Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Family of seven sleep in Garda station Mod note post one

1223224226228229301

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Melendez wrote: »
    I realise as a social welfare sponger yourself, who presents themselves on the social welfare forum as the absolute guru

    I'm not on social welfare

    I have two jobs .





    (Fail )


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Melendez


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Melendez wrote: »
    Anyone can check your posting history. You are a complete hypocrite.

    I have previously been on social welfare ,
    Don't even have a medical card.


    And now I'm in employment with 2 jobs do you have a an actual point .



    Actually what has my previous social welfare payment got to do with this discussion ,on someone who's scamming the system while publicly lieing about her situation and previous situations


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Melendez


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Melendez wrote: »
    It would be interesting to find out how much tax you think you have to pay before you are contributing to the likes of Ms Cash.
    , the likes of Gatling will assert that the likes of him would be able to gouge even more off the taxpayer if it wasn't for the likes of her.


    The likes of Gatling the taxpayer with two jobs so he can keep a roof over family's head and food on the table .



    (Must doing something wrong then )


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Melendez wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.


    Maybe you should bow before her


    Bow before her ,did you actually say

    Bow before her ,

    Are you on crack like seriously .

    You think people should worship this bone iddled layabout who's scamming people left right and centre with her lies .


    Ah here I've lost all hope in humanity


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,364 ✭✭✭Damien360


    Melendez wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    It would be interesting to find out how much tax you think you have to pay before you are contributing to the likes of Ms Cash. I reckon a working adult has to pay the bones of €40,000 per annum in tax during their working life just to pay for their share of the basic state services that they will benefit from during their lifetime. Only a small portion of the population actually will manage to pay this to the state. I'm sure that small proportion will include absolutely everybody on here that claims they are paying for Ms Cash. Of course, the likes of Gatling will assert that the likes of him would be able to gouge even more off the taxpayer if it wasn't for the likes of her.[/quote]

    I'm not sure you understood what I posted. She is the poster boy/girl for this wrong system.

    The issue is not just one person but the absolute belief that there are many others just like her. Plenty has been posted here and in other publications to show this is true. Mainstream media chooses to ignore this for political correctness reasons.

    When you read about lack of adequate funding for a service like ambulances/schools/health (all these are for all citizens) then you must look at the waste that is in the social welfare system. She has made herself the poster girl for this waste. Her lifestyle is being funded without any contribution. That is money not well spent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,340 ✭✭✭deco nate


    Melendez wrote: »
    I realise as a social welfare sponger yourself, who presents themselves on the social welfare forum as the absolute guru on how a person can claim every conceivable benefit that they might be able to scrounge off the taxpayer, that you might feel your position has been usurped by a young starling who has managed to outclaim even you without your many years of study and experience. There is not one jot of evidence that it has been done fraudulently. Maybe you should bow before her and try and learn from her.
    Wow! So much bs from you. Tell me again which charity organisation you work with?

    Full disclosure needed


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Melendez


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,968 ✭✭✭Grab All Association


    Someone needs to call in and say 'gyar I'm an angry widow form Tallaght and if you come back here I'm going to put a spell (sic) on you"

    They are highly superstitious about widows.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    tomofson wrote: »
    I am normally a very compassionate person, but after a few dozen negative encounters with the traveller community some of which have been extremely violent I find it very hard to sympathize with them in any way.

    Ah you didnt give them a chance


  • Site Banned Posts: 210 ✭✭Sardine


    Money Mags Ca$h 1 - 0 Working public

    Media will not let people have views on this nor will politicians speak out. Tax increases to fund this type of things on the way. Well played Mags.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭PlaneSpeeking


    Someone needs to call in and say 'gyar I'm an angry widow form Tallaght and if you come back here I'm going to put a spell (sic) on you"

    They are highly superstitious about widows.

    How about widowers ??

    Sure we lost the sainted mother 25 years ago and am sure me arl fella could give them a scare ?

    He worked from 15 so perhaps that in itself would terrify them!!!!


  • Site Banned Posts: 210 ✭✭Sardine


    I often wonder why the SJWs who were so adamant on various issues including this, wearing repeal t-shirts, gay marriage etc., aren't focusing on how awful women in the travelling community are treated.
    81% of them have faced physical abuse from partners. They're not allowed stay in school because they'll be mixing with non-travellers. They're forced into marriages. They don't work. They're not allowed with anyone outside of the community.
    It's basically Sharia law.
    Meanwhile any mentioned of a Burkha or Islam etc gets people fired up on these boards. No one seems to care about how poorly travellers are treated. I do feel some sympathy for Mags having grown up in that society, she never really had a chance.

    So why do we allow the medieval treatment of Traveller women to happen? Why don't the usual SJWs care?
    I'll tell you why - it's the least sexiest cause in the world and no one wants anything to do with travellers! Plus they'd have to call out traveller men, do so at your peril.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/traveller-women-30-times-more-likely-to-suffer-domestic-violence-report-1.707916

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/traveller-women-shocked-at-research-into-rape-and-abuse-1.780043

    https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/file/6231/download?token=XyDGlOUh

    https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/aug/14/gypsies-travellers-domestic-abuse


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Sardine wrote: »
    I often wonder why the SJWs who were so adamant on various issues including this, wearing repeal t-shirts, gay marriage etc., aren't focusing on how awful women in the travelling community are treated.
    81% of them have faced physical abuse from partners. They're not allowed stay in school because they'll be mixing with non-travellers. They're forced into marriages. They don't work. They're not allowed with anyone outside of the community.
    It's basically Sharia law.
    Meanwhile any mentioned of a Burkha or Islam etc gets people fired up on these boards. No one seems to care about how poorly travellers are treated. I do feel some sympathy for Mags having grown up in that society, she never really had a chance.

    So why do we allow the medieval treatment of Traveller women to happen? Why don't the usual SJWs care?
    I'll tell you why - it's the least sexiest cause in the world and no one wants anything to do with travellers! Plus they'd have to call out traveller men, do so at your peril.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/traveller-women-30-times-more-likely-to-suffer-domestic-violence-report-1.707916

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/traveller-women-shocked-at-research-into-rape-and-abuse-1.780043

    https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/file/6231/download?token=XyDGlOUh

    https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/aug/14/gypsies-travellers-domestic-abuse


    I'm no SJW but I did vote for gay marriage and have a couple of repeal tshirts and hoodies and paraphernalia.


    I don't care about traveller women rights to be honest as they are all travellers and decide to live the lives they live. Anyone deciding to live in a caravan and enforce that life on their children when you can get a free house (as this thread shows) then, well, it speaks for itself really.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭PlaneSpeeking


    Sardine wrote: »
    I often wonder why the SJWs who were so adamant on various issues including this, wearing repeal t-shirts, gay marriage etc., aren't focusing on how awful women in the travelling community are treated.
    81% of them have faced physical abuse from partners. They're not allowed stay in school because they'll be mixing with non-travellers. They're forced into marriages. They don't work. They're not allowed with anyone outside of the community.
    It's basically Sharia law.
    Meanwhile any mentioned of a Burkha or Islam etc gets people fired up on these boards. No one seems to care about how poorly travellers are treated. I do feel some sympathy for Mags having grown up in that society, she never really had a chance.

    So why do we allow the medieval treatment of Traveller women to happen? Why don't the usual SJWs care?
    I'll tell you why - it's the least sexiest cause in the world and no one wants anything to do with travellers! Plus they'd have to call out traveller men, do so at your peril.

    It has always baffled me - I work with a fairly militant feminist who has consulted with Pavee Point, I asked her how she squared that with the treatment of traveller women and the high incidences of domestic violence and near forced marriage.

    "We can't tell other cultures that they are wrong, we must accept it".

    She's said similar about FGM too. It's maddening.


  • Site Banned Posts: 210 ✭✭Sardine


    ELM327 wrote: »
    I'm no SJW but I did vote for gay marriage and have a couple of repeal tshirts and hoodies and paraphernalia.


    I don't care about traveller women rights to be honest as they are all travellers and decide to live the lives they live. Anyone deciding to live in a caravan and enforce that life on their children when you can get a free house (as this thread shows) then, well, it speaks for itself really.

    I just meant with the Repeal thing that the t-shirts etc made it become a Cause Celibré. Traveller women will never be that.
    But I don't think the women decide to get the sh*t kicked out of them by their neanderthal husbands, or get married off at 15. That's a toxic culture that needs intervention yet no one bloody cares.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Sardine wrote: »
    I just meant with the Repeal thing that the t-shirts etc made it become a Cause Celibré. Traveller women will never be that.
    But I don't think the women decide to get the sh*t kicked out of them by their neanderthal husbands, or get married off at 15. That's a toxic culture that needs intervention yet no one bloody cares.


    They decide it for themselves though
    Normal lives are available but they refuse to accept it, instead living on the fringes of society while those of us in the real world fund them - either by taxation or through their nefarious activities.


    No sympathy from me at all. Literally could not care less. Sorry if that's not politically correct or offends some bleeding heart SJW.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 670 ✭✭✭sightband


    That's because, like so many on this thread, you're a massive racist.

    I don’t really give a shįte what the equality act says about their ethnicity, they are not a race...the only thing that distinguishes them from the rest of us is their talent for theft and wreaking general havoc, looking for benefits and doing sweet f*ck all other than the aforementioned.
    Mod-Banned


  • Site Banned Posts: 210 ✭✭Sardine


    ELM327 wrote: »
    They decide it for themselves though
    Normal lives are available but they refuse to accept it, instead living on the fringes of society while those of us in the real world fund them - either by taxation or through their nefarious activities.


    No sympathy from me at all. Literally could not care less. Sorry if that's not politically correct or offends some bleeding heart SJW.

    SJWs don't seem to care about the treatment of women by Traveller men, that was my point!
    Anyway if you read the Guardian link, one girl speaks of trying to leave over and over but the guy kept dragging her back. I'm not sure if normal lives are available tbh.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    It has always baffled me - I work with a fairly militant feminist who has consulted with Pavee Point, I asked her how she squared that with the treatment of traveller women and the high incidences of domestic violence and near forced marriage.

    "We can't tell other cultures that they are wrong, we must accept it".

    She's said similar about FGM too. It's maddening.

    The Bigotry of Low Expectations.

    It's ****ing disgraceful....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,989 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Sardine wrote: »
    ELM327 wrote: »
    They decide it for themselves though
    Normal lives are available but they refuse to accept it, instead living on the fringes of society while those of us in the real world fund them - either by taxation or through their nefarious activities.


    No sympathy from me at all. Literally could not care less. Sorry if that's not politically correct or offends some bleeding heart SJW.

    SJWs don't seem to care about the treatment of women by Traveller men, that was my point!
    Anyway if you read the Guardian link, one girl speaks of trying to leave over and over but the guy kept dragging her back. I'm not sure if normal lives are available tbh.
    Once the eighth is off the books, I think Traveller women's lives will be able to improve.


  • Site Banned Posts: 210 ✭✭Sardine


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Once the eighth is off the books, I think Traveller women's lives will be able to improve.

    Why? The only people getting abortions will be the girls trying to advance their education and careers etc. Jacinta and Sharon and Mary Margaret won't be the ones at the clinics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Once the eighth is off the books, I think Traveller women's lives will be able to improve.
    Considering they are the last bastion of staunch catholics I doubt it will make an iota of difference
    Sardine wrote: »
    SJWs don't seem to care about the treatment of women by Traveller men, that was my point!
    Anyway if you read the Guardian link, one girl speaks of trying to leave over and over but the guy kept dragging her back. I'm not sure if normal lives are available tbh.
    If it's such an issue why don't they go to the police or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Sardine wrote: »
    Why? The only people getting abortions will be the girls trying to advance their education and careers etc. Jacinta and Sharon and Mary Margaret won't be the ones at the clinics.
    This post has been deleted due to redacted


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    Mod-Ok, I've had it. We the mods have tried to be light handed in our modding recently after the feedback threads. But this thread here is a prime example of why we can't have nice things.

    I'm locking this for a review cause I've nothing to do till 5.30. Any hint of racism will be dealt with. I suspect a few probably won't be here by the time I'm done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    Mod- the following are thread banned, Going to leave locked for another little while so people can see this. Post again and it will be bans
    Yer Da sells Avon
    sightband
    Sardine
    Melendez
    Mongfinder General
    ELM327


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    Mod- My bad, Completely slipped my mind to reopen the thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Putinbot wrote: »
    Mod- My bad, Completely slipped my mind to reopen the thread.

    You were an hour early according to your initial post .

    ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    Seems eoin o brion mentioned her this morning in his rant against Eoin Murphy I thought I’d give a shout out to her again.

    She has the shinners wrapped like our Erica.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement