Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Book readers" - Season 8 Episode 3 "The Long Night" - Spoilers post 2 forward

11012141516

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,394 ✭✭✭PhiloCypher


    I fail to see how a mounted cavalry charge, of renowned open plain fighters, failed to have the smallest impact on the NK army. Fine they ran into a giant but it's one giant. Other than that they should have been mowing into them like the Rohirrim, through Orcs, in the charge to Minas Tirith.

    The NK army were shown to only be useful in a swarm, not like they had organised pike defences.

    If they were mounted armoured knights on war horses they might have faired better, but they are clearly based on steppe nomads/horse Archers like the Huns and Mongols who wore little to no armor and used smaller more agile horses to charge, fire a volley of arrows, and wheel away. They should never have been used for a frontal charge at an enemy whose lines you can't see and whose depth is unknown but likely significant. They could risk it against the Lannisters in 'Spoils of War' only because the Lannisters forces were stretched so thin. Against an army of the undead they might be able to penetrate 50-100 metres but they won't be able to burst out the other side to safety . If the horses weren't already knackered by the charge up to the enemy lines they would definitely lose their momentum once they hit it. Unable to burst through the mass of enemy and out the other side(any side) they'd soon get mired and pulled off their horses. A flaming Arakh can only do so much.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,245 ✭✭✭check_six


    If they were mounted armoured knights on war horses they might have faired better, but they are clearly based on steppe nomads/horse Archers like the Huns and Mongols who wore little to no armor and used smaller more agile horses to charge, fire a volley of arrows, and wheel away. They should never have been used for a frontal charge at an enemy whose lines you can't see and whose depth is unknown but likely significant. They could risk it against the Lannisters in 'Spoils of War' only because the Lannisters forces were stretched so thin. Against an army of the undead they might be able to penetrate 50-100 metres but they won't be able to burst out the other side to safety . If the horses weren't already knackered by the charge up to the enemy lines they would definitely lose their momentum once they hit it. Unable to burst through the mass of enemy and out the other side(any side) they'd soon get mired and pulled off their horses. A flaming Arakh can only do so much.

    Logically, they would have spent ages whittling away the edges of the army of the dead at range, followed by picking off smaller groups that chase them away from the main body with their arakhs. However, the show still has to get to the point where the Dothraki are worn down and mostly eliminated. I can see that they had to do this, but I'm not sure that the method they used was the best way to do it. My initial response to the scene was "Woah! That looks amazing!" followed a while after by "But it doesn't make any sense from a technical military history perspective...". Maybe most viewers were happy enough with the "Wow!" visuals without worrying about the technicalities.

    The rollercoaster of "we're doomed" to "this is working, we're gonna be okay", back to "we're doomed" again had to be traveled. It was just a bit too brief for my own tastes. I guess budget and time concerns ruled out the more "correct" version of their defeat.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    check_six wrote: »
    Logically, they would have spent ages whittling away the edges of the army of the dead at range, followed by picking off smaller groups that chase them away from the main body with their arakhs. However, the show still has to get to the point where the Dothraki are worn down and mostly eliminated. I can see that they had to do this, but I'm not sure that the method they used was the best way to do it. My initial response to the scene was "Woah! That looks amazing!" followed a while after by "But it doesn't make any sense from a technical military history perspective...". Maybe most viewers were happy enough with the "Wow!" visuals without worrying about the technicalities.

    The rollercoaster of "we're doomed" to "this is working, we're gonna be okay", back to "we're doomed" again had to be traveled. It was just a bit too brief for my own tastes. I guess budget and time concerns ruled out the more "correct" version of their defeat.

    Edges? More like a solid wall of dead bodies stretching for miles.

    They piled on top of each other to get over the flames and the castle walls, and if they reduced in number the NK just raises all the dead from the battlefield.

    In terms of a 'battle' it was never even winnable unless they killed the NK. Which is why Bran needed to lure him into a situation where he was vulnerable.

    I think that's acknowledged a few times in the episode, with the ice storm being summoned, the ice dragon sniping at the other two instead of directly engaging it and indeed the Night King raising the dead again to defend him against Jon Snow.

    The ONLY quibble if I have to be nitpicky is him surviving a head on blast of dragon fire - I think that was a bit silly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,245 ✭✭✭check_six


    Necro wrote: »
    Edges? More like a solid wall of dead bodies stretching for miles..
    Great point.
    Necro wrote: »
    if they reduced in number the NK just raises all the dead from the battlefield.
    Can't remember, but can the "dead" dead be raised again? I think some of them were crumbling after being hit by the dragonglass weapons.
    Necro wrote: »
    The ONLY quibble if I have to be nitpicky is him surviving a head on blast of dragon fire - I think that was a bit silly.
    Yeah, some kind of ice shield would have been appropriate here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 115 ✭✭NuttyMcNutty


    What happened yer woman's necklace that kept her alive?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,940 ✭✭✭Tazzimus


    Dropped it in the snow as she sauntered out to die.
    Power looked to be gone as the Ruby went dark.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,858 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    What happened yer woman's necklace that kept her alive?

    full-13.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭ckeng


    Necro wrote: »
    Edges? More like a solid wall of dead bodies stretching for miles.

    How big are we saying the NK's army is? 100,000? Bunched up that doesn't actually take up that much space. Croke Park takes 80,000 like


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 115 ✭✭NuttyMcNutty


    I bet if there was more porn in this episode it would probably get a pass.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    ckeng wrote:
    How big are we saying the NK's army is? 100,000? Bunched up that doesn't actually take up that much space. Croke Park takes 80,000 like

    That's the number some were saying earlier alright but given they had wiped all before them up until Winterfell I'd reckon much bigger. Wouldn't put a figure on it though.

    After all the dragons when they did get involved scorched huge parts of them and yet they just kept coming, piling over the fire and then creating huge pile ons to scale the walls in multiple locations.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    Necro wrote: »
    The ONLY quibble if I have to be nitpicky is him surviving a head on blast of dragon fire - I think that was a bit silly.
    A White Walker walked through fire at Hardhome. The NK is a lot stronger and colder so I'm ok with that scene.

    Skip to 1.10



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,950 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Where the knights of the Vale there ?

    Also I bet Daario Naharis turns up with the gold company to cause mayhem for Cersei


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    Where the knights of the Vale there ?

    Also I bet Daario Naharis turns up with the gold company to cause mayhem for Cersei
    Lord Royce was seen talking to Sansa in the first two episodes but I didn't see the knights of the vale on the battlefield. Did they go home? If they didn't they would've been part of the cavalry with the dothraki.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    leggo wrote:
    People wanted more deaths, less darkness, the NK to win or someone else to kill him, more answers to the mythology, and so on...read that list. Is that a criticism of what actually happened or being angry that what YOU wanted to happen didn't? Read it again. It's the latter. None of us have any right to make those decisions!

    Not me. I just want it to make sense regardless of what I would prefer to happen. I didn't want Robb and Cat to die but it was fantastic writing and I had no problem accepting it eventually.

    I enjoyed MrBTongue's review (https://www.shamusyoung.com/twentysidedtale/?p=46782) and I liked his point about a major theme of GOT (the books) being that all sides have to put their petty differences aside to beat the major evil, the Wights. Now in the show we see Cersei was absolutely right not to put her differences aside. This joining together malarkey is not the way to go.

    Another thing I see a lot of folks saying is that Arya was perfect to kill the NK because she was a trained Assassin. Well this is where the poor writing comes home to roost. All I remember is Arya getting the sh1t kicked out of her regularly in staff fights and then getting gutted while wandering around in the open knowing she was marked for death. I saw her assassinate people after that but I never saw her actually training to assassinate people in any convincing manner.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    mewso wrote: »

    Another thing I see a lot of folks saying is that Arya was perfect to kill the NK because she was a trained Assassin. Well this is where the poor writing comes home to roost. All I remember is Arya getting the sh1t kicked out of her regularly in staff fights and then getting gutted while wandering around in the open knowing she was marked for death. I saw her assassinate people after that but I never saw her actually training to assassinate people in any convincing manner.

    Which she overcame when she killed the waif in total darkness.

    Before coming back to Westeros and feeding Walder Frey his own sons before murdering him.

    And then making it back to Winterfell to - alongside Sansa - outwit Littlefinger and stick him with the pointy end.

    I'd say she's the most qualified assassin the show has ever seen.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    Necro wrote: »
    Which she overcame when she killed the waif in total darkness.

    Before coming back to Westeros and feeding Walder Frey his own sons before murdering him.

    And then making it back to Winterfell to - alongside Sansa - outwit Littlefinger and stick him with the pointy end.

    I'd say she's the most qualified assassin the show has ever seen.

    Yep. See the bit where I said she killed people after months of getting hit by a staff. I know she is supposed to be a master assassin but I didn't see it. Only the result.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭Harambe


    Paddy Cow wrote: »
    Lord Royce was seen talking to Sansa in the first two episodes but I didn't see the knights of the vale on the battlefield. Did they go home? If they didn't they would've been part of the cavalry with the dothraki.

    I saw the knights of the vale during the battle, you'll notice the shields with the House Arryn sigil (bird and a crescent moon), I believe they were standing behind Brienne at one stage. Did not see Lord Royce though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    mewso wrote: »
    Yep. See the bit where I said she killed people after months of getting hit by a staff. I know she is supposed to be a master assassin but I didn't see it. Only the result.
    She made her first kill in KL. She killed a stable boy with needle. She also made a bunch of kills when on her journey with the hound. She was a killer long before she started her training with the Faceless men.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    mewso wrote: »
    Yep. See the bit where I said she killed people after months of getting hit by a staff. I know she is supposed to be a master assassin but I didn't see it. Only the result.

    Well that's not correct either, she mutilated and murdered Meryn Trant and as a result lost her sight. That was pretty much after her training with the Faceless Men had finished.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    Harambe wrote: »
    I saw the knights of the vale during the battle, you'll notice the shields with the House Arryn sigil (bird and a crescent moon), I believe they were standing behind Brienne at one stage. Did not see Lord Royce though.

    Yeah Brienne was commanding the left wing which was composed of the knights of the Vale (on foot) with Pod and Jamie as her lieutenants.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭ckeng


    Necro wrote: »
    That's the number some were saying earlier alright but given they had wiped all before them up until Winterfell I'd reckon much bigger. Wouldn't put a figure on it though.

    After all the dragons when they did get involved scorched huge parts of them and yet they just kept coming, piling over the fire and then creating huge pile ons to scale the walls in multiple locations.

    Point is, even if the army was twice that size, with the way wights seem to operate it can't be both solid and miles wide.
    jonsnow wrote: »
    Yeah Brienne was commanding the left wing which was composed of the knights of the Vale (on foot) with Pod and Jamie as her lieutenants.

    This makes it worse for me. They had heavy cavalry which they used as foot troops and light cavalry which they used as heavy cavalry.

    mewso wrote: »
    Not me. I just want it to make sense regardless of what I would prefer to happen. I didn't want Robb and Cat to die but it was fantastic writing and I had no problem accepting it eventually.

    Same as. I'm not emotionally invested in anyone living or dying. I just think if you want them all alive at the end then you shouldn't keep putting them in certain death situations. Obviously I find tactics and strategy interesting so I found the lack of effort there a bit disappointing also, but Battle of the Bastards was no better so it wasn't that much of a let down.

    Other than that though, I didn't have a problem with the episode. If the darkness thing was a technical problem with the stream then fair enough, complaints are justified. Seemed fine on my tv. Arya killing the Night King - well John and Theon both tried the heroic warrior route and failed miserably. Dany threw a whole dragon at him and just about got him to crack a smile. Obviously the frontal assaults weren't going to work so why not give the resident assassin a shot?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    Overall I was disappointed with the episode. It was hyped as the greatest battle ever committed to film and it wasn't that. Say what you want about GOTS plotting and consistency in the last few seasons but it has always held up on the spectacle front - up until now. That's not to say that it was a bad episode or anything like that - it was still an astounding and breathtaking feat of filmmaking. But it wasn't up to the battle scenes of earlier seasons. It wasn't as good as BOB, the loot train, Hardhome or even the battle of the wall. It probably slightly edged out Blackwater. And 5th place for the culminating battle of your own 8 season show just doesn't cut it.

    I think that they probably shot for the moon and missed. Fighting a battle in an ice storm at night against CGI zombies probably just pushed the envelope a bit too far vis a vis current technology. It was murky and confusing to watch. They had the best fight scene director currently operating in the world on the job so I think if he couldn't get it done then no-one could.

    I think that D+D have achieved an amazing show over the years. There has never been a tv show of this scale and ambition before and never may be again. I remember Michael Imperoli in an interview years ago saying that the worst film you ever saw was made by talented people trying really hard to make art or at least something entertaining. The fact that it was so bad just shows you how astoundingly hard it is to make good films or tv shows. GOT isn't in the top tier of the top quality shows like the sopranos, the wire, madmen, breaking bad but it many ways its in a league of its own. Its first 3 seasons might have been but for budget constraints but as the budget increased the writing got sloppier and sloppier. It became a totally different show and worth watching for totally different reasons.

    I remember seeing an article years ago which set out the shooting schedule that GOT had to do each year and it was so brutal. Whole swathes of the GOT production team have had very circumscribed lives for years on end at this stage D and D especially.

    Taking all that into consideration it is clear that what they enjoyed is the political game of thrones - the show is not called a song of ice and fire. This was obvious when Dan said in the Inside the Episode something like "the valryian dagger killed the NK . i dont know why - youll have to figure that out for yourselves". That showing a pretty serious level of disengagement from your own canon.

    I think for all the lip service towards this being the real war that mattered the one they really cared for was who sits the Iron Throne. As others have pointed out everyone who sat out the Battle for the dawn is doing much better at no cost whatsoever - pretty bad climate change analogy!!. To my mind D and D were always a bit too in love with the cynical winner takes all view of politics and war. In the books we are seeing this short term lannister approach lead their house to creating legions of bitter enemies who will inevitably take their revenge. Neds approach didnt play well in kings Landing - but his bannermen are rallying to his childrens cause out of love for him and his decency. In the tv show the only loyal bannermen are the lannister lords!!. Because D and D dont value soft power only badasses. We kept being told sansa and tyrion are strategic geniuses but tvsansa has never displayed any skills (deploying the vale army which LF arranged for her is so obvious it doesn't count) and tvtyrion has achieved nothing of note since the Blackwater. Booktyrion launched a spoiler invasion of westeros using a game of cyravesse.

    The Good

    That extra guy with the beard who fought for stannis and then the starks getting reanimated

    Arya killing the NK was a cool scene even if it made no thematic sense and was all about the writers rewarding one of their favourite characters and actors and pulling off another twist.

    The unsullied scenes were epic. By far the best army on the series. Great to see Grey Worm actually be a general for once and make tactical calls instead of just another foot soldier. The US actually used a retreating formation which was cool.

    Some epic shots of the dragons strafing or getting above the cloud cover.

    I thought that the ironborns last stand was actually well shot and choreographed.

    Arya unleashed against the wights before she took the headshot was cool - as was Davos just staring agog

    Some of Jons scenes once he got into the keep with the tracking shot was cool. I also loved that he ignored sam as he had to be ruthless and get back to the godswood.

    Sam getting Dolrous Edd killed

    Drogon getting swamped by undead

    OKish

    In this battle I can live with the idiotic Dothraki charge because I understand the budget constraints that plains cavalry deployed against a cgi army would entail - and the lights winking out

    Arya library scene - except were these the braintrust wights - how were the so much quieter and smarter than any we have seen before?

    Jorahs/Theons death scenes

    Lyanna Mormonts last charge was kinda narmish but also kinda fun

    Likewise Berics death

    Bad

    Tactics 101 - Catapults behind infantry. Fire more than one salvo. 25 year old strategy games AI know this!!.

    We have seen the effectiveness of unsullied Lannister and Bolton infantry in Pike and shield formations. Why was the rest of the army just in general melee formation.

    Some boiling pitch and rocks for the wall. Like we saw in season 2 Blackwater. Maybe fire more arrows when the dead are stationary in front of the fire trench instead of just staring at them. I thought some of the stuff on the parapets looked like dragonglass scythes!!. Nope. Lay out some dragonglass spikes and caltops and pour buckets of them and the liquid dragon glass on the dead. Nope.

    Brans storyline has been as useless as his legs. He got the three eyed raven killed and then pretty much did nothing else except stir up potential conflict on the eve of battle.

    The nightking storyline is to quote the hound "a smoking pile of rubble". Whats the NKs motivation, why did he stir now, why the symbols, whats going on with the babies - who cares!!!

    The show has settled on traditional unstoppable badasses such as Jamie, Brienne, Tormund, Jon, davos? and sam?. They are essentially indestructible on the battlefield. Why did Jamie and Brienne ever surrender to Locke and his outriders. They could have slaughtered them all in minutes. They have full-on reached Aragon levels of superhuman ability.

    Im hopeful that once they get back to kings landing and the machinations against cersei the show will have one more decent battle set piece (i think arya will overplay her hand and get killed by the mountain which will set off the hound and clegane bowl.) In reality 2 dragons (and the rest of the vale armies and dorne and maybe even the tullys - but i think DD have forgotten about them) should curbstomp 20k mercenaries but they will probably put their thumbs on the scales one last time before she gets her comeuppance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    ckeng wrote: »
    Point is, even if the army was twice that size, with the way wights seem to operate it can't be both solid and miles wide.



    This makes it worse for me. They had heavy cavalry which they used as foot troops and light cavalry which they used as heavy cavalry.




    Yep


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    ckeng wrote: »
    Point is, even if the army was twice that size, with the way wights seem to operate it can't be both solid and miles wide.

    I don't understand your point? There are no 'flanks' to attack per se, they move in a large mass as is evident from when they were standing in front of the flames. Are you suggesting the Dothraki try to swing around the sides - because the mass would just shift fairly quickly and overwhelm them like they did with the main forces.

    And it's not width, it's depth I'm referring to. To attempt to flank them would mean travelling a huge distance, at speed on horseback. The horses would be shattered by the time they reached the rear and the mass would simply turn and hit them hard regardless.

    Anyways the Dothraki aren't exactly trained cavalry. Someone compared them to the Mongols/Huns and that's more appropriate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭fash


    Necro wrote: »
    I don't understand your point? There are no 'flanks' to attack per se, they move in a large mass as is evident from when they were standing in front of the flames. Are you suggesting the Dothraki try to swing around the sides - because the mass would just shift fairly quickly and overwhelm them like they did with the main forces.

    And it's not width, it's depth I'm referring to. To attempt to flank them would mean travelling a huge distance, at speed on horseback. The horses would be shattered by the time they reached the rear and the mass would simply turn and hit them hard regardless.

    Anyways the Dothraki aren't exactly trained cavalry. Someone compared them to the Mongols/Huns and that's more appropriate.
    Not that far for a horse- I read a good analysis of correct tactics online suggesting that they would have been used for reconnaissance and repeated harrying (with bows and dragon glass arrows) over several days followed by harrying from the rear and sides - just far back enough that the numbers aren't too thick and you scythe right through then scythe right back again and again.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    fash wrote: »
    Not that far for a horse- I read a good analysis of correct tactics online suggesting that they would have been used for reconnaissance and repeated harrying (with bows and dragon glass arrows) over several days followed by harrying from the rear and sides - just far back enough that the numbers aren't too thick and you scythe right through then scythe right back again and again.

    These are war horses though, bred for battle not reconnaissance


  • Posts: 8,385 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Necro wrote: »
    These are war horses though, bred for battle not reconnaissance

    Was it you saying that they were strafing horses,, earlier, and not warhorses?


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Was it you saying that they were strafing horses,, earlier, and not warhorses?

    Nope, made no such claims. You've got the wrong guy :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    Necro wrote: »

    Anyways the Dothraki aren't exactly trained cavalry. Someone compared them to the Mongols/Huns and that's more appropriate.

    The mongols were the best trained cavalry in the history of the world.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    fash wrote: »
    Not that far for a horse- I read a good analysis of correct tactics online suggesting that they would have been used for reconnaissance and repeated harrying (with bows and dragon glass arrows) over several days followed by harrying from the rear and sides - just far back enough that the numbers aren't too thick and you scythe right through then scythe right back again and again.

    Weve seen jon snow on one horse escape from the entire army of the dead. The dothraki would have remounts. Which granted you never see in movies and is rarely even mentioned in fantasy novels


Advertisement