Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is Islam right for Ireland?

15681011113

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 300 ✭✭garbo speaks


    None of that happens where I live.

    You seem to think all Muslims are from Saudi. They're not.

    The vast majority of the Muslim world live in regions and subscribe to the beliefs I listed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage




    What's sad is that those kids aren't even radical Muslims. They're moderate at the most.

    Exactly, my brother is a teacher in Brussels, he had to shut up and put up when they were all celebrating after the Paris attacks.

    tick tick tick tick ...

    Merkel doesn't give a ****, she doesn't have any investment in the future - 0 kids.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Scotty # wrote: »
    I was going to get involved in this debate but then I saw the comment below and thought what's the point? When you're dealing with this kind of ignorance you're really just pissing against the wind.



    Weldoninhio, do you not remember the people in their thousands traveling from war torn Syria through Turkey, Greece, up to Hungary, then through Austria and into Germany and beyond in recent years?? THEY WALKED IT!! What "oceans" are you talking about??

    Did you see the post I was responding to?? Europe was their only option apparently. Fairytale.

    Homs to Berlin 3346kms,
    Homs to Riyadh 2034kms,
    Homs to Medina 2302kms,
    Homs to Ammam 375kms.


    You also may have missed it, but the Irish navy spent quite a lot of time fishing these "refugees" out of the Med. Perhaps they thought they could walk on water, eh??


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 300 ✭✭garbo speaks


    Exactly, my brother is a teacher in Brussels, he had to shut up and put up when they were all celebrating after the Paris attacks.

    Jesus. And I bet if he said something, he would be the 'racist'.:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 249 ✭✭Summer In the City


    The vast majority of the Muslim world live in regions and subscribe to the beliefs I listed.

    No they don't. Hardly any women cover up where I live. They also don't need to be escorted when out, they work and drive. Nobody gets stoned, for better or worse.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 300 ✭✭garbo speaks


    No they don't. Hardly any women cover up where I live. They also don't need to be escorted when out, they work and drive.

    Where you live, is not representative of the majority of the Muslim world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 249 ✭✭Summer In the City


    Did you see the post I was responding to?? Europe was their only option apparently. Fairytale.

    Homs to Berlin 3346kms,
    Homs to Riyadh 2034kms,
    Homs to Medina 2302kms,
    Homs to Ammam 375kms.


    You also may have missed it, but the Irish navy spent quite a lot of time fishing these "refugees" out of the Med. Perhaps they thought they could walk on water, eh??

    What makes you think all the refugees went to Europe? Jordan has lots of refugees from Syria and Palestine. Almost a 3rd of the Jordanian population are refugees or migrants.


  • Posts: 16,208 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    eeguy wrote: »
    Yes and many die trying.

    There's some serious lack of compassion in this country. The west has continually f*cked up Muslim countries for the last 200 years, and especially in the last 30. From Gulf War 1, Gulf War 2, the Arab Spring, Libya, Syria and many more occassions when the West felt it was in their interest to intervene with bombs and bullets.

    There are a lot more countries in the west than the primary military nations. And TBH while I seriously dislike the involvement of western governments in the M.East, you're applying military operations in particular regions as justification for all immigration/refugee status.

    As for compassion, I'd be perfectly happy with a tax added on to us, to provide funding for settlement and help to them outside of Europe. The few camps that were implemented were poorly researched, poorly administered, and poorly funded. Doesn't mean that we should throw that answer out the window.
    Now these countries are such sh*tholes that people are willing to risk the lives of themselves and their families to live in a tent under a bridge in Europe.

    Except that there are many immigrants coming from countries that haven't been touched by Western nations, and have fallen apart due to the inherent corruption of their cultures, the civil wars, the religious wars, etc. But even with those countries affected by Western countries, Ireland wasn't directly involved.
    And we have the audacity to tell them to go elsewhere.

    Yes we do. Or rather I do. Not all of them, mind. Those that meet the practical immigration requirements, by having education and skills we need are fully welcome to come settle in the west, living under western culture, learning the host country's language and not rocking the boat.

    Compassion is all very well and good, but I've noticed that people in the west are often more compassionate about foreigners than they are about our own people. Settle the problems within our own society first, and then consider how to help those outside.

    I find the attitude to be short-sighted. Most western countries while recovering from the economic crash are still a fair bit away from pre-crash stability. Fact is, our economic models are rather fragile these days. The EU itself is under scrutiny due to Brexit, and other issues. Social problems with our own cultures are on the rise. The Welfare state system is a massive drain with few practical ideas of how to resolve it. We are seeing the rise of automation in workplaces with the knowledge that sooner or later it will impact on many persons employment. etc etc. And best of all, we already have a decent population of immigrants from recent years, and little idea of how to settle them effectively. But, hey, lets bring more in before we figure out how to solve the problems with the ones we already have. There really are so many things wrong, or going bad at the moment.

    But, we should allow in people who don't know the language (and often don't learn it), don't have employable skills for Europe, barely any education, and provide incredibly expensive government led support for them although that support still isn't enough. And won't ever be. Still, damn expensive, but we can find plenty of excuses for that.

    Compassion? Hmm... I still believe keeping them out until we fix our own problems is probably far more compassionate in the long run. Provide camps in other neighboring countries, provide education and other services to those in need, but ultimately prepare them to return to their original country with the aim of improving it.... or giving them the skills/education (while in the camps) to gain a visa to another country.

    I'm not against immigration or allowing refugees into Europe. I'd just like us to fix our own existing problems first, and be in a real position to help. Right now, we're just bringing them in and settling them up in a broken system.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    What makes you think all the refugees went to Europe? Jordan has lots of refugees from Syria and Palestine. Almost a 3rd of the Jordanian population are refugees or migrants.

    Nowhere have I stated or inferred that ALL refugees went to Europe. Hundreds of thousands have thought.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 249 ✭✭Summer In the City


    Where you live, is not representative of the majority of the Muslim world.

    Its a smack bang in the Middle East so I'll take it as more representative than your small world view. Again, you think Saudi is the whole Middle East. Its not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,684 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    Ironic.

    There’s morons on here banging on about Sharia Law in Ireland and to dodge dealing with the crimes of Christianity you claim I’m endulging in hyperbole.

    Let’s arrest those RC officials who helped paedo priests avoid detection. Let’s end tax breaks for all religions.

    Then we’ll deal with the big, bad muzza threat. :rolleyes:

    Is it possible for you to post something without insulting someone?
    Anyway those priests and nuns you talk about are mostly dead or very old. So it is hyperbole.
    In Ireland in the last century you weren't whipped for having an affair or beheaded for homosexual acts.
    It was all about standing in society. Admittedly, it was wrong and crazy, but it is erroneous to lump 60 year Irish church attitudes and behavior as a counter claim against peoples current concerns about Islam.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 249 ✭✭Summer In the City


    Nowhere have I stated or inferred that ALL refugees went to Europe. Hundreds of thousands have thought.

    And millions went to Jordan, do you think they should have had to take all of them?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,399 ✭✭✭eeguy


    There are a lot more countries in the west than the primary military nations. And TBH while I seriously dislike the involvement of western governments in the M.East, you're applying military operations in particular regions as justification for all immigration/refugee status.
    .

    There is so much wrong with your "I'm alright jack" argument I'm not even going to bother.
    Sort out our own problems first. Ffs, our problems have and will never be solved. There will always be new problems and new inequality. . I can't believe you wasted your life writing that short-sighted bigoted whataboutery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,594 ✭✭✭Harika


    Where you live, is not representative of the majority of the Muslim world.

    Indeed, representative for the Muslim World is what we get on our Facebook and Twitterstreams!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Irish Praetorian


    Perhaps instead of lobbing personal experience and heresay at one another, we should concern ourselves with the polling data?

    This is the most recent Pew study I can find, although the latter is perhaps more comprehensive.

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/09/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/

    http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 300 ✭✭garbo speaks


    Its a smack bang in the Middle East so I'll take it as more representative than your small world view. Again, you think Saudi is the whole Middle East. Its not.

    You're welcome to stay there mate :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 300 ✭✭garbo speaks


    Perhaps instead of lobbing personal experience and heresay at one another, we should concern ourselves with the polling data?

    This is the most recent Pew study I can find, although the latter is perhaps more comprehensive.

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/09/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/

    http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/

    Sssh!! You can't post facts on here!


  • Posts: 16,208 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    eeguy wrote: »
    There is so much wrong with your "I'm alright jack" argument I'm not even going to bother.
    Sort out our own problems first. Ffs, our problems have and will never be solved. There will always be new problems and new inequality. . I can't believe you wasted your life writing that short-sighted bigoted whataboutery.

    Rather simplistic and limited objection. But TBH I can't say I'm too surprised.

    We'll always have new problems. Of course, we will... Obviously. However, we can settle the major problems facing Europe before increasing the strain. Settle the question of the EU. Settle our economies and increase the wealth of Europe once more. Reduce the social & political instability currently sweeping Europe. Decide on a realistic and effective system to settle our existing immigrant population.

    As for bigoted... It's obvious anyone that doesn't agree with your selfless attitude is a bigot... You might want to consider what the word really means.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,782 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Perhaps they thought they could walk on water, eh??

    or... more likely, they thought better to die trying to find a better life than die staying put?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,399 ✭✭✭eeguy


    Rather simplistic and limited objection. But TBH I can't say I'm too surprised.

    We'll always have new problems. Of course, we will... Obviously. However, we can settle the major problems facing Europe before increasing the strain. Settle the question of the EU. Settle our economies and increase the wealth of Europe once more. Reduce the social & political instability currently sweeping Europe. Decide on a realistic and effective system to settle our existing immigrant population.

    As for bigoted... It's obvious anyone that doesn't agree with your selfless attitude is a bigot... You might want to consider what the word really means.

    Nope. Europe always has and always will have problems. There will always be major problems as major is relative. When was the last time an economy of any country was "settled"?

    Social and political instability is a result of the West actions against the middle East and won't go away while there are millions on the border trying to get in.

    Kicking the can down the road is not a viable solution.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭donegaLroad


    Ireland is a moderate country. Islam to me, does not appear to be a moderate religion.

    Ireland is just after loosening the shackles of one oppressive regime. Why would we want bring a more oppressive one upon ourselves.

    A religion free Ireland is the best way forward.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,165 ✭✭✭Captain Obvious


    DanDan6592 wrote: »
    So you mean when it's too late. Fantastic. The kick the can down the road mentality.

    Not even remotely what I posted.


  • Posts: 19,178 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ireland is a moderate country. Islam to me, does not appear to be a moderate religion.

    Ireland is just after loosening the shackles of one oppressive regime. Why would we want bring a more oppressive one upon ourselves.

    A religion free Ireland is the best way forward.

    so, no-one in Ireland should be free to practise their religion?
    my mam will be devasted........


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭donegaLroad


    bubblypop wrote: »
    so, no-one in Ireland should be free to practise their religion?
    my mam will be devasted........

    I didn't say that... what I meant is that there should be a seperation between church and state.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    jmayo wrote: »
    Eh wasn't Humprhys the guy that had the video of the Halawa's up on stage at a muslim brotherhood protest ?
    The video that disappeared elsewhere and proved embarrassing because it was the truth about what they were up to.

    Yes and he has never been sued by the Halawas - and you can bet your ass they would have had lawyers all over it .

    Can't sue someone for telling the truth.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Scotty # wrote: »
    or... more likely, they thought better to die trying to find a better life than die staying put?

    Strange how it was the majority of single, military aged men that thought this. The women and children must be a lot more resilient than them. :rolleyes::rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,594 ✭✭✭Harika


    Strange how it was the majority of single, military aged men that thought this. The women and children must be a lot more resilient than them. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    Men go first to earn the money to bring the rest of their family. What makes sense as they will have it easiest to find work and send the money back.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,399 ✭✭✭eeguy


    Strange how it was the majority of single, military aged men that thought this. The women and children must be a lot more resilient than them. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    Maybe because women and children and more likely to be washed up on a beach or kidnapped and sold into sexual slavery or find it harder to scale the razor wire fences, survive the rubber bullets, tear gas and living in a container. Once you receive asylum in the EU you can extend it to your immediate family so it makes sense for a family to send a young man no?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Harika wrote: »
    Men go first to earn the money to bring the rest of their family. What makes sense as they will have it easiest to find work and send the money back.

    Yes, makes complete sense to leave the women and children in a war-zone for an indeterminable amount of time while you walk 3500kms to Europe.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,594 ✭✭✭Harika


    Yes, makes complete sense to leave the women and children in a war-zone for an indeterminable amount of time while you walk 3500kms to Europe.

    What is the alternative?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement