Gameweek 14 Transfers

MR NINE wrote: »

Im now considering a - 8;

In: sané, sterling, schindler

Out: richarlison, hazard, Robertson

Is that crazy?

-4 the following week to bring in kane and Button for aguero and hart would leave me with:

Fabianski, Button
Alonso, Doherty, digne, schindler, wan b
Salah, sterling, sané, kenedy, obiang
Kane, arnie, Murray

A team i would be very happy with for the next 8 gws, possibly replacing Murray with mitrovic in a couple weeks.

-12 to get rid of 4 players (well maybe 3 depending on when you got hazard to be fair) who are performing very well?
I think you already know the answer yourself........

Fraser out, sane in

Next week is aguero out, Kane in

km79 wrote: »

-12 to get rid of 4 players (well maybe 3 depending on when you got hazard to be fair) who are performing very well?
I think you already know the answer yourself........

I realise it seems crazy, but I'm viewing it as a long term move.

Do sterling, sane, kane and schindler outscore hazard, richarlison, aguero and Robertson over the next 8? I would say almost certainly.

Do they outscore them by more than 12? I think so.

I also think kane and schindler are nailed on for the xmas period and would expect sterling to only miss 1 or 2 games. Sané could be a risk but it seems that he is a lot more nailed when mendy is out. There's always going to be rotation with city but they're both scoring so well that the odd 0/1 pointer is absorbable. City are even better this season than they were last season, i think going one more gw without sterling would be foolish. he's the top scorer in the game by 8 points despite missing two games; he has 12 more points than any other attacking player.

Hazard and aguero are going to miss games in December, without doubt, and they both have question marks hanging over them. When morata plays, hazard doesn't score well, and morata is currently first choice. Aguero has struggled on the road this season. Richarlison and Robertson have difficult fixtures and I'd expect Robertson to miss one or both of Burnley/Newcastle. Klopp has already spoken about him being tired and they now have a huge game coming up against napoli. Id expect to see a lot of rotation from pool in the next 3 gws.

Finally, one of the - 4s is to swap hart for button, freeing up 0.5. Its hard to quantify, but having that extra 0.5 to use in the coming months adds some value to my squad which could result in a >4 point return.

Its a risky move for sure, hazard and aguero definitely have the potential to punish you in fpl. I'll need to decide tonight as sterling is going up, at the moment im leaning towards doing it, but the feedback here has me rethinking. I've been toying with a lot of options this gw, i feel its going to be an important decision for the season.

Despite contemplating a multi-hit get-all-the-Man-City-midfielders approach all week, I might just cool my jets and do Ings to Jiminez instead.


Would leave me with a slightly underwhelming front 8 of:


Milner | Salah | Hazard | Fraser | Richarlison


Jiminez | Arnie | Agueroooooooooooo


Milner was a major mis-step last week :rolleyes:....he was basically a make-weight to get Kun in

Taxuser1 wrote: »

here's team

Ryan
TAA Alonso AWB
Richar Salah Martial Sterling Hazard
Murray Wilson

Hamer Ings Bennett Dunk

Cost me -8 to bring in Richarlinson but considering dumping him for Paterson freeing up money for Ings to Arnautovic for a -4

Richarlinson has 2 home fixtures to come and anything can happen in a Merseyside derby. Want to get Arni in shortly but next week would see the 2 transfers in playing each other. Should I bank for this week?

I'd bank.

Wildcard time two options I'm sitting atm

Fab and button GK
AWB TAA Schindler Doherty DEF
Sterling Ali Mane Brooks Kayal MID
Kun Arnautovic Morara FWD

Option 2
Fab for Ederson in GK
Martial for Ali and Mane for Salah in Mid
Morata for Rondon up Front (leaves. 02)

Any views?

i think if it's at all possible, managers should bank.

shít is about to get hectic, and i'd prefer the info of who plays this GW to inform me for the midweek games, than the pure guesswork this GW is in terms of a lot of teams.

Suarezistheman wrote: »

Gonna play boring transfer just so I don't lose it. Getting rid of Begovic , is Fabianski the best option based on fixtures between here & NY?

If you're making a keeper transfer for the sake of it, I'd get Button at 4.0.

Based on form and how deep he is playing, why is everyone looking at getting Kane in now?

He's playing very deep, he's not scoring goals as easily/frequently as he should be for his price tag.

Suarezistheman wrote: »

It's for my first choice

I'd probably keep Begovic and get Button as my second choice in your situation.

I'm assuming you have 2 FTs and have no pressing transfer to make!

tailgunner wrote: »

I'd probably keep Begovic and get Button as my second choice in your situation.

I'm assuming you have 2 FTs and have no pressing transfer to make!

Are we sure Button is 2nd choice keeper, he was back fit last week and not on the bench, himself and Steele both joined in the Summer, so just curious as to why folk now think Button is 2nd Choice, ala first choice come January.

Hazard & Kun to Sterling & PEA

normanoffside wrote: »

Pea is at home to Spurs this week. Kun is at home to Bournemouth.
Hazard is at home to Fulham and Sterling might not play.

These may be good moves in the short to medium term but neither make sense this weekend IMO.

I do see where you're coming from, but:


Hazard might not play, Sterling is home to Bournemouth



Kun to PEA to free up a city place (already have Dilva & Ederson)


Have been in 2 minds on this for last few days (basically my thoughts above vs yours ) but have pressed button now so will have to live with it

Ace2007 wrote: »

Are we sure Button is 2nd choice keeper, he was back fit last week and not on the bench, himself and Steele both joined in the Summer, so just curious as to why folk now think Button is 2nd Choice, ala first choice come January.

I had the "pleasure" of watching Jason Steele week in, week out last season.

Trust me when I say that Steele getting a move to a Premier League club, even as 3rd choice, is the strangest move I have seen in a long time and IMO surely just a favour/backhander to an agent.

If Brighton only had 3 goalkeepers, then Steele should still be 4th choice!

Worst case scenario Steele plays the first game during Ryan's absence, everyone laughs, I say "I told you all", and Button slots in the following week.

Scorpion Sting wrote:

So he’s not very good then?

Sounds like he's steeling a living.....