Micky Jackson in trouble again

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 12:44PM

Boggles wrote: »

It was a claim made by Aphrodite Jones (that's why I said apparently), she also went on to say that she couldn't get a publisher to back her book because it was "pro Jackson".

As for the Jury being bombarded with book deals, it was reported at the time they were being approached before the trial was even finished.

Even by our press.

https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/world/jackson-jury-lining-up-lucrative-book-deals-206957.html

The bit in bold is quite telling, IMO.

Sorry but nowhere does any of that state your claim that:

Boggles wrote: »

Apparently the majority of the jurors were approached with book deals if they would state that they thought Jackson was indeed guilty, as was his lead counsel.

And Aphrodite wasn’t on the jury so that’s irrelevant.
Can you clarify where you read the bit in bold?

Sleeper12 · 31-01-2019 12:57PM

retro:electro wrote:

Ps. Iâ€™m a lady

Howdy do mam.

My apologies. I do have the stupid habit of assuming most posters are male

Boggles · 31-01-2019 01:14PM

retro:electro wrote: »

And Aphrodite wasn’t on the jury so that’s irrelevant.
Can you clarify where you read the bit in bold?

In her book, you should read it.

All though I imagine you only indulge in fiction.

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 01:16PM

Boggles wrote: »

In her book, you should it read.

All though I imagine you only indulge in fiction.

No need to resort to personal remarks. The first bit would have sufficed

There’s nothing I can find online about it. Do you have the book handy?

Boggles · 31-01-2019 01:23PM

retro:electro wrote: »

There’s nothing I can find online about it. Do you have the book handy?

Yeah I carry around with me everywhere. It's like a bible.

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 01:25PM

Boggles wrote: »

Yeah I carry around with me everywhere. It's like a bible.

Very defensive there. Quite telling. Anyway, I’ve read I’ll I needed to know here.

Boggles · 31-01-2019 01:27PM

retro:electro wrote: »

Very defensive there. Quite telling. Anyway, I’ve read I’ll I needed to know here.

I don't know how else one would answer such an odd question.

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 01:28PM

Boggles wrote: »

I don't know how else one would answer such an odd question.

Asking if you own the book you’ve claimed to have read is an odd question?

Rory28 · 31-01-2019 01:30PM

I have not read the whole tread so apologies if this was already mentioned. Was he not chemically castrated as a kid/teen by his Father to keep his voice the way it was? He was obviously a sick puppy but if that rumor is true was he even capable of abusing kids?

Boggles · 31-01-2019 01:35PM

retro:electro wrote: »

Asking if you own the book you’ve claimed to have read is an odd question?

No that's not an odd question at all. That's not the question you asked though.

retro:electro wrote: »

Do you have the book handy?

That is odd.

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 01:37PM

Okay since you’re being purposefully obtuse, I’ll ask again in plainer English. Do you own the book you’ve claimed to have read and have quoted from? Not to be confused with do you carry the gospel according to Michael with you around in your bag.

Boggles · 31-01-2019 01:38PM

retro:electro wrote: »

Do you own the book you’ve claimed to have read and have quoted from?

No.

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 01:39PM

Figured

Boggles · 31-01-2019 01:42PM

retro:electro wrote: »

Figured

The library does.

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 01:47PM

Rory28 wrote: »

I have not read the whole tread so apologies if this was already mentioned. Was he not chemically castrated as a kid/teen by his Father to keep his voice the way it was? He was obviously a sick puppy but if that rumor is true was he even capable of abusing kids?

Those are unverified claims floating about by his doctor Conrad Murray but I don’t know how true they are, as there’s no evidence to confirm. Maybe Aphrodite Jones can tell us.

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 02:22PM

Also even if true, I believe chemical casteration is just a temporary measure to lower your libido and is reversible when treatment stops. It’s not permanent and it doesn’t sterilise you.

Sleeper12 · 31-01-2019 02:52PM

retro:electro wrote: »

Also even if true, I believe chemical casteration is just a temporary measure to lower your libido and is reversible when treatment stops. It’s not permanent and it doesn’t sterilise you.

i think you are correct. As far as I remember if you stop taking the medication the effect wears off

Sleeper12 · 31-01-2019 02:55PM

Flippyfloppy wrote: »

You haven’t claimed Michael had this condition, you’re just mentioning it?

No I'm not claiming it. It is a common condition. I know three sets of father & sons that have admitted to it.

I only posted it to show that not every erect penis look like they are cut

Rory28 · 31-01-2019 03:07PM

retro:electro wrote: »

Also even if true, I believe chemical casteration is just a temporary measure to lower your libido and is reversible when treatment stops. It’s not permanent and it doesn’t sterilise you.

Ah. I was unaware of that.

ceadaoin. · 31-01-2019 03:52PM

Rory28 wrote: »

I have not read the whole tread so apologies if this was already mentioned. Was he not chemically castrated as a kid/teen by his Father to keep his voice the way it was? He was obviously a sick puppy but if that rumor is true was he even capable of abusing kids?

His high pitched voice speaking voice was fake. He had a normal deep male voice that he used when he wanted to. Obviously he had a wide vocal range but it wasn't because he was castrated. I'm sure he didn't mind those rumours being out there though if it cast doubt on any allegations

Anyway, if someone is intent on abuse they will do it, a functioning penis isn't a requirement

Flippyfloppy · 31-01-2019 04:48PM

Sleeper12 wrote: »

No I'm not claiming it. It is a common condition. I know three sets of father & sons that have admitted to it.

I only posted it to show that not every erect penis look like they are cut

Well I’m sure if he did have that condition he would have had surgery to fix it.

Sleeper12 · 31-01-2019 05:32PM

Flippyfloppy wrote:

Well Iâ€™m sure if he did have that condition he would have had surgery to fix it.

Why would you be so sure he'd have surgery for it? most men don't

My 62 year old neighbour hasn't gotten the surgery nor has a 52 year old friend.

It doesn't cause discomfort in everyone & lots of men see it as perfectly normal. They have never known anything different.

Flippyfloppy · 31-01-2019 05:36PM

Sleeper12 wrote: »

Why would you be so sure he'd have surgery for it? most men don't

My 62 year old neighbour hasn't gotten the surgery nor has a 52 year old friend.

It doesn't cause discomfort in everyone & lots of men see it as perfectly normal. They have never known anything different.

Because he was no stranger to plastic surgery

AllForIt · 31-01-2019 05:47PM

Rory28 wrote: »

I have not read the whole tread so apologies if this was already mentioned. Was he not chemically castrated as a kid/teen by his Father to keep his voice the way it was? He was obviously a sick puppy but if that rumor is true was he even capable of abusing kids?

Well I had to laugh out loud at this comment.

What effect would castrating him have on his dancing skills or song writing ability and why would you think that his older voice wouldn't be as good as his younger voice.

If you heard this online then how can anyone trust what has been written about him, or anything reported to have been thought about him, or anything he's been accused of.

I think your post typifies the hysterics of this thread.

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 05:55PM

AllForIt wrote: »

Well I had to laugh out loud at this comment.

What effect would castrating him have on his dancing skills or song writing ability.

If you heard this online then how can anyone trust what has been written about him, or anything reported to have been thought about him, or anything he's been accused of.

I think your post typifies the hysterics of this thread.

Tbf I don’t believe that poster even mentioned that?
It’s not just an online rumour either. His doctor responsible for his death stated it. Although I believe it’s untrue.
Quite a rude response to someone only asking a question.

Rory28 · 31-01-2019 06:05PM

AllForIt wrote: »

Well I had to laugh out loud at this comment.

What effect would castrating him have on his dancing skills or song writing ability and why would you think that his older voice wouldn't be as good as his younger voice.

If you heard this online then how can anyone trust what has been written about him, or anything reported to have been thought about him, or anything he's been accused of.

I think your post typifies the hysterics of this thread.

Glad you got a chuckle. I would have assumed the effect was obvious. Higher pitch. I was corrected by retro:electro and acknowledged it.

ceadaoin. · 31-01-2019 06:11PM

Sleeper12 wrote: »

Why would you be so sure he'd have surgery for it? most men don't

My 62 year old neighbour hasn't gotten the surgery nor has a 52 year old friend.

It doesn't cause discomfort in everyone & lots of men see it as perfectly normal. They have never known anything different.

So we don't even know if he even had the condition. It has no relevance at all.

And I'm sure someone with plenty of money and a penchant for surgery (and the drugs that come with it) would have got it fixed, don't you?

Also, why would you even know that about your neighbour?!

Sleeper12 · 31-01-2019 06:15PM

Flippyfloppy wrote:

Because he was no stranger to plastic surgery

Most men don't get this surgery. Most men don't want any surgeon messing with their bits.

It's all a bit silly really. No one knows if he had this issue with his foreskin & yet we're certain what he would or wouldn't do something about it.

Ya gota love the Internet

Sleeper12 · 31-01-2019 06:16PM

ceadaoin. wrote:

Also, why would you even know that about your neighbour?!

I have a wife and he has a wife.

Enough said

retro:electro · 31-01-2019 06:19PM

Sleeper12 wrote: »

Most men don't get this surgery. Most men don't want any surgeon messing with their bits.

It's all a bit silly really. No one knows if he had this issue with his foreskin & yet we're certain what he would or wouldn't do something about it.

Ya gota love the Internet

In fairness you brought it up.

Micky Jackson in trouble again

Comments