Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Avengers: Endgame [** SPOILERS FROM POST 613 **]

1313234363760

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Tazzimus


    Seen it last night, ho Lee chit.
    Great end to the saga and very well done, couldn't help but smile when Mjolnir flew back into caps hand.

    Regarding power levels, Thor was massively out of shape and depressed, likely ****ing around with his power level.

    For Mjolnir and Stormbreaker, the weapons themselves aren't as powerful as people seem to think, they're a focal point for Thor's power, plus the enchantment on Mjolnir giving whoever is worthy his power as well.


    Captain Marvel is also supposed to be overpowered, she's basically Marvel's Superman.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭Uncharted


    Tazzimus wrote: »

    Regarding power levels, Thor was massively out of shape and depressed, likely ****ing around with his power level.

    So,ancient gods,who have lived for millenia,are at a massive loss of power,because they gain 4or5 stone weight? Nah. No chance.

    It was a lazy plot device to install Iron man front and centre as the saviour. (Which was inevitable,I don't know anyone who didn't already know the outcome for Stark prior to seeing AE).

    As an aside,the "sad,meloncolic,fat " Thor schtick was also waay overdone imo. It was humorous for 5minutes,but was tiresome after that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,868 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Thor is the power not his weapons. Odin told him Mjolnir was only a supplement Thor could go hand to hand with Hela/her army without any weapon and still use his lightning.

    Stormbreaker is stronger than Mjolnir and can channel the Bifrost but again it is Thor himself that provides the vast majority of the power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,868 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Uncharted wrote: »
    So,ancient gods,who have lived for millenia,are at a massive loss of power,because they gain 4or5 stone weight? Nah. No chance.

    Thor himself may have been around for millenia but he himself for almost all of that time had absolutely no idea he could even channel lighting without Mjolnir. Thor in reality was nowhere near that experienced with regards controlling his own natural power levels. He spent most of his time over-relying on Mjolnir.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    I saw it last night and while I don't want to oversell what is still ostensibly a silly superhero film, I kinda want to as well.

    I don't see that many films in the cinema. It's pretty much just blockbusters.
    With that caveat, it was probably the most riveting, thrilling and enjoyable film I've ever seen at the cinema.

    Nobody's getting oscars for this, because that's just the nature of the beast, but I thought by any standards, the performances were brilliant. To a large extent you don't really get the emotional payoff in Infinity War, because it's just happened. It's this film where I think that is all payed off. In the back of your mind you know everything is going to be "fine", but seeing the characters live through their new reality was really compelling, and Scarlett Johansson, Chris Evans, Jeremy Renner and RDJ really sold it fantastically. Their performances as straight characters were brilliant.

    Josh Brolin was brilliant as well, and not only did he (and the CGI team), seamlessly fit a giant purple man into a live action film, but he managed to do it in a way that seemed subtly distinct from the one we saw last time.

    Hemsworth was a little different, but no less brilliant in my eyes. Thinking about it, I'd love to see him play a surfing champion who loses a leg or something when he's in the prime of his life, and the film is a dark comedy about him coming to terms with that, and his fight with his aimless hopelessness and struggles with alcoholism and substance abuse. He was funny, but I thought his performance brought a vulnerability that elevated it well above just silliness for silliness's sake.

    In general, I think the film was better acted, better shot, better written, funnier, more emotionally striking and more thrilling than Infinity War, and I really liked Infinity War.

    I don't think you can give films an objective relative score on the same criteria, but for what this film was trying to achieve, and on a technical and artistic basis, it was essentially perfect in my eyes. I eyerolled a bit at the girl power scene, but I think that was literally the only foible and I didn't actually mind it that much.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,690 ✭✭✭Mokuba


    And any comment on how convenient it was that the only two characters who loved each other ended up going to Vormir? What if any other two characters had gone. Was it just chance? A 45/1 chance by the way.

    And it was 'good Nebula' who knowingly sentenced one of them to death. Maybe she observed that they loved each other and recommended they go together. In Infinity War she says:
    "Gamora... He took her to Vormir, he came back with the Soul Stone, she didn't"

    She displays an understanding that something would have had to take place for him to get it and says nothing to anyone. Because when Clint and Nat rock up, the last thing they are expecting is this little twist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭Uncharted


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Thor himself may have been around for millenia but he himself for almost all of that time had absolutely no idea he could even channel lighting without Mjolnir. Thor in reality was nowhere near that experienced with regards controlling his own natural power levels. He spent most of his time over-relying on Mjolnir.

    That's not really my point though. Regardless of what Thor "knew" about his powers, they still existed within him.

    My point is that this movie set him up as a secondary character,(obviously to put Stark in the limelight for his swansong) predominately due to his obesity,and booze issue.

    A beer belly and a foggy beer brain turned Thor into a far far lesser superhero???

    I mean,is that not just lame??

    Anyway,I'm not here to take away from anyone else's enjoyment of the movie. I enjoyed it myself but it just seemed ever so slightly ham fisted with some plot devices.

    Each to their own.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 103 ✭✭Ferajacka


    In the thanos power versus Thor debate - Thanos is a Hardy b*stard and was in his prime coming from the past. Thor is out of shape and messed up. Also if Thor was at his best he still would not beat Thanos on his own he came close IW with help.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,690 ✭✭✭Mokuba


    Ferajacka wrote: »
    In the thanos power versus Thor debate - Thanos is a Hardy b*stard and was in his prime coming from the past. Thor is out of shape and messed up. Also if Thor was at his best he still would not beat Thanos on his own he came close IW with help.


    He had no gauntlet vs two superpowered weapons. And Cap. And Tony who was able to draw blood from a Thanos with almost full gauntlet.

    Nothing you can say about weight changes that. They messed with the power scales that they had established in the last movie for dramatic effect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,071 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Tazzimus wrote:
    Captain Marvel is also supposed to be overpowered, she's basically Marvel's Superman.


    See, that's where things go wrong. She's been overpowered in the films and other characters have been underpowered (Thor and Hulk mainly). She's never been anywhere near equivalent of Superman's power levels in the comics, whereas Thor has.

    There's a huge amount of power scaling in the MCU vs the comics and even between MCU films.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,303 ✭✭✭✭klose


    When cap grabs mjolnir was the first time I went oh sh!t in a cinema and plenty around me did too, brilliant scene.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Tazzimus


    Mokuba wrote: »
    He had no gauntlet vs two superpowered weapons. And Cap. And Tony who was able to draw blood from a Thanos with almost full gauntlet.

    Nothing you can say about weight changes that. They messed with the power scales that they had established in the last movie for dramatic effect.

    Tony drew blood from a Thanos that was pulling his punches as he didn't want to kill them, he didn't feel he needed to.

    The weapons themselves aren't super powered per say, more they're a way to focus the power of Thor through them.

    Thanos beat the piss out of the Hulk without using any of the stones, the dude is very powerful on his own.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,690 ✭✭✭Mokuba


    And out of nowhere it's Scarlet Witch who is the strongest Avenger as she is on the verge of killing Thanos before he calls down the fire to save himself.

    Which I would see as reasonable only:

    Tony + Thor + Steve lost to him minutes before.

    Not saying she wasn't established as powerful previously, but she struggles against two of his order in the last movie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    Mokuba wrote: »
    And out of nowhere it's Scarlet Witch who is the strongest Avenger as she is on the verge of killing Thanos before he calls down the fire to save himself.

    Which I would see as reasonable only:

    Tony + Thor + Steve lost to him minutes before.

    Not saying she wasn't established as powerful previously, but she struggles against two of his order in the last movie.

    She's a glass cannon.

    She can level a city but unlike Thor or Hulk, single bullet to the head would put her down.

    She was simultaneously killing Vision while holding off Thanos with 5/6 stones in the last film.

    Her issue (as was part of the plot in Civil War), was that she's too powerful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,868 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Wanda is probably underpowered in the MCU tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,503 ✭✭✭brianregan09


    Nebula did not know about the sacrifice on Vormir , she just knew Thanos killed Gamora somewhere between there and Titan

    Also Clint and Natasha were the closest so obviously they would have went together same way Tony and Cap went together and Rocket and Thor , Rhodey and Nebula drew the short straws


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Tazzimus


    Mokuba wrote: »
    And out of nowhere it's Scarlet Witch who is the strongest Avenger as she is on the verge of killing Thanos before he calls down the fire to save himself.

    Which I would see as reasonable only:

    Tony + Thor + Steve lost to him minutes before.

    Not saying she wasn't established as powerful previously, but she struggles against two of his order in the last movie.

    She held off five stones Thanos with one hand in IW, she's massively powerful.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,690 ✭✭✭Mokuba


    Nebula did not know about the sacrifice on Vormir , she just knew Thanos killed Gamora somewhere between there and Titan

    Also Clint and Natasha were the closest so obviously they would have went together same way Tony and Cap went together and Rocket and Thor , Rhodey and Nebula drew the short straws


    No way did she not know about that. Watch Infinity War again and she displays a clear understanding that something had to go down there for him to get the stone. No way did she have no idea.


    https://youtu.be/xZbOn3q_9Co?t=119


    I'll say still convenient for them to end up together and convenient for them to end up on Vormir also. They could have gone to 2 out of the 3 other locations. It happened that they were the only two people who could have gotten the soul stone, yet had no idea of this. Very fortunate unless Nebula pushed them to go there together in which case she is far from good.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,690 ✭✭✭Mokuba


    Tazzimus wrote: »
    She held off five stones Thanos with one hand in IW, she's massively powerful.


    Fine, but Thor almost killed Thanos with full gauntlet and got kicked around with two superpowered weapons + Cap + Tony vs no gauntlet. You can't have it every way. Massive power variance whatever lengths people will go to justify it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    Mokuba wrote: »
    Fine, but Thor almost killed Thanos with full gauntlet and got kicked around with two superpowered weapons + Cap + Tony vs no gauntlet. You can't have it every way. Massive power variance whatever lengths people will go to justify it.

    He sucker punched him when his guard was down.

    Thanos already kicked Thor around the place at the start of IW, so it's hardly that surprising.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,690 ✭✭✭Mokuba


    Gbear wrote: »
    He sucker punched him when his guard was down.

    Thanos already kicked Thor around the place at the start of IW, so it's hardly that surprising.


    When his guard was down. Just fought Hela, saved his people, lost his planet. Ambushed in space. Ship being attacked. All of Thanos' order there. Seeing as the bulk of that fight happened offscreen not really fair to point to anything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,868 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Gbear wrote: »
    He sucker punched him when his guard was down.

    Thanos already kicked Thor around the place at the start of IW, so it's hardly that surprising.

    Thor was also fully charged and ready for War when he arrived with Tree and Rabbit to Wakanda. Endgame......yeah not really.



    But I think this is destined to go for multiple pages at this point Mokuba has decided so canon/power sets/actual scenarios/reasons be damned.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,690 ✭✭✭Mokuba


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Thor was also fully charged and ready for War when he arrived with Tree and Rabbit to Wakanda. Endgame......yeah not really.



    But I think this is destined to go for multiple pages at this point Mokuba has decided so canon/power sets/actual scenarios/reasons be damned.


    Just had one of the most powerful interactions of his life with his mother - I'd say he was plenty motivated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Tazzimus


    Mokuba wrote: »
    Fine, but Thor almost killed Thanos with full gauntlet and got kicked around with two superpowered weapons + Cap + Tony vs no gauntlet. You can't have it every way. Massive power variance whatever lengths people will go to justify it.

    Stormbreaker had enchantments built in to counter the infinity gauntlet and he caught Thanos off guard.
    Thanos is easily as strong as Thor, if not stronger, and much stronger than a peak physical human like Cap or human in a metal suit like Tony.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,227 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Mokuba wrote: »
    And any comment on how convenient it was that the only two characters who loved each other ended up going to Vormir? What if any other two characters had gone. Was it just chance? A 45/1 chance by the way.
    .

    Plenty of comment if you read the thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,690 ✭✭✭Mokuba


    Plenty of comment if you read the thread.


    Yes, plenty of comment pointing out the same thing that I did with no decent response.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    You don't think iron man and cap love each other?

    You don't think a bond of love exists between most of the team?

    You don't think it's more likely BW and Barton are more likely to team up because they have been a unit before?

    Its a plot device for sure but it's not as far fetched as all that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    On a minor point, I didn't get Thor giving the keys of Asgard to Valkyrie, and telling her she was a leader. The first time we saw her she was like alcoThor, doing a bit of bounty hunting between binges, to cope with a life-shattering defeat. Since then she stepped up but until the big battle she seemed to be just fishing and farming with the rest of them in Scotland.

    Or I'm just still confused about how one of the Valkyries got to be called Valkyrie. Were they all called Valkyrie or has she the name as a nickname only?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,690 ✭✭✭Mokuba


    Pter wrote: »
    You don't think iron man and cap love each other?

    You don't think a bond of love exists between most of the team?

    You don't think it's more likely BW and Barton are more likely to team up because they have been a unit before?

    Its a plot device for sure but it's not as far fetched as all that.

    Nat and Clint had a relationship spanning years before the events of the original Avengers. They even refer to Budapest again in this movie. They are the most obvious candidates for sharing a love for each other.

    I think there were very few combinations that would have been successful.

    I think it is convenient that those two people ended up on that planet. Yes it is a plot device and it is a poor one which is what I am getting at. Quite a few things in this movie are poor plot devices.

    I wonder again why Nebula said nothing about something she had a fair idea about. One of 2 characters that we know of that know about Vormir in the whole universe. The way she reacts here - https://youtu.be/xZbOn3q_9Co?t=119. It's quite clear to me at least that she knows whats up.

    I could go on and talk about alternate realities and how they don't make sense with the Captain America scene at the end. Or how they doomed many other realities in order to get their desired outcome (ethics?). Why even bother putting the stones back if there were alternate realities.

    I wanted to love this movie but I just can't ignore the various holes and missteps. I'm just pointing out a few inconsistencies that nobody has given any adequate answer for yet. Maybe we should rename the thread "Avengers: Endgame [Positivity Only]"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,269 ✭✭✭paulbok


    On a minor point, I didn't get Thor giving the keys of Asgard to Valkyrie, and telling her she was a leader. The first time we saw her she was like alcoThor, doing a bit of bounty hunting between binges, to cope with a life-shattering defeat. Since then she stepped up but until the big battle she seemed to be just fishing and farming with the rest of them in Scotland.

    Or I'm just still confused about how one of the Valkyries got to be called Valkyrie. Were they all called Valkyrie or has she the name as a nickname only?

    I'd say it's just a plot device so Thor doesn't have to stay on in New Asgard and go off on a gap year for GotG 3


Advertisement