Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

1111112114116117334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Lindyloo 1


    EGG2018 wrote: »
    Has the 2009 Charities act come into force yet?

    Yep, in Oct 2014


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 frankiejoepat


    Are you only talking in the context of equity?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 EGG2018


    Are you only talking in the context of equity?

    Yeah, is it different in that regard?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭supersaint3


    Hi I’m in same boat as lawhead only started tort today - has anyone decided what to cover I am at a loss. Doing passing off defamation negligence duty of care occupiers liability anything else I should cover in your opinion. Only looking for 50%!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭GlobalSun


    Thank you all for your help, much appreciated.

    I agree that I will need to firstly refresh my memory before jumping into revisions. I have been exposed to law throughout my years as a professional, but obviously not from an academic perspective.

    I have ordered past papers & examiner's reports to have an idea as to what to expect. I am planning on slowly easing myself into it in April & start the revisions from June onwards.

    The amount of work does not scare me. I'm however apprehensive as to how difficult it will be for me to get into the swing of things, given I work in a completely different field.

    I will definitely buy proper manuals as obviously jurisprudence is not frozen in time. As far as the preparatory courses go, I will skip those. In my opinion, they're only revenue driven. If I were to sit the test in a foreign jurisdiction such as the UK or US, I would certainly rely on those preparatory schools, but as a former law student in Ireland, these don't sound too appealing to me.

    We will see how it goes. This will require a massive commitment, but I feel ready. I never really had any interest in sitting these tests (mainly out of fear of failure), but I have been very drawn to sitting them lately. If it works out good, if not, it's not the end of the world.

    The reason why I sought to sit Criminal, Constitutional, Contract & Company at the same time is because those subjects were my strong subjects in college. Hence, it would be easier for me to study these 4. Then again, I should probably switch and choose a subject I don't feel as comfortable with, for the sake of balancing and not putting all of my eggs into one basket.

    Equity & EU law were my weakest points in college.

    Anyway, we will see how I will approach these after refreshing my memory and looking at past papers.

    Thank you all for your help!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 188 ✭✭Teamhrach


    PROPERTY PREDICTIONS?
    - 2 Succession law questions
    I'm also studying:
    - Finding
    - Registration
    - Family Home
    - Adverse Possession
    - Mortgages

    Planning to study: co-ownership (but can't get my head around it!) and/or influence of equity. Would people recommend these?
    Does anyone have predictions? Am I missing an easy-ish topic? Thank you!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭david_etc


    Teamhrach wrote: »
    PROPERTY PREDICTIONS?
    - 2 Succession law questions
    I'm also studying:
    - Finding
    - Registration
    - Family Home
    - Adverse Possession
    - Mortgages

    Planning to study: co-ownership (but can't get my head around it!) and/or influence of equity. Would people recommend these?
    Does anyone have predictions? Am I missing an easy-ish topic? Thank you!

    Landlord - Tenant perhaps? Lease-License distinction is easy enough to write about.

    What's your problem with co-ownership? Most of it is quite straightforward in terms of who gets what.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 frankiejoepat


    Easements!!! Almost every sitting!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭BASHBAG


    Hi I’m in same boat as lawhead only started tort today - has anyone decided what to cover I am at a loss. Doing passing off defamation negligence duty of care occupiers liability anything else I should cover in your opinion. Only looking for 50%!!!

    I don't think Nuisance or medical/professional negligence have come up in the past two sittings. Might be worth a look.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭david_etc


    BASHBAG wrote: »
    I don't think Nuisance or medical/professional negligence have come up in the past two sittings. Might be worth a look.

    Yeah and Nuisance came up four times in a row prior to this. Along with Defamation, it's been the joint-second most popular topic since 2011 according to my grid.

    I don't know what was on October 2017, but feel like Nervous Shock is due a run too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,901 ✭✭✭Gunslinger92


    Nervous shock came up last sitting and my grid says it has never come up twice in a row


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭BASHBAG


    david_etc wrote: »
    Yeah and it came up four times in a row prior to this. Along with Defamation, it's been the joint-second most popular topic since 2011 according to my grid.

    I don't know what was on October 2017, but feel like Nervous Shock is due a run too.

    Full problem question on nervous shock last sitting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13 joedubs


    BASHBAG wrote: »
    Full problem question on nervous shock last sitting.

    You seem to know what came up last sitting - do you have a list of the topics that came up? thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭BASHBAG


    joedubs wrote: »
    You seem to know what came up last sitting - do you have a list of the topics that came up? thanks

    Sure!
    Q1. Trespass to the person- Problem
    Q2. Pure Economic Loss- Essay
    Q3. Vicarious Liability- Problem
    Q4. Damages- Essay
    Q5. Nervous Shock- Problem
    Q6. Rylands v Fletcher- Problem
    Q.7 Causation and Remoteness- Problem
    Q.8 Concurrent Wrongdoers- Essay


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13 joedubs


    BASHBAG wrote: »
    Sure!
    Q1. Trespass to the person- Problem
    Q2. Pure Economic Loss- Essay
    Q3. Vicarious Liability- Problem
    Q4. Damages- Essay
    Q5. Nervous Shock- Problem
    Q6. Rylands v Fletcher- Problem
    Q.7 Causation and Remoteness- Problem
    Q.8 Concurrent Wrongdoers- Essay

    Cheers buddy!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭david_etc


    Sad to see NS and Rylands, as I like both of those topics, but overall I probably would have failed that paper...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18 Lawhead767


    Economic loss according to my knowledge came up last year and isn’t a frequent flyer..... do ye think it’s safe to leave out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭supersaint3


    Thanks for all responses guys ! This thread has been such a help for tackling fe1s


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭Leraf


    Dont forget it is a new year. Two papers were drafted up for this year and two for last year. It is very possible there will be a repeat of topics. I dont know if it is the best idea to be basing the March paper on last Octobers sitting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭david_etc


    Leraf wrote: »
    Dont forget it is a new year. Two papers were drafted up for this year and two for last year. It is very possible there will be a repeat of topics. I dont know if it is the best idea to be basing the March paper on last Octobers sitting.

    Two papers per sitting? Is this in case of it being "leaked" or something?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭starbar91


    Guys - quick question - don't know if I'm going crazy or not but it seems as if Hedley Byrne / Negligent Misstatement never comes up as a question? Is it still examinable or what??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 189 ✭✭Supermax1988


    starbar91 wrote: »
    Guys - quick question - don't know if I'm going crazy or not but it seems as if Hedley Byrne / Negligent Misstatement never comes up as a question? Is it still examinable or what??

    Last time it came up as a problem Q was October 2013. It's due a run.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 140 ✭✭sapphire309


    Last time it came up as a problem Q was October 2013. It's due a run.

    Does anyone have this problem/sample answer Q Oct 2013 on negligent misstatement? I only have past papers as far as Mar.'15 from the law society :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭FreeFallin94


    For trespass to the person in Tort, am I right in saying that battery can be either done negligently or intentionally, but assault requires intention? That's what my notes seem to be saying anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 188 ✭✭Teamhrach


    For trespass to the person in Tort, am I right in saying that battery can be either done negligently or intentionally, but assault requires intention? That's what my notes seem to be saying anyway.

    Not doing tort yet but pretty think that's correct :)
    Battery is the act of touching, however slight (even just tapping someone on the shoulder is battery, nudging someone in a queue by mistake).
    Assault tends to be something of a graver nature but requires intention.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭david_etc


    Teamhrach wrote: »
    Not doing tort yet but pretty think that's correct :)
    Battery is the act of touching, however slight (even just tapping someone on the shoulder is battery, nudging someone in a queue by mistake).
    Assault tends to be something of a graver nature but requires intention.

    Just to clarify, assault is the unlawful apprehension of immediate contact (i.e. there is no actual contact occurring).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 Fergalr2092


    Hey, any help with topics for Equity...I am desparate.

    So far I have covered:

    Undue Influence
    Resulting Trusts (w/ Advancement)
    Constructive Trusts (New Model and Strangers)
    Trusteeship
    Proprietary Estoppel
    Mareva and Quia Timet Injunctions
    Strong v Bird
    Donatio Mortis Causa

    Does this sound like enough? I am seriously dreading this exam.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36 castle123


    Teamhrach wrote: »
    Do you know whether it appears as a PQ ever? I just have undergrad notes for it so nothing of use, sorry.

    No its always an Essay question. Pretty straightforward. Would just like a sample answer as the manual isn't very clear


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 140 ✭✭sapphire309


    Tort - does negligent care of children / negligence on the roads appear much? Is it worth knowing as a sub-topic within Negligence?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,901 ✭✭✭Gunslinger92


    Last time it came up as a problem Q was October 2013. It's due a run.

    It was a problem question in October 2016 aswell!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement