Hungary Scrap Gender Studies Indoctrination Courses

Thomas_IV wrote: »

I presume that you've read the whole Content of this article as you agree with all what is written there. Well, I strongly disagree with you and the Orban Regime. That is because of the quoted passages from the article as follows:



The language used to defend that 'ban' tells much about the real intentions of the Orban Regime. Quite in line with the old damned fecking Communist attitude, which is always shared by fecking Nazis as well or any other stupid authoritarian minded people, what questions the regime has no place in society and must be forbidden.

But it is getting even better as the other stupid Person gets more concrete about the meaning which is behind the ban which is:



Those 'values' this person speaks of are that of the old Fascist ideology, in which women have only a limited purpose on this earth which is to become a wife that becomes a mother of as many children as she can 'produce'. Women have to shut up and do as being told by their husband who is to be the head of the Family and decides about everything. In contrast to this stands the Communist ideology in which a woman has the same rights and the same duties like men and that included Military Service. Both ideologies are of not just of authoritarian but more of totalitarian basis and both are enemies of every freedom loving and free thinking human being, no matter the gender.

I am not in the slightest surprised that the old antisemitism which is still alive in Hungary and other countries adds up to the way Orban runs his Country. Even Communists were antisemitic and you should be aware of the time period your Hungarian anti-immigrant hero grew up and what shaped him in his young life and afterwards, making him to what he is today.

I tell you one thing which is that as that equal rights for both genders have to prevail and that in every aspect of life, every aspect of business and employment, equal pay for equal work, equal chances in all aspects of education, chances in profession and that it all should be based on the qualifications and abilities of the person, no matter what gender, colour of the skin or social background because it is the individual and its character that should stand at the centre of it, not anything else like nationality, religion, sex or even that sort of orientation. It is the itellect that counts and it is the latter what people who applaud and follow authoritarian leaders lack most of all.

In cases where such gender studies are the tool to expose the discrimination of women by their gender, the studies have their right to exist and to expose every case of discrimination to be dealt with and to finally root out this so much by myself hated macho idiocy which puts the worst bullies in a way of power to Harass others and bully them the way they seem fit just because of their gender. That is not right, it never was and it never will be. But it is the quintessence of all Fascists who love to subdue women to feel surperior over them and this disgusts me.

To be a man means to respect and treat a woman in such a way and that means on equal terms, in good and bad conditions. It means total equality, with all the consequences because a women is a fellow human being to me, not a 'second class' one or one I would have to claim a right over her, not even in marriage. It takes more strenght and self-consciousness to lead such a way of life with a femal partner but it works, on a compromise basis but it works because a wife is still her own person and one has to treat her as such with respect. Anything else is subjugation but that is what all the authoritarian idiots have in mind. They can't and won't treat women as equal partners and that is because they are weak themselves. The perfect bully characters that they are.


Curious enough, I was able to read that twitter message and I think that others can read that too, if they even bother to read it.

DickSwiveller Returns;107766916


Well, when someone starts with calling others 'snowflakes' and thus trying to discredit other peoples opinions, it says a lot of himself. As I utterly detest the likes of your writings and also the ideology which stands behind it, I welcome you to my ignore list.

Brian? wrote: »

Hold on there. I asked first. I want an answer. You can’t simply attempt to circumvent the question I asked in order to try and win an argument.

I want know peoples actual objections. Saying “it’s obvious” isn’t an answer.

Is it because of the risk of sexual abuse? Is it the example being set? Is it the risk of physical harm?

What is it?