Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

"Book readers" - Season 8 Episode 1 "Winterfell"

1246

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,094 ✭✭✭juneg


    She's always drinking. Maybe it's just in front of Euron so that he wouldn't notice any difference in her and think it's not his baby.

    In medieval times fresh water was neither widely available nor clean enough to drink so people mainly drank ale or wine which was brewed/fermented


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,490 ✭✭✭Fluorescence


    bur wrote: »
    if we ever get there, the thought of having all these characters in one place having real full conversations gets me giddy.

    if we ever get there...

    I don't see it ever happening. George might release Winds of Winter before he dies but he's made too much of a mess for himself. We'll only ever dream of A Dream of Spring...

    I thoroughly loved books 1-3. Read AFFC shortly after it came out and found it a struggle. ADWD was good, but again all these plotlines and people made it difficult enough to follow. GRRM shot himself in the foot by trying to follow so many people that setting up for endgame was almost impossible. It's no wonder he's been fighting with the book for 8 years and no sign of it ever being released.

    You'd love to have him and Pat Rothfuss swap manuscripts and maybe they might finish each others :pac:


  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Shur in the show King Stannis is dead, that's never going to happen if he's going to kill the Night King, the Mountain and Euron in successive single combat bouts like I assume he will in the book.

    They ruined Stannis for me. Easily one of the best characters in the book. An absolute tactical master when it comes to battle, who withstood the siege of Storm's End for a year. What does he do in the show? Marches on Winterfell. In the snow. On foot. And camps out in the open. Really?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭leggo


    They ruined Stannis for me. Easily one of the best characters in the book. An absolute tactical master when it comes to battle, who withstood the siege of Storm's End for a year. What does he do in the show? Marches on Winterfell. In the snow. On foot. And camps out in the open. Really?

    I didn’t hate that. It wasn’t an act of stupidity, as soon as Melisandre abandoned him he knew it was a lost cause, he’d just come too far and lost too much to turn back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,945 ✭✭✭Tazzimus


    They ruined Stannis for me. Easily one of the best characters in the book. An absolute tactical master when it comes to battle, who withstood the siege of Storm's End for a year. What does he do in the show? Marches on Winterfell. In the snow. On foot. And camps out in the open. Really?
    He did the same in the book, he's camped at some town last we seen him I think, getting ready to move again.
    Most horses dead, food ran out, people fed up etc.
    Also, he had the mountain clans of the North with him in the books, no sign of them in the show.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,205 ✭✭✭Fian



    In the books as it stand, Jon is dead, Dany is lost in the Dothraki Sea, Mereen is blockaded, Bran's in a cave, Arya's blind, Sansa's in the Vale waiting to get married, Stannis is snowed in, Cersie is about to go on trial in front of the Faith Militant and Jaime has run off with Brienne on some Lady Stoneheart caper. Not to mention that Loris is "dead", but the might of Highgarden still exists as a threat, Doran Martell is up to some sh*t, Euron is up to some sh*t and the whole Young Griff story has to play out. There's a whole lot of story between there and the finale. For me anything in the show post season four is fan fiction up until the end which I assume with be close enough to what Martin intended. It may be the only ending we ever get.

    I still like the show and enjoyed the new episode. People complain about not enough being made of Jon's dragon riding, but at this stage we're just trying to get to the end. A few pages of lineage and dragon riding lore are nice in a book, but to explain it in the show would involve Tyrion/Sam/Bran just reeling off exposition.

    On Bran in the courtyard, I'd have wheeled him out and left him there too, he's such a bummer.

    Really brings home how much story is left to write to try to bring it all together. More than 2 more books tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,715 ✭✭✭The White Wolf



    Surely somebody recognises him as an exiled man? Lyanna Mormont is such a great character, acted superbly, that a scene of her tearing strips off him would be great.

    They haven't developed Lyanna all that well for me. I'd like to see her interact with the characters outside of the great Hall and not just to be snarky. The actress seems decent enough so I'm sure she could cope with something more meaningful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Trent Houseboat


    Tazzimus wrote: »
    He did the same in the book, he's camped at some town last we seen him I think, getting ready to move again.
    Most horses dead, food ran out, people fed up etc.
    Also, he had the mountain clans of the North with him in the books, no sign of them in the show.

    Stannis was trying to rally the north, he'd toured the mountain clans and liberated Deepwood Motte from Yara. He was following Jon's advice and the blizzard even seemed to catch the grey haired mountain clansmen and Umbers unawares. So I don't think he can be blamed for getting caught in it. I think it's a freak occurrence or supernatural. It's still Autumn. They were marching on Winterfell for "The Ned's girl", not because Stannis wanted Winterfell or to kill Boltons.

    Stannis is much more likely to destroy the Bolton forces in the books than Jon. Though Ser Too Fat to Sit a Horse will probably play an important role. If there is a battle of the bastards I'd expect it to be much smaller an affair that the War for the North we got on the show.

    Stannis might be the best king, but I don't think he's going to sit the Iron Throne in the end. Lord Commander of the New Night's Watch would be a great fit for him I think, though in fairness he's probably toast. I could see him dying on the ice, taking the bulk of the Frey/Bolton army with him, though I imagine that at least Theon, maybe Asha are getting out of there. There's no princess there to burn or priestess to urge it so I don't see that happening.
    Fian wrote: »
    Really brings home how much story is left to write to try to bring it all together. More than 2 more books tbh.

    Most likely. He could devote a whole book to Davos and the search for Rickon on Skagos, I think we'll see another book or two from Martin, but I don't think it'll ever be finished. You begin to see why the showrunners just decided that people could travel from one end of the continent to the other in an ad break just to move things along.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,757 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    On Bran in the courtyard, I'd have wheeled him out and left him there too, he's such a bummer.

    As I said to my sister on both viewings of this episode, it totally seemed like they'd done just that. I was like "They've forgotten they left Bran outside."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,605 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    I thought it was a good return. Overall I'm just happy to have it back.

    My only gripe is by removing the Quentyn storyline, and the way they told the story last night, takes all the significance out of Jon being accepted by Rhaegal as a dragonrider. To non-book readers it probably seems like anyone can just jump onboard and away you go.

    It's also a bit late in the game with five episodes left to be trying to paint Dany as a villain when they've spent the last seven seasons showing us she is ultimately a good person with bit of a fiery streak (literally).

    Given the seriousness of the situation having Bran lay out the truth to both of them before the dragon lessons begin might have been a better way to go about it, especially as they've spent seven seasons building viewers belief in Bran and his abilities.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,715 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    I didn't really see them painting Dany as a villain in the episode. More her decisions and dismissal of advice are starting to catch up on her. Sam is the after thought she didn't account for and you could see how difficult it was for her to tell him what she did.

    Dany's journey has been about learning how to rule and this is just the latest obstacle she needs to face up to. She has adapted in the past to this and that's opposed to someone like Cersei who sees it as not only her right to rule but to do it unquestioned as well - that's why she chose a sycophant as a hand and Dany didn't.

    The conflict with Sansa I would call a case of two people who have gotten to a point where neither of them are willing to give an inch. One isn't worse than the other.


  • Administrators Posts: 56,321 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yeah, the books are what got me hooked in the first place. I'll 100% be returning once they are released, but will probably read the 2nd half of the last one again to catch up before starting anything new. The TV show is a decent sidekick though, but not a patch on the books. For all it's faults (pages of greasy beards, lemon pies and boiled leather can get to be a bit much) the amount of info conveyed and the world conjured is beyond compare.

    I tried to re-read the books again last year. Honestly it's tough going. The first book is grand. The second book is grand. But after that it becomes hard work. Half of the remaining books should have ended up on the editing room's floor.

    Dare I say it, the TV show is actually better than the books in later seasons. It's definitely more accessible anyway, those books are IMO totally off limits for a more casual reader. The screen writers did a good job cutting a lot of the book crap out of the TV show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,998 ✭✭✭Conall Cernach


    They ruined Stannis for me. Easily one of the best characters in the book. An absolute tactical master when it comes to battle, who withstood the siege of Storm's End for a year. What does he do in the show? Marches on Winterfell. In the snow. On foot. And camps out in the open. Really?
    One thing my nephew pointed out to me was that Stannis survived the Battle of Winterfell even though he was on foot and in the front rank of his army. He must be a complete bad ass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,890 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Euron is great and the scenes with Cersei were excellent

    I thought it was brilliant how she was shown to be attracted to him on an animal level, even though the cold, rational part of her probably despises him. Part of the underlying GoT of illustrating how people are driven by their base instincts...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    I didn't really see them painting Dany as a villain in the episode. More her decisions and dismissal of advice are starting to catch up on her. Sam is the after thought she didn't account for and you could see how difficult it was for her to tell him what she did.

    Dany's journey has been about learning how to rule and this is just the latest obstacle she needs to face up to. She has adapted in the past to this and that's opposed to someone like Cersei who sees it as not only her right to rule but to do it unquestioned as well - that's why she chose a sycophant as a hand and Dany didn't.

    The conflict with Sansa I would call a case of two people who have gotten to a point where neither of them are willing to give an inch. One isn't worse than the other.
    Dany learned to rule in across the seas but the rules are different in Westeros. Sansa knows how to play the game here but Dany doesn't understand that you can't simply say "I'm the Queen so bend the knee". I really don't want to see Dany as ruler. Her whole life has been about claiming the throne but she has given little thought to what she's going to do once she sits the throne. Her dragons have always been her power and we have seen that they are not immortal. If she loses her dragons she doesn't have much going for her. It'll be interesting to see how she reacts when she finds out that Jon has a stronger claim to the throne than her.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭leggo


    awec wrote: »
    Dare I say it, the TV show is actually better than the books in later seasons. It's definitely more accessible anyway, those books are IMO totally off limits for a more casual reader. The screen writers did a good job cutting a lot of the book crap out of the TV show.

    A lot would have you hung, drawn and quartered for that comment, but I agree. The show has streamlined well and cut a lot of the crap that didn't need to be in there. It feels like GRRM has written himself into a corner tbh, a consequence of being a gardener rather than an architect perhaps and not mapping out your story but letting it develop. Sansa is just stranded and completely ineffectual to the main plot, there's been so many resurrections now (after emotional deaths that hit home like
    Brienne
    ) that I can't believe in any character dying, the Quentynne plot took a long time to go nowhere and it feels like the Iron Islands plot is going the same way. The Dany storyline makes the absolute age it took to get through the Slaver's Bay plot on TV seem like 100m compared to a marathon!

    Don't get me wrong, I did actually love the books and will read whatever else we get, it's just the TV show is better for me. The only plotlines I wish the show covered, so I'd know I was getting resolution on, are Lady Stoneheart and Young Griff.

    People give out about the show going off the rails when they diverged from the book, but I think a lot of those haven't actually read the books in full. Some of the best stuff on GoT has been show-only stuff: Hardhome, Winds of Winter, Battle of the Bastards, even things like Cersei and Rob's heart-to-heart in series 1.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    awec wrote: »
    I tried to re-read the books again last year. Honestly it's tough going. The first book is grand. The second book is grand. But after that it becomes hard work. Half of the remaining books should have ended up on the editing room's floor.

    Dare I say it, the TV show is actually better than the books in later seasons. It's definitely more accessible anyway, those books are IMO totally off limits for a more casual reader. The screen writers did a good job cutting a lot of the book crap out of the TV show.
    I agree 100%. The first two books were great, the third was ok and the last two were a slog. Too many characters and story arcs and while the last few seasons have gone downhill, it's a reflection on the books as well. Martin talked to the producers and told them how the books were meant to end. I think he wimped out and let the show over take the books because he knew he couldn't tie up all his arcs. There was no way he could finish his story in just two more books.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    leggo wrote: »
    A lot would have you hung, drawn and quartered for that comment, but I agree. The show has streamlined well and cut a lot of the crap that didn't need to be in there. It feels like GRRM has written himself into a corner tbh, a consequence of being a gardener rather than an architect perhaps and not mapping out your story but letting it develop. Sansa is just stranded and completely ineffectual to the main plot, there's been so many resurrections now (after emotional deaths that hit home like
    Brienne
    ) that I can't believe in any character dying, the Quentynne plot took a long time to go nowhere and it feels like the Iron Islands plot is going the same way. The Dany storyline makes the absolute age it took to get through the Slaver's Bay plot on TV seem like 100m compared to a marathon!

    Don't get me wrong, I did actually love the books and will read whatever else we get, it's just the TV show is better for me. The only plotlines I wish the show covered, so I'd know I was getting resolution on, are Lady Stoneheart and Young Griff.

    People give out about the show going off the rails when they diverged from the book, but I think a lot of those haven't actually read the books in full. Some of the best stuff on GoT has been show-only stuff: Hardhome, Winds of Winter, Battle of the Bastards, even things like Cersei and Rob's heart-to-heart in series 1.
    I remember a few seasons ago book readers were waiting for the appearance of Lady Stoneheart. She hasn't been mentioned in ages and I'm glad they cut her from the show. A couple of things are strange for me though. In the books, the direwolves were a lot more important and a big deal was made of Arya also being a competent warg. That was also cut. I would love for Martin to finish the books, just to get his take on it but I don't think it will happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭leggo


    Paddy Cow wrote: »
    I remember a few seasons ago book readers were waiting for the appearance of Lady Stoneheart. She hasn't been mentioned in ages and I'm glad they cut her from the show. A couple of things are strange for me though. In the books, the direwolves were a lot more important and a big deal was made of Arya also being a competent warg. That was also cut. I would love for Martin to finish the books, just to get his take on it but I don't think it will happen.

    I liked keeping Bran as the only warg, it’s such a cool power but Arya and Jon also having it (and not using it for anything constructive) definitely diluted it a bit.

    I liked how they brought Nymeria into the show as the leader of the pack of wild wolves, that storyline was class and barely developed in the books, so having it play out in the show in some kind of epic wolves vs wights battle would be really cool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,647 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    Bran waiting for wight hodor or wight summer


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    leggo wrote: »
    I liked keeping Bran as the only warg, it’s such a cool power but Arya and Jon also having it (and not using it for anything constructive) definitely diluted it a bit.

    I liked how they brought Nymeria into the show as the leader of the pack of wild wolves, that storyline was class and barely developed in the books, so having it play out in the show in some kind of epic wolves vs wights battle would be really cool.
    I agree it's best to keep it to Bran, it makes the story less complicated but it makes me wonder where Martin was going with the idea that three of the Starks are accomplished wargs. Was there a reason or had he over complicated the story by adding that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,647 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    Having only 10 hours of screen time per season alot of content would have to be cut from the source material that can be very dangerous when the story is unfinished if the on screen adaption is to remain loyal to it in this case it is based on which gives HBO licence to kill the source material and rewrite it as they see fit which in many cases has been very strange and almost unbearable to see, the adaptions have been good in other parts but seeing characters underused or misused has been frustrating.

    For instance Dorne deserved a place in the story better than the bad poosy brutality, killing off characters that played vital roles in the story and amalgamated or renamed characters has also been bloody frustrating, characters doing silly uncharacteristically wrong things too has confused book readers but the show is in a world quite separate to the book now and until the books are finished any comparison can not properly take place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,890 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    wp_rathead wrote: »
    Chrisht that Umber kid scared the bejaysus outa me

    Me too
    Biggest tv/movie shock I've experienced since

    giphy.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,648 ✭✭✭Riddle101


    What's the timeline in the show now? The show has gone on for about 8 or 9 years but it can't be the same amount of time in the show's timeline can it? How long has it been since Ned Stark got his head cut off?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,945 ✭✭✭Tazzimus


    Paddy Cow wrote: »
    Dany learned to rule in across the seas but the rules are different in Westeros. Sansa knows how to play the game here but Dany doesn't understand that you can't simply say "I'm the Queen so bend the knee". I really don't want to see Dany as ruler. Her whole life has been about claiming the throne but she has given little thought to what she's going to do once she sits the throne. Her dragons have always been her power and we have seen that they are not immortal. If she loses her dragons she doesn't have much going for her. It'll be interesting to see how she reacts when she finds out that Jon has a stronger claim to the throne than her.

    She has the Unsullied and the Dothraki, so hardly nothing.
    Fairly sure she has the biggest army at the moment, by a fair amount.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,907 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Paddy Cow wrote: »
    I agree it's best to keep it to Bran, it makes the story less complicated but it makes me wonder where Martin was going with the idea that three of the Starks are accomplished wargs. Was there a reason or had he over complicated the story by adding that.
    Arya used her latent ability to warg to see through the eyes of a cat when the Faceless Men blinded her which allowed her to identify the "kindly man" in the House of Black and White which allowed her to get her sight back.

    Jon will presumably use his latent abilitites to warg into Ghost so that his mind is preserved when he's resurrected by Mellisandre in The Winds of Winter.

    Having more than one of the Stark children have the ability demonstrates it as a genetic talent that only Bran has mastered.


  • Administrators Posts: 56,321 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    leggo wrote: »
    A lot would have you hung, drawn and quartered for that comment, but I agree. The show has streamlined well and cut a lot of the crap that didn't need to be in there. It feels like GRRM has written himself into a corner tbh, a consequence of being a gardener rather than an architect perhaps and not mapping out your story but letting it develop. Sansa is just stranded and completely ineffectual to the main plot, there's been so many resurrections now (after emotional deaths that hit home like
    Brienne
    ) that I can't believe in any character dying, the Quentynne plot took a long time to go nowhere and it feels like the Iron Islands plot is going the same way. The Dany storyline makes the absolute age it took to get through the Slaver's Bay plot on TV seem like 100m compared to a marathon!

    Don't get me wrong, I did actually love the books and will read whatever else we get, it's just the TV show is better for me. The only plotlines I wish the show covered, so I'd know I was getting resolution on, are Lady Stoneheart and Young Griff.

    People give out about the show going off the rails when they diverged from the book, but I think a lot of those haven't actually read the books in full. Some of the best stuff on GoT has been show-only stuff: Hardhome, Winds of Winter, Battle of the Bastards, even things like Cersei and Rob's heart-to-heart in series 1.
    I think he got bored writing so just started inventing new characters as a way to amuse himself.

    His problem now is there are so many story arcs (and the book arcs are way more complicated than the TV show) that there is going to have to be some bizarrely abrubt endings for some characters if he wants to finish it in 2 books.

    Lady Stoneheart is an odd one for me. So far, from what I remember, she's a very minor character in the books. But if you introduce that character to the TV show it would be hard to keep it as a minor character, you'd have to introduce some plot and purpose. She's a bit of an odd one really.

    Young Griff confused me. In the books, Young Griff is Aegon Targaryen. In the TV show Jon Snow is Aegon Targaryen. Is it Martin's intention for there to be two Aegon Targaryens alive at the same time in the books, both with the same father but different mothers? That would definitely be confusing. Or have the TV show just merged a few characters together for simplicity sake?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,907 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    I think Young Griff is an unwitting pretender to the throne a la Perkin Warbeck in real history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,014 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    Sleepy wrote: »
    I think Young Griff is an unwitting pretender to the throne a la Perkin Warbeck in real history.

    There's nothing unwitting about him. Didn't he take charge of assault plans and head off to Storm's End against Connington's advice?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,907 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Unwitting as in he believes he's Aegon when in fact he (and perhaps Connington) have been lied to by others as to his true parentage (probably a Blackfyre).


Advertisement
Advertisement