rocjohn wrote: » Wife and I have been renting an apartment for over three years now in Dublin.We rented through an agent.Shortly after moving in the landlord came to apartment and informed me he would be using our apartment for his post. Over the next couple of years any time he came to the apartment to carry out maintenance he demanded all his post which we were required to collect and store.Other times he comes to the apartment unannounced demanding his post.His father and mother who apparently live abroad also use our address which is collected by the landlord.All the post is of an official nature, nothing that appears to be personal. For example letters addressed to these three people come from Revenue,Social protection banks etc. Despite repeated objections the landlord has told me it is his absolute right to have anything he wants delivered to the apartment.He was quite menacing at times and both my wife and I are fearful of a violent reaction if we pursue the matter legally.We are also worried our address is being used as a drop box for some nefarious purpose. The tenancy is unregistered and landlord will not give us a contact address or e mail address,only a phone number. The Landlords father has taken over from the agent and deals with any issues by phone. We have part 4 rights and know we should have exclusive right to the property in accordance with the Residential Tenancies Act. This week he came to the apartment and there was an ugly exchange over the post. My Wife had a panic attack and is terrified. Whilst we know we have rights through the RTB what we are afraid of is being attacked as a reprisal .Any different perspectives or advice would be appreciated.
tvjunki wrote: » The landlord may just want the information going to the house. Dont even think about why they are going this. It is not your concern. Revenue social welfare etc has nothing to do with you. Don't make a big issue about it or you will find you will be looking for a new place to live shortly. Just put in a box at the door and agree a cartain day in the month to collect. I can't see it is a big deal. Be nice about it when you ring the landlord. For all you know the parents could be ill and staying with the son for a while until back on their feet which has given you a roof over your head. People have situations they have to deal with and have a lot of strain on them. Not a good thing to do "return to sender "expect to be out on your ear. Ring the landlord and have a chat. Don't cause issues. Leave as is.
davo2001 wrote: » Hi Mr Landlord
LotharIngum wrote: » Have you 4 years part 4 or 6 years part 4?
OSI wrote: » Bull****. Revenue and Social Welfare are everyones concern.
Grumpypants wrote: » The only reason for the landlord not to register is to avoid paying tax. Not just rent a room, I would go as far as to say he is still registered at that address and is pretending it's not rented at all and is prob claiming some welfare payment too if you are getting those letters. Call the PRTB and register yourself as the tenant to protect your rights. Then call and report suspected fraud to revenue and social protection. I'm sick of subsidising these clowns.
LotharIngum wrote: » Ive been accused of not registering tenants. I was also accused of registering them late. They got very, very aggressive one day about something trivial and started accusing me of avoiding tax and of not registering them with the RTB because they looked it up. Then when I advised them to go talk to the RTB and stop annoying me about it they lodged a complaint with the RTB. It turned out that the registration was just not updated on the RTB website. And even when the RTB sent letter out confirming the registration they had the date registered as the date the letters were sent. I got a call with another earful from the tenant. They were very hard work to be honest.
rocjohn wrote: Wife had a panic attack and is terrified. Whilst we know we have rights through the RTB what we are afraid of is being attacked as a reprisal.
tvjunki wrote: » Revene and social welfare are not stupid. The owners could be paying tax on the property being rented out. People are assuming they are not paying tax or they are doing something shady.
belfe wrote: » Also, if the landlord claims that he is living there, and he can use the post as proof of address, you are a licensee and not a tenant. I'd start to look for a new house immediately and leave as soon as possible.
Garibaldi? wrote: » This sounds like a property owner who wants to get out of the business.
rocjohn wrote: » from reading the rtb website ,registration of a tenancy implies state registration of a home address as the site goes onto explain that without registration there may be problems claiming tax refunds,mortgage approval etc . I interpreted ( I may be wrong ,its just my reading of what is written by rtb) this to mean that without registration a renter is not officially domiciled in the state and somebody else,in this case the property owner is actually living there. The landlord had apparently lived in the apartment before we moved in .There was no one present when we viewed it other than the agent. The landlords parents have a property abroad where they live and according to them were involved in the property business and have other properties let out in Dublin.They apparently were using the landlords address for their post before we rented.They do not have any health issues as far as I am aware ( as suggested by one poster) that would necessitate them using our address. We signed a one year standard lease,following which we attained part 4 rights.We would have moved out two years ago after one particular encounter in the apartment .I made a statement to the Guards that night,but decided not to lodge an official complaint in the hope things got better and because of the extremely tough rental situation.We rented the apartment at slightly above the market rate in the area at the time. We have paid the rent in full and on time and have always promptly reported any maintenance issues to the landlord.
Caranica wrote: » Start randomly marking items "not at this address" and returning to sender. Not everything, maybe 1 in 5/10. There's nothing deceitful, the landlord does not live at that address