WW XXI: Christmas Chaos!

Barbara WW · 14-12-2017 08:47AM

Jake WW wrote: »

Well that bg charade was worthwhile now.

I am the bg and Tegan was not and Mary is a very big liar.

I'll admit I suspected this all along, but nothing is certain yet. So where did this list come from or was that made up. I have a theory but lets hear it from you first.

I think we will know at munch if mary is telling the truth.

Ah I need a coffee, me head is wrecked.

Jake WW · 14-12-2017 08:56AM

There is a list. I am reluctant now to give the names of the good out other than to possibly clear one of them if they are attacked and I protect them.

I usually do classic bg and protect myself as much as possible, but this isn't my first rodeo as bg so I decided to go balls out and not protect myself at all. So I can protect myself or anyone I want really. Hope you enjoy making the call to call my bluff on that wolves.

Still thinking that I reveal the 3 names I have (two good, one bad) at last minute before munch so that wolves can't change their kill.

This doesn't clear that the message was from a goodie, so we will need to get to the bottom of that.

Barbara WW · 14-12-2017 08:59AM

Jake WW wrote: »

There is a list. I am reluctant now to give the names of the good out other than to possibly clear one of them if they are attacked and I protect them.

I usually do classic bg and protect myself as much as possible, but this isn't my first rodeo as bg so I decided to go balls out and not protect myself at all. So I can protect myself or anyone I want really. Hope you enjoy making the call to call my bluff on that wolves.

Still thinking that I reveal the 3 names I have (two good, one bad) at last minute before munch so that wolves can't change their kill.

This doesn't clear that the message was from a goodie, so we will need to get to the bottom of that.

Ok, reveal them at 10am, I'm in agreement with that, we can discuss them then afterwards.

Nigel WW · 14-12-2017 09:02AM

Jake WW wrote: »

There is a list. I am reluctant now to give the names of the good out other than to possibly clear one of them if they are attacked and I protect them.

I usually do classic bg and protect myself as much as possible, but this isn't my first rodeo as bg so I decided to go balls out and not protect myself at all. So I can protect myself or anyone I want really. Hope you enjoy making the call to call my bluff on that wolves.

Still thinking that I reveal the 3 names I have (two good, one bad) at last minute before munch so that wolves can't change their kill.

This doesn't clear that the message was from a goodie, so we will need to get to the bottom of that.

Im good with a last min reveal, im just concerned we will have lost two good posters who can dissect that info. Although im more thinking the source of the message was dodgy, your post to signal yoi got the message may have activated the cub

Angus WW · 14-12-2017 09:07AM

Haha, I don't believe Mary at all..

Jake, there's zero chance a genuine seer would also get the powers to send a secret message. That's way too overpowered. I'd stand by my original thoughts that Moggy got a reward to send a secret message, and thatbthe "confirmed" goods and bads are just Moggy trying to cause chaos.

Ewan WW · 14-12-2017 09:16AM

Jake WW wrote: »

There is a list. I am reluctant now to give the names of the good out other than to possibly clear one of them if they are attacked and I protect them.

I usually do classic bg and protect myself as much as possible, but this isn't my first rodeo as bg so I decided to go balls out and not protect myself at all. So I can protect myself or anyone I want really. Hope you enjoy making the call to call my bluff on that wolves.

Still thinking that I reveal the 3 names I have (two good, one bad) at last minute before munch so that wolves can't change their kill.

This doesn't clear that the message was from a goodie, so we will need to get to the bottom of that.

But surely the good are not guaranteed to be good? The bad is obv important. Not sure if you should say about the good or not.
Had more to say, phone rang and now can't remember.

Oh! on the bolded bit. You better Check it twice

:pac:

Barbara WW · 14-12-2017 09:21AM

Angus WW wrote: »

Haha, I don't believe Mary at all..

Jake, there's zero chance a genuine seer would also get the powers to send a secret message. That's way too overpowered. I'd stand by my original thoughts that Moggy got a reward to send a secret message, and thatbthe "confirmed" goods and bads are just Moggy trying to cause chaos.

This is actually what I thought but wanted to hear it from Jake.

Ewan WW · 14-12-2017 09:22AM

OK from the OP

"For Mogwai to win they need to survive to the end of the game"

Again the word THEY is used

"Ghost of Christmas future: the seer. Gets one peek per night, which will return good or bad based in the role currently given to the target. Stripe will always appear good."

"Mogwai is playing for itself. Its win condition is it needs to survive to the end of the game. For parity purposes Mogwai counts as village and appears good on peeks."

So we have 2 evils that appear good. It really is too hard to trust anything but evil that a seer comes out with.

This game is so hard.

Pretty sure we can clear Jake and that means Mary is off to the gallows.

Jake WW · 14-12-2017 09:45AM

Barbara WW wrote:

This is actually what I thought but wanted to hear it from Jake.

I can't rule it out and I'm inclined to agree. We can dissect the names after munch I think?

Oh btw I'm pter also

Jake WW · 14-12-2017 09:46AM

Ewan WW wrote:

Pretty sure we can clear Jake and that means Mary is off to the gallows.

You can do no such thing.

Angus WW · 14-12-2017 09:58AM

8:59

Possible final thoughts

Looks forward to seeing the supposed list, but please be aware it is a bit entertaining, isn't it?

Also, be aware of clearing Jake cause he "caught" Mary. That, too, could be a wolf ploy. Sacrifice Mary to "clear" Jake. Suspicious of Ewan for that eagerness too. No one should be "cleared"....possible trio of gremlins? Hopefully the seer hasn't been converted. Was Steve he forth?

Love
NRV

Barney92 · 14-12-2017 10:01AM

Mod Reminder

Today is a speed day

Munch 10am
Lynch 2pm
Munch 4pm
Lynch 9pm

Barbara WW · 14-12-2017 10:02AM

Another hour to munch/kill, what was that Angus?

Angus WW · 14-12-2017 10:03AM

Whoops.

Angus WW · 14-12-2017 10:03AM

Hmmm

Angus WW · 14-12-2017 10:05AM

I'll resist the urge to post jokes or gifs, but yeah, I thought it was 9 that people died.

My bad....

Well, least I didn't out myself too much or for anything important....

Desmond WW · 14-12-2017 10:11AM

Guys Marys claim will be easily proved/disproved at 10am. Today is a marv kill is it not?

If harry kills today it will prove that mary is either the priest or harry. Its not that hard.

Jake WW · 14-12-2017 10:11AM

The accidentally post thoughts that make you seem a NRV, at the 'wrong' time ploy. Nice.

Jake WW · 14-12-2017 10:14AM

Desmond WW wrote: »

Guys Marys claim will be easily proved/disproved at 10am. Today is a marv kill is it not?

If harry kills today it will prove that mary is either the priest or harry. Its not that hard.

So not actually proved/disproved at all - just narrowed down.

Barbara WW · 14-12-2017 10:15AM

Desmond WW wrote: »

Guys Marys claim will be easily proved/disproved at 10am. Today is a marv kill is it not?

If harry kills today it will prove that mary is either the priest or harry. Its not that hard.

Good point, I didn't think of this.

Also, if there is no munch, it proves she lied about Riona.

Desmond WW · 14-12-2017 10:15AM

Jake you are bg?

Did you ever think that mary could be saying the bg was dead in order to a) get the wolves and sk to both target her and b) allow the bg to protect her.

Can people think before they start throwing their roles about

Desmond WW · 14-12-2017 10:16AM

Jake WW wrote: »

So not actually proved/disproved at all - just narrowed down.

Well its narrowed down to harry or priest isn't it?

Barbara WW · 14-12-2017 10:16AM

Jake WW wrote: »

So not actually proved/disproved at all - just narrowed down.

I think we can prove she is lying.

Jake WW · 14-12-2017 10:17AM

It could be i suppose. I wouldnt worry about the timing Desmond i was revealing this morning one way or another.

Barbara WW · 14-12-2017 10:20AM

Desmond WW wrote: »

Jake you are bg?

Did you ever think that mary could be saying the bg was dead in order to a) get the wolves and sk to both target her and b) allow the bg to protect her.

Can people think before they start throwing their roles about

Also thought of this but didn't want to highlight it before munch.

Only thing is, BG would know she is lying, would they think she is bluffing on purpose to distract the wolfs and actually protect her?

Desmond WW · 14-12-2017 10:20AM

Jake WW wrote: »

It could be i suppose. I wouldnt worry about the timing Desmond i was revealing this morning one way or another.

Maybe so but your role is now a known... not an uncertainty.... at 9.59.59

Desmond WW · 14-12-2017 10:22AM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Also thought of this but didn't want to highlight it before munch.

Only thing is, BG would know she is lying, would they think she is bluffing on purpose to distract the wolfs and actually protect her?

Tbh if i were bg whether i believed it ir not i qould run with the play and waiting for post munch reactions expecting a 9.59.59 post explaining her plan

Jake WW · 14-12-2017 10:24AM

That could still happen i suppose.

Mary WW · 14-12-2017 10:27AM

Desmond WW wrote: »

Jake you are bg?

Did you ever think that mary could be saying the bg was dead in order to a) get the wolves and sk to both target her and b) allow the bg to protect her.

Can people think before they start throwing their roles about

Jake is not the BG.

Desmond WW · 14-12-2017 10:27AM

Jake WW wrote: »

That could still happen i suppose.

It could. I won't elaborate on it anymore and will wait for your info in eagerness.

First things first. Is mary lying or is she harry/priest. We'll find out at 10 i guess

WW XXI: Christmas Chaos!

Comments