Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

€20k for couple accused of not paying for meal

Options

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,742 ✭✭✭accensi0n


    She'll be able to buy some new jeans.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43,024 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Great session in Harelawn tonight


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭mojesius


    That'll keep them in carvery dinners for years to come.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭CeilingFly


    I reckon there's more to it.

    "other fella gave a hand written receipt"

    A little "cash agreement" between people?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,772 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    CeilingFly wrote: »
    I reckon there's more to it.

    "other fella gave a hand written receipt"

    A little "cash agreement" between people?

    If there was 'more to it' why didn't the other side defend themselves?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭CeilingFly


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    If there was 'more to it' why didn't the other side defend themselves?

    They sold it for over €3m a couple of years ago. Company not short of cash.

    They did try and have it dismissed
    http://www.thejournal.ie/dinner-bill-defamation-2390485-Oct2015/

    Problem is staff members are no longer around and a few were "let go" over irregularities.

    So probably unable to get "paddy" to attend court.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,772 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    CeilingFly wrote: »
    They sold it for over €3m a couple of years ago. Company not short of cash.

    They did try and have it dismissed
    http://www.thejournal.ie/dinner-bill-defamation-2390485-Oct2015/

    Problem is staff members are no longer around and a few were "let go" over irregularities.

    So probably unable to get "paddy" to attend court.

    'By any readings of the papers, you have been in serious default in supplying a defence.....'
    Thats what the judge said about the owners. She then qualified by suggesting that the defendants were using delaying actions to frustrate the plaintiffs case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Tenigate


    I agree. The pub made mistake after mistake. I'm not sure why the couple waited around for 40 mins though -maybe anticipating damages?


Advertisement