journalist (Gemma perhaps) can do some digging and find out just how deep this collusion goes. Perhaps there was collusion when tech companies interfered in the Abortion referendum. Perhaps there was some illegality.

      Very sloppy by the IT in any case.

      Creating a 2nd account to circumvent a ban is against T&C's tjat she agreed to when signing up so thats why both were closed.

      What time was her accounts closed? what time was IT article posted?

      If you're gonna make this claim at least back it up with proof please.


    • #1127
      Harvey Weinstein
      Closed Accounts Posts: 536 Harvey Weinstein
      ✭✭✭


      Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
      Creating a 2nd account to circumvent a ban is against T&C's tjat she agreed to when signing up so thats why both were closed.

      What time was her accounts closed? what time was IT article posted?

      If you're gonna make this claim at least back it up with proof please.

      She didn't create an account it was her first account.

      Obviously I wasn't watching as youtube removed her channel, but it was sometime before 6 and the IT article went up shortly after


    • #1128
      Harvey Weinstein
      Closed Accounts Posts: 536 Harvey Weinstein
      ✭✭✭


      Absolutely shocking that the so called libs and lefties here fail to see that they will be next.


    • #1129
      super_furry
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,363 super_furry
      ✭✭✭✭


      Gem-Trails is off to make her own YouTube, with hookers, blackjack and Black and Tan Torino.


    • #1130
      gandalf
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 gandalf
      ✭✭✭✭


      Google took their time banning the hatemonger, now to get her off Twitter.

      The state of her and that goon in black kicking off outside Google's headquarters.


    • #1131
      Timberrrrrrrr
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,873 Timberrrrrrrr
      ✭✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      She didn't create an account it was her first account.

      Obviously I wasn't watching as youtube removed her channel, but it was sometime before 6 and the IT article went up shortly after

      She had her main account suspended


      She started streaming on a 2nd (backup account....her words not mine) and that was suspended.

      Google then closed both accounts


      So "almost immediately" could actually be 2 or 3 or even 4 hours after her accounts were closed?


    • Advertisement
    • #1132
      Harvey Weinstein
      Closed Accounts Posts: 536 Harvey Weinstein
      ✭✭✭


      super_furry wrote: »
      Gem-Trails is off to make her own YouTube, with hookers, blackjack and Black and Tan Torino.

      'Tan' will of course be listed under the coming hate speech laws. Watch what you say. Everything is screenshotted


    • #1133
      Timberrrrrrrr
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,873 Timberrrrrrrr
      ✭✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      Absolutely shocking that the so called libs and lefties here fail to see that they will be next.

      Next for what?

      Simple question for you,

      should Gemma be allowed to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up?


    • #1134
      Timberrrrrrrr
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,873 Timberrrrrrrr
      ✭✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      'Tan' will of course be listed under the coming hate speech laws. Watch what you say. Everything is screenshotted

      Well ISF on facebook is fùcked so.


    • #1135
      Harvey Weinstein
      Closed Accounts Posts: 536 Harvey Weinstein
      ✭✭✭


      Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
      She had her main account suspended


      She started streaming on a 2nd (backup account....her words not mine) and that was suspended.

      Google then closed both accounts


      So "almost immediately" could actually be 2 or 3 or even 4 hours after her accounts were closed?

      Nope I was re watching her stream from last night about an hour before it was deleted. thats how i knew as I refreshed the page and the channel was gone.


    • #1136
      Harvey Weinstein
      Closed Accounts Posts: 536 Harvey Weinstein
      ✭✭✭


      Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
      Next for what?

      Simple question for you,

      should Gemma be allowed to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up?

      Why do you - a supposed leftist, argue for the ability of a hyper capitalist conglomerate to interfere in political discourse

      Just what kind of socialist are you??


    • #1137
      super_furry
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,363 super_furry
      ✭✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      Nope I was re watching her stream from last night about an hour before it was deleted. thats how i knew as I refreshed the page and the channel was gone.

      Ah well sure look on the brightside, with Gemma off air and getting ready to fling her own ****e at Google HQ, you have the chance to catch up on Love Island tonight.


    • #1138
      Timberrrrrrrr
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,873 Timberrrrrrrr
      ✭✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      Nope I was re watching her stream from last night about an hour before it was deleted. thats how i knew as I refreshed the page and the channel was gone.

      She literally had a video up 3 days ago boasting about how she had to use he "back up account"


    • #1139
      Timberrrrrrrr
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,873 Timberrrrrrrr
      ✭✭✭✭


      Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
      Why do you - a supposed leftist, argue for the ability of a hyper capitalist conglomerate to interfere in political discourse

      Just what kind of socialist are you??

      Im not a leftist lol, that's just a childish label you wisj to use because i disagree with some things you believe.

      If you wish me to answer your question then please answer mine 1st.


    • #1140
      Annasopra
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 Annasopra
      ✭✭✭✭


      I wonder will she be calling for gardai to arrest her henchman who just tried to assault google staff.

      It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

      Terry Pratchet



    • Advertisement
    • #1141
      Seth Brundle
      Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,171 Seth Brundle
      Mod ✭✭✭✭


      For Forks Sake wrote: »
      She's taking it well


      https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151166667776561154
      Jesus H!
      Could you imagine being married to her?


    This discussion has been closed.
    Advertisement