Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread IX (Please read OP before posting)

15556586061330

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,719 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    The debate on BBC1 is @ 8pm tonight right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Mezcita


    Headshot wrote: »
    The debate on BBC1 is @ 8pm tonight right?

    Yep.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,270 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    Stand by!

    Boris Johnson 126
    Gove 41
    Hunt 46
    Javid 33
    Stewart 37

    Raab 30 out

    So as you were really. 2nd is a four horse race with Stewart coming up on the rail

    those 30 Raab votes will go to Johnson.

    Its been speculated that Johnson is loaning votes to ensure Stewart is out and ideally Hunt is in the last 2.

    I expect after the debate that Johnson will step this up and make sure its Boris v Hunt, he has the numbers sadly for that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,885 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    The pity is that Johnson will need to be discovered in bed with a live boy or a dead girl not to win this.

    Well given his, ahem, colourful personal history, who knows?:p I thought something might crop up to disqualify him in the post #metoo era, but apparently he isn't that sort of sleaze.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Mezcita


    Rjd2 wrote: »
    those 30 Raab votes will go to Johnson.

    Its been speculated that Johnson is loaning votes to ensure Stewart is out and ideally Hunt is in the last 2.

    I expect after the debate that Johnson will step this up and make sure its Boris v Hunt, he has the numbers sadly for that.

    That doesn't add up though. Hunt just got three more votes than in the first round. So if he was going to be loaned votes surely it more make more sense to give him more to be on the safe side.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    It’s wll over twitter and radio today that Johnson is having votes stacked for Hunt.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Tonight's debate is rather odd - questions from the public but not in the studio. It'll feel a bit dead unless the 5 left start to let rip properly (even if it's only in Latin)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,885 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Tonight's debate is rather odd - questions from the public but not in the studio. It'll feel a bit dead unless the 5 left start to let rip properly (even if it's only in Latin)

    I like that format, should cut down on the grandstanding and platitudes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Laois_Man


    Ken Clark ripping BoJo a new hole on Sky earlier! :D

    BoJo lending votes to Hunt doesn't make sense at this point - reducing his count and increasing Hunt's instead doesn't prevent anyone else from reaching 33. It will make sense in round 5 alright!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭A Shropshire Lad


    Theres no one within a donkeys roar of Johnson in the betting, currently hes 1/7.

    Interesting Rory is second favourite way out at 7/1


    I thought Johnson might be marmite to a lot of Conservatives but seemingly not


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Theres no one within a donkeys roar of Johnson in the betting, currently hes 1/7.
    Interesting Rory is second favourite way out at 7/1
    I thought Johnson might be marmite to a lot of Conservatives but seemingly not

    Yet this morning you said:
    I am laying Bojo at 1.17 just becuase there is always a possibility with him that he will say or do something to torpedo his campaign
    So 1.17 (lay bet) is as bad of an idea, as backing Hilary for POTUS 2020.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭A Shropshire Lad


    Yet this morning you said:

    So 1.17 (lay bet) is as bad of an idea, as backing Hilary for POTUS 2020.


    Do you know what a lay bet is ?


    It means to bet against.



    Yes I think its worth laying Johnson just because his price is so ridiculously low. It looks value, on the exchanges


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Do you know what a lay bet is ?
    It means to bet against.
    Yes I think its worth laying Johnson just because his price is so ridiculously low. It looks value, on the exchanges


    Correct, but going up (against) the clear favourite without any clear logic does not make any sense. Hoping for some 'wild-party-night-story' scandal to emmerge and de-track him within the next month is simply wishful thinking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,261 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    This debate is awful so far. Bickering between themselves. Maitlis is struggling to control them.

    They all completely ignored Rory Stewarts perfectly cromulent question

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭gooch2k9


    Johnson isn't allowing himself to be interrupted. This is worse than Sunday so far. A whole lot of non answers.

    Stewart has the tie off..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭nc6000


    Here we go again with talk of existing technology which solves the border issue. Why can't anyone ask them to explain what the technology is and how it will work?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭gooch2k9


    Javid sinking here over the backstop.

    Hunt and Javid prattling on vaguely about technology.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    They are ganging up on Rory.............a sure sign that they are scared of him?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭gooch2k9


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    They are ganging up on Rory.............a sure sign that they are scared of him?

    Maitlis is quite annoying, she won't let Stewart ask pertinent questions of the others.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,616 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Boris bringing up Gatt 24 as a solution to the Irish Border issue. Charlatan.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,819 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Boris is not impressive.....but neither are the rest... Bertie Ahern would do a job on these lads


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,591 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    'Comprehensive solution' says Michael Gove. What is it then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Rorys totally correct when he says none of them are answering the questions, either about delivering brexit or on the backstop. Its all fantasy and delusion. But i cant honestly see Rory answering it himself either, a border in the irish sea, as i think he is suggesting, isnt something i see working either. And the citizens assembly is a fair enough idea, but a group likely split 50-50 leavers and remainers isn't all that likely to bring things any farther along imho.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Listening to this on radio 4

    This is going to haunt each of them. Or would do in the normal real world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,591 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    'I went in to politics to help the very poorest in society'. Said with a straight face. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    Who would have thought that the Tories are so concerned about the poor. The sound like a bunch of Labour MPs at their annual conference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Gove is the one i like least of all these, and by some distance. Sure, Johnson is a man of no morals or convictions but i will at least say about him that's he's fairly transparent. Gove just looks so slick and managed, its just not possible to actually believe a word that comes out of his mouth. As education minister he ravaged schools sports facilities at a time they were bleating on about their olympic legacy, cant find any redeeming quality about him at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,356 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    Such delusion and willful ignorance on display from all of them apart from Rory Stewart who at least seems to recognise the ****-show that they've gotten themselves into. That shred of reality from him will rule him out of the running now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭gooch2k9


    Johnson isn't saying a whole lot, and he's not really being pushed either. He's being allowed talk when he wants, so is sure of what he wants to say.

    Can't say something wrong if you don't say anything!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,863 ✭✭✭54and56


    This debate is a shambles, very poorly organised. Emily isn't controlling and moderating very well at all.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement