Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump is the President Mark IV (Read Mod Warning in OP)

1313314316318319323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,155 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    the proverbial is definitely about to hit the fan.....




    https://twitter.com/CREWcrew/status/1067777368733962246

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    everlast75 wrote: »
    the proverbial is definitely about to hit the fan.....




    https://twitter.com/CREWcrew/status/1067777368733962246
    He seems to have gone on a small run of retweeting that account. It is nuts.

    The man needs help. At this point the thread may well be a load of slagging some mentally unwell man.

    He should not have that position but there is little reason for a party to remove its own president and few other ways to do it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,851 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Trump is not mentally unwell, that is unkind to those who genuinely suffer.

    Certainly has a personality disorder; narcisstic, sociopath.

    Great to see Manafort cannot be pardoned. This seems to be trademark Mueller move. Great move also if he has weaved a plot so that Whitaker cannot bury his Report.
    As they say the WH doesn't know what work is until they get hit by a Dem House in the New Year. They will probe everything of the last 2 years.

    It will be funny if Trump's only reason to run for a second term is to keep himself from being investigated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    everlast75 wrote: »
    the proverbial is definitely about to hit the fan.....




    https://twitter.com/CREWcrew/status/1067777368733962246

    Oh Sweet Jeebus!! Yet another new low breached!! When/where will it end?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,711 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Christy42 wrote: »
    He seems to have gone on a small run of retweeting that account. It is nuts.

    The man needs help. At this point the thread may well be a load of slagging some mentally unwell man.

    He should not have that position but there is little reason for a party to remove its own president and few other ways to do it.
    I'd say it's just more of the same distract/deflect stuff that he's been doing for ages. The only conclusion you can draw from this is whether the hysteria level has gone up a notch or not. I'd say we're up a notch which generally means something coming down the line.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,254 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Christy42 wrote: »
    He seems to have gone on a small run of retweeting that account. It is nuts.
    Which account is it ?(I tried but couldn't work it out).

    edit: ah ,got it (pass the bag)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,829 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    everlast75 wrote: »
    the proverbial is definitely about to hit the fan.....

    In fairness to Trump, he probably just saw Obama and Hilary behind bars and smashed the retweet button like it was a pornstar and his wife had just given birth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    His twitter really holds no interest for me any more; it's just a distraction tool that he uses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,272 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    TomOnBoard wrote: »
    I do agree that, depending on how the Dems play it in the House, Trump could become highly toxic to Reps who .may decide to get a moral backbone and dump him for 2020. However, there's going to need to be some conversion for that to happen

    The problem for the GOP is they need the Trump base and the suburban educated people that ran for the hills in the midterms and getting them on the same team for 2020 and the future is a really big ask as ultimately their is so much differences between both and they probably loath each other.!

    Some of the people the Never Trumper Neo Cons have suggested have been laughable, Kasich, Flake etc.

    The one that has played it really well is Hailey who since getting her job from Trump has never slammed him while keeping her support in the Never Trumpers. She will be formidable when she runs for President, but how do the GOP speed it up for 2020?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,155 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Rjd2 wrote: »
    The problem for the GOP is they need the Trump base and the suburban educated people that ran for the hills in the midterms and getting them on the same team for 2020 and the future is a really big ask as ultimately their is so much differences between both and they probably loath each other.!

    Some of the people the Never Trumper Neo Cons have suggested have been laughable, Kasich, Flake etc.

    The one that has played it really well is Hailey who since getting her job from Trump has never slammed him while keeping her support in the Never Trumpers. She will be formidable when she runs for President, but how do the GOP speed it up for 2020?

    Trump was elected with assistance of Wikileaks, the Russians, gerrymandering and Comey, to a degree.

    Trump had 2 years to put his stamp on things, and go into the mid terms on the back of good economic status (thanks Obama!)

    The midterms were record breakingly bad for the Reps, despite the positive economics.

    Imagine the deficit come 2020, the fall out from the tariffs, or even there is a recession. The reps will be obliterated

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Trump was elected with assistance of Wikileaks, the Russians, gerrymandering and Comey, to a degree.

    I don't reckon that gerrymandering had much effect on Trump's presidential vote. It certainly helped the Reps for the House as well as a range of State contests, but as both Presidential and Congressional Senate elections are not really decided by the people directly, it had less impact on the Presidency. Apart from Trump's blitzkrieg campaign and his campaign's use of modern electoral voting strategies, the biggest contributor was the failure of the Clinton campaign to curb the Trump effect in the Rust Belt and other rural states. The second biggest contributor was HRC herself, who garnered a massive degree of antipathy among non- committed and independent- leaning voters. There is no doubt in my mind that troll factories had an effect, but its not really quantifiable. Similarly, Comey's interference definitely put his thumb on the scale.

    For 2020, Trump's appeal will be greatly reduced and if the Dems play it smart in the next 2 years and put up a sensible candidate, they could do very well. But the next election has to be about getting Trump out, rather than flying any diversity or other flags that will polarise otherwise supportive voters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,444 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    Goal in 2020 is pretty simply for Dem presidential candidate.
    1. Hold onto states won by Clinton in 2016 (which shouldn't be too difficult)
    2. Flip Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan.

    Considering the Dems won the 3 Senate and 3 Governor elections in those states earlier this month it clearly should be where all their effort goes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,189 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    It's been reported by that Donald trump has told Robert mueller(presumably in his written answers) that he didn't know about a Russian lawyer's trump tower visit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,161 ✭✭✭relax carry on


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    His twitter really holds no interest for me any more; it's just a distraction tool that he uses.

    I don't agree with discounting his Twitter. Yes it's a distraction but much like the transcripts of his rambling interviews; they are a record of his character and his failings.

    Words have power and words have consequences. His disjointed ramblings in those interviews he gives and his inflammatory tweets energise his base and drive his agenda. He continues to sow discord and confusion and those tweets are part of it. Hopefully something in his rantings will be able to be used against him before he can do irreparable damage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,036 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    It's been reported by that Donald trump has told Robert mueller(presumably in his written answers) that he didn't know about a Russian lawyer's trump tower visit.

    Link?
    He's being saying that for months in public.

    Apparently Manafort's legal team have been feeding Trump's team with the answers that Manafort supplied to Mueller, which since yesterday were reported as lies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,189 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    I don't agree with discounting his Twitter. Yes it's a distraction but much like the transcripts of his rambling interviews; they are a record of his character and his failings.

    Words have power and words have consequences. His disjointed ramblings in those interviews he gives and his inflammatory tweets energise his base and drive his agenda. He continues to sow discord and confusion and those tweets are part of it. Hopefully something in his rantings will be able to be used against him before he can do irreparable damage.

    But I don't think his peronal tweets on his personal twitter account will be archived once he leaves office. There is an official POTUS twitter account and other government accounts that are archived and when there is a change the outgoing person uses a new or existing one and not the government ones. I know the White House says Trumps tweets should be taken an official line from the president but as they aren't under the official presidential account will they be used against him ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,189 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    duploelabs wrote: »
    Link?
    He's being saying that for months in public.

    Apparently Manafort's legal team have been feeding Trump's team with the answers that Manafort supplied to Mueller, which since yesterday were reported as lies

    It's an alert from CNN.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,024 ✭✭✭Carry


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    But I don't think his peronal tweets on his personal twitter account will be archived once he leaves office. There is an official POTUS twitter account and other government accounts that are archived and when there is a change the outgoing person uses a new or existing one and not the government ones. I know the White House says Trumps tweets should be taken an official line from the president but as they aren't under the official presidential account will they be used against him ?

    I don't know if all his tweeds will be kept forever, but there is an archive of his personal twitter account:

    http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/

    Not sure though if his tweets and his personal account will be kept in the WH archives, but at least it's in the public domain.
    Historians might want to properly archive the tweets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,161 ✭✭✭relax carry on


    Carry wrote: »
    I don't know if all his tweeds will be kept forever, but there is an archive of his personal twitter account:

    http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/

    Not sure though if his tweets and his personal account will be kept in the WH archives, but at least it's in the public domain.
    Historians might want to properly archive the tweets.

    Saw that alright. Seems that National Archives warned the Whitehouse to preserve tweets relating to his presidential role. The jury is still out on the rest of his tweets but they are already preserved for posterity through websites like the above.

    http://time.com/4958877/donald-trump-deletes-tweets-legal-implications/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,739 ✭✭✭serfboard


    rossie1977 wrote: »
    Flip Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan.
    80,000 votes in those three states is what won it for Trump in 2016.

    Tiny margins when you consider that 130 million voted in the election.

    I saw Michael Moore on MSNBC saying that Michigan voters sent the message that they were pissed off with the Dems (and Hillary) by voting for Trump in 2016.

    They're now pissed off with Trump and are sending the message that they want Progressive Democrats - he instanced Rashida Tlaib as an example - someone who won not because of her identity (one of the first two Muslim women in Congress and the first Palestinian-American woman in Congress) but because of the platform she supports (including Medicare For All and a $15 minimum wage).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Will the news that Ford will cut shifts but not jobs in Michigan and Kentucky satisfy the unions? Trump was furious at earlier reports GM plants would be shut.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,617 ✭✭✭swampgas


    It strikes me that all his life Trump has been working his way from one scam to the next, leaving a trail of lies, broken promises, unpaid bills and lawsuits in his wake. He almost ran out of road a few times but got bailed out by Russian "investors".

    His usual M.O. doesn't work long term as POTUS. He's stuck in the White House. He can't run off to some other alternative US of A and start his scam all over again. When he lies and spins and exagerates, it's just instinct ingrained over 70 years of getting the suckers to sign up before he runs off to the the next con. He doesn't really expect to have to stand over anything he says or promises.

    Except now he can't hide. Everything he has done and promised is hanging over him, and he can't slip away in the night or get his legal fixer to take care of it. He must be feeling pretty trapped right now. Who knows what he might try to dig himself out of the hole he's in.

    He certainly doesn't seem to be one for learning new tricks. He's probably still trying to figure out which judge he will need to bribe or blackmail to keep himself out of prison. I doubt he could even manage to skip the country as POTUS, something I imagine he could do quite easily otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,155 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1067871079962685440?s=19


    As said, another obstruction add on to the list.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    rossie1977 wrote: »
    Goal in 2020 is pretty simply for Dem presidential candidate.
    1. Hold onto states won by Clinton in 2016 (which shouldn't be too difficult)
    2. Flip Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan.

    Considering the Dems won the 3 Senate and 3 Governor elections in those states earlier this month it clearly should be where all their effort goes.

    And point 2 highlights how badly DNC electoral strategy failed in 2016 by not having HRC saturate those states.

    Hopefully they've learned for 2020....
    1) Don't take any place for granted and
    2) The Clintons have no further role to play


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    But I don't think his peronal tweets on his personal twitter account will be archived once he leaves office. There is an official POTUS twitter account and other government accounts that are archived and when there is a change the outgoing person uses a new or existing one and not the government ones. I know the White House says Trumps tweets should be taken an official line from the president but as they aren't under the official presidential account will they be used against him ?

    The RealDonaldTrump seems to be the source of most of the tweets I've seen (particularly the loopy/offensive ones). Is that not an official account, subject to all the rules regarding Presidential Archives?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,711 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    TomOnBoard wrote: »
    The RealDonaldTrump seems to be the source of most of the tweets I've seen (particularly the loopy/offensive ones). Is that not an official account, subject to all the rules regarding Presidential Archives?
    Yeah. It's pretty irrelevant which account he uses. Everything he says while president is de facto from the president. It would be the same argument in earlier times if he wrote a letter on WH headed paper or blank paper.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,996 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    It's an alert from CNN.

    CNN repeated that report that Don included that statement in his written replies to Rob Mueller's questions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,829 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Pardoning Manafort at this stage neither helps Trump nor hurts Mueller. If Mueller is already proceeding with pulling the plea deal from Manafort for lying, it means they already have whatever they need from him and already had evidence to counter his lies. Manafort was a tool (in numerous senses of the word), but not something the investigation hinges on. It would only be bad optics for Trump.

    The question would be, would those bad optics outweigh the risk of Manafort realising he's not getting a pardon and decides to actually fully turn on Trump.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭circadian


    I see Corsi went on Ari Melber last night to "spill the beans" on his involvement in the probe.

    I suspect he is both covering for Stone and using this as a means to get information to the Trump admin. He also ran with the "Mueller offered me a plea deal in return for a lie" in a attempt to discredit the SC.

    I wonder if the likes of MSNBC get the go ahead from the special counsel to let people like this on, is this part of the play to let those involved think they're making a smart move but in reality they're just tightening the noose.

    https://www.msnbc.com/the-beat-with-ari-melber/watch/key-mueller-witness-i-lied-and-i-m-ready-to-die-in-jail-1383185475967?v=railb&


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,036 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    circadian wrote: »
    I see Corsi went on Ari Melber last night to "spill the beans" on his involvement in the probe.

    I suspect he is both covering for Stone and using this as a means to get information to the Trump admin. He also ran with the "Mueller offered me a plea deal in return for a lie" in a attempt to discredit the SC.

    I wonder if the likes of MSNBC get the go ahead from the special counsel to let people like this on, is this part of the play to let those involved think they're making a smart move but in reality they're just tightening the noose.

    https://www.msnbc.com/the-beat-with-ari-melber/watch/key-mueller-witness-i-lied-and-i-m-ready-to-die-in-jail-1383185475967?v=railb&

    Was half expecting his lawyer to extend a shepherd's crook from left of camera to yank him off screen to stop him talking when he said he lied to Congress


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement