Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Kildare farmer objects to €8bn Intel investment...

145791029

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,575 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    Ardillaun wrote: »
    Threads about land always contain some strange responses.

    No collar, uniform or weapon will protect the man who steals my field.

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,373 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    stoneill wrote: »
    I suggest you read it again
    I've read it again. Should I have seen something that you think I may have missed?

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,810 ✭✭✭✭sbsquarepants


    greencap wrote: »
    but no, not possibly.

    jobs are vital to the economy, and the economy is vital to the state.

    if you want the country to continue to function, and if that one site is the only place that these jobs can go, then how else do you resolve the issue other than apply to the court for a cpo?

    No, absolutely not. Intel do not own or run this country - they do not get to compel anyone to do anything.

    They can offer remuneration in return for services, materials, land, whatever - but that is all they can do.

    It is then up to the person involved to either accept or reject that offer - that's as far as it goes. That's fundamental to contract law, and Intel would be quick enough to point that out should anyone try compel them to move for example.
    Not being a third generation sentimental fool, I'd very happily take Tesco's money and run. In fact I'm tempted to question your sanity in asking such an incredibly naive question.

    So would I most likely - but the crucial thing is that's my choice as it is yours, we're both free to choose a different course should we wish to. It's when you try remove that freedom to suit a commercial entity that I have a problem with.

    Intel may well be a giant corporation, but it's still just a corporation. It doesn't and shouldn't get to have any power whatsoever over the citizens of this or any other country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 517 ✭✭✭10pennymixup


    Not being a third generation sentimental fool, I'd very happily take Tesco's money and run. In fact I'm tempted to question your sanity in asking such an incredibly naive question.

    And that's OK, it's your choice if you want to take the money and allow Tesco ride roughshod over you.

    Just as there are very stubborn third generational fools in life, there are also plenty of people that have no principals at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,195 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I don't dispute they've had an enormous effect on the economy and the country as a whole.
    This would appear to be true.
    If it wasn't suiting them, they'd up and leave
    That's true too, considering the enormous effect on the economy and the country as a whole, well, lets hope that it continues to suit them.
    we owe them nothing!

    Wait, what about the whole "enormous effect on the economy and country as a whole" thing?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,983 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Mad_maxx wrote: »
    There wouldn't be a decent road in the country if guys like him were indulged

    Roads are a public asset to be used by the public at large. While there is certainly a public benefit.arisibg from building a factory, the constitution preserves personal property rights which means he should have strong rights to determine whether another private entity should be permitted to effectively acquire his property.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,143 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Ireland indulges nimbys far too much and we’ve seen the effects in Dublin as well. The constitutional pendulum needs to swing a little more in favour of the national interest. Not too sound too freemannish here but, in the final analysis, the people of Ireland are sovereign and all property rights are granted by them to individuals.

    Do I contradict myself?
    Very well then I contradict myself,
    (I am large, I contain multitudes.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,735 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Ardillaun wrote: »
    Ireland indulges nimbys far too much and we’ve seen the effects in Dublin as well.

    better that and it's many faults then giving private multinationals leeway to do what they like.
    Ardillaun wrote: »
    The constitutional pendulum needs to swing a little more in favour of the national interest.

    the constitution strikes the correct balance between national and personal interest. no changes are required to deal with this specific issue as the relevant procedures are more then enough.
    Ardillaun wrote: »
    Not too sound too freemannish here but, in the final amalysis, the people of Ireland are sovereign and all property rights are granted by them to individuals.

    ultimately irrelevant as we via the constitution grant the rights to ourselves and we all benefit from such property rights.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap



    It is then up to the person involved to either accept or reject that offer - that's as far as it goes.



    No its not, thankfully.

    Just the same as if there was someone who owned a square meter in the path of the m50 they would have got some compensation and a wave off, I'm hoping this particular case gets the same treatment.

    A whole country shouldn't have to miss out over one gobshytes nostalgia for a random field.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,249 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    greencap wrote: »
    No its not, thankfully.

    Just in the same was as if there was someone who owned a square meter in the path of the m50 they would have got some compensation and a wave off, I'm hoping this particular case gets the same treatment.

    A whole country shouldn't have to miss out over one gobshytes nostalgia for a random field.

    Bit harsh calling him a gob****e but he does march to a different drum to say the least.

    There is quite a difference between the State compulsorily purchasing land for public infrastructure and a privately owned company seeking to buy land from a citizen.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,143 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    ultimately irrelevant as we via the constitution grant the rights to ourselves and we all benefit from such property rights.

    It’s not at all irrelevant to the insular, nimby mindset that is given so much weight in Ireland. If we started every discussion of this sort from the national interest end of things we would be better off.

    This incident in Sligo illustrates how people can get a bit carried away when the issue of da land comes up:

    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/sligo-farmer-warned-by-gardai-about-shotgun-patrolling/

    Do I contradict myself?
    Very well then I contradict myself,
    (I am large, I contain multitudes.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,735 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Ardillaun wrote: »
    It’s not at all irrelevant to the insular, nimby mindset that is given so much weight in Ireland. If we started every discussion of this sort from the national interest end of things we would be better off.

    we already do where such needs to happen.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,373 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    greencap wrote: »
    No its not, thankfully.

    Just in the same was as if there was someone who owned a square meter in the path of the m50 they would have got some compensation and a wave off, I'm hoping this particular case gets the same treatment.

    A whole country shouldn't have to miss out over one gobshytes nostalgia for a random field.
    If you're referring to the Intel objection then your way off! The ownership or CPOing of land is not part of this!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,031 ✭✭✭✭Birdnuts


    The principle of being able to object to planning isn't an issue. What is the problem, is the amount of time it takes for the appeals process to run its course.

    As it stands, applicants can spend a couple of years and hundreds of thousands carrying out the requires studies and surveys and compiling an Environmental Impact Assessment and submitting this to a planning authority.

    A few cranks can then lodge fairly spurious objections and frustrate the process for further years in some cases.

    There are international companies that have chosen other countries to invest in over Ireland purely on the basis of the time, expense and hassle to secure planning permission.

    One of the big issues is the many of these "studies" are not worth the paper their written on in terms of carrying out a fair assessment of a developments impact. Developers will never produce a "study" that shows their development is economically or environmentally unsustainable. I've read many of these in my time and the amount of BS and gaps would make you laugh if it wasn't so potentially serious. At the end of the day ABP and the courts will nearly always kick spurious objections out. The issue is the length of time it takes to process such things. What we don't need are facist proposals that restrict peoples legitmate rights to environmental justice which is quaranteed under various EU Directives and Aahraus etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Ardillaun wrote:
    This incident in Sligo illustrates how people can get a bit carried away when the issue of da land comes up:


    Yet the article you linked has nothing got to do with da land, it concerns dogs attacking sheep. At least read your own links FFS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭rayjdav


    For anyone on here who wants to actually see what InHell are proposing:

    http://webgeo.kildarecoco.ie/public/planningsearch/171#

    file No. 1991

    Seems he should have paid a few quid in fairness to someone who knows how to compile objection letters as this will be ignored as vexatious waffle tbh.... Wasted opportunity to be taken somebit serious imo....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,368 ✭✭✭Sheep breeder


    There is two sides to this the good and the bad, the good of the country and the bad the guy that won’t sell the land, the middle is the mess the IDA have caused and the cost to the state. In approaching the purchase of the land and ending up in court and now a Mexican standoff over the planning,surly the have made a tit of this and should be held accountable and asked who got the back hander to get the guy off the land and bull a head and forget about owners rights.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,143 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Yet the article you linked has nothing got to do with da land, it concerns dogs attacking sheep. At least read your own links FFS.

    It has everything to do with the land. You think a man threatening dog owners with a gun on a public road is acceptable? In an earlier outburst, he even threatened to shoot the dogs while they were on their leads right beside their owners for crying out loud. That sense of entitlement arises from an outdated cultural consensus. In a properly run country he would have been charged to send a clear message to any other loon with the same worldview.

    Do I contradict myself?
    Very well then I contradict myself,
    (I am large, I contain multitudes.)



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Ardillaun wrote:
    It has everything to do with the land. You think a man threatening dog owners with a gun on a public road is acceptable? In an earlier outburst, he even threatened to shoot the dogs while they were on their leads right beside their owners for crying out loud. That sense of entitlement arises from an outdated cultural consensus. In a properly run country he would have been charged to send a clear message to any other loon with the same worldview.


    Yet again the article refers to dogs worrying sheep. Says it all when you refer to others as 'loons'. Sense of entitlement? You don't really understand property rights do you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65 ✭✭The pink killer


    Its like offering someone money for there car but they don't want to sell it as its there pride and joy but the guy wanting to buy it starts crying cause him and his mates can't get to work in the the new flashy car, ITS HIS CAR NOT YOURS NOW F#CKOFF. !


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,730 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Its like offering someone money for there car but they don't want to sell it as its there pride and joy but the guy wanting to buy it starts crying cause him and his mates can't get to work in the the new flashy car, ITS HIS CAR NOT YOURS NOW F#CKOFF. !

    How many times has it been pointed out on the thread that the application to which farmer is objecting has NOTHING to do with his land?

    10 times, 15 times?...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    How many times has it been pointed out on the thread that the application to which farmer is objecting has NOTHING to do with his land?


    Doesn't matter whether it relates to his land or not. He has the right to object and considering the behaviour of the IDA in the past on behalf of Intel it's hardly surprising he's objecting tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 517 ✭✭✭10pennymixup


    How many times has it been pointed out on the thread that the application to which farmer is objecting has NOTHING to do with his land?

    10 times, 15 times?...

    Most of us what you are saying....... 10, 15 times ago. The PP sought by Intel is not for development on his land, but to say it has nothing to do with his land is incorrect.

    If I have to fight someone to stop them from taking my property, I fight them with everything. If they then seek PP on their own land, I will fight that too, if only to ensure they are not in a stronger position to try take my land the next time.

    And with every weapon too, from the important obs like entrance sight lines, to the ridiculous obs like the colour they want to paint the walls.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Doesn't matter whether it relates to his land or not. He has the right to object and considering the behaviour of the IDA in the past on behalf of Intel it's hardly surprising he's objecting tbh.

    He's objecting because he's a serial crank


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,373 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Mad_maxx wrote: »
    He's objecting because he's a serial crank
    How so?

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭rayjdav


    Someone from Donegal can object to something in Dingle, whether it directly affects them or not, that is the joy of living in a democracy and having statutory Acts that everyone, including large multi nationals, have to abide by. What kinda of country would we live in if anyone could do anything they wanted, without due process, and a system whereby the individuals voice could not be heard.
    In this kind of instance, if they were refused permission and if they so wished, they could fight this through the courts, after due process has been completed, but they one voice still must be heard, no matter what side of the fence they side on and how abstract the argument.....
    When Intel has completed it's mission and Ireland as a resource, whatever that might be ;) is exhausted, we will still have to look at an empty shell of a monstrosity lying idle in an outcrop of a village. The process has to be good for us and not just an independent international employer for the "short term" gain, no matter what "short term" employment comes from it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Mad_maxx wrote:
    He's objecting because he's a serial crank


    So you don't think the attempt by the IDA on behalf of Intel to CPO his land has anything to do with his objections?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,249 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Mad_maxx wrote: »
    He's objecting because he's a serial crank

    He is not.
    He is a gentle soul reacting to trouble brought to his door.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭Mrsmum


    So you don't think the attempt by the IDA on behalf of Intel to CPO his land has anything to do with his objections?


    If Intel wasn't so powerful, there would be calls for an inquiry into the behind the scenes of what went on with this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Its like offering someone money for there car but they don't want to sell it as its there pride and joy but the guy wanting to buy it starts crying cause him and his mates can't get to work in the the new flashy car, ITS HIS CAR NOT YOURS NOW F#CKOFF. !

    *parks car across hospital entrance.*

    hey! my car, my rights. are we to violate the sanctity of personal property.
    just so you can move some of these so called ''organs'' to your precious ''patients''.

    CPO's ruin lives.
    Up to 3 people per year in Ireland face the heartache of not sitting in one particular spot. Due to corporations employing people.
    Many have had to move kilometers.

    For just $8 billion we can stop the torment of new jobs arriving, and make sure Tomas gawks out over an empty field.

    Please, compromise just 100 jobs per month.
    Together we can keep Irelands future bleak.


Advertisement