Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Peter Casey believes Travellers should not be recognised as an ethnic minority

1309310312314315333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,216 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It was always going to happen.

    Supporters of a politician - who 'spoke the truth'(his truth) crying like babies because he was confronted/challenged by others who were speaking their 'truth'.

    Fabulously ironic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,259 ✭✭✭micks_address


    I kinda see Casey's argument. That by classifying someone as being part of an ethic minority your automatically labelling them as outside of normal society. If that's the right term. Not that I necessarily agree with him


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,447 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    Do you crack one off when thinking about that party, you're as bad as a drug pusher, it's funny though

    There is only one party there that fits the bill at the moment renua. If you see my quote I said “like renua” ...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,797 ✭✭✭tretorn


    I wonder how many of the travellers pay the Tv licence.
    Could we dig up that info, we could msybe ask how many have microchipped the dogs and bought licences for them too.


  • Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I see the 'hate' nonsense is still being trotted out. I wonder will any examples of this hate speech be provided? Although Casey was referred to repeatedly as a racist yet none could back up this claim.

    Just quoting this again.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭youtube!


    I haven't read much of the thread but is it true or false that because traveller's are considered as an ethnic minority that they get more payment than the standard from the Social welfare? I heard this being bandied around but it surely cannot be true...Can it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,216 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I kinda see Casey's argument. That by classifying someone as being part of an ethic minority your automatically labelling them as outside of normal society. If that's the right term. Not that I necessarily agree with him

    Casey - A Derry man, had his own identity given 'parity of esteem and the right to inclusivity' enshrined in an international treaty. That is what SEMS was designed to do for this community, nothing more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,314 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    Do you crack one off when thinking about that party, you're as bad as a drug pusher, it's funny though

    There is only one party there that fits the bill at the moment renua. If you see my quote I said “like renua” ...

    Of course you're entitled to your opinion and choice of voting preference, but they're not everyone's cup of tea, certainly not mine, it ll be interesting to see how they do in the next ge though, it may give an indication where Ireland is going


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    It was always going to happen.

    Supporters of a politician - who 'spoke the truth'(his truth) crying like babies because he was confronted/challenged by others who were speaking their 'truth'.

    Fabulously ironic.
    You seem to be the only one referring to Casey as a politician. No crying here dude, just find it hilarious how some try to be so dismissive of hundreds of thousands of their fellow citizens. He has said some stark and truthful things some nonsense aswell. Will he get in the Dail? Doubtful but he has started a discourse that is long overdue, votes there for any politician willing to call out the bs engaged in by the travelling community.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,837 ✭✭✭Edward M


    How much more articulate do you need to be?

    There is nothing beyond stating the 'soundbytes' since Casey started. He falls apart when questioned on his opinions.
    Evidenced again last night.

    I am still laughing at the 'Phoenix Park' interlude and the idea that a mouthful like that could be defended or expanded on. Pure hate based rethoric designed to rabble rouse. And again, it has been successful to a degree, but I reckon there are a lot of IQ's considering their positions at the moment across the country. :D

    Realistically I'd say he is just throwing out the idea of where it's socially acceptable to site travellers or how close to the aras we would be happy to have them congregate for any reason, and be on view, say when foreign dignitaries are visiting.
    We have cricket, horse back polo, a zoo, other sports and activities taking place there regularly, why not traveller college for instance?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,216 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You seem to be the only one referring to Casey as a politician. No crying here dude, just find it hilarious how some try to be so dismissive of hundreds of thousands of their fellow citizens. He has said some stark and truthful things some nonsense aswell. Will he get in the Dail? Doubtful but he has started a discourse that is long overdue, votes there for any politician willing to call out the bs engaged in by the travelling community.

    :D:D:D:D There was a 'discourse' last night and he couldn't get past his loud mouth soundbytes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    The traveler community are as Irish as everyone else, more so in some ways. Defining them as separate is I suspect, just a political thing or perhaps a tactic to use in legal argument. In my experience, the travelers are likable and hardworking but when they misbehave, problems arise.

    On crime and drunken behavior, I would be inclined to apply a measure of brutality to all criminals and drunks, regardless of the community from which they hail. I am also opposed to the welfare state and the travelers are by no means the only recipients of welfare.

    Surely, now is the time to bring back the stick so as to discipline the young. Of course, in days gone by, sailors and prisoners were occasionally birched for insubordination and perhaps such methods might prove effective when applied to the backs of those inmates who display outward signs of defiance or loutish aggression. Manners need to be imposed on those who fail to acquire them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,371 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Would Renua not be a natural home for Casey and his supporters? (Assuming that is that FF don't take him up on his offer to lead that party)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    tretorn wrote: »
    I wonder how many of the travellers pay the Tv licence.
    Could we dig up that info, we could msybe ask how many have microchipped the dogs and bought licences for them too.

    Or bin and electricity charges?

    One rule for them....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,314 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    The traveler community are as Irish as everyone else, more so in some ways. Defining them as separate is just a political thing or perhaps a tactic to use in legal argument. In my experience, the travelers are likable and hardworking but when they misbehave, problems arise. That said, I would be inclined to apply a measure of brutality to all criminals regardless of the community from which they hail. I am also opposed to the welfare state and the travelers are by no means the only recipients of welfare.

    Why not have an ould bitta crack with it, a fight to the death with criminals, could be staged in croker


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    :D:D:D:D There was a 'discourse' last night and he couldn't get past his loud mouth soundbytes.

    Dude you seem overly focused on Casey my point was he opened a can of worms and lights are being shown in areas that some would rather didn't happen. Have to say though despite some nonsense on Casey's part he held his own against Tubs and the PP idiots. Worst attempt at an ambush ever.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    Hi Guys!
    i'm back again after me 2 week ban,

    Have i missed much?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895


    Phoebas wrote: »
    Would Renua not be a natural home for Casey and his supporters? (Assuming that is that FF don't take him up on his offer to lead that party)

    For some for sure but I know of a lot of left leaning people who voted for Casey who wouldn't go near Renua with a barge pole.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,216 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Dude you seem overly focused on Casey my point was he opened a can of worms and lights are being shown in areas that some would rather didn't happen. Have to say though despite some nonsense on Casey's part he held his own against Tubs and the PP idiots. Worst attempt at an ambush ever.

    'Overly focused on Casey' on a thread about Casey?

    I am noticing this tactic - wheneve a light is shone on Casey, the excuse is 'it's not about Casey' :D:D

    Arranging a counterpoint to a controversial opinion on a debate show is not an 'ambush'.
    Juvenile excuse making for a shambolic performance/defence of his statements.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,141 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    The issue is not going away is it, despite the media and Establishment desire to kill off any dissenting voices ASAP.

    The one thing I would like to focus on is what Casey actually said. He said everyone should be treated equally, and there is no need for ethnic status for Travellers. That's true and is NOT racist, how could it be?

    But the narrative has been hijacked to assign to him the very labels he seeks to abolish.

    Travellers are not treated equally here, they are treated better than the so called non ethnic people IMV. Rarely pulled up on anti social behaviour, fighting, animal cruelty, misogyny, a culture of non education and marrying the girls off as soon as possible and so on.

    It really is up to Travellers to prove they are being discriminated against. I don't see much of that, quite the opposite in fact.

    This is despite millions of taxpayer funds been funnelled into Pavee Point. What benefits has than shown?

    We hear all the time about health outcomes, and lack of education etc. Well in fairness those services are available to all, so I don't understand why this narrative keeps being repeated. They should help themselves a bit more and quit the victim mentality.

    We are all equal remember.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,168 ✭✭✭Ursus Horribilis


    It must hurt that this has taken all the spotlight away from Sinn Féin, eh?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    Why not have an ould bitta crack with it, a fight to the death with criminals, could be staged in croker

    No, no. Authority must be the arbiter and applicator of discipline. Loutish behaviour such as fighting, has no place in a civilized society, be it in an arena or a back alley.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dav3


    I'm not sure what else the people that support him want.

    He has been on the biggest platforms in the state, there is nowhere else to go. For someone without a political party or without an idea what he's going to do next, he should actually be delighted with the airtime that he's received.

    The questions put to him have always been fairly tame. People have just let him speak, he's his own worse enemy.

    He's going to run in the counties that nominated him is he? Well I wish him the best of luck running against these lads and trying to take their seats.

    465263.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    Tubs doing a great job for the the Casey PR machine I see


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84 ✭✭Roark


    listermint wrote: »
    He was the most suited out of the crop of people applying.

    That is my opinion.

    Casey gave no one a voice they don't already have. These same people are not bothered voting for new parties . So they aren't too bothered about their voice. Protest vote with zero results.

    Get off their arse and start campaigning to councillors and TDs if they want change.

    Or dish out pointless protest votes when they get activated at a perceived bogey man.

    Look at the protest vote in the UK millions voting for themselves to be put out of work.again a perceived bogey man. The EU

    We don’t know what the result of the protest vote will be yet. It’s too early to tell. A perceived bogeyman? You honestly don’t have a clue. I live in one of the towns where Casey topped the pole. People here didn’t vote for Casey because they were manipulated and/or are stupid/hateful/racist. They supported him because they live in a town with a high traveller population and have to live everyday with the problems that that often brings. I won’t bore you with anecdotes. Google has pages and pages of newspaper articles if you wish to educate yourself.

    There are no candidates that will touch traveller issues or the growing welfare state at the moment. Maybe that will change. We’ll see.

    Comparing the presidential election with Brexit makes no sense. One outcome has pretty much no impact on voters lives and the other has huge impact.

    Here is something to think about. Maybe people that think/vote differently to you aren’t idiots. Maybe we havent been manipulated and are blaming all our woes on a bogeyman. Maybe we have genuine real concerns that you and people like you have very little experience of and frankly don’t give a damn about.

    That’s me done for a while. Please don’t expect a reply.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    'Overly focused on Casey' on a thread about Casey?

    I am noticing this tactic - wheneve a light is shone on Casey, the excuse is 'it's not about Casey' :D:D

    Arranging a counterpoint to a controversial opinion on a debate show is not an 'ambush'.
    Juvenile excuse making for a shambolic performance/defence of his statements.
    I can see responding to you could become very tedious. I said Casey started a discourse as to whether he has a future place in that discourse is my opinion doubtful.
    It was an ambush but the idiots that attempted should have been better coached. Appalling effort. Casey getting attacked by Tubs just adds fuel to the fire. Anyway as I said engaging with you further would become tedious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,314 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    Why not have an ould bitta crack with it, a fight to the death with criminals, could be staged in croker

    No, no. Authority must be the arbiter and applicator of discipline. Loutish behaviour such as fighting, has no place in a civilized society, be it in an arena or a back alley.

    It might be best if you leave this planet, as I'd imagine life is stressful for you. Would brutality be considered err emm brutal behaviour?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    It must hurt that this has taken all the spotlight away from Sinn Féin, eh?

    Sinn Fein could have organised a better ambush against Casey, lots of experience to draw on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,216 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I can see responding to you could become very tedious. I said Casey started a discourse as to whether he has a future place in that discourse is my opinion doubtful.
    It was an ambush but the idiots that attempted should have been better coached. Appalling effort. Casey getting attacked by Tubs just adds fuel to the fire. Anyway as I said engaging with you further would become tedious.

    You are joining the 'we want a 'discussion' but we don't want any challenge to the discussion' gang is it?
    I can see why this gang are upset Casey got challenged last night. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    You are joining the 'we want a 'discussion' but we don't want any challenge to the discussion' gang is it?
    I can see why this gang are upset Casey got challenged last night. :rolleyes:

    Nah dude just joining " the couldn't be bothered responding to you gang". Tedious boring and circular. Don't expect any further response.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement