Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The 8th amendment referendum - part 4

1189190191192194

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,513 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Re: calling the cops if you see a poster within 50/100m of a polling station, is it also against the law to walk into a station with a YES or NO lapel badge on?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,513 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    vladmydad wrote: »
    There is one issue that I haven’t heard about. If yes wins , I don’t want to contribute financially towards abortions and I don’t want to become a tax dodger, so what do you suggest ? Some sort of tax rebate or those having abortions must pay for them

    Sorry no, you can't pick and choose where you income tax goes to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,282 ✭✭✭pitifulgod


    vladmydad wrote: »
    There is one issue that I haven’t heard about. If yes wins , I don’t want to contribute financially towards abortions and I don’t want to become a tax dodger, so what do you suggest ? Some sort of tax rebate or those having abortions must pay for them

    You know the state contributes towards a person getting viagra too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 786 ✭✭✭vladmydad


    NIMAN wrote: »
    vladmydad wrote: »
    There is one issue that I haven’t heard about. If yes wins , I don’t want to contribute financially towards abortions and I don’t want to become a tax dodger, so what do you suggest ? Some sort of tax rebate or those having abortions must pay for them

    Sorry no, you can't pick and choose where you income tax goes to.
    No it’s ok, I’m a landlord so it’s quite easy to withhold tax ,it’s just a question of how much


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,709 ✭✭✭✭Cantona's Collars


    So there are still No leaflets going into houses in Tallaght long after midnight. They also have a car going around Fettercairn., tannoy a pumping, spreading their message :eek:

    Fecking joy(less) riders.

    Sorry. :)

    Gardai should do them for disturbing the peace.
    They are so interested in "caring for babies" yet are keeping those in your area awake with their noise blaring at this hour.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,029 ✭✭✭SusieBlue


    Sheeps wrote: »
    Does a woman having taken an abortion pill flush the fetus down the toilet or give it a burial? What is the norm?

    It would be similar to a miscarriage, it’s a heavy period.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,110 ✭✭✭123balltv


    So if Yes to euthanizing healthy babies can we do the same for adults suffering agonizing pain


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,534 ✭✭✭gctest50


    vladmydad wrote: »
    There is one issue that I haven’t heard about. If yes wins , I don’t want to contribute financially towards abortions and I don’t want to become a tax dodger, so what do you suggest ? Some sort of tax rebate or those having abortions must pay for them


    Stop that and be a good little worker drone like the rest of us




    rgWIHJK.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,053 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    sideswipe wrote: »
    Whatever the result tomorrow I just hope there is no mass celebrations and hoisting people up on shoulders from either side, respect and decorium would be far more fitting.

    Yet another attempt from the losers to police the winners.

    Women gaining control over their own healthcare and bodies is VERY MUCH a cause for celebration. Whether we subsequently get an abortion law, or not.

    G'way with the "whatever the result is" spiel, it's perfectly obvious what you wish the result was.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,029 ✭✭✭SusieBlue


    123balltv wrote: »
    So if Yes to euthanizing healthy babies can we do the same for adults suffering agonizing pain

    Hopefully we’ll have a euthanasia referendum in our life time. Fingers crossed it’ll be sooner rather than later!

    No one is advocating euthanizing healthy babies, you’ve been misinformed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    Not sure if this has been posted (not been following the thread today) but the Liberal have been going crazy with their articles! I mean, a misleading, scaremongering article posted every half hour or so. I think it's safe to say that Sherlock is a bit worried...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    If not 'anywhere close' how close.

    The UK has a rate of 1 abortions to every 4 live births. On the debate the other night, the estimate for here was 1 in 12

    ???
    Do you have a source for this claim yet

    Assuming you find one, are you aware that the reasons for abortions might not correlate with live births? That is, a woman who frequently miscarries has way more abortions than births, but that doesn’t mean given the choice that she isn’t trying to conceive a child.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    nullzero wrote: »
    I didn't make the comment.
    It was made in relation to trusting women by another poster.
    I do find it interesting that you've never heard of the case, you do live in Ireland I take it?

    No I live in South Carolina. I last lived in Ireland in 2008.

    And I had made the quip about trusting women. The statement is admittedly very boiled down for the purposes of the referendum but I trust most understand what is meant by it in the context of the issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,110 ✭✭✭123balltv


    Less welfare payments and supports? for single Mother's :( governments dream


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    Fecking joy(less) riders.

    Sorry. :)

    Gardai should do them for disturbing the peace.
    They are so interested in "caring for babies" yet are keeping those in your area awake with their noise blaring at this hour.

    They were driving around here with The Final Countdown blaring the other day. Had a touch of Arrested Development about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,795 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    cournioni wrote: »
    On another note, should the Yes vote pass. Harris and the HSE will have to get their bloody act together. Support for mental health is diabolical so I would hate to see what another complex issue landed at their door will do. Harris claiming to be a bastion for womens health, yet cannot even provide proper cervical checks.

    To be fair to the man he isn't that long in the job yet so maybe give him a chance.

    Maybe direct your anger at those in the HSE who are years in the job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,053 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    cournioni wrote: »
    Alive inside the womb is an acceptable killing but outside it’s deemed murder?

    Got it in one

    /thread

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,080 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    123balltv wrote: »
    So if Yes to euthanizing healthy babies can we do the same for adults suffering agonizing pain

    Euthanasia and neutrality will be the big imponderables over the next decade.

    Me, I would willingly assist a loved one seeking to end the agony of serious illness.

    My mother often cites an old Aunt of hers, back in the 60s, riddled with cancer she had the heart of an ox that my mothers family are all blessed with, but my mother reckons she was so far gone, so morbid with cancer that parts of her actually began to decompose before her heart finally gave in. I know what the humane act would be there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,053 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    NuMarvel wrote: »
    Do NOT dial 999. This is not an emergency.

    An Garda Siochana have failed to provide a national non-emergency number to dial, so in the meantime if you want to report a CRIME then the number to report a CRIME is 999.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,534 ✭✭✭gctest50


    They were driving around here with The Final Countdown blaring the other day. Had a touch of Arrested Development about it.

    except y'know



    iu0WB7L.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    cournioni wrote: »
    Do you want to include Varadkar too?

    I want to include the HSE. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,053 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    cournioni wrote: »
    On another note, should the Yes vote pass. Harris and the HSE will have to get their bloody act together. Support for mental health is diabolical so I would hate to see what another complex issue landed at their door will do. Harris claiming to be a bastion for womens health, yet cannot even provide proper cervical checks.

    Yeah, pretend you care. These issues are not "should the Yes vote pass". They're here and now and have been for years.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭jigglypuffstuff


    SusieBlue wrote: »
    Well seeing as we’re being condescending to each other, yes hun, I can read.

    The point I was making was that in the post previous to that, I said that many of the men throwing around the word feminist/feminazi as an insult are the ones who only seem to be concerned with women aborting without their permission.

    You then went on to refer to what I said as veiled with a feminist curtain. Irony.

    That's not true though...I am vocal about not voting because of the fact that there's both provision that's drastically needed yet simultaneously provision that is outright unnecessary and reduces the value of an unborn human life to little more than transactional

    I am quite frankly disgusted with how the government handled this... because bundling the two of those together is not something that's needed bor required

    You think I don't see that? Not every person who speaks out about the 12 weeks unlimited proposal is against any provision.... personally that section just shifts the accountability...and I can assure you that people will abuse that as a means of "hindsight contraception"

    I know of nobody that's had a FFA, rape case or indeed anything that could be labelled as a "crisis"

    I know a whole lot of stupid men and women who decided they were irresponsible and hopped over to the UK to "fix it"...and in from a small town of 5000... But you generally won't hear about those cases... because abortion isn't something people tend to brag about

    If anyone believes that period won't be abused... they have their head in the sand.

    And to claim men are controlling because they don't want their baby Aborted against their wishes is a statement veiled with feministic tones. That's not an insult at all... because #1 you've no basis to say it and #2 it victimises women and blames men... which is generally what feminists do

    Here's the objective view. If men and women are so against procreation to the point they'd abort if it happened....then they shouldn't have sexual intercourse to begin with. Because when you strip away all the nonsense and subjective sense of entitlement, what you find is the primary biological purpose of coitus is procreation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭Just her


    Overheal wrote: »
    Do you have a source for this claim yet

    Assuming you find one, are you aware that the reasons for abortions might not correlate with live births? That is, a woman who frequently miscarries has way more abortions than births, but that doesn’t mean given the choice that she isn’t trying to conceive a child.

    What is your source? I've put up a post explaining where the 1 in 5 figure, I believe has come from. NHS abortion figures and ons live birth figures. They are quite clearly not talking about miscarriages in the abortion figures. They even explain how the abortions are funded and who is allowed to perform them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,307 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    NIMAN wrote: »
    Re: calling the cops if you see a poster within 50/100m of a polling station, is it also against the law to walk into a station with a YES or NO lapel badge on?

    You may be refused to be issued a ballot paper but what will happen is that they simply won't issue it until you remove or cover up same.

    In relation to garda activities at polling stations, calls from Polling Station will be answered as high priority, and most likely by detective units. Or at least they were in 2009 and 2011 when last I did Election station duties.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭Just her


    An Garda Siochana have failed to provide a national non-emergency number to dial, so in the meantime if you want to report a CRIME then the number to report a CRIME is 999.

    Have you any sense? You want people to block emergency services phone lines up with silly calls about posters, making people with real emergencies wait while you go through a rigmarole with a 999 operator? Yeah showing real compassion and caring there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,053 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    You may be refused to be issued a ballot paper but what will happen is that they simply won't issue it until you remove or cover up same.

    You may be refused admission to the polling station, failure to comply will result in arrest by the garda in attendance.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    SusieBlue wrote: »
    It would be similar to a miscarriage, it’s a heavy period.
    I'd say quite a few of the no's in here if they had a heavy painful period would be running the nearest a+e thinking they were dying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,316 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    An Garda Siochana have failed to provide a national non-emergency number to dial, so in the meantime if you want to report a CRIME then the number to report a CRIME is 999.

    Wow. You do know that you can call your local station. Save the emergency number for emergencies ffs.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Just her wrote: »
    What is your source? I've put up a post explaining where the 1 in 5 figure, I believe has come from. NHS abortion figures and ons live birth figures. They are quite clearly not talking about miscarriages in the abortion figures. They even explain how the abortions are funded and who is allowed to perform them.

    All of the fact checks state the 1 in 5 is inaccurate. There are no accurate figures.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement