Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Ireland Team Talk Thread IX: Grand Slam Champions SEE MOD WARNING POST #1122

18081838586335

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,747 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    Edna_Ennky wrote: »
    However the opinion that I still believe to be the case today that the IRFU prioritized keeping Jamie Heaslip in these shores and did not go the extra mile to keep Ryan in Ireland. That is my opinion and I look forward to hearing what views people have on this issue.

    Ryan was reportedly offered the exact same contract by the IRFU that he got from Racing.

    Heaslip had nothing to do with it. Ryan wanted to go off and finish his career abroad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Edna_Ennky wrote: »
    I was under the impression that in relation to point two that Ryan wanted to remain with Munster. But as you said that if Ryan wanted to leave then fair enough. However the opinion that I still believe to be the case today that the IRFU prioritized keeping Jamie Heaslip in these shores and did not go the extra mile to keep Ryan in Ireland. That is my opinion and I look forward to hearing what views people have on this issue.

    There is no relationship between Heaslip staying and Ryan leaving. Just a myth concocted by people who didn't like Heaslip and were bitter about a quality player departing Munster. Ryan had previously tried to get a deal to join Leinster, he just wanted to experience a new environment, which is fair enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,058 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Edna_Ennky wrote: »
    However the opinion that I still believe to be the case today that the IRFU prioritized keeping Jamie Heaslip in these shores and did not go the extra mile to keep Ryan in Ireland. That is my opinion and I look forward to hearing what views people have on this issue.

    Ryan was reportedly offered the exact same contract by the IRFU that he got from Racing.

    Heaslip had nothing to do with it. Ryan wanted to go off and finish his career abroad.

    I didn't realise that Racing offered Ryan the same contract.

    Maybe he realised that with James Ryan coming through, Henderson there as well and of course Toner that he was going to be in a battle to make the 23 never starting XV so made the call to move to France while he still could rather than putting everything on the WC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,058 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Edna_Ennky wrote: »
    I think it is about time that Joe Schmidt appointed a backs coach to the Ireland coaching ticket. Once again we looked rudderless, clueless and shapeless with our attack play so narrow. Our attack strategy seems centered on our back row and our center partnership going the direct route one, crashing over the gainline.

    People that criticize Earls and Stockdale must understand that under the direct hard running, attritional style that we play that it does not give our backline a chance to express ourselves. They simply don't get enough of the ball and it must be so frustrating for them. Using brute force as a number one weapon for our attack simply won't cut it in international rugby. If people think that Schmidt will change philosophy over the next 15 months to the World Cup then you will be very disappointed. Finally on this issue of our lack of ambition the continued lack of offloads is simply an issue that is not going away.

    I don't agree that on the back of a Grand Slam and one defeat in 13 games we need to change the coaching structure. However even if we did change it would be an attack coach rather than a backs coach we would need anyway. When we get into the red zone we need to see a few more offloads, backs are rarely involved in those situations, James Ryan is good at it (think Fardy's try against the Scarlets) but in those tight areas where defences are watertight it's probably the best way to break them down, but it's high risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,821 ✭✭✭Tigerandahalf


    Zebo was probably right to head off as he knew Schimdt didn't rate him enough.
    Many commentators outside of Ireland rate Zebo better as they understand that he has the handling, step and offloading skills that few others have. He will make the odd mistake but he is miles ahead of Kearney going forward.

    He can also come in to the line after the 1st phase and be a playmaker.

    While Larmour has looked great with ball in hand we have yet to see what he can do in terms of offloading at the right time and doing the simple things like clearing his lines with kicks to touch or chase kicks. He is probably less exposed on the wing for now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,442 ✭✭✭its_phil


    Edna_Ennky wrote: »
    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    1. Zebo this very week said he wasn't putting his life on hold for the rwc. He wanted to go. Nobody alienated Zebo but Zebo. His media remarks since have been nothing but dumb. If you want to win a place in the squad you dont go crying to the media.

    2. Donnacha Ryan wanted to go. He said as much himself. He was offered a contract to stay btw.

    I was under the impression that in relation to point two that Ryan wanted to remain with Munster. But as you said that if Ryan wanted to leave then fair enough. However the opinion that I still believe to be the case today that the IRFU prioritized keeping Jamie Heaslip in these shores and did not go the extra mile to keep Ryan in Ireland. That is my opinion and I look forward to hearing what views people have on this issue.

    No view because it’s not an issue, James Ryan and Tadhg Beirne have come through and Donnacha is happy out playing some great rugby in France.


  • Administrators Posts: 55,293 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    swiwi_ wrote: »
    World's best coach (as per World Rugby 2015), got one over Schmidt. Aside from relentless recycling, box-kicks and the odd attacking move off phase ball, there is not too much to Ireland's attack. In particular, off multiphase plays or counter-attacking ball, Ireland don't offer a lot. We know this already, as Ireland have already dominated games with possession and territory, while coming up short on the scoreboard, most notably against NZ in Dublin.

    Schmidt has set out his stall, I don't seem him changing the low-risk, multiphase ruck, one-off runners approach, but man I'm looking forward to the 2nd test to see what Ireland and Australia bring.

    Agree with all of this. Our attack is fairly limited, always has been the weakest facet of our game under Schmidt, and we struggle to adapt during a game to what’s in front of us if it isn’t working.

    For whatever reason, if it hasn’t been solved by now then it’s unlikely to be solved.

    Next week is very significant in my opinion. Another defeat in the same manner will not look good, in fact it would be pretty concerning. That’s the interesting thing about these tours, playing the same team three times in a row is a very different prospect to any of our other series of games.

    Still think a series win must be the goal here. Still quietly confident we’ll get the win next week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭Quint2010


    Team for next week:
    Kearney
    Earls
    Ringrose
    Henshaw
    Stockdale
    Sexton
    Murray
    Healy
    Herring
    Furlong
    Ryan
    Henderson
    POM
    Leavy
    Conan


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 603 ✭✭✭umop episdn


    Ryan was reportedly offered the exact same contract by the IRFU that he got from Racing.

    Heaslip had nothing to do with it. Ryan wanted to go off and finish his career abroad.

    Nobody reported that...but Joe in a presser ...and even Munster rugby let it be known they couldn't offer the same terms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Our attack wasn't great but I think it's being overstated a little bit. We made a few breaks and we had a few opportunities. In fact we made more line breaks and beat more defenders than Australia despite our midfield defense being all over the place in the first half. It's far better now than it was last year I'd say.

    The game passed Carbery by quite a bit, I'm holding off judgement until we see Sexton in there. Hopefully with himself Henshaw/Ringrose we'll be a bit more aggressive in our use of the ball.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Nobody reported that...but Joe in a presser ...and even Munster rugby let it be known they couldn't offer the same terms

    Ryan himself said there was no financial difference this year.

    But sure what would he know!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 603 ✭✭✭umop episdn


    Once Earls went off we started to look extremely pedestrian in attack.
    . Stockdale had a fine game in defence.. but tried too hard in attack and chose the wrong option a few times.
    Beirne gets a start next week for me...it should be partnering Ryan... but he looks tired and could do with a week off... Leavy at 7 gives a balance to the back row


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭Rigor Mortis


    I get the distinct impression that Joe has picked his ideal teams for each match well in advance. i think he is using this to essentially try a plan b for every position. So we will see Henshaw Aki, Henshaw Ringrose and Aki RIngrose. We'll see carbery murray and sexton marmion and possibly cooney sexton. I have a notion, that other than injury, this tour is all about building options, not particularly about results. if that is the case, I'm delighted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    The reactionaries are out. This is not a must win series, this is about giving the wider squad a chance at starting a game at the highest level.

    I think this Australian team played a better game than their last game against NZ -which they won btw :p We had chances, but kicked them away or into touch. Although tired we were definitely in that game.

    Australia are discovering what works for them, kick chase to gain territory using Felou (why wouldn't you? He's a banker).

    There are two things in this world that are certain, death and taxes. In Australia there are four, the aforementioned death and taxes, Israel Folau will win high balls and Pocock will turn them over.

    Mid season, you can ruck Pocock out of the game. At the end of a long season, he's a banker. He didn't even bother contesting that much in the first half either, he turned it on in the second half when we were tiring.
    I would say Joe will be having a word about Hooper lying all over the ball, which didn't help our rucking.


    All in all, I was happy with what I saw from Ireland, considering how fatigued they were.

    There were some great learning too:

    We know we have a 10 that can start and run a very tough game.
    We now know that we need two 13s (Farrell, Ringrose) and Aki and Henshaw are our 12s.
    We know JR can do a job for us (wouldn't mind seeing Cronin get a run at 1 either, he's the best loose-head we have on the ground).
    We know Herring is up to the job.
    We know that we need to give Beirne a spot on the bench, because the best way to deal with turned over ball is of course to win it back.


  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Simone Thoughtless Guava


    I see we have a new angle on "Whaaaa Donnacha Ryan". Wonderful.


  • Administrators Posts: 55,293 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The reactionaries are out. This is not a must win series, this is about giving the wider squad a chance at starting a game at the highest level.

    I think this Australian team played a better game than their last game against NZ -which they won btw :p We had chances, but kicked them away or into touch. Although tired we were definitely in that game.

    Australia are discovering what works for them, kick chase to gain territory using Felou (why wouldn't you? He's a banker).

    There are two things in this world that are certain, death and taxes. In Australia there are four, the aforementioned death and taxes, Israel Folau will win high balls and Pocock will turn them over.

    Mid season, you can ruck Pocock out of the game. At the end of a long season, he's a banker. He didn't even bother contesting that much in the first half either, he turned it on in the second half when we were tiring.
    I would say Joe will be having a word about Hooper lying all over the ball, which didn't help our rucking.


    All in all, I was happy with what I saw from Ireland, considering how fatigued they were.

    There were some great learning too:

    We know we have a 10 that can start and run a very tough game.
    We now know that we need two 13s (Farrell, Ringrose) and Aki and Henshaw are our 12s.
    We know JR can do a job for us (wouldn't mind seeing Cronin get a run at 1 either, he's the best loose-head we have on the ground).
    We know Herring is up to the job.
    We know that we need to give Beirne a spot on the bench, because the best way to deal with turned over ball is of course to win it back.
    Define “must win series”.


  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Simone Thoughtless Guava


    awec wrote: »
    Define “must win series”.

    The 6N.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    There is no relationship between Heaslip staying and Ryan leaving. Just a myth concocted by people who didn't like Heaslip and were bitter about a quality player departing Munster. Ryan had previously tried to get a deal to join Leinster, he just wanted to experience a new environment, which is fair enough.

    My understanding is that he wasn't offered an IRFU central contract and from that Ryan got the message that unlike Heaslip he was surplus to requirements with Ireland (despite starting the game v. ABs in Chicago with Toner on the bench who did get a central contract).

    Zebo knew that his days with Ireland were limited as Schmidt didn't/does not rate him, so pointless sticking around. As far as I can recall, he was refused a central contract which meant that he was completely dependent on probably injuries to Rob Kearney to get any starts for Ireland (and hence his earning income was much depleted).

    There is reason why Zebo & Ryan left - they knew they had no future with Ireland which is what keeps most of the best players here.


  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Simone Thoughtless Guava


    jm08 wrote: »
    My understanding is that he wasn't offered an IRFU central contract and from that Ryan got the message that unlike Heaslip he was surplus to requirements with Ireland (despite starting the game v. ABs in Chicago with Toner on the bench who did get a central contract).

    Have you not embarrassed yourself enough in the past talking about Ryan leaving? You don't even have your basic facts straight, Toner and Ryan BOTH started that match, Henderson was injured and out of the 23.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Have you not embarrassed yourself enough in the past talking about Ryan leaving? You don't even have your basic facts straight, Toner and Ryan BOTH started that match, Henderson was injured and out of the 23.

    The point remains that Ryan was a starter for Ireland when his central contract was recinded.

    And no, I don't get embarrassed for myself or anyone else on an anonymous message board.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    jm08 wrote: »
    My understanding is that he wasn't offered an IRFU central contract and from that Ryan got the message that unlike Heaslip he was surplus to requirements with Ireland (despite starting the game v. ABs in Chicago with Toner on the bench who did get a central contract).

    Zebo knew that his days with Ireland were limited as Schmidt didn't/does not rate him, so pointless sticking around. As far as I can recall, he was refused a central contract which meant that he was completely dependent on probably injuries to Rob Kearney to get any starts for Ireland (and hence his earning income was much depleted).

    There is reason why Zebo & Ryan left - they knew they had no future with Ireland which is what keeps most of the best players here.

    You should listen to his own words. He said the IRFU were “fantastic” to deal with and there was no difference in the contracts and it was absolutely not a contractual decision.

    But again, what would he know!


  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Simone Thoughtless Guava


    jm08 wrote: »
    The point remains that Ryan was a starter for Ireland when his central contract was recinded.

    And no, I don't get embarrassed for myself or anyone else on an anonymous message board.

    His contract was not rescinded. What on earth are you talking about?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    His contract was not rescinded. What on earth are you talking about?
    The Tipperary man is coming to the end of a central IRFU contract and with the union unwilling to offer him an extension of that deal, Ryan was facing the prospect of taking a hefty salary cut if he was to remain with Munster on a provincial contract.


    It’s understood that Ryan had hoped to remain with his native province into next season, not committing when Racing first showed their interest in recent months, but the financial reality of the situation complicated matters.
    Playing the best rugby of his career, Ryan has been an important figure for Ireland this season, helping them to beat the All Blacks for the first time ever and being one of their best performers during the Six Nations.

    http://www.the42.ie/donnacha-ryan-munster-racing-92-move-3308462-Mar2017/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    You should listen to his own words. He said the IRFU were “fantastic” to deal with and there was no difference in the contracts and it was absolutely not a contractual decision.

    But again, what would he know!

    Link please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,747 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    My god the ignorance here is astonishing.

    Ryan has said himself it wasn't down to the contract. And that he was offered the exact same contract as he was in Racing.

    He chose to leave to finish his career outside of Ireland.

    Same with Zebo, he was starting with Ireland when he started negotiating his contract with Racing. He had always mentioned he wanted to play in France.

    I've no idea why Munster fans are convinced the IRFU "drove their players away".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    jm08 wrote: »

    It seems you don't know what 'rescinded' means, but it absolutely is not the same thing as choosing not to renew something.


  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Simone Thoughtless Guava


    jm08 wrote: »

    That's nice.

    His contract still wasn't rescinded. Paddy Jackson's contract was rescinded. Stuart Olding's contract was rescinded.


    I know you're an absolutely rabid Munster supporter, you'll desperately try and find some victimhood angle no matter what, and this might be hard for you to take but he wanted to leave. That's the long and short of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    jm08 wrote: »
    Link please.

    http://www.secondcaptains.com/2018/02/09/episode-1083-donnacha-ryan-life-paris-life-rugby-sexton-schmidts-secret-sauce-ken-v-caesar-eddie-jones-pokes-dragon/
    Were you upset you didn't get a better offer?

    Ryan: No. In the end, it was definitely not a financial decision.

    http://www.offtheball.com/Off-The-Ball/Jesus-youd-love-to-stay-and-keep-playing-forever--Donnacha-Ryan-on-leaving-Munster-for-Racing-92
    In the end from a contract point of view there was no difference at all. There was no difference between staying and going. It's going to come down to a stage where you are going to have to leave, you are going to finish, you are going to leave. Whereas, how hard would I find that leaving as well if it was out of my hands. I suppose I said I need to prepare for that as well, and that's probably the reason why. Look, it does get difficult for players when they do get older."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    It seems you don't know what 'rescinded' means, but it absolutely is not the same thing as choosing not to renew something.

    I obviously don't. The point still remains. Ryan wasn't getting a new central contract from the IRFU, unlike Toner & Heislip.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    That's nice.

    His contract still wasn't rescinded. Paddy Jackson's contract was rescinded. Stuart Olding's contract was rescinded.

    thanks for the English language lesson.
    I know you're an absolutely rabid Munster supporter, you'll desperately try and find some victimhood angle no matter what, and this might be hard for you to take but he wanted to leave. That's the long and short of it.

    Victimhood? :D

    I've no problem with Ryan (or Zebo) leaving Ireland and moving to a place where they are actually appreciated.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement