Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Belfast rape trial - all 4 found not guilty Mod Note post one

Options
11920222425316

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    While spit roast is a crass and juvenile way of describing that particular act, I don't think there is any other way to describe it

    Also known as a 4-baller. Jokes aside I don't think I'd want to have sex with a girl at the same time as a mate. To me that would be just plain weird.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,965 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Love some of the twitter eejits saying men shouldn't be allowed on juries for rape cases.

    The women jurors found the defendants not guilty aswell. Or have they lost their right to be classed as a woman?
    Ahh keep up will you - that's the internalized misogyny that comes out in the patriarchy when toxic masculinity is present in a room.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    While spit roast is a crass and juvenile way of describing that particular act, I don't think there is any other way to describe it


    Ménage à trois

    (technically is meant for 3 people in a relationship, but the use and meaning varies)


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,369 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Anyone know her name by the way?
    I would have thought she'd be identified by now since the allegations failed.
    Anyone know name?

    Known up there apparently. Should be public outright. At least to warn people about her.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭irishproduce


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Known up there apparently. Should be public outright. At least to warn people about her.

    I would expect it to be know locally of course but for those of us looking on, we know who was on one side of the trial but we don't know who was on the other.
    I would like to know


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,306 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Honestly? I find it hard to believe anyone would not feel sorry for her. She either genuinely believes she was raped or she's nuts. Either way...

    No chance she's just a malicious wagon who wanted fame, fortune or revenge no?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Known up there apparently. Should be public outright. At least to warn people about her.

    Frankly the whole thing should have been done in camera and stayed that way.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    ChikiChiki wrote: »
    Also known as a 4-baller. Jokes aside I don't think I'd want to have sex with a girl at the same time as a mate. To me that would be just plain weird.

    It's hard enough trying to find someone willing to let me sleep with them, let alone trying to find someone to actually be my friend.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,663 ✭✭✭sheroman01


    Zulu wrote: »
    I feel sorry for the girl, whether or not she was telling porkies or not, it's a sorry sorry affair.

    Out of interest, why exactly would you feel sorry for the girl if she was lying?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Or doing the 'sydney harbour bridge'

    If the lads high five its an "Eiffel Tower"


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,737 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Known up there apparently. Should be public outright. At least to warn people about her.

    If someone is found not guilty, that does not mean that their accuser is a liar or that people need to be warned about her.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,727 ✭✭✭lalababa


    Ulster and IRFU better man the f**k up and invite these men back to training in a few weeks when things on **** for brains Twitter /social media and **** paper tabloids calm down a bit.
    If they don't , major respect will be lost.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,852 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Zulu wrote: »
    Ahh keep up will you - that's the internalized misogyny that comes out in the patriarchy when toxic masculinity is present in a room.

    every jury should just be made up of Julie Bindel and Anita Sarkeesian "does the convict have anything to say before the verdict is made?

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 300 ✭✭garbo speaks


    ChikiChiki wrote: »
    I don't think I'd want to have sex with a girl at the same time as a mate. To me that would be just plain weird.

    I wouldn't mind, it would be kinda cool to high-five your mate while doing it, but I would need to be 100% guaranteed that penises would not touch in any way.


  • Registered Users Posts: 485 ✭✭benneca1


    Google Stuart Olding and see what comes up. Not guilty he may be but the online encyclopedia has its own views.  This is libel so could be interesting.


  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    Mge rois

    (technically is meant for 3 people in a relationship, but the use and meaning varies)
    Also it means all 3 with each other, with one at each end the only contact would usually be eye. And maybe a high five.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    No chance she's just a malicious wagon who wanted fame, fortune or revenge no?

    Possibly, but putting her self through this lot for it? I just don't see it. Perhaps naively


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,653 ✭✭✭storker


    Zulu wrote: »
    Ahh keep up will you - that's the internalized misogyny that comes out in the patriarchy when toxic masculinity is present in a room.

    Well remembered. Your Gender Studies degree is in the post... :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 208 ✭✭Debtocracy


    The emotional arguments I see on twitter are:

    Believe every woman who claims rape
    The men should have been convicted 1) for what the girl was made to go through in court 2) to encourage rape victims to report 3) to punish their sleazy behaviour

    Looking at social media, I feel very worried that a feminist zeigest could have made an example of these men. If so, the ruling would have huge implications. While it may support more legitimate convictions, it would also increase the chances of false convictions where there is no clear evidence of non-consent.

    In eyes of the law, the most heinous act that can ever be committed is to falsely imprison an innocent person. The jury could not be sure of guilt and had to return a verdict of not guilty based on the objective evidence.

    Legal cases are about civil rights, evidence, facts and balanced judgement. Emotional gender politics should stay out of the courtroom.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,624 ✭✭✭✭meeeeh


    I wouldn't either. Did I say you had to or other people had to spend time with men/women with similar views in my post?

    What were you replying to the then. I didn't say they were guilty I said I think they were scum. And to brush off that attitude towards women as just a bit of banter (or similar) is just sad.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,283 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    seamus wrote: »
    Sure. But courts have to take into account that obtaining a consent form before a sex act is not a reasonable expectation (and actually wouldn't make a difference).

    The overall measure is to determine whether the defendants believed the act to be consensual, with the requirement that consent must be active and ongoing. So as soon as the person falls asleep, you no longer have active consent. As soon as they say no, you do not have active consent.

    If the act starts out with active consent and she continues being conscious, engaged and not attempting to stop you, verbally or physically, then a reasonable person will believe they have consent, even if she feels like she is being forced.

    That's how horrible situations like these come about.

    A complicating factor is that it seems to have started with Jackson and the woman alone in the bedroom, and then they were joined by others, but at no point were there four people in the room. The last two to enter the room would probably have no knowledge of what went on before or how the sexual encounter was initiated.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,965 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    sheroman01 wrote: »
    Out of interest, why exactly would you feel sorry for the girl if she was lying?
    Why wouldn't I. It's clear she isn't happy.

    ....and just to head things off at the pass - feeling sorry for her is not the same as condoning her actions, and it's not mutually exclusive to feeling sorry for the others in this case.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    This’ll freak all you fragile Menimists out but there’s rallies tomorrow

    Solidarity rallies to say #IBelieveHer tomorrow at half 12:

    Belfast Courthouse
    Dublin, the Spire
    Limerick, Bedford Row

    Please RT.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,369 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    It's hard enough trying to find someone willing to let me sleep with them, let alone trying to find someone to actually be my friend.

    :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,306 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Possibly, but putting her self through this lot for it? I just don't see it. Perhaps naively

    Very naively I'm afraid. Her Instagram tells a story.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,298 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    david75 wrote: »
    This’ll freak all you fragile Menimists out but there’s rallies tomorrow

    Solidarity rallies to say #IBelieveHer tomorrow at half 12:

    Belfast Courthouse
    Dublin, the Spire
    Limerick, Bedford Row

    Please RT.

    Jesus christ......


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    Very naively I'm afraid. Her Instagram tells a story.

    What story is that? A summary...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,889 ✭✭✭Christy42


    benneca1 wrote: »
    Google Stuart Olding and see what comes up. Not guilty he may be but the online encyclopedia has its own views.  This is libel so could be interesting.

    Prove it is libel. As long as they don't say he was found guilty they should be OK. For libel he needs to prove it did not happen which has not happened yet and would be difficult.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    david75 wrote: »
    This’ll freak all you fragile Menimists out but there’s rallies tomorrow

    Solidarity rallies to say #IBelieveHer tomorrow at half 12:

    Belfast Courthouse
    Dublin, the Spire
    Limerick, Bedford Row

    Please RT.

    Do you not accept the verdict?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement