Sherlock - A game of Werewolf!

Would the 4th hospitalized person care to corroborate the story that is being laid out here for us?

Why does Des know there are 4 but the others did not indicate so? I would think especially on Day 1 this is too big to be a wolf ploy (involving all 4 of their team) and the flavor does fit the SK as per the OP but still its very odd that Des knows more than the others or that the others felt the need to not let the village know the full story. Surely whoever put them there would know already so testing for reactions etc seems a bit off

User Name| Posts
Orla WW |78
Mary WW |48
Derry WW |35
Katie WW |33
Riona WW |31
Nigel WW |31
Conor WW| 27
Winifred WW |22
Clodagh WW| 22
Abigail WW |20
Brendan WW| 20
Doris WW| 18
Gabriel WW |16
Desmond WW| 16
Tegan WW |16
Wendy WW| 11
Steve WW |10
Frank WW| 9
Liam WW |6
Barbara WW| 5
Eva WW |1
Holly WW |1

So by my counting we've yet to hear from Gertrude, Isla and Oisín.

I'd be slightly worried the the hospitalisation fills the Arsonist role as the SK is Hospital based. 3 (or is it 4) people when it's not even Lynch day 1 seems like an awful lot of people waiting to die though.

Desmond WW wrote: »

You know when you send those email things from the computer to many people, and don't use the bcc field. Well, its like that.

I'd imagine if you found out that way that maybe you shouldn't have mentioned it on thread but cats out of the bag now.



So literally nothing for you 4 (if the 4th person wants to speak up) has changed apart from being told your in hospital at the moment, yes?

Abigail WW wrote: »

I'd imagine if you found out that way that maybe you shouldn't have mentioned it on thread but cats out of the bag now.

I assumed that knowledge was imparted onto us to use how we see fit.

So literally nothing for you 4 (if the 4th person wants to speak up) has changed apart from being told your in hospital at the moment, yes?

correct.

Derry WW wrote: »

Ah, no, not Desmond too

I've not spotted 4th though.

Desmond, how did you know 4 people were hospitalised?

Tegan WW wrote: »

Desmond, how did you know 4 people were hospitalised?

At risk of going meta, there's four names in the "Sent to" part of the message. The message wasn't sent to four people individually, but to 4 people simultaneously, so we're all listed on the PM as recipients.

Derry WW wrote: »

At risk of going meta, there's four names in the "Sent to" part of the message. The message wasn't sent to four people individually, but to 4 people simultaneously, so we're all listed on the PM as recipients.

So it was either a mod mistake or a clue

I'm speeding back through yesterday, focusing from the solving of the first puzzle onwards. These are the notes I've taken as I read back. These aren't accusations. Just thoughts that came to mind as I read back.

Dorris waffles a lot.
Nigel tries to confirm me as good after I solved the first puzzle; Abi (rightly) shuts down that line of thought.
Connor seems the quickest to move onto solving puzzle 2.
Wendy, in post '163, seems to post for the sake of posting.
Babs doesn't appear on radar until after the second clue is solved.
Post solving clue 3, Dorris still feels super fluffy.

List of people I feel worked on the puzzles overtly; Connor, Desmond, Clodagh, Riona, Nigel and Myself. (Leaving Mary off cause she dead).
List of people who started contributing after the second was solved; Barbara, Brendan

This morning.

Wini lists three suspects. One dies. Nigel immediately starts trying to throw shade (Post 391)
Brendan, myself and Desmond are all targeted by the same person (I'll let the forth reveal himself if he'd rather though).

I'd wager that at least one wolf would have wanted to appear helpful, without actually being helpful, yesterday during the puzzles. So I'd guess there's a wolf in the list of Connor, Desmond, Clodagh, Riona, Nigel, Barbara and Brendan. (Leaving myself off, obviously). Of that list, Nigel stands out as the most suspicious to me, at this moment. Connor, Desmond, Clodagh and Riona would be in my "Lean good" columns currently.

Without further information is there anything else to be gleamed from the hospitalisation thing?

It doesn't clear anyone nor damn them i think.

I would like the 4th person to corroborate the story for later, but I don't see what else we can gain from focusing on it.

I propose we get the usual d1 FFAs are important vs d1 FFAs are a waste of time debate going.

Derry WW wrote: »

Yes.

So you can verify the other lad and my suspicion on Desmond is unwarranted for now.

I had thought he was slipping up by mentioning 4.

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Without further information is there anything else to be gleamed from the hospitalisation thing?

It doesn't clear anyone nor damn them i think.

I would like the 4th person to corroborate the story for later, but I don't see what else we can gain from focusing on it.

I propose we get the usual d1 FFAs are important vs d1 FFAs are a waste of time debate going.

Im game for an FFA

Riona WW wrote: »

So would you surmise that the 4 of you were singled out by the Sk who is in essence taunting you before killing one of you?

Seems very likely, which sadly doesn't confirm any of them as village cleared.

Tegan WW wrote: »

So you can verify the other lad and my suspicion on Desmond is unwarranted for now.

I had thought he was slipping up by mentioning 4.

But if it’s an SK move surely it just means the chosen 4 aren’t the SK?