Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Pastor Steven Anderson banned from Ireland

«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,295 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    Banned from the whole of Europe it seems. That doesn’t happen by chance


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    pjohnson wrote: »
    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/anti-gay-preacher-is-first-ever-banned-from-ireland-under-exclusion-powers-1.3889848?mode=amp

    Seems a proper decision given his track record. Cant imagine many will disagree so what do you think?

    Did he deserve the ban or not?

    He is banned cause he takes a literal interpretation of the Bible. What if it were another book?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,722 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Good news.
    I sat through one of his videos vile oul sh#te, glad we followed the rest of Europe in banning him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,763 ✭✭✭francois


    He is banned cause he takes a literal interpretation of the Bible. What if it were another book?

    Let the whataboutery commence!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    He is banned cause he takes a literal interpretation of the Bible. What if it were another book?


    zCdhGoA.jpg


    If he's a biblical literalist why is he wearing a polo shirt that is clearly some kind of heathen blend of fabrics???




    Unclean! UNCLEAN!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Strange the way they didn't ban the anti Gay preachers that were at Clonskeagh mosque.

    Ah sorry it's Islam, Micheal D Higgins was out there shaking their hands and saying how great they all were ... carry on.

    http://markhumphrys.com/clonskeagh.html#death


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,144 ✭✭✭✭Deja Boo


    *Waits until the secret life of Pastor Glass House, is publicly exposed.*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    It's complex
    On one hand I am glad he cannot come here to stir **** up.
    On the other, I don't like when the government big-brothers the citizenship


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    Deja Boo wrote: »
    *Waits until the secret life of Pastor Glass House, is publicly exposed.*

    Oh he is most definitely gay. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,144 ✭✭✭✭Deja Boo


    Oh he is most definitely gay. :pac:

    "The pastor lady doth protest too much, methinks." ;)

    .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,390 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    He is banned cause he takes a literal interpretation of the Bible. What if it were another book?

    Banned also I'd imagine


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭MrFresh


    He is banned cause he takes a literal interpretation of the Bible. What if it were another book?


    I'd hope that if someone took a literal interpretation of Harry Potter they'd be getting mental health treatment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Strange the way they didn't ban the anti Gay preachers that were at Clonskeagh mosque.

    Ah sorry it's Islam, Micheal D Higgins was out there shaking their hands and saying how great they all were ... carry on.

    http://markhumphrys.com/clonskeagh.html#death

    This, all day long, people multitudes more extreme than this man are regularly preaching and touring all over Europe yet are untouched.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,729 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    He is banned cause he takes a literal interpretation of the Bible. What if it were another book?

    The holocaust wasn't in the bible.
    biko wrote: »
    It's complex
    On one hand I am glad he cannot come here to stir **** up.
    On the other, I don't like when the government big-brothers the citizenship

    As you know yourself there's no such thing as an entitlement to free speech. This guy doesn't argue anything based on facts, so it's not like the government are 'protecting' us from some truth they don't want us to hear.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭MrFresh


    Danzy wrote: »
    This, all day long, people multitudes more extreme than this man are regularly preaching and touring all over Europe yet are untouched.


    When will the man with right wing views get his time to shine? When will the white heterosexual Christian man stand up to his oppressors?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 769 ✭✭✭tjhook


    My opinion has swung over and back on this one.

    TLDR: meh.

    I don't know much about the lad, but what I've read makes him sound somewhat unhinged.

    But I'm not comfortable with a minister deciding who can be heard, and that only "correct" opinions are allowed to be voiced. Surely stupid ideas should be open to ridicule. They shouldn't be feared.

    But... in this case, I suppose the minister isn't actually preventing speech. He's denying entry to the country for an "undesirable" person who isn't entitled to be here and will add no value. If anything, we should be more picky about who does and doesn't enter the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    MrFresh wrote: »
    When will the man with right wing views get his time to shine? When will the white heterosexual Christian man stand up to his oppressors?

    ?

    Did you hope to hear this man preach or something?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,729 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Strange the way they didn't ban the anti Gay preachers that were at Clonskeagh mosque.

    Ah sorry it's Islam, Micheal D Higgins was out there shaking their hands and saying how great they all were ... carry on.

    http://markhumphrys.com/clonskeagh.html#death
    Danzy wrote: »
    This, all day long, people multitudes more extreme than this man are regularly preaching and touring all over Europe yet are untouched.

    Nobody is stopping members of the Catholic church travelling.

    But is it convenient for you two to ignore his issue with Jews?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


      biko wrote: »
      It's complex
      On one hand I am glad he cannot come here to stir **** up.
      On the other, I don't like when the government big-brothers the citizenship

      incitement to hatred and promotion of violence. I've no problem with this.
      He is banned cause he takes a literal interpretation of the Bible. What if it were another book?

      The exact same thing. You wanted consistency? You've got consistency.

      Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



    1. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


      tjhook wrote: »
      My opinion has swung over and back on this one.

      TLDR: meh.

      I don't know much about the lad, but what I've read makes him sound somewhat unhinged.

      But I'm not comfortable with a minister deciding who can be heard, and that only "correct" opinions are allowed to be voiced. Surely stupid ideas should be open to ridicule. They shouldn't be feared.

      But... in this case, I suppose the minister isn't actually preventing speech. He's denying entry to the country for an "undesirable" person who isn't entitled to be here and will add no value. If anything, we should be more picky about who does and doesn't enter the country.

      He can still be heard. The very fact that we're discussing him proves this.

      Minister just not providing him with a platform, and he has no obligation to provide him with anything.

      Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



    2. Advertisement
    3. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭Bob Harris


      Where do I get a refund for two tickets?


    4. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


      If he were let in, he wouldn't get anywhere to preach. No hotel in the country would have him.

      Tbh think not being let in is a good idea, only recipe for trouble. See Love Ulster Parade.


    5. Closed Accounts Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭Berserker


      Nice bit of selective banning. Do not agree with his views but I do believe that he should have been subject to a ban either. Any idea where he was scheduled to speak in Dublin? Is there a Christian church in Dublin which supports such views?
      If he were let in, he wouldn't get anywhere to preach. No hotel in the country would have him.

      He was scheduled to speak on May 26th, so someone was willing to facilitate him.


    6. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,295 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


      Berserker wrote: »
      Nice bit of selective banning. Do not agree with his views but I do believe that he should have been subject to a ban either. Any idea where he was scheduled to speak in Dublin? Is there a Christian church in Dublin which supports such views?

      He was banned from the entire rest of Europe and Ireland was the only EU country he could get into before he was banned. I’d say there’s more to it


    7. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


      Hurrache wrote: »
      Nobody is stopping members of the Catholic church travelling.

      But is it convenient for you two to ignore his issue with Jews?

      I haven't listened to much of him, what are his views on Jews.

      His views on what I've heard are extreme so I presume he sounds like a Corbyn supporter on speed when it comes to Jews.

      I presume they are reprehensible.

      The point of him being challenged is fine, that countless others who will give sermons this Friday in Ireland, across Britain and Europe who have equal or more extreme views and often a history of backing that up are not.


    8. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,707 ✭✭✭valoren


      He must really hate being gay.


    9. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,729 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


      Berserker wrote: »
      Nice bit of selective banning.

      You want everyone banned instead?


    10. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,729 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


      Danzy wrote: »
      I haven't listened to much of him, what are his views on Jews.

      It's there on the web.


    11. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 769 ✭✭✭tjhook


      He can still be heard. The very fact that we're discussing him proves this.

      Minister just not providing him with a platform, and he has no obligation to provide him with anything.

      Definitely agree with the last bit, and would expand it to say that *this country* doesn't have any obligation to him. In the same way that if I want to spend a little time in Australia, they don't have any obligation to let me in either.

      That was my point really, that the minister isn't preventing speech, he's just being (a little) picky about who can enter the country. I think we should be selective about who we allow here.


    12. Advertisement
    13. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭El_Bee


      biko wrote: »
      It's complex
      On one hand I am glad he cannot come here to stir **** up.
      On the other, I don't like when the government big-brothers the citizenship


      very few countries actually have 100% free speech as a right, we have free speech as long as it doesn't breach public order, which can be stretched and moved to mean just about anything.


    Advertisement
    Advertisement