Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What's your ultimate age limit (upper&lower!) when dating?

1235789

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    16-25. If a girl is still single above that age, there's something not quite right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭Emme


    18 is lowest and death is the upper.

    Once we girls pass 40 the lad in the cloak carrying the sickle is the only option for many of us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,029 ✭✭✭SusieBlue


    16-25. If a girl is still single above that age, there's something not quite right.

    What if she was in a relationship from 16-25, and then becomes single. Is there still something "not quite right"?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    SusieBlue wrote: »
    What if she was in a relationship from 16-25, and then becomes single. Is there still something "not quite right"?

    I'd be curious as to why she'd want to be single at that age.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,029 ✭✭✭SusieBlue


    I'd be curious as to why she'd want to be single at that age.

    Maybe she got dumped, or maybe the person wasn't right for her so she ended things, and isn't it better to be single than to be committed to the wrong person?

    It isn't as black a white an issue as you repeatedly try to make it.
    Single women over 25 are not the cat hoarding spinsters you like to think they are.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'd be curious as to why she'd want to be single at that age.

    Is this a piss take?

    Maybe she wants to have fun, travel the world, focus on her studies/career, the list is endless. Having a man isn't the be all and end all for most women in their twenties, believe it or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,833 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    34 year old..

    18 - 88


  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Is it? I was 25 when I met my missus, she was 18. Your sweeping generalisation didn't seem to be shared by anyone within my earshot.

    If I had an 18 year old daughter I wouldn't be thrilled about it, no. There's an obvious power inbalance there, and people change a lot between their late teens and mid twenties - they are formative years. Of course the older you get the less it matters, but at 18 it's a significant gap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭Emme


    16-25. If a girl is still single above that age, there's something not quite right.

    What's the age something isn't quite right about a man if he's still single?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    Flying Fox wrote: »
    Is this a piss take?

    Maybe she wants to have fun, travel the world, focus on her studies/career, the list is endless. Having a man isn't the be all and end all for most women in their twenties, believe it or not.

    Most women? Really? I doubt that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,385 ✭✭✭lainey_d_123


    Flying Fox wrote: »
    Is this a piss take?

    Maybe she wants to have fun, travel the world, focus on her studies/career, the list is endless. Having a man isn't the be all and end all for most women in their twenties, believe it or not.

    It's amazing how many men truly don't understand this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,245 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    16-25. If a girl is still single above that age, there's something not quite right.
    So if there's something not quite right, what are you going to do about it? Or are you just looking for reasons to reject people?

    This seems to be the trend in dating: people very quick to find fault if someone doesn't tick some box, but no interest in learning more or maybe doing something about it. It's so much easier to walk away, say it's somebody else's problem. Then years later, you find yourself wondering why you're still single, wondering where all the good men or women have gone. :rolleyes:

    Government resting upon the will and universal suffrage of the people has no anchorage except in the people's intelligence.

    — Grover Cleveland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭Deebles McBeebles


    Flying Fox wrote: »
    If I had an 18 year old daughter I wouldn't be thrilled about it, no. There's an obvious power inbalance there, and people change a lot between their late teens and mid twenties - they are formative years. Of course the older you get the less it matters, but at 18 it's a significant gap.

    You assume its a significant gap, it wasn't. You might take your own advice.
    Flying Fox wrote: »
    People really need to stop being so hung up on a number and just go out and see who you click with.


  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Most women? Really? I doubt that.

    You seem to have a very old fashioned view of women.

    I have plenty of friends who met their partners in their late 20s or 30s. They weren't going out every weekend desperate to tie down a man, they just met people they clicked with and the relationship developed naturally.

    I started going out with my ex at 23 and we split up when I was 30. So by your logic there was nothing wrong with me when I was coupled up at 29, but something wrong with me when I was single a few months later.

    Not everyone needs a partner to validate their existence. It is possible to be happily single, but also open to starting a relationship if you meet the right person.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,366 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    16-25. If a girl is still single above that age, there's something not quite right.

    How young are you that you would consider dating a 16 year old?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,202 ✭✭✭partyguinness


    It's amazing how many men truly don't understand this.


    There is a girl who works for us just gone 23 and lives at home with parents. Been with us since she left school- first and only job to date. She got engaged 2 years ago.

    I had a right go at her for getting engaged.What type of person gets engaged at 21? This is not the 1970s and our parents era.

    There is a whole world out there to see and experience. Getting engaged at 21? **** me..is that the extent of your ambition. Now I accept we all do not go to university for 4 years, do the whole J1 thing, shag and drink loads as much as possible, do a lot of traveling etc (me at 21),

    Anyway, she dumped the fiancee at Christmas as he was caught drink driving. Sounds like she was looking for a way out...we teased her that it was just drama and they will be back together in a few weeks. She has held out so far and is having a right laugh heading off on her own or with friends for weekends away.

    Glad she has seen the light.


  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You assume its a significant gap, it wasn't. You might take your own advice.

    I said within reason. I personally don't think someone of 25+ should be going out with a teenager. Just my opinion, but I doubt it's an uncommon one. Your life experience changes so much between 18 and 25.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,242 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Emme wrote: »
    Once we girls pass 40 the lad in the cloak carrying the sickle is the only option for many of us.

    I'll make sure to pass that little gem on to my girlfriend (now that she's hit 40),
    I'm sure she'll be thrilled to know she still has options out there, even if limited..
    (and I reckon she'd quite like the cloak)

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    How young are you that you would consider dating a 16 year old?

    I'm 36.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,134 ✭✭✭Lux23


    23 and no upper limit if they're rich enough.

    I'm 36.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,366 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I'm 36.

    well that is a bit sick.


  • Posts: 7,344 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Flying Fox wrote: »
    I personally don't think someone of 25+ should be going out with a teenager. Just my opinion, but I doubt it's an uncommon one.

    "not uncommon" is vague enough though. It is amazing how little something has to become "not uncommon" to feel like it is everywhere. Even though it is actually relatively very rare.

    I have a partner who is 30 now and 17 when we met. I am 40 now - 27 when we met. We have been doing nothing but getting steadily happier together the entire time and she is now due to have her first child with me. All good stuff.

    The "opinion" of which you speak was barely something I registered from sources around me. In fact most of the lads and even a couple of the girls I knew were jealous about how attractive she was - and still is. Her age generally did not seem to register as a concern at all.

    And most of the people who had issues with it were just the parents and siblings who were naturally protective. They all came around in time when they realised it was a committed relationship and not just some fling where I was a manipulative predator or something. But certainly in the early days I had a lot of issues with them. Some somewhat violent at the time alas. Water under the bridge these days however and I even respect them for it in a way.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    well that is a bit sick.

    In what way? It's entirely normal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,033 ✭✭✭Feisar


    In what way? It's entirely normal.

    Username... doesn't fit.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Posts: 21,740 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm curious as to why men who have posted with a preference for a younger woman are getting a hard time? What is so terrible about being 40 something and not wanting to date a woman older than 30 something?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    Feisar wrote: »
    Username... doesn't fit.

    It's biology; we're programmed to be more attracted to women that age than our own age. Have to think about the continuation of our race. Not going to get that from some career-focused, globe-trotting narcissist.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 144 ✭✭Marcus Rashford


    18 is lowest and death is the upper.

    18 right up to Death plus 30 mins for me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭Deebles McBeebles


    I'm curious as to why men who have posted with a preference for a younger woman are getting a hard time? What is so terrible about being 40 something and not wanting to date a woman older than 30 something?

    Certainly cannot see an issue with a 7 year gap, the woman being younger. Most successful relationships I've seen have a similar age gap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,003 ✭✭✭Orwellmerchant


    18-21, take them right from their mother. I'm 27.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,819 ✭✭✭howamidifferent


    I'm male early 50's. Currently single. I've always been attracted to women in the early to late 20's. As someone else said. It's biology.

    Been married twice before, I was 1 year older than my first wife and 17 years older than my second. Both marriages lasted 11 years. My preference has not changed in all that time and its nothing to do with being predatory or looking to groom some naive innocent young girl. It's just natural attraction at play.

    First marriage I ended because she cheated. Second marriage we decided mutually to end due to differing aspirations at that point. Still great friends.

    Age is only a number for people to gossip about. :D


Advertisement
Advertisement