Micky Jackson in trouble again

retro:electro wrote:

A dig about a gif? A sure sign all opposing argument has been exhausted

I actually thought it was a dig at the type and source of the "facts" you are posting rather than the gif itself

https://talunzeitoun.com/2019/01/30/michael-jackson-and-me/?fbclid=IwAR0ch5huUwFqEZvnNluGGabQqkKAyTob7jUaFIEciFm-hqU2tST7a9Wbzcs

I was a boy in Michael Jackson’s life, and nothing of what he’s being accused of in this documentary happened

It gets better!!

“nothing of what he’s being accused of in this documentary happened”

He then goes on to say

“I haven’t seen the documentary”



You’re a hoot Sleeper never change.

That doesn’t give him the authority to decide whether or not someone else’s experiences did or didn’t happen.
I provided proof earlier where a lawyer who submitted a motion concluded that the insurance rumour is just that, a rumour. And you dismissed it as “not first hand knowledge” among other crap.

Yet you think you can post proof that something didn’t happen because a totally irrelevant person with completely different experiences said it didn’t?

I’m literally haemorrhaging over your brain dead posts.

I luv u Michael, don’t ever think ur fans will abonden u. U were too good and pure for this world and miss understand and the world always destroys what it doesn’t know , I luv u mj.

fin12 wrote: »

I luv u Michael, don’t ever think ur fans will abonden u. U were too good and pure for this world and miss understand and the world always destroys what it doesn’t know , I luv u mj.

He’s dead and can’t read this. We’ve reached peak cray.

retro:electro wrote: »

He’s dead

Still isn't stopping ne'er do wells from trying to profit from him post-mortem.

Anyway, I think the reason why the thread was started was largely ignored, mainly because some people thought it fun to re-litigate a farcical trial using myths from lunatic fringe conspiracy sites.

The context of the new "allegations"

Wade Robson when Jackson died.

Michael Jackson changed the world and, more personally, my life forever. He is the reason I dance, the reason I make music, and one of the main reasons I believe in the pure goodness of humankind. He has been a close friend of mine for 20 years. His music, his movement, his personal words of inspiration and encouragement and his unconditional love will live inside of me forever. I will miss him immeasurably, but I know that he is now at peace and enchanting the heavens with a melody and a moonwalk.

That's that so.

Until.

In 2011, Robson approached John Branca, co-executor of the Michael Jackson Estate, about directing the new Michael Jackson/Cirque du Soleil production, ONE. Robson admitted he wanted the job “badly,” but the Estate ultimately chose someone else for the position.

In 2012, Robson had a nervous breakdown, triggered, he said, by an obsessive quest for success. His career, in his own words, began to “crumble.”

That same year, with Robson’s career, finances, and marriage in peril, he began shopping a book that claimed he was sexually abused by Michael Jackson. No publisher picked it up.

In 2013, Robson filed a $1.5 billion dollar civil lawsuit/creditor’s claim, along with James Safechuck, who also spent time with Jackson in the late ‘80s. Safechuck claimed he only realized he may have been abused when Robson filed his lawsuit. That lawsuit was dismissed by a probate court in 2017.

Pull the fooking other one Wade.

:rolleyes:

Boggles wrote: »

Still isn't stopping ne'er do wells from trying to profit from him post-mortem.

Anyway, I think the reason why the thread was started was largely ignored, mainly because some people thought it fun to re-litigate a farcical trial using myths from lunatic fringe conspiracy sites.

The context of the new "allegations"

Wade Robson when Jackson died.



That's that so.

Until.









Pull the fooking other one Wade.

:rolleyes:

You know some children don’t realise they were abused right? That’s part and parcel of grooming.

Flippyfloppy wrote: »

You know some children don’t realised they were abused right? That’s part and parcel of grooming.

He knew he was "abused".

He didn't realize that anally raping a 7 year old was actually wrong until he was 30 years old.

It just happened to coincide with him been turned down for a job from the estate he tried to sue.

ceadaoin. wrote: »

So if more people came forward would you automatically write them off as money grabbers too?

This is the difficult point to overcome with regards Michael. Unfortunately if anybody was a real victim it's going to be harder than with anyone else because of the history of false allegations about him from people trying to exploit him for money.

I don't deny something could have happened to somebody but I find it harder given the previous claims and the fact that there's still so much media disinformation that many people believe him to be an abuser and his estate still has a lot of money.

The motivations of Wade Robson to me are nearly as suspect as those of Jordy Chandler and Gavin Arviso but I'm going to wait until the documentary to decide on whether I believe him. At the moment I'm very sceptical...but then nobody has seen this doc yet so we're only speculating

Boggles wrote: »

And some "victims" come flat out with it in a book they couldn't get published and then in a lawsuit that was fooked out of court.

And when that doesn't work they latch onto some no-body "documentarian" who only wants to give their side of the story because of something...something...etc, something.

"Fooked out of court" because the statute of limitations had passed. Not for any other reason.

I don't know, I've read their accounts and if they weren't abused, they've really done their homework about how a groomer operates and how abuse victims feel. It just rings true to me, on several levels. They have said they didn't get paid for documentary

Yeah a "nobody documentarian" who's been nominated for several awards including an emmy and won a bafta for previous work.

Boggles wrote: »

Still isn't stopping ne'er do wells from trying to profit from him post-mortem.

Anyway, I think the reason why the thread was started was largely ignored, mainly because some people thought it fun to re-litigate a farcical trial using myths from lunatic fringe conspiracy sites.

The context of the new "allegations"

Wade Robson when Jackson died.



That's that so.

Until.









Pull the fooking other one Wade.

:rolleyes:

Well summarised IMO, thank you.

I don't believe a word Wade says - just another money grabbing con man.

ceadaoin. wrote: »

I don't know, I've read their accounts and if they weren't abused, they've really done their homework about how a groomer operates and how abuse victims feel.

Yeah, 1.62 billion would make you do your homework all right.

BBFAN wrote:

He's since been jailed for 14 years and she still refuses to admit he did anything wrong. Delusion is real folks.

Off topic I know but some women chose to believe their husband over their children he's sexually abusing or raping. Fortunately this is rare but delusion is alive and well for sure

ceadaoin. wrote:

And others who were in his life for years have said they were abused. You choose not to believe those people but are more than willing to believe the ones who said nothing happened to them.

Here's the thing. Every single accuser has gone for money, sold their story. Not a single accuser just tried to get him stopped (if he was doing anything). One of the idiots in the movie tried to get one Billion dollars! The original 1993 case the family took the money & ran. They had no regard for future possible victims. No one is a nice person in this story. Its hard to believe someone when they are more interested in money than stopping the "monster".