Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

WW XXI: Christmas Chaos!

1…3435373940…95

Comments

  • #1082
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,716 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    *rereads riona's FFA*

    *reads username list*

    Hello Mick/Vale.

    ?


  • #1083
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    That Riona FFA has to be a piss take.


  • #1084
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    *rereads riona's FFA*

    *reads username list*

    Hello Mick/Vale.

    lol I thought that was you!


  • #1085
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    That Riona FFA has to be a piss take.

    i'm reluctant to agree with you on that, cos it might be me tagging along with you


  • #1086
    Liam WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭Liam WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    ?

    Our chief messers


  • Advertisement
  • #1087
    Liam WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭Liam WW


    Orla WW wrote: »
    lol I thought that was you!

    Same as that, could be SM though, wasn't she up the duff there until recently? :D


  • #1088
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,118 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Are we really any better off than yesterday?


  • #1089
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,864 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Doris WW wrote: »
    If this line continues, I wouldn't advocate a peak on myself. There is nothing I can do about the above.

    This is true, my point earlier in this case about what we do after compiling the FFAs. Your on two i think so probably not in danger of beong lynchwd, if you are number 4 or 5 on the FFA id suggest peeking you or someone in that position. I dont think your an alpha so would come back bad/good.

    Its ****ty that posts from day 0 are being held against you but its what we've got to work on at the moment.


  • #1090
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    FFA#2


    1. Winnie - agressive response to acusations, one of those Conor accused of being an SK before he was killed by an SK, the kind of post count I think Wolves may be hiding in
    2. Phil - SOme similar stuff to Winnie but not accused of being an SK instead 2 x seasonal reference posts and no others while still able to Vote despite barely posting
    3. Doris - early H20/Giz reference, picked out a post of mine from hours ago to point out a mistake I made even though others already had (spreading aspersions), responded to someone questioning their dodgy posts simply by saying "Meh. First one is arguably dodge but its a joke."

    I will probably be voting early enough so I wouldn't be surprised if a lot changes on thread between my vote and when it goes down. I don't blame any of those people for firing back at me but wanted to make sure I got an FFA in.

    completely different 3 from me today but then again 2 of my 3 from last time are dead now (Tegan & Gabby) and the third Frank was the one I had the least to go on and he has been a lot less active today.

    Riona also has me very curious after those recent FFAs and is hovering close to my top 3 right now as a result


  • #1091
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Until we get some of the lower posters posting and (hopefully) slipping up, best to off them.

    Agree with Liam's theory of not getting to the end game with low posting scum (jk).


  • Advertisement
  • #1092
    Liam WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭Liam WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    Are we really any better off than yesterday?

    Hey Frank, care to weigh in with anything?

    You've been very quiet today.

    Anyways, there's a long time before the lynch, people will only be getting in from work in the next hour or two


  • #1093
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Or, you know, everyone could just vote for Isla.


  • #1094
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,118 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    This is true, my point earlier in this case about what we do after compiling the FFAs. Your on two i think so probably not in danger of beong lynchwd, if you are number 4 or 5 on the FFA id suggest peeking you or someone in that position. I dont think your an alpha so would come back bad/good.

    Its ****ty that posts from day 0 are being held against you but its what we've got to work on at the moment.

    Its really it goes. Anything can be used against anyone. No one is above suspicion. Also, just have a feeling the wolves are quite seasoned. No glaring stand out comments as yet.


  • #1095
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,118 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    Hey Frank, care to weigh in with anything?

    You've been very quiet today.

    Anyways, there's a long time before the lynch, people will only be getting in from work in the next hour or two

    Bad work day. Barely had a toilet break. I honestly feel today is shaping up like last night.

    Ive no set ffa, also still reading back some earlier posts from individual posters, seeing if anything stands out.


  • #1096
    Riona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭Riona WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    So your only reason is because they suspected you? Would it not be better to find a reason on someone for something more substantial? I mean personally your reasoning makes me suspect you.

    Yes.

    That is all there is to go on - Can you point out any good reason for suspecting anyone else over the last 10 pages??

    If you accuse someone your automatically accused

    If you ask questions your automatically accused of pretending to be new

    If you dont say anything your automatically accused because your being too quiet

    If you say to much your accused because y'know - your chatty

    Having a crack at my logic for posting that ffa when the above is all that seems to be happening is quite frankly absurd, it's the best reason of any.

    And I also now suspect frank because I wrote "Frankly" - There is definitely a subconscious message from mind working to my advantage here!!


  • #1097
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,716 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Is it just me or this heaving of Phil onto the ffa's a cop out? I mean the lad has 2 posts on day 1. Are people seriously considering voting for him? If he has voted again tonight fair enough he's following the thread but i just think its a bit premature


  • #1098
    Ewan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    I have to be AFK and not sure when I will get back. I was going to put my vote in now for Gertie and then I read up and all the stuff about being a noob etc so I am going to hold off and go for my other FFA person of Winnie.


  • #1099
    Ewan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Lynch list has dead on it


  • #1100
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Better to kill someone not contributing than someone contributing.

    With the low contributors, we have no posts to analyse, no slip ups to look for.

    For the contributors, we have these things, so there is more chance we will catch them out if they are bad.

    In the absence of a solid lead, killing Phil based off his late vote switch and lack of posting is as good an option as anything.


  • #1101
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Better to kill someone not contributing than someone contributing.

    With the low contributors, we have no posts to analyse, no slip ups to look for.

    For the contributors, we have these things, so there is more chance we will catch them out if they are bad.

    In the absence of a solid lead, killing Phil based off his late vote switch and lack of posting is as good an option as anything.


  • Advertisement
  • #1102
    Angus WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭Angus WW


    Riona WW wrote: »
    FFA

    Barbara - Suspected me earlier
    Jake - Suspected me above
    Orla - Tagged along with Jake



    Those are as good reasons as any at this stage for me!

    His is the most suspicious FFA I've ever seen, ever....


  • #1103
    Riona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭Riona WW


    If Jake double posts again thats a far better reason than any to vote for him!!!


  • #1104
    Riona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭Riona WW


    Angus WW wrote: »
    His is the most suspicious FFA I've ever seen, ever....

    Thats coz I voted for you yesterday is it??

    I'm onto you..............


  • #1105
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    My read on the gab comments is just misunderstating the mechanics tbh. Holly is really trying to push it though. Like a dog with a bone.

    This is what grinds my gears, peopel like desmond swanning in with his idiotic statments like this.

    Like a dog with a bone, pushing an agend...etc... really..... so I made 5-6 comments discussing an observation.

    I never once called Gerty suss

    I never once pushed anything hard,

    I never once accused anyone.

    All I did was discussed an observation openly and constructivly with other posters.

    You sir are barely active, comes in with eitehr a foolish observation of your own, suggesting something which was never done.

    You are either a foolish villager who hasnt done any research in his absence or a wolf trying to confuse others.

    Im leaning towards the former.


  • #1106
    Angus WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭Angus WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Better to kill someone not contributing than someone contributing.

    With the low contributors, we have no posts to analyse, no slip ups to look for.

    For the contributors, we have these things, so there is more chance we will catch them out if they are bad.

    In the absence of a solid lead, killing Phil based off his late vote switch and lack of posting is as good an option as anything.

    I won't be voting Phil tonight.

    If he votes again without posting, then I'd advocate a quick vigilante kill if they're out there. Otherwise, I'll be happy to see Phil lynched tomorrow.

    But for tonight, it's a bandwagon waiting to happen imo, and I think the wolves would love everyone to jump on someone who isn't defending themselves.


  • #1107
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,716 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Riona WW wrote: »
    If Jake double posts again thats a far better reason than any to vote for him!!!

    Lol.... to true.

    Its actually a known problem with the touch site i believe. I know it happens to me every now and again


  • #1108
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    I dont buy that you didnt know that already Riona.

    Glad Im not the only one


  • #1109
    Angus WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭Angus WW


    Riona WW wrote: »
    Thats coz I voted for you yesterday is it??

    I'm onto you..............

    But you didn't :confused:


  • #1110
    Riona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭Riona WW


    Angus WW wrote: »
    I won't be voting Phil tonight.

    If he votes again without posting, then I'd advocate a quick vigilante kill if they're out there. Otherwise, I'll be happy to see Phil lynched tomorrow.

    But for tonight, it's a bandwagon waiting to happen imo, and I think the wolves would love everyone to jump on someone who isn't defending themselves.

    Is this not a waste if he is to be mod killed, he has 2 posts from day 1 if im not mistaken - surely 3 days no activity is enough?


  • Advertisement
  • #1111
    Riona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭Riona WW


    Angus WW wrote: »
    But you didn't :confused:

    I thought I did??:confused:

    You sure??


Advertisement