Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

The Grass Measuring Thread

11314161819

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭Keepgrowing


    The problem with the afc of 600 is that it's virtually every paddock. Maybe not a problem per say but another week and the balers will need to be moving as there will be a week plus of covers passing 1200.

    Good point. Our goal is to take no bales off cow ground. We’ll bang away with lower covers and withdraw buffer and pray for more rain. We’ve enough ground otherwise to fill forage deficit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,979 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    What's yer milk urea like now with grass back in ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,808 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    whelan2 wrote: »
    What's yer milk urea like now with grass back in ?

    28 here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,561 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    whelan2 wrote: »
    What's yer milk urea like now with grass back in ?

    Just gone to 37 from a test of 22 before that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,979 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Just gone to 37 from a test of 22 before that.
    mine was 45 from yesterdays collection, up from 35 the day before


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    whelan2 wrote: »
    mine was 45 from yesterdays collection, up from 35 the day before

    I'd be getting a bit worried if ours was at that tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,561 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    whelan2 wrote: »
    mine was 45 from yesterdays collection, up from 35 the day before

    The grass is still short with me. Roughly 1000 cover. I'm blaming that for being too full of nitrogen.
    When it gets longer it should go down a bit. Plus I'll drop my 16 % nut down in the next load. I'm feeding 8 kgs still so even with that supplementation the grass must be shocking high.
    I was 17 before that 22. But that was on silage at night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    whelan2 wrote: »
    mine was 45 from yesterdays collection, up from 35 the day before

    Careful now...

    ‘Tis grand to have money to burn. I’d have to be feeding urea, literally, to come up with a figure like that. And well over 200gms/ hd at that.
    Think about the fish and aquatic organisms.


    Wrote plenty about mineralised N on here...wasting my time.
    It’s possible to actually poison animals with N if you follow Teagasc blind...not your fault Whelan.

    Jesus wept.

    Edit. There’s a product that you can include to help reduce the poisonous effects of N overload.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    Careful now...

    ‘Tis grand to have money to burn. I’d have to be feeding urea, literally, to come up with a figure like that. And well over 200gms/ hd at that.
    Think about the fish and aquatic organisms.


    Wrote plenty about mineralised N on here...wasting my time.
    It’s possible to actually poison animals with N if you follow Teagasc blind...not your fault Whelan.

    Jesus wept.

    Edit. There’s a product that you can include to help reduce the poisonous effects of N overload.
    Teagasc are recommending not to spread N. but tbh only we spread N we wouldn't have got the growth we got.
    See..... we don't follow teagasc blind ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    Teagasc are recommending not to spread N. but tbh only we spread N we wouldn't have got the growth we got.
    See..... we don't follow teagasc blind ;)

    Mon cul.

    Did you do a contrôle plot?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    Mon cul.

    Did you do a contrôle plot?

    Unintentionally yes!
    Paddock for reseeding got none. Wouldn't be 1/5 of what's on the rest of the farm but there's poor grass in that so it might reflect much tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,808 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    Careful now...

    ‘Tis grand to have money to burn. I’d have to be feeding urea, literally, to come up with a figure like that. And well over 200gms/ hd at that.
    Think about the fish and aquatic organisms.


    Wrote plenty about mineralised N on here...wasting my time.
    It’s possible to actually poison animals with N if you follow Teagasc blind...not your fault Whelan.

    Jesus wept.

    Edit. There’s a product that you can include to help reduce the poisonous effects of N overload.

    It’s a great reference test if results are accurate ,my milk urea is all over the shop as are neighbours could be at 28 today 6 next collection 20 etc .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    Unintentionally yes!
    Paddock for reseeding got none. Wouldn't be 1/5 of what's on the rest of the farm but there's poor grass in that so it might reflect much tbh

    L’ouest sauvage...

    Perfectly scientific...and replicated, obviously.

    Looks like Greenfield are the only ones that respect the N guidelines.
    Hmmm...”guidelines”....:).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    mahoney_j wrote: »
    It’s a great reference test if results are accurate ,my milk urea is all over the shop as are neighbours could be at 28 today 6 next collection 20 etc .

    I absolutely live by it Mahoney.
    Great analysis.

    Objectif 28-32...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,920 ✭✭✭freedominacup


    Careful now...

    ‘Tis grand to have money to burn. I’d have to be feeding urea, literally, to come up with a figure like that. And well over 200gms/ hd at that.
    Think about the fish and aquatic organisms.


    Wrote plenty about mineralised N on here...wasting my time.
    It’s possible to actually poison animals with N if you follow Teagasc blind...not your fault Whelan.

    Jesus wept.

    Edit. There’s a product that you can include to help reduce the poisonous effects of N overload.

    Gr are gone way beyond the level that mineralised N will support now. 27-33 here last 5 tests. Pr level of buffer cut a good bit in the last few days. Back to around 15% today. I didn't do an exact figure on it. Just estimate as I was filling the feeder.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 890 ✭✭✭mengele


    whelan2 wrote: »
    mine was 45 from yesterdays collection, up from 35 the day before

    That's very high. How long since nitrogen was spread? I would be waiting at least another week before grazing that stuff if its that high. Could you skip to paddocks where you put out less or the fert is out longer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,979 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    mengele wrote: »
    That's very high. How long since nitrogen was spread? I would be waiting at least another week before grazing that stuff if its that high. Could you skip to paddocks where you put out less or the fert is out longer?

    Over 3 weeks since it got fertiliser. Has had plenty of rain since.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 890 ✭✭✭mengele


    whelan2 wrote: »
    Over 3 weeks since it got fertiliser. Has had plenty of rain since.

    Ok and how much did it get to the acre then. Also when did it get very before that and how much again.. most likely most of the fert from the second last application is also in it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,979 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    mengele wrote: »
    Ok and how much did it get to the acre then. Also when did it get very before that and how much again.. most likely most of the fert from the second last application is also in it?

    Was about a month at least before that when it got fertiliser. Got can the last time and cut sward before that at a bag to the acre


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭Signpost


    can poor Kerry suppliers do a urea sample easily?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    Gr are gone way beyond the level that mineralised N will support now. 27-33 here last 5 tests. Pr level of buffer cut a good bit in the last few days. Back to around 15% today. I didn't do an exact figure on it. Just estimate as I was filling the feeder.

    Great to have grass bombing along at last, but someone that’s feeding very little concentrates and finding MU at 45...?

    There’s a big risk of fœtus mortality from N poisoning at levels in that range. Animals that are less than 100days pregnant are at greatest risk.
    The product below, or one like it, is very beneficial...

    http://alfalor.ch/wp-content/themes/SolInfo_alfalor/docs/VALO_HERBE.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,709 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Great to have grass bombing along at last, but someone that’s feeding very little concentrates and finding MU at 45...?

    There’s a big risk of fœtus mortality from N poisoning at levels in that range. Animals that are less than 100days pregnant are at greatest risk.
    The product below, or one like it, is very beneficial...

    http://alfalor.ch/wp-content/themes/SolInfo_alfalor/docs/VALO_HERBE.pdf

    Would using limestone flour help. 100 grams/head/day. Limestone flour is the ingredient in some cubicle limes.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    Would using limestone flour help. 100 grams/head/day. Limestone flour is the ingredient in some cubicle limes.
    Bentonite clay looks like the main ingredient, would attract ammonium


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,709 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Bentonite clay looks like the main ingredient, would attract ammonium

    It is 12.5% calcium which is an acid netralizing agent. Urea is an acid calcium should neutralize it in gut before it enters the bloodstream.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 734 ✭✭✭longgonesilver


    whelan2 wrote: »
    Was about a month at least before that when it got fertiliser. Got can the last time and cut sward before that at a bag to the acre

    Can you get a grass sample analysed? Like people do it they are unsure if a field for silage has used its nitrogen.
    Would you describe the grass colour from a distance as green or blue?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,979 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Can you get a grass sample analysed? Like people do it they are unsure if a field for silage has used its nitrogen.
    Would you describe the grass colour from a distance as green or blue?

    Green. My milk is tested everyday. So I have results from everyday. I have stopped spreading anything. I will have to order a new load of nuts before the end of the week. I didn't over spread and didn't spread for about a month when there was no growth. Grass is bombing it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 734 ✭✭✭longgonesilver


    I'm not criticising you. You seem to have been doing everything right and kept grass growing. Did you have enough rain or was there moisture coming up from below?

    Testing the grass would give you an idea of just how high the N is in the grass, or is there something else going on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,979 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    I'm not criticising you. You seem to have been doing everything right and kept grass growing. Did you have enough rain or was there moisture coming up from below?

    Testing the grass would give you an idea of just how high the N is in the grass, or is there something else going on.
    Ye we had a full day of rain on Sunday 3 weeks ago and a good bit since. There was dew on the grass until eleven yesterday morning


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    It is 12.5% calcium which is an acid netralizing agent. Urea is an acid calcium should neutralize it in gut before it enters the bloodstream.

    IIRC urea is slightly basic, but close to neutral.
    Liquid urea doesn’t corrode metal and has a “soapy” feel to it...

    I’d think that the calcium is to settle the rumen. (?)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    whelan2 wrote: »
    Ye we had a full day of rain on Sunday 3 weeks ago and a good bit since. There was dew on the grass until eleven yesterday morning

    The less rain the more N available in the ground...conversely the more rain the more N lost to the environment.
    Sorry if I’m stating the obvious.


Advertisement