Influencers over-editing photos in Social Media/Cyber-bullying accusations

JaMarcus wrote: »

My take on it is that the girl in the IT article was accused, denied it, and then this Jason Kidd guy posted up lots of stuff to his Instagram page as "proof" it actually is her. If you take what he's posted at face value, it's hard to disagree that it isn't her.

I'm just waiting for the next bombshell.

BU said they were sent that screenshot with the sunflower profile pic by someone and posted it up, that is where the confusion is apparently.

billybonkers wrote: »

BU said they were sent that screenshot with the sunflower profile pic by someone and posted it up, that is where the confusion is apparently.

JK also had in insta a conversation with an unknown person and Santa Paws - who is RT (proof of that on Insta) - they are discussing that a 'Lindsay' knows its her and discussing what proof she might have.

GingerLily wrote: »

JK also had in insta a conversation with an unknown person and Santa Paws - who is RT (proof of that on Insta) - they are discussing that a 'Lindsay' knows its her and discussing what proof she might have.

Oh god I am lost again...who is JK?


The only one I know is JK Rowling!

GingerLily wrote: »

'Lindsay' knows its her and discussing what proof she might have.

I think this is referring to Mermaid Jade who is an admin on Mas who drink

I feel like I saw a different page to a lot of you. I always saw nasty undertones to the BU account They could never just post facts, always had to get snide little digs in too and it got worse and worse as they performed to their ever growing audience. It was obvious that they saw the attention bull****callerouter got and wanted a bit of that themselves, it was never anything to do with wanting to help people see what bloggers were doing and everything to do with putting bloggers in their place.

I also thought everyone was just pretending not to know who BU was. It certainly didn't take rocket science to connect the dots, sure they didn't even attempt to change their posting style across various media. As for people expecting bloggers to take some kind of high ground in all this, the (alleged)person behind BU spent years of their life spewing vileness about said bloggers long before BU became a thing, years ripping into every little thing they did and you want them to pretend like none of that happened now?

When you spend years of your life being rotten to pretty much every section of society across the internet you aren't going to make friends and can't be surprised when people are less than sympathetic when the full extent of your actions come to light.

Suckit wrote: »

:rolleyes:
Really?

It may not have been hard to figure out if you follow so many of them, but I don't see how you thought everyone was just pretending..

Ok, anyone who uses forums. I was talking about everyone here and the various other forums they posted on, I should have been more specific sorry.

Suckit wrote: »

I haven't looked back over LOR's posts, but the other name Shoes doesn't sound too upset when bull****callerouter was mentioned here for one of the first times. Everyone seems to agree that is what is needed (at the time).

I don't think it matters that she is outed, she'll just need to approach things differently. She has a talent - maybe with a lot of negativity attached, but if she was going to single out anyone, she seems to have chosen the right ones (most of the time).

If she take some time away, and comes back in a week, now that everyone knows who she is, it could be beneficial. It may not be. She could aim at another market.

No matter if she was "bullying" (a word that has lost all meaning to me), I prefer that many of the people being called out, were being called out for the reasons that they were.
I am useless at judging of someone is nice or not, so I don't really care too much about their online persona. If they are trying to con/fleece people, then they are game for the shooter.

What was her talent? The ability to re post what people sent her?

You might not care about online personas but the people she has spent years bad mouthing(not just bloggers, many regular Joes were at the end of her trolling) do care and can you blame them?

Sittingpretty wrote: »

I’m totally lost.

I never really got a bitchy vibe from BU.

It is amusing to watch grown adults behave the way some are the past few days.

Not at all surprised RMC has thrown her hat in the commentary ring either.

These people need to get off their laptops and have a chat with themselves, a bunch of people on the wrong side of thirty celebrating... kinda grim life for all involved that is bizarrely reminiscent of how pre secondary school would act.

RMC/WMC are all equally as toxic

Deleted User wrote: »

What were the years before? Was there a different bloggers unveiled type account?

No, just the girl who is allegedly behind it badmouthed or berated bloggers she didn't like.

Looks like a parody account has already been set up.

Conrad Enough Theatre wrote: »

Google her name and you will see. There has for years been a blog that called this girl out as a troll and catfish.

I can't see anything??