Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Cartier?

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,128 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Cartier are as legit as any imo

    And I love the santos

    Resale is an issue especially anything mid sized


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,279 ✭✭✭Trigger Happy


    I always saw them as a rich persons fashion watch. There is nothing spectacular about the movements they use from a quality perspective but the prices are up there with the 'quality' movement makers. But this is only my impression, have not looked in to it in great detail.
    That said, they make some cracking looking watches and I would like a Tank in my collection.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 651 ✭✭✭2shea


    The 35mm wears so well also. What are used versions going? €2500/€3000 I would consider one over a Tudor Black Bay 36mm if they are good value used.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,424 ✭✭✭Oafley Jones


    Cyrus wrote: »
    Cartier are as legit as any imo

    And I love the santos

    Resale is an issue especially anything mid sized

    Yip, and you can’t really argue with a lot of their pieces (particularly the Santos) place in watch history. As for being overpriced; the Santos seem like a bargain compared to some of the sellita powered offerings from their sister brand IWC. Still have the fear of Richemont’s after sales care though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭oxocube


    My wife likes them. She pointed out the 18k gold Panthere when browsing on holiday.

    Might have to re-mortgage the car is she really wants one :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,283 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    Cartier have a pretty decent amount of watch making heritage. They're not just a luxury brand branching out into it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 833 ✭✭✭funkyouup


    I dont like Roman Numerals on any watch, apart from that i like the design. And who doesnt like blue hands!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Eoin wrote: »
    Cartier have a pretty decent amount of watch making heritage. They're not just a luxury brand branching out into it.
    True, they were up there in the early days. Their image problem among watch nuts is more down to what came later, they became a luxury jewellers with a watch department and the watches often reflected that. Not a lot of horological innovation beyond the first Santos anyway.

    That said the Santos and the Tank are icons of watch history and deserve a look IMHO.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭AmberGold


    I’d buy one, wouldn’t go mid size myself but each to their own. Some family members have them now for many years with no issues.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,408 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    If I won the Euromillions, the Tank would be one of the ones in my collection. One of the most iconic watches I think.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,105 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    A brand my wife enjoys - a good mix of watchmaking pedigree plus iconic jewellery design.

    Their tank, ballon bleu and dolce vita ladies' lines are all pretty in my wife's eyes.

    For me it's about saying - hey we're a high end jewellery company that makes great watches from the aesthetic perspective - so less about mechanical innovation nowadays but their jewellery side is the bread and butter i.e. bracelets, cases etc.

    My wife really enjoyed her ballon bleu quartz before it was stolen and I can understand why for some people who see watches more from the jewellery aspect more than the mechanical aspect that they want the convenience of pick up and go of battery movements...

    Though - speaking of which - I have a very interesting quartz piece from Omega I'll be making a thread about soon enough - two words - Speedmaster Professional ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,197 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    I've always been a fan of Cartier tbh, some really nice classic designs. You can spot ltheir style a mile away. As always, it's subjective. I wouldn't be a fan of other popular brands, always for stupid little reasons. But hey, that's why watches and choosing one is interesting. If everyone liked the same things what would be the point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,126 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Wibbs wrote: »
    True, they were up there in the early days. Their image problem among watch nuts is more down to what came later, they became a luxury jewellers with a watch department and the watches often reflected that. Not a lot of horological innovation beyond the first Santos anyway.

    That said the Santos and the Tank are icons of watch history and deserve a look IMHO.

    For me it would have to be the Santos Dumont, manual wind and very slim, precious metal only or the Tank Americaine. I bought a Santos 100 XXL once and returned it the following day. I hated it after 2 hours and luckily discovered that it wasn’t functional (mechanism completely out of whack) so they had to take it back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 833 ✭✭✭funkyouup


    Looks like it helped style the gshock :D

    472431.jpg


Advertisement
Advertisement