Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Very confusing

2»

Comments

  • #32
    hatrickpatrick
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Jaime and wrote: »
    Explain why they wouldn't?

    I'm just asking for opinions on the most likely reasons.

    jLRyrAo.png


  • #33
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,766 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    dxhound2005 wrote: »
    It lead to a lot of hassle for Scott. The report does not conclude that he was involved. It would have been much easier for him to leave his car unlocked for them to steal, if he wanted to supply the car for the bomb.

    And if they had wanted to try to conceal their identity, they would have been better to steal a car in the usual way, not kidnap the owner.

    In an ideal world, yes. But as I said, he wouldn't be the first to not realise what he was getting involved in.
    An unlocked car probably would have voided any payout.

    I stress, I have no idea whether he was involved or not.


  • #34
    dxhound2005
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,881 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    In an ideal world, yes. But as I said, he wouldn't be the first to not realise what he was getting involved in.
    An unlocked car probably would have voided any payout.

    I stress, I have no idea whether he was involved or not.

    It could have been locked. And he could have given them the keys, and got them back the next day. How would the insurance prove any of this when the car was blown up?


  • #35
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,766 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    dxhound2005 wrote: »
    It could have been locked. And he could have given them the keys, and got them back the next day. How would the insurance prove any of this when the car was blown up?

    I am just saying, it was done. It gave credence to claims if there was a bit of a barney over getting cars.


Advertisement