WereWolf: A 13 player Seer game

tusk · 02-07-2019 05:38PM

I'll lb voting kitten. It may change. But currently I don't think any of the 4 on the block are strong enough contenders

quickbeam · 02-07-2019 05:39PM

Green&Red wrote: »

But sure that was clearly stated wayyyy back

What you're saying making no sense at all, I'm sorry QB but you have to go, your FFA reasons are too weak and you're contradicting yourself in post after post

Exactly. It was stated. It shouldn't have been. IMO, of course.

What contradictions?

I actually don't mind being lynched. Not when it's not LYLO. If I'm up and it's a matter of my lynch losing the game, I'll fight tooth and nail. As it is, if I'm lynched then, meh!

Whiplashy · 02-07-2019 05:39PM

I’ve put in a vote already but willing to change if that’s what the majority want. I will point out just to be petty that anytime I’ve brought up how we’re going to vote in previous games I’ve been accused of being a wolf for it for some reason so I’m p****d off no ones accusing Sulli! (I don’t think you’re a wolf Sulli it’s just always annoyed me that gets used against me!)

Green&Red · 02-07-2019 05:40PM

quickbeam wrote: »

Exactly. It was stated. It shouldn't have been. IMO, of course.

What contradictions?

I actually don't mind being lynched. Not when it's not LYLO. If I'm up and it's a matter of my lynch losing the game, I'll fight tooth and nail. As it is, if I'm lynched then, meh!

But sure it was blatantly obvious

For what its worth I think they will still munch him

tusk · 02-07-2019 05:40PM

Green&Red wrote: »

Explain that?

I wouldn't worry QB and Strawbs will probably do enough canvassing to get me lynched

Your basically making everyone choose between 3/4 people instead of giving players open reign in who to vote for.

Wolves biggest adversary is wagonomics and trying to vote so as to not get themselves found out. If you remove the very narrow list of targets. They have a lot more to think about and a harder time fitting in.

quickbeam · 02-07-2019 05:41PM

Green&Red wrote: »

But sure it was blatantly obvious

For what its worth I think they will still munch him

It wasn't obvious to you. You thought it was binary!

Ectoplasm · 02-07-2019 05:42PM

sullivlo wrote: »

Next decision:

Are we voting from the compiled FFA's?

Green&Red 4
quickbeam 4
tusk 8
Clarabel 4

If so, are we open voting and declaring on thread?

If not, are we open voting and declaring on thread?

Personally, I'm loath to force people to vote within the compiled FFA. I'm fine with it as 2 of mine are on the list but I know in the past I've disagreed with the front runners and voted elsewhere.

That said, if we are voting from it, I think declared voting makes it easier on the wolves to pick a wagon. Not sure though as I don't think I've ever seen a full FFA.

tusk · 02-07-2019 05:42PM

Whiplashy wrote: »

I’ve put in a vote already but willing to change if that’s what the majority want. I will point out just to be petty that anytime I’ve brought up how we’re going to vote in previous games I’ve been accused of being a wolf for it for some reason so I’m p****d off no ones accusing Sulli! (I don’t think you’re a wolf Sulli it’s just always annoyed me that gets used against me!)

I'm basically saying it's helping wolves to do a race. That's as close as I can get.

quickbeam · 02-07-2019 05:42PM

tusk wrote: »

Your basically making everyone choose between 3/4 people instead of giving players open reign in who to vote for.

Wolves biggest adversary is wagonomics and trying to vote so as to not get themselves found out. If you remove the very narrow list of targets. They have a lot more to think about and a harder time fitting in.

No, wagonomics make a lot more sense when it's over fewer players. That's the point of FFAing in the first place.

Not that it matters (to the wolves) if none of those racing are wolves, which could, potentially be the case. But if one is, then where their vote goes among the racers will be telling. Once they start to flip.

quickbeam · 02-07-2019 05:44PM

tusk wrote: »

You didn't answer for me haha.

Your answered someone else for yourself but basically it was the exact same question and response so I used you to get my point across

Meant to come back to this. Still don't get it

.

Don't stress about explaining though unless you think it's important.

tusk · 02-07-2019 05:45PM

I think a race is a bad idea. I'd be advocating against them for future games.

What if all four of us are village? The can vote whoever they want and it doesn't help us.

It only helps if there's one of them in there. And then maybe not even helpful.

Bah. I don't think it's a good idea..

tusk · 02-07-2019 05:45PM

quickbeam wrote: »

Meant to come back to this. Still don't get it .

Don't stress about explaining though unless you think it's important.

It's not

Green&Red · 02-07-2019 05:45PM

tusk wrote: »

Your basically making everyone choose between 3/4 people instead of giving players open reign in who to vote for.

Wolves biggest adversary is wagonomics and trying to vote so as to not get themselves found out. If you remove the very narrow list of targets. They have a lot more to think about and a harder time fitting in.

I didnt suggest narrowing the pool, I said I'm in favour of open voting

tusk · 02-07-2019 05:46PM

Green&Red wrote: »

I didnt suggest narrowing the pool, I said I'm in favour of open voting

I was just replying to your question. Not accusing you.

I meant the general you. Not the you you :pac:

quickbeam · 02-07-2019 05:47PM

tusk wrote: »

I think a race is a bad idea. I'd be advocating against them for future games.

What if all four of us are village? The can vote whoever they want and it doesn't help us.

It only helps if there's one of them in there. And then maybe not even helpful.

Bah. I don't think it's a good idea..

The original theory, is that by the wisdom of crowds, by combining all players' FFAs there is a good chance of there being a wolf in the race. There's no guarantee, but there's a really good chance.

Green&Red · 02-07-2019 05:48PM

quickbeam wrote: »

It wasn't obvious to you. You thought it was binary!

Binary that hes seer or not but I said way back in #47 he could be drawing the munch

Green&Red wrote: »

Ok now you’re just being strange which makes me think you’re trying to draw a munch but if there’s no autopriest then that just leaves us with a complete headf**k over Whippy

tusk · 02-07-2019 05:48PM

Anyway. I'm stepping away for a bit. Will hop on just before lunch. Good luck village.

Green&Red · 02-07-2019 05:49PM

tusk wrote: »

I was just replying to your question. Not accusing you.

I meant the general you. Not the you you :pac:

The me me accepts this reasoning

Green&Red · 02-07-2019 05:51PM

QB, I'm getting worried I'm tunnelling you a bit. I'm going to ISO Strawbs, shes thrown in grenades and I'm sure is delighted with how well they are going off

I'm online until 8

quickbeam · 02-07-2019 06:00PM

Green&Red wrote: »

QB, I'm getting worried I'm tunnelling you a bit. I'm going to ISO Strawbs, shes thrown in grenades and I'm sure is delighted with how well they are going off

I'm online until 8

If you're villager then wolves are sitting back laughing at the two of us going at each other.

quickbeam · 02-07-2019 06:01PM

So, really gotta go in a min. Are we racing or not? Sully, as master of FFAs, can you advise?

Ectoplasm · 02-07-2019 06:08PM

quickbeam wrote: »

So, really gotta go in a min. Are we racing or not? Sully, as master of FFAs, can you advise?

TBF, Sully can advise but we're always going to be relying on people to actually do it. I have a vote in on someone from the list at the moment but until there's a bit more activity on thread, can't really make a group decision.

quickbeam · 02-07-2019 06:09PM

Right, I'm off. I've voted. I reckon I should be back before 10pm but can't promise.

Green&Red · 02-07-2019 06:11PM

ISO of Strawbs

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

#ibelieveher

I wouldn’t be lynching here in a hurry.

Straight in with a defence of QB, post liked by Trit

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

My first reaction guesses would be green and tusk as two wolves.

If Trit was a wolf (not saying you are). Would he always claim an actual villager was a villager for the brownie points?

Second post is straight out an accusation of Tusk and myself

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

Kitten_K
2. Sullivlo
3. whiplashy VILLAGE CLEARED BY TRIT
4. green&red
5. ectoplasm
6. kolido
7. tusk
8. duffman
9. clarabel
10. baggly
11. tritium CLAIMING SEER
12. Strawberry milkshake
13. quickbeam

OK. The seer will get another peek at 10pm tonight. That means there will be 3 roles known leaving 10 who are yas.

The wolves can’t afford to leave Trit after munch but based on the reactions so far, it could be easy to pop off wolves. Lynch tonight will tell us if we have auto priest.

Goes all in on believing Trit, while at the same time calling the wolves to munch him.

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

If Trit wasn’t the real seer would he really say one of his team was village straight off the bat. The real seer would peek Whippy and come out and tell us. Not only would a wolf Trit be caught but he would be hanging another teammate too.

If anything, whippy is the closest we have to clear by a long shot.

This is followed by a few back and forths with me on Trit. Seems to pocket Whippy here. Personally I believe Trit's claim is bogus, therefore the clearing of Whippy is nonsense. Clear pocketting

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

I’m not lynching QB, Trit or Whippy tonight.

A few fluffy posts followed by this pocket of three players, nice work

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

I’m afraid that if I stray from my habit of a lifetime that it will be that one time that I was right. So I’m voting kitten. Gonna go through her posts to see if there are any reasons I can add.

Gives a nonsense reason to vote for Kitten followed by accusing her of genieing, which in fairness Kitten did

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

Your 1st post of the game talking about auto priest doesn’t tally with the second post I quoted. Or am I misreading the second post?

Questions (and I mean shades) me on the auto priest, she later ignores my explanation completely.

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

Can I just say Trit, I’m liking this Spartacus version of you. Making me chuckle.

Can I also say - Tusk is my wolf of the day.

Further pocketing of Trit followed by calling out Tusk with zero reasoning

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

I’m not putting you on my FFA as I want to get a counter wagon going.

#FFA1

Tusk
Kitten
Duffman

Then says shes leaving me off her FFA

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

So tusk made a mistake putting baggly in and changed it to duffman.

I’m voting you tusk.

Then gives a weak enough reason to vote Tusk, I wonder why she hasnt used this rationale to go after QB? If its a good enough reason to vote for Tusk why not her?

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

How many FFAs do we have now?

Then a nothing post two hours ago, this is significant IMO, shes obviously lurking but not posting.
If I'm right about her being a wolf this means we're off range with our FFAs, shes keeping quiet because we're going to lynch a villager. I'm pretty certain she'll be back posting if we get warmer

QB - I'd advise you to read through her posts, if you're not her team mate then you need to get out of her pocket

Green&Red · 02-07-2019 06:15PM

quickbeam wrote: »

If you're villager then wolves are sitting back laughing at the two of us going at each other.

Read my ISO of Strawbs, I came to the same conclusion

tusk · 02-07-2019 06:25PM

changing vote to strawbs. I knew there was something dodgy about her. But you've clarified it for me. Cheers.

Clarabel · 02-07-2019 06:29PM

Whiplashy wrote: »

Its like a big firm hug Originally designed for kids with autism but they have loads of health benefits and are getting very popular. Pricey but worth it. I’m paying mine off in installments.

I'd heard about them for autistic kids alright. I love a hug so I do.

tritium · 02-07-2019 06:31PM

Hmm very mixed views of the ffa list tbh. Not liking the idea of lynching tusk since my feeling is there’s better information out there. That many having tusk on an ffa smells of a serious wagon build so I think there’s wolves already pushing for it. I won’t be voting tusk based on the ffa dynamics we’re seeing here, there’s lazy wolves smelling an easy mislynch there I think, it can be revisited tomorrow if needed

Other three are a mixed bag. Wouldn’t be adverse to racing just them.

Odd I know, but the dynamics feel wrong

Clarabel · 02-07-2019 06:33PM

sullivlo wrote: »

Next decision:

Are we voting from the compiled FFA's?

Green&Red 4
quickbeam 4
tusk 8
Clarabel 4

If so, are we open voting and declaring on thread?

If not, are we open voting and declaring on thread?

I don't know that I want to vote for any of those to be honest. I will if village consensus.

Whiplashy · 02-07-2019 06:42PM

tritium wrote: »

Hmm very mixed views of the ffa list tbh. Not liking the idea of lynching tusk since my feeling is there’s better information out there. That many having tusk on an ffa smells of a serious wagon build so I think there’s wolves already pushing for it. I won’t be voting tusk based on the ffa dynamics we’re seeing here, there’s lazy wolves smelling an easy mislynch there I think, it can be revisited tomorrow if needed

Other three are a mixed bag. Wouldn’t be adverse to racing just them.

Odd I know, but the dynamics feel wrong

I agree. I have tusk in my ffa but I wouldn’t be putting my vote there. There’s definitely going to be wolf’s on that wagon so hopefully someone will at least get some decent wagonomics from it if he flips green.

WereWolf: A 13 player Seer game

Comments