The Herald runs a headline buts leaves out biggest part of the story PC bull, BOSS

27-12-2018 06:15PM

lawred2 wrote: »

Shouldn't your ire be more reserved for the parents of that child who are happily placing their children in harm's way?

You can despise the parents for putting a child at risk and simultaneously wonder what on earth is wrong with (what I assume is) an adult hoping a small child gets torn to shreds.

Most of us can cope with caring about more than one thing at a time.

saintsaltynuts · 27-12-2018 06:16PM

yesnow wrote: »

Travellers alright https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-ab&q=cock+wall+gang

See I told ye!

CinemaGuy45 · 27-12-2018 06:17PM

Candie wrote: »

But it's not that you said you didn't care, oh no. You're actually HOPING a small child will get torn to bits.

I'd be very keen to see far greater sanctions on criminal activity and far more active supervison of traveller kids in education. For starters. I wouldn't be keen on the continuation of the status quo because it's not doing anything for the life prospects of traveller kids.

Just because I'm not actively hoping a child gets torn to bits doesn't mean I don't care.

You know that though.

So what that is how I feel at least I am honest.

Bubblegummers · 27-12-2018 06:19PM

So cinema guy any proof about the 7 year old Oliver Twist character?

The Talking Bread · 27-12-2018 06:19PM

pjohnson wrote: »

People have condemned your lack of punctuation and Grammar. Makes me wonder onder what culture you are from.

Wonder onder what you like, I don't think his punctuation is the problem here.

Hard to take someone's sincerity, social values and general opinions seriously when they would say that they would be laughing if a child, just born into a negative social surrounding, is mauled to death by a dog.

Yer Da sells Avon · 27-12-2018 06:19PM

CinemaGuy45 wrote: »

Report what I have broken no rule here.

There was a time when posting that you hope a child gets torn to bits by a dog would get you banned. You should probably count yourself lucky that the mods no longer give a toss.

27-12-2018 06:19PM

CinemaGuy45 wrote: »

So what that is how I feel at least I am honest.

Indeed.

It takes a special person to hope small children are torn to bits by savage dogs, but hey, at least you're honest.

The Talking Bread · 27-12-2018 06:20PM

CinemaGuy45 wrote: »

So what that is how I feel at least I am honest.

Being honest doesn't make your desires any less disturbing

Zaph · 27-12-2018 06:21PM

CinemaGuy45 wrote: »

So you don’t care about seven year old girls being used for breaking into people’s homes I see.

Do I care about such a thing? Yes, of course I do. A child being used for criminal acts at so young an age is never going to have much of a chance to be a worthwhile member of society when they grow up.

Do I care whether they're black, white, travellers, Muslims, Mormons, purple-headed aliens or anything else you care to mention? No I fcuking don't. If someone has burgled my house using a 7 year old to gain access then they're complete and utter cnuts, and their colour, ethnicity or whatever won't change that.

However in this case OP you're getting outraged over something that isn't stated in a newspaper story that you seem to have irrefutable proof should be in it. So all I'll say to you is put up or shut the fcuk up and let the rest of us enjoy the rest of our Christmas in peace without having to endure this trumped-up mock outrage crap. Do we not have enough of this bullsh*t the rest of the year?

Skylinehead · 27-12-2018 06:23PM

CinemaGuy45 wrote: »

A big dog that will tear the child to bits is what they will eventually find with a bit of luck.

Mod: Get the fuck out of this forum and never come back.

Threads closed after that, no good can come of this.

The Herald runs a headline buts leaves out biggest part of the story PC bull, BOSS

Comments