Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ana Kriegel - Boys A & B found guilty [Mod: Do NOT post identifying information]

1151152154156157247

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,334 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I saw a documentary recently about the murder of Maddie Clifton. The perpetrator was a 14 year old boy sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parol. There was no sexual element. Astonishing how sentencing differs depending on the state/country where a crime is committed.

    That sentence was overturned on appeal. He is eligible for parole in 4 years time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Cryptopagan


    Gerry G wrote: »
    I see that journalist Niall O'Connor is in serious bother for naming one of the boys twice on a Cork radio show. Realistically, how is it possible to police this. I know they cant be named publically or by the media but I'm figuring that by the end of the year they will be household names. So how is it possible to stop this from happening and how many more people will find themselves before the courts?

    If they are never named on mainstream media, how would they become household names?

    And what is this obsession with knowing their names? What would you do with that information? Maybe when they are adults and eligible for release, then people can argue there are valid reasons to know their identities, but right now we’re talking about two children being detained by the state. There is no good reason to name them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 536 ✭✭✭mrjoneill


    Neyite wrote: »
    I don't envy the judge right now trying to determine a just sentence for both. He's constrained by the concessions that must be made due to their young age, but has to balance that with the savagery of the crime which feels like a 'lock up and throw away the key' one. Anything falling short of that - and it likely will due to them being minors - will probably result in uproar in the public.


    Yes indeed the pure savagery and calculating of it, led the girl to an abandoned house away from their own village to Lucan to put the blame there. I'm sure these thought the Gardai would be racing around Lucan looking for those responsible there when Ana's body was found. No doubt about is a lot of planning & scheming went into this. It was the last pinging from a mast in Lucan of Ana's phone switched the search there other than that her body may not have been found for weeks and there may be no forensics to be got. The fact there was so much protracted scheming went into it embeds their sheer evil. And these 2 are well aware of the enormity of their crime by their systematic denials and not one semblance of accepting the wrongdoing or empathy for Ana's family. I regard all the hugging and landholding in court as just a rouse at playacting innocence. While they were only 13 when the did the deed the nature of what they did defines them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 536 ✭✭✭mrjoneill


    That sentence was overturned on appeal. He is eligible for parole in 4 years time.




    Paul Henry Gingerich: Killer at 12, Now Free at 19


    https://www.newsmax.com/thewire/paul-henry-gingerich-killer-kid-free/2017/08/02/id/805258/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,334 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    mrjoneill wrote: »

    what is the relevance? he is nothing to do with the post i was replying to.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    That aside, I think it came out that Lundy's step-father had been abusing him, especially when he was drunk. So the case was reviewed with those circumstances in mind.
    It's not similar to two psychopathic scumbags luring an innocent girl out of her house, and into an abandoned house to beat her to death.

    I wonder do any other kids know anything more that they may have been afraid to say. Thinking about it, somebody must have heard something, maybe one of the others in the 'homework' club. Hopefully they decide to tell somebody if they do. It could make a huge difference if Boy B decides to appeal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 536 ✭✭✭mrjoneill


    Suckit wrote: »
    That aside, I think it came out that Gingerich's step-father had been abusing him, especially when he was drunk. So the case was reviewed with those circumstances in mind.
    It's not similar to two psychopathic scumbags luring an innocent girl out of her house, and into an abandoned house to beat her to death.

    I wonder do any other kids know anything more that they may have been afraid to say. Thinking about it, somebody must have heard something, maybe one of the others in the 'homework' club. Hopefully they decide to tell somebody if they do. It could make a huge difference if Boy B decides to appeal.
    I was focusing to sentencing? I have not seen any reports Gingerich's step-father had been abusing him either. And they are totally different circumstances as you state to Ana's mrder.



    There are rumors that other kids were propositioned to partake but the Gardai failed to get any evidence for it. I could well see why parents would not want their kid drawn through the courts over an issue that they don't want anything to do with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    mrjoneill wrote: »
    I was focusing to sentencing? I have not seen any reports Gingerich's step-father had been abusing him either. And they are totally different circumstances as you state to Ana's mrder.

    I know, but even the sentencing would be different here anyway.
    I meant Lundy's stepfather.
    He was abusive when drunk on (usually) whiskey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 536 ✭✭✭mrjoneill


    Suckit wrote: »
    I know, but even the sentencing would be different here anyway.
    I meant Lundy's stepfather.
    He was abusive when drunk on (usually) whiskey.


    The big thing in these is usually sex abuse but that was not here, but abusive is open to many interpretations. Looking at the case back then it came across to me they didn't like him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,428 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    I am watching a documentary about the murder of 11 year old Rhys Jones in Liverpool . It is from the prospective of his parents and the sheer pain and trauma they suffered . My heart goes out to them even now all these years later the pain is palpable . It brings it home how Anas parents and family must be suffering and how they will suffer
    But it always brings home how they will suffer if ever these two boys are freed
    Surely that should be the most important thing to remember . The familys pain and that they should matter


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    I am watching a documentary about the murder of 11 year old Rhys Jones in Liverpool . It is from the prospective of his parents and the sheer pain and trauma they suffered . My heart goes out to them even now all these years later the pain is palpable . It brings it home how Anas parents and family must be suffering and how they will suffer
    But it always brings home how they will suffer if ever these two boys are freed
    Surely that should be the most important thing to remember . The familys pain and that they should matter

    The shooters mother ended up doing time too. A woman with no redeeming features. The dregs of humanity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,076 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    splinter65 wrote: »
    The shooters mother ended up doing time too. A woman with no redeeming features. The dregs of humanity.

    The shooter also recently stabbed Jimmy Mizen's killer in prison, nearly killed him. Absolute cretin.

    Liverpool is getting much better as a city but it still has this element in it that emboldens young kids to do really bad things


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    Absolutely 100% hypothetical and a bit of a nonsense post, but....

    I saw that a young girl went missing in Lucan on Wednesday night. She was last seen getting into a car (I hope she is okay).
    It got me thinking bcause it is close to the area I guess.
    What would happen if one of the boys sisters or brothers went missing in the same manner?
    Surely they would have to tell the public who they were, as it may be related to the boys actions.
    So would they have to name the person missing and the fact that they were related to one of the boys, or would they try and keep anonymity?

    Like I said, a bit of a nonsense post, and very unlikely to happen, I just got thinking about it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    They wouldn't have to name anyone because judging by some of the comments about A & B's familys, she would deserve to be missing for daring to be related to one of them "animals".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,294 ✭✭✭LiamoSail


    They wouldn't have to name anyone because judging by some of the comments about A & B's familys, she would deserve to be missing for daring to be related to one of them "animals".

    That's bollox. You're trying to trivialise legitimate criticism of the parents by drawing innocent relatives into it. Innocent relatives don't deserve that. Nobody is tarnishing them with the same brush.

    At some point you're going to have to accept the fact that people are horrified, with good reason, at the parents facilitating attempts by their kids to get away with murder.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    LiamoSail wrote: »
    That's bollox. You're trying to trivialise legitimate criticism of the parents by drawing innocent relatives into it. Innocent relatives don't deserve that. Nobody is tarnishing them with the same brush.

    At some point you're going to have to accept the fact that people are horrified, with good reason, at the parents facilitating attempts by their kids to get away with murder.
    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQSm2aviV_eZig7NA_uUlvSmwULQb1i6fGZM9IaIp2eh5BJslk7hw


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hannibal_Smith


    They wouldn't have to name anyone because judging by some of the comments about A & B's familys, she would deserve to be missing for daring to be related to one of them "animals".

    They are animals. What they did to Ana Kriegel was barbaric.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,412 ✭✭✭Road-Hog


    They are animals. What they did to Ana Kriegel was barbaric.

    Very hard to argue otherwise. Is it possible to reform them through the prison / detention system.....?

    Is 👁 For 👁 and 🦷 for 🦷 not the way to go like 🇺🇸 ? It’s not an option in this state so not even worth debating.

    They should be deprived of their liberty for decades though. Don’t think they will have much to offer society ever when ever they do get out...!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    LiamoSail wrote: »
    That's bollox. You're trying to trivialise legitimate criticism of the parents by drawing innocent relatives into it. Innocent relatives don't deserve that. Nobody is tarnishing them with the same brush.


    Nope, there have been posts in this very thread saying their family's deserve being forced to move. There have been posts saying their family's should be shunned. There have been posts saying their parents should be punished by the state. Its not "bollox", it is there for everyone to read.


    IMHO, if a member of A or B's family went missing, there would be no shortage of people who would secretly get some sort of sick satisfaction from it.
    LiamoSail wrote: »
    At some point you're going to have to accept the fact that people are horrified, with good reason, at the parents facilitating attempts by their kids to get away with murder.

    The parents done exactly what they signed up to do by becoming parents, supporting their child unconditionally. There is no "good reason" to be horrified at that.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hannibal_Smith


    Road-Hog wrote: »
    Very hard to argue otherwise. Is it possible to reform them through the prison / detention system.....?

    Is 👁 For 👁 and 🦷 for 🦷 not the way to go like 🇺🇸 ? It’s not an option in this state so not even worth debating.

    They should be deprived of their liberty for decades though. Don’t think they will have much to offer society ever when ever they do get out...!

    I think the American system is so harsh. But the problem with Ana's murder is, they haven't admitted what they did or explained it. They've left a situation with people guessing and Ana's family not entirely sure what happened to their daughter. So if there is no acceptance of what they did and no remorse then it seems to me like they're number 1 priority isn't dealing with the horror of what they did, its to protect themselves from a harsh punishment. And that doesn't seem right to me.

    If there's no acknowledgement on their part, how can they be rehabilitated? How do the professionals treat it? So if they're releast after 10/15/20 years, how do we know they won't do the same thing again? How can the process work?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hannibal_Smith


    Nope, there have been posts in this very thread saying their family's deserve being forced to move. There have been posts saying their family's should be shunned. There have been posts saying their parents should be punished by the state. Its not "bollox", it is there for everyone to read.


    IMHO, if a member of A or B's family went missing, there would be no shortage of people who would secretly get some sort of sick satisfaction from it.



    The parents done exactly what they signed up to do by becoming parents, supporting their child unconditionally. There is no "good reason" to be horrified at that.

    There is no requirement to support your child if they savagely kill some one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,042 ✭✭✭RoryMac


    mrjoneill wrote: »
    Yes indeed the pure savagery and calculating of it, led the girl to an abandoned house away from their own village to Lucan to put the blame there. I'm sure these thought the Gardai would be racing around Lucan looking for those responsible there when Ana's body was found. No doubt about is a lot of planning & scheming went into this. It was the last pinging from a mast in Lucan of Ana's phone switched the search there other than that her body may not have been found for weeks and there may be no forensics to be got. The fact there was so much protracted scheming went into it embeds their sheer evil. And these 2 are well aware of the enormity of their crime by their systematic denials and not one semblance of accepting the wrongdoing or empathy for Ana's family. I regard all the hugging and landholding in court as just a rouse at playacting innocence. While they were only 13 when the did the deed the nature of what they did defines them.

    I'm not sure about the stuff about the phone, Ana's dad saw she went with boy B and told the Guards that evening. Boy B told them he brought her to Catherine's park. The abandoned house where she died is at one of the entrances to Catherine's park.

    I'm surprised it wasn't one of the first places checked.

    None of that takes away from their crimes or guilt though


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    There is no requirement to support your child if they savagely kill some one.


    Should A & B's parents just have abandoned them so?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,042 ✭✭✭RoryMac


    Should A & B's parents just have abandoned them so?

    Boy A should have told Gardai everything, he had no defence and offered none in court. His parents should have ensured this


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,980 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    RoryMac wrote: »
    Boy A should have told Gardai everything, he had no defence and offered none in court. His parents should have ensured this

    Both of them should have disregarded legal advice?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    RoryMac wrote: »
    Boy A should have told Gardai everything, he had no defence and offered none in court. His parents should have ensured this


    If he didn't tell the guards anything then chances are he didnt tell his parents anything. It has been discussed ad infinitum now why there was no point pleading guilty.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hannibal_Smith


    Should A & B's parents just have abandoned them so?

    I am in no position to tell them what they should do. Only someone who had been in their position can make a call on it.

    But to use words like unconditional and doing their job as parents is a bit of a stretch. There is no obligation on a parent to stand by your children. If they take an innocent 16 year old girl to an abandoned house, beat the living out of her, sexually assault her and leave here there like she was worth nothing.

    Cynthia Owen came out and publicly denounced what her son did and said she wasn't standing by him. Boy A and Boy B couldn't even plead guilty and one father verbally abused the court.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hannibal_Smith


    tuxy wrote: »
    Both of them should have disregarded legal advice?

    Yes, they should have.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Cryptopagan


    I am in no position to tell them what they should do. Only someone who had been in their position can make a call on it.

    But to use words like unconditional and doing their job as parents is a bit of a stretch. There is no obligation on a parent to stand by your children. If they take an innocent 16 year old girl to an abandoned house, beat the living out of her, sexually assault her and leave here there like she was worth nothing.

    Cynthia Owen came out and publicly denounced what her son did and said she wasn't standing by him. Boy A and Boy B couldn't even plead guilty and one father verbally abused the court.

    Cynthia Owen’s son is an adult. Parents have responsibilities to their children while they remain children. As horrendous as what these boys have done is, we can’t judge parents for standing by their children. So one guy was upset at the judgement, probably believing his son is innocent, so what. They didn’t run off to Mexico to try evade justice. Stop being so bloody sanctimonious.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hannibal_Smith


    Cynthia Owen’s son is an adult. Parents have responsibilities to their children while they remain children. As horrendous as what these boys have done is, we can’t judge parents for standing by their children. They didn’t run off to Mexico to try evade justice. Stop being so bloody sanctimonious.

    Read the first line of my post again and then have a rethink about calling me sanctimonious


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement