Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

WW XXI: Christmas Chaos!

1…3233353738…95

Comments

  • #1022
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,056 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    Good to hear, would have been sad to see another modkill :)

    If the mod came near me ,I would put them into an armbar.


  • #1023
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Liam,

    Lets say gert is a wolf.... he knows gab is good (not conor as you stated). He knows both sks are still alive, and he by default knows his kill was good.


  • #1024
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Doris WW wrote: »
    If your intention was to get a reaction Barbra, you go it :pac:

    Always good to get a reaction, all part of the game, look forward to hearing your FFA. :)


  • #1025
    Liam WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭Liam WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Liam,

    Lets say gert is a wolf.... he knows gab is good (not conor as you stated). He knows both sks are still alive, and he by default knows his kill was good.

    How would he know both SKs are alive?

    He was talking about thinking Conor was evil in the first place, not Gab


  • #1026
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    How would he know both SKs are alive?

    He was talking about thinking Conor was evil in the first place, not Gab

    I would assume an SK would know if the other SK dies as suddenly they would have a kill every turn as apposed to every 2nd turn. I could have mis-interpretid the OP though


  • Advertisement
  • #1027
    Steve WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    Isla
    Ewan
    Frank

    Two of the people on your FFAs yesterday are now dead, have you any notions of who they might be replaced with?

    Steve
    Winny

    everyone on your FFA is dead, what do you make of that?

    I should be in the everyone group like Winny.


  • #1028
    Ewan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Hmm Gertie is sure making a wolfie case for themself.


  • #1029
    Ewan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    I would assume an SK would know if the other SK dies as suddenly they would have a kill every turn as apposed to every 2nd turn. I could have mis-interpretid the OP though

    Nope you seem to be spot on. Just checked myself

    "The Wet Bandits – The Serial Killer Team
    Marv

    Harry

    The serial Killers are a team, however they are separated and take alternate kills each night, starting with Marv- i.e they will kill every night. They don’t know each other and have separate rooms. If one dies the other picks up their kills"


  • #1030
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,853 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    How do you know he wasn't a baddie, Conor was killed by an SK, he could have been the other SK or a wolf?

    She doesn't unless she is the seer or the priest and unless I'm wrong about the roles and the power they have it would take a complete new player or a fool to reveal that for no reason


  • #1031
    Liam WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭Liam WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    I would assume an SK would know if the other SK dies as suddenly they would have a kill every turn as apposed to every 2nd turn. I could have mis-interpretid the OP though

    But we're taking Gert as a wolf in this hypothetical.

    Gert as a wolf, May have killed Gab but wouldn't know anything about the SKs

    Gert as an SK, May have killed Conor but couldn't be sure that he wasn't a wolf

    You're conflating this and I'm not sure if it's purposeful or not


  • Advertisement
  • #1032
    Liam WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭Liam WW


    Steve WW wrote: »
    I should be in the everyone group like Winny.

    I left you out of that as you only had a two man FFA where he had three, but yeah, you should be in the everyone group.


  • #1033
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Mary WW wrote: »
    She doesn't unless she is the seer or the priest and unless I'm wrong about the roles and the power they have it would take a complete new player or a fool to reveal that for no reason


    Hey Mary, what is your take on things at the moment? I don't have much of an idea who you are but would be interested to see another slant on things.


  • #1034
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Liam,

    Lets say gert is a wolf.... he knows gab is good (not conor as you stated). He knows both sks are still alive, and he by default knows his kill was good.

    I don't understand this Holly. Can you explain?


  • #1035
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    How would he know both SKs are alive?

    He was talking about thinking Conor was evil in the first place, not Gab

    Judging by the kill notice, I assume both bandits are alive as it was noted that he was munched by the wet bandits.... plural


  • #1036
    Liam WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭Liam WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Judging by the kill notice, I assume both bandits are alive as it was noted that he was munched by the wet bandits.... plural

    That's fair enough, normally that kind of thing is disguised in the flavour. I wouldn't rule it out but it's weaksauce to try hang Gertrude with


  • #1037
    Steve WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    Steve have you finished catching up yet? It's been reasonably quiet since your last post

    I'm at 14:30


  • #1038
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    But we're taking Gert as a wolf in this hypothetical.

    Gert as a wolf, May have killed Gab but wouldn't know anything about the SKs

    Gert as an SK, May have killed Conor but couldn't be sure that he wasn't a wolf

    You're conflating this and I'm not sure if it's purposeful or not

    re-reading the hypothetical now and it does seem there is a lot of supposing alright
    Holly wrote:
    Lets say gert is a wolf.... he knows gab is good (not conor as you stated). He knows both sks are still alive, and he by default knows his kill was good.

    How would he be a wolf and know both SKs are still alive? the only one who would know if the SKs are alive are the other SKs via the situation I outlined before or a Seer of some sort. I'm not sure how this hypothetical is even possible


  • #1039
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Orla WW wrote: »
    I don't understand this Holly. Can you explain?

    If gertrude is a wolf, and judging by my assumotion that the wet bandits both live as oer the latest munch kill obit,

    Gert would know by default that whomever was killed wasnt bad and therefore good


  • #1040
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    That's fair enough, normally that kind of thing is disguised in the flavour. I wouldn't rule it out but it's weaksauce to try hang Gertrude with

    Why did gert say someone wasnt bad then..... explain that


  • #1041
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Gert would know by default that whomever was killed wasnt bad and therefore good

    but this is based on an assumption that the fate of the bandits is/would be revealed in the death notice, right?

    I'm inclined to think flavour is flavour and we won't be told, either overtly or covertly if one of the bandits dies. The only people who will know that are the priest, or the other bandit, and possibly the seer if they had peeked them


  • Advertisement
  • #1042
    Liam WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭Liam WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Why did gert say someone wasnt bad then..... explain that

    Gert is genuinely a newbie and made a mistake?

    I'm not giving them a pass but it's more likely than what you're insinuating, in my opinion anyways


  • #1043
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,864 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    What was Nigels first day? I'm taking Sunday and Monday as one day, but I thought his posting was fine all the way through. Getting a bit more suspicious if anything to me

    Its the first few pages off posts I was pointing out what i thought was Mogi behaviour, i hadnt read the OP properly and didnt realise the impact it would have if one of the wolf teams took out the Mogi. It was on the first 4 or 5 pages of the thread.


  • #1044
    Angus WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭Angus WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Why did gert say someone wasnt bad then..... explain that

    I think it was a fair presumption, and tbh, I find it weird how hard you're trying to push this. I think I read exactly what he meant in that initial post, and am not sure why it's suddenly has becoming a dominating point of conversation.....


  • #1045
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    Gert is genuinely a newbie and made a mistake?

    I'm not giving them a pass but it's more likely than what you're insinuating, in my opinion anyways

    Thats a weak explaination, especially as we have a few villagers already claiming to be new and dumb


  • #1046
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Angus WW wrote: »
    I think it was a fair presumption, and tbh, I find it weird how hard you're trying to push this. I think I read exactly what he meant in that initial post, and am not sure why it's suddenly has becoming a dominating point of conversation.....

    Define hard, im discussing something I noticed, dont try to label me as pushing hard when im not.


  • #1047
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    This gertie issue is getting more complicated with every post, admitedly started by me. Could be a genuine mistake by a newbie, has he posted an explanation yet?


  • #1048
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    This gertie issue is getting more complicated with every post, admitedly started by me. Could be a genuine mistake by a newbie, has he posted an explanation yet?


  • #1049
    Steve WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    Gertrude WW wrote: »
    Well he is dead so he wasn’t a baddie.

    Not necessarily, the baddies can die too. Also, wolves can kill SK. SK can kill other SK. SK can kill wolves.


  • #1050
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,864 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Right now ,

    My ffa2

    Jake ; probably fueled by my paranoia but I cant shake the idea that hes bad. Not saying hes a bonafide wolf but I find myself responding to his posts negativly and seeing reasons why a wolf may want to act as he has. In my eyes he tried to clear phil this morning as soon as conor was killed, he denies this but its what I saw. Maybe im wrong but I cant shake the feeling of suspicion with Jake.

    Nigel ; very helpful this morning, maybe that is how he wanted to appear. Reposted some other villagers posts without really having any silid feelings himself. Nigel makes my list as wolves usually like to appear helpful.

    Phil ; not sold on him being bad yet, but his absense is doing him no favours either so he makes uo my list.

    Just on the above, context of those posts were discussing low posters and they are below. I also pointed out phils only two posts and how i felt he wasnt a new aplyer. I felt Gertie might be new aswell, still do but her behviour is still suspicious. No issue with being in your FFA but just wanted to give those two context
    Nigel WW wrote: »
    All of Gerties posts, nothing really in there in the way of contribution either. Tbh only one post is not filler
    Nigel WW wrote: »
    Phils only two posts. In both he makes seasonal references, maybe not a lot to read into it, but the 15 posts per page thing makes me think its not his first rodeo in which case the extremely low posting is slightly more suspicious. He posted once a day so he should be along soon with his daily post


  • Advertisement
  • #1051
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    Just on the above, context of those posts were discussing low posters and they are below. I also pointed out phils only two posts and how i felt he wasnt a new aplyer. I felt Gertie might be new aswell, still do but her behviour is still suspicious. No issue with being in your FFA but just wanted to give those two context

    I missed that 2nd point, about the 15 posts. That's a good one!


Advertisement