WW XXI: Christmas Chaos!

Liam WW · 12-12-2017 05:03PM

Holly WW wrote: »

Thats a weak explaination, especially as we have a few villagers already claiming to be new and dumb

Riona being the other, Tegan fessed that it was an act.

Weak it may be but you're drawing this from reading from flavour, which is something mods have never done, nor would they in this game imo, I'm just backing what I think is the most likely explanation, same as yourself.

Liam WW · 12-12-2017 05:05PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

This gertie issue is getting more complicated with every post, admitedly started by me. Could be a genuine mistake by a newbie, has he posted an explanation yet?

She hasn't, waiting to see that anyways.

For what it's worth I think Holly is pushing this from a villager pov

Nigel WW · 12-12-2017 05:08PM

#FFA2
1. Doris - references on day 1 to backroom along with H20 and G**mo raised my suspicions at the time, think shes the only one left alive from my first FFA so moves up to top spot.

2. Phil - as mentioned previously, i dont think hes new and cant excuse his lack of posts. The vote last didnt help his cause and i said to myself that i wouldn't linger on it all day. I havent but his lack of posting smacks of a wolf hoping for a something to pop up to take him out of the firing line.

3. Gertie - might be new but behaviour has been weird to say the least especially saying she wanted to vote for herself last night. Im on fence about the newbie thing but regardless of that her behaviour and posts havent helped the village.

Tbh there is about 5 other low posters id be happy to run off at this stage aswell.

Desmond WW · 12-12-2017 05:21PM

Hey just read todays activity. Will admit i did so very quickly so some of my remarks may be obsolete.

I did an ffa yest. I had Liam, tegan and doris iirc. I voted for Liam as I said in the post.

Fwiw Liam has moved off my ffa when i make one later. I missed that he replied to me yesterday (him ignoring my earlier question was one of my reasons for having him on it) and his general chat today has eased my earlier concerns. Obviously im not trying to clear him just that i am more suspcicious of others at the moment.

Jake asking for bg protection this morning really irks me. Was this explained and i missed it.

Someone posted about doris' early posts, was it barb? I see they had a to and fro, these posts are why i had her on my ffa yest as i thought she might be the sk. Not so sure now tbh.

Conors death isnt really a surprise tbh and the fact that it was an sk kill would lead me to believe moreso that it was trying to cast assertions more than self defense.

My read on the gab comments is just misunderstating the mechanics tbh. Holly is really trying to push it though. Like a dog with a bone.

Just a few of my initial musings. Will read last few pages now again. I know i havent been around to date so any questions just ask. I hope to be more active over the next couple of days anyway... either here or in the dr

Doris WW · 12-12-2017 05:25PM

Nigel WW wrote: »

#FFA2
1. Doris - references on day 1 to backroom along with H20 and G**mo raised my suspicions at the time, think shes the only one left alive from my first FFA so moves up to top spot

...

If this line continues, I wouldn't advocate a peak on myself. There is nothing I can do about the above.

Desmond WW · 12-12-2017 05:36PM

Actually another thing i was wondering. Was Jake's, "o i see someone has revealed themselves", post discussed? Man i hate these posts, nearly as much as i dislike people asking for themselves to be cleared by the seer.

I mean doris your claiming not to be a wolf but you would like our seer to waste a peek, in which their sole aim is to find a wolf, on you to verify you as a villager? To me this always reads like a wolf who's back is against the wall saying "peek me, i dare you. I have nothing to worry about", in order to remove some of the heat. If your good convince your accusers or give an alternate.

Desmond WW · 12-12-2017 05:38PM

Doris WW wrote: »

If this line continues, I wouldn't advocate a peak on myself. There is nothing I can do about the above.

Apologies.... didnt read the wouldn't. Just to be clear your saying dont peek you?

Liam WW · 12-12-2017 05:39PM

Desmond WW wrote: »

Actually another thing i was wondering. Was Jake's, "o i see someone has revealed themselves", post discussed? Man i hate these posts, nearly as much as i dislike people asking for themselves to be cleared by the seer.

I mean doris your claiming not to be a wolf but you would like our seer to waste a peek, in which their sole aim is to find a wolf, on you to verify you as a villager? To me this always reads like a wolf who's back is against the wall saying "peek me, i dare you. I have nothing to worry about", in order to remove some of the heat. If your good convince your accusers or give an alternate.

I thought that was aimed at me 'clearing' Tegan, a few people mentioned role claims, all of which I thought were aimed at me being the seer.

Doris asked to not be peeked

Jake WW · 12-12-2017 05:40PM

Liam WW wrote: »

I thought that was aimed at me 'clearing' Tegan, a few people mentioned role claims, all of which I thought were aimed at me being the seer.

Doris asked to not be peeked

To clarify, it was aimed at your clearing of Tegan.

Desmond WW · 12-12-2017 05:41PM

Liam WW wrote: »

I thought that was aimed at me 'clearing' Tegan, a few people mentioned role claims, all of which I thought were aimed at me being the seer.

Doris asked to not be peeked

Ya addressed that above. Im wrecked atm and words getting jumbled.

So are you the seer :P ? Thans for clearing that up.. my list is getting flimsy again

Riona WW · 12-12-2017 05:42PM

How does the seer let us know whos bad or is that just for them?

Isla WW · 12-12-2017 05:44PM

Riona WW wrote: »

How does the seer let us know whos bad or is that just for them?

They would have to out themselves to let others know and in doing so they would obviously make themselves a target so unless they know someone is bad and decide to tell us pre lynch i'd say they will be keeping most things to themselves that they learn.

Jake WW · 12-12-2017 05:45PM

They dont. Not yet anyway. They stay hidden (assuming Liam wasnt claiming that role) until they have solid info (usually after a few days) and then come out on thread and tell us.

Liam WW · 12-12-2017 05:46PM

Riona WW wrote: »

How does the seer let us know whos bad or is that just for them?

Normally they'll try to drop hints at who they've peeked or that they're the seer so if a villager spots it they'll know to follow their lead.

When they have enough information they'll make a big long coming out post at 9:59am (so wolves can't change the munch in time) saying I'm the seer I've peeked xyz and they're evil/good

Same with the priest, hints normally followed by a long coming out post

Jake WW · 12-12-2017 05:46PM

I dont buy that you didnt know that already Riona.

Orla WW · 12-12-2017 05:47PM

the caveat this game is that one of the baddies shows as good to the seer, so we have to take the peeks with a pinch of salt

Desmond WW · 12-12-2017 05:47PM

Riona WW wrote: »

How does the seer let us know whos bad or is that just for them?

The seer gets a peek every night. They are given info, sometimes a specific tole other times just good or bad. They then decide when to reveal their info themselves. The aim is to get the info out before tou die but not so early so that you will be killed early.

Riona WW · 12-12-2017 05:47PM

Ya makes sense. Right,

Who is nominated to go and post the votes and post counts again? I cant im eh - washing my hair!

Doris WW · 12-12-2017 05:48PM

I'll take a stab an FFA so
#FFA2

Isla, fluffly posts haven't been sitting right with me. I reckon she's the SK who killed Conor judging by the posts immediately after it
Phil, hard to know on this one. I don't believe a wolf would play like this. We need some answers though.
Ewan, honestly no one else on my radar. I'd like to hear more from Ewan as one of the lowish posters

Jake WW · 12-12-2017 05:48PM

Vote logged.

Conor was gonna collate the FFAs but he gone ded.

Ill be travelling and putting down little Jake (no pun) until about 8ish, so i wont be able to collate.

My #FFA2 was tagged earlier, and ive already placed my vote, so chat to ye in the lead up to the lynch folks.

Orla WW · 12-12-2017 05:48PM

Jake WW wrote: »

I dont buy that you didnt know that already Riona.

I was actually about to post something like this, now Riri seems fishy to me. Trying to seem newer than new

Liam WW · 12-12-2017 05:48PM

Riona WW wrote: »

Ya makes sense. Right,

Who is nominated to go and post the votes and post counts again? I cant im eh - washing my hair!

The votes and FFAs are at the top of page 24 I think, I'll get today's FFAs if they're not done by 8pm

Doris WW · 12-12-2017 05:49PM

Desmond WW wrote: »

Apologies.... didnt read the wouldn't. Just to be clear your saying dont peek you?

Apologies, I sometimes get the meaning of advocate backwards.

I'll say now that a peak on me is a waste. As someone said earlier, NRV's are fodder. Probably better to lynch me as an NRV than waste a peak on me and find out I'm an NRV.

Riona WW · 12-12-2017 05:50PM

FFA

Barbara - Suspected me earlier
Jake - Suspected me above
Orla - Tagged along with Jake

Those are as good reasons as any at this stage for me!

Mary WW · 12-12-2017 05:52PM

Isla WW wrote: »

Hey Mary, what is your take on things at the moment? I don't have much of an idea who you are but would be interested to see another slant on things.

I'm a bit overwhelmed atm by the post count, I can get a few minutes here and there in work to check but when I come back there has been pages posted since will be able better to catch up after I get home around 6:30 depending on traffic

Orla WW · 12-12-2017 05:52PM

Riona WW wrote: »

FFA

Barbara - Suspected me earlier
Jake - Suspected me above
Orla - Tagged along with Jake

Those are as good reasons as any at this stage for me!

OMGUS!

Jake WW · 12-12-2017 05:52PM

Riona WW wrote: »

FFA

Barbara - Suspected me earlier
Jake - Suspected me above
Orla - Tagged along with Jake

Those are as good reasons as any at this stage for me!

That is way too newbie a thing for an actual newbie to do.

Desmond WW · 12-12-2017 05:54PM

Riona WW wrote: »

FFA

Barbara - Suspected me earlier
Jake - Suspected me above
Orla - Tagged along with Jake

Those are as good reasons as any at this stage for me!

So your only reason is because they suspected you? Would it not be better to find a reason on someone for something more substantial? I mean personally your reasoning makes me suspect you.

Jake WW · 12-12-2017 05:55PM

*rereads riona's FFA*

*reads username list*

Hello Mick/Vale.

Jake WW · 12-12-2017 05:55PM

*rereads riona's FFA*

*reads username list*

Hello Mick/Vale.

WW XXI: Christmas Chaos!

Comments