Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

So this Hurricane

1636466686971

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,973 ✭✭✭RayM


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    That would make a good road safety advert (presuming it's not been done before). Disguise it as a lotto ad, with the usual "it could be you", etc, and then have the big shocking car crash "reveal" at the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,877 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    GFish wrote: »
    True, and there were lots of people out for very good reasons.

    Don't assume that people who were out and who might or might not have lost their lives were either selfish or stupid.

    People who were out walking in areas with fallen trees , or out swimming , surfing etc are both selfish and stupid which is not what I said about the victims.

    You are just perceiving/twisting it that way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭GFish


    murpho999 wrote: »
    The advice was to stay at home. Very clear cut.

    The fact is if people went out for whatever reason then they're not following the advice.


    Read it back.

    The advice was "Do not go out unless ... "

    But you are clearly blaming the victims for not "Following the advice" - when you had and still have - no idea why those people were out.

    We all know what the advice was; we all know what the risks were.
    Lots of people were out there, knowing what the risks were, and a few of them lost their lives.

    I find it offensive for you - or anybody - to suggest that those who lost their lives did so because they were stupid.
    They may have had very good reasons for being out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,285 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    Here lads could murpho come back and explain again that he wasn't judging, just stating facts, and then could gfish point out again how offensive it still is? If ye could do that another ten or twelve times I'm sure you'll change one another's mind. Sound.


  • Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If it was a relative of yours you woudn't be saying what you're saying.

    I'd say that's a fair assumption.

    Even the best of us make mistakes and whether warnings get heeded or not, families got destroyed today.
    So yeah maybe the word "insensitive" applies alright.

    Yes, I would. I've literally scolded people all day not to go outside, and didn't go to work for it.

    I am not saying these are bad people. I am just saying there were warnings put in place which were not heeded.
    GFish wrote: »
    Read it back.

    The advice was "Do not go out unless ... "

    Where does it say that?

    According to the MET:
    https://www.met.ie/nationalwarnings/warnings-explained.asp

    "STATUS RED - Severe Weather Warning - Take Action

    The issue of RED level severe weather warnings should be a comparatively rare event and implies that recipients take action to protect themselves and/or their properties; this could be by moving their families out of the danger zone temporarily; by staying indoors; or by other specific actions aimed at mitigating the effects of the weather conditions."
    GFish wrote: »
    But you are clearly blaming the victims for not "Following the advice" - when you had and still have - no idea why those people were out.

    Well, of course, he is blaming the victims. When there literally, A RED ALERT, stating that there is potential to lose your life if you should go outside. And you go outside. You are at fault for you own demise, as simple as that.
    GFish wrote: »
    We all know what the advice was; we all know what the risks were.
    Lots of people were out there, knowing what the risks were, and a few of them lost their lives.

    I find it offensive for you - or anybody - to suggest that those who lost their lives did so because they were stupid.
    They may have had very good reasons for being out.

    If you play a poker hand which has a low chance of winning and it loses, were you stupid to play that hand?

    I am not saying they are stupid, but there were warnings, national warnings to not go out. You can find it offensive all you like, but when dealing with facts, people lost their lives today by not taking heed of warnings. The deaths were totally avoidable.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭GFish


    Thanks Paddy.
    I think you've said enough.

    I get it - except for the Poker bit - that's your area.
    I don't know much about gambling with peoples lives


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,823 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Permabear wrote:
    This post had been deleted.


    I was out in the storm yesterday, during or near it's worst, this was planned. I have an interest in weather, in particular extreme weather. I had provisions with me encase I got stranded including sleeping bag etc. I've been in extremely dangerous situations in the past, possibly including yesterday, this will not stop me from doing it again. I did however see extremely dangerous risk taking yesterday, the most concerning being, a father and two young kids being outside, watching the big waves at or near storm height, I was inside my car at this stage. Having your kids outdoors during storm height is one thing, but actually having them outside is whole level of stupidity! I was astonished. I can understand people's fascination with these kind of natural phenomenon, but please, don't risk your kids lives!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,792 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Re: happy pear, let's not be too hasty in saying we should warn them about being in dangers way..

    Those two twats are actually adults who have modeled their sctick on John and Edward Grimes; aka Jedward. They are due a special kind of contempt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18 American Pie


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    Just to add to the mix, I happened to be driving in the middle of the Storm coming home from work in what would have been close to peak intensity for the North of the Island. I know NI was under a slightly different warning, ie. yellow rather than red, however almost everywhere was sending home employees early to get back home before the worst hit. The company I work for was the exception which sent an e-mail around stating it would be "business as usual" but that they would be monitoring the situation. I also heard a manager stated in a meeting something similar and something along the lines of how important it was for people to be working rather than being let out early. This meant that practically everyone who left my place of work yesterday had to drive during the beginning of peak intensity and a number came across trees that were down and blocking the road.

    A lot of people might have been out in the middle of it all because they didn't have a choice or had to weigh up in their head getting in trouble with work for leaving early or staying and taking a chance on getting home later. There were times it didn't seem bad and staying in work would have been an easy option to make. Then other times a large gust would hit the car and remind you that you were in the middle of a particularly nasty storm. It's still quite gusty where I am at the minute with some large and loud gusts periodically which aren't too far off what it was like when it was at it's worst.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,069 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Is it safe to come out now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    murpho999 wrote: »
    The advice was to stay at home. Very clear cut.

    The fact is if people went out for whatever reason then they're not following the advice.

    Sorry but we will have to agree to disagree here. Too many variables for anyone to make such a call unless (as I said earlier, being privy to the exact circumstances)

    Neither you nor I know why any of those poor unfortunates had to venture out today, I know the initial warnings i read this AM was not to make unnecessary journeys.

    I don't know if any of the people killed today were on necessary or unnecessary journeys.

    Do you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,292 ✭✭✭✭Nekarsulm


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Those two twats are actually adults who have modeled their sctick on John and Edward Grimes; aka Jedward. They are due a special kind of contempt.

    Ah, they are only receiving attention because they're known from their TV appearances.
    There were 8 or 10 others pictured in the water behind them, and no one cares about them at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭A Battered Mars Bar


    I don't believe you should be allowed delete stupid twitter. Those tworking should be shamed for life for what they done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    We know that one person was killed when they tried to clear a damaged tree that was leaning over their house. There were plenty of clear spots and he may have well felt that he had time before the next wave that could see the tree crash into his house was due. Unfortunately, another tree fell/lost a branch on him which lead to his death.

    As it turned out, it was a much higher risk than perhaps he reckoned. It was a tough call though, especially if the tree was large enough to threaten the whole house. With a huge tree out the back that I was eyeballing most of yesterday, especially as the northerlies started swinging it towards the house, I could well see that sort of decision being made.

    Many people were out for dumbass reasons yesterday. Many were out for either good reasons or what seemed to be good reasons. Three died. It's early days to cast blame. Maybe be glad for now that you weren't pushed into that sort of awkward risk-it-or-not situation. I am.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,222 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    I'm very thankful for social media yesterday it really was a life saving platform. While I was sitting in my tall terraced well sheltered city centre house in cork I was doubting the severity of it but I could see the carnage unfolding on Twitter, Facebook etc and heeded the advise to stay in. I'm sure lots felt the same.

    On another note there is a precedent for this now "hurricane winds" in ireland. Public structures will need to be fit for purpose, too many easily ripped apart yesterday.


  • Posts: 5,249 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I can guess who in work today will be saying this was a non event, that they went for a cycle in Salthill and they weren't killed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭whoopsadoodles


    People don't know what sort of journeys of others had to make. I work in healthcare, people don't suddenly get better and go home if there's a storm so that we can shut up shop. Almost all staff were in. They needed to be.

    Then some of those staff had to go home to their children or other vulnerable family members.

    No stupidity, just necessity.

    On my way home I picked up a guy who had walked 8k home from work in it by the time I saw him. He wasn't given a choice to stay in work and had to leave as they were closing the place and there was no other way for him to get home.

    I brought rain gear and hiking boots with me in case I had to leave the car. I stuck to big roads.

    I'm very glad that most of the country stayed in doors and have no doubt that it minimised the loss of life, but some people did have genuine reasons to be out in it and it's not fair to imply that if you were outside, your death was your own fault.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,222 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    I can guess who in work today will be saying this was a non event, that they went for a cycle in Salthill and they weren't killed.

    3 people were killed needlessly, it was a huge event. The only reason that number is so low is because of extensive media and social media coverage showing the extent of the carnage.
    Vast majority of people needed the advice.

    I has it this morning in the gym. "storm in a teacup" " hard breeze is all"
    You'd swear people are disappointed the roof wasn't ripped off their home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    jon1981 wrote: »
    I think met eireann were afraid of getting it wrong and just put the whole country under red alert. Costly move, is it lazy weather forecasting or was it just that unpredictable?

    I think the wind in north Dublin is far worse now.

    Also, while i criticize the forecasting, had the scaremongering not taken place i feel many more would have been killed or seriously injured. Some large trees came down in parts of Dublin that would be along very busy pedestrian paths.

    A few points on the forecasting;

    - This was an exceptionally rare event. The models are decent, but having past data to extrapolate from is invaluable and there just wasn't much of it this side of the Atlantic.

    - The storm did a few unusual things. Firstly, it was supposed to start transitioning from a Cat2 as it lurked up the Atlantic seaboard. Instead, a couple of days beforehand, it stalled in a patch of low-shear winds. This held off the transition process (to extra-tropical storm or ex-hurricane*) It also lead to an unexpected strengthening to a Cat3.

    I am not sure how much difference that delay did, but there was some question as to whether that stalling and intensifying made it harder for the jet stream to whisk it up to where models were predicting landfall and/or caused unpredictable movement from then. We do know that the models were having trouble aligning, and she shifted a bit east (when she was due to hit Waterford dead-on), and then west again at the last moment, taking the path she eventually did.

    This meant that predicting the worst of the storm impact was very difficult. A shift of a couple of milimeters on the models could result in a whole county getting hammered that was predicted to see nothing worse than a gale. That is a hell of a lot of responsibility to take on for the sake of inconvenience to people. When the Red warning was put in place across the country, there was still question as to whether it would wallop Waterford. Crucially, it seemed to be skipping Cork (Cork was showing between the eye and the eastern windwall, with Waterford in the windwall). I think they did have a Red for Cork anyway, but taking two counties further in, it could have made the difference between no-one being on the streets and a normal day that suddenly got a hurricane.

    I'm very forgiving of the forecasters in this. They did an incredible (and pretty accurate) job in very difficult, time-limited circumstances with lives depending on them.




    *This was causing a lot of confusion yesterday, I think. A hurricane can be downgraded to a tropical storm within the tropics (Cat 2 - Cat 1 - TS). This refers to a drop in its sustained wind speed. A hurricane will transition to an extra-tropical storm if it lurks northwards enough to get caught by mid-lat upper air conditions/jet stream, etc. This changes the shape of the storm in this case but is not predicated on intensity or speed.

    So, you can have an extra-tropical storm that hits with the force of a Cat1 hurricane, but a tropical storm hits at tropical storm intensity. (Corrections welcome if I've mucked up a point).

    Note the phrasing of "the remnants of Hurricane Ophelia" is both technically accurate and misleading. From the technical modelling point of view, yes, it was the remnants of a hurricane, insofar as she had transitioned to an ex-hurricane. BUT, what we usually get when we have the term "remnants of hurricane X" is the more usual hurricane from the Americas rolling across the cooler Atlantic, losing power along the way and arriving to us as a low pressure zone with a lot of rain and some wind. What hit us still had the force and intensity of a hurricane, especially in the south. It's a slightly clumsy way to phrase it, and it is misleading, technically accurate or not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,513 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    A lot of the strength depends on where you are in relation to the centre of these storms.

    Some people got luckier than others. Up here in Donegal we got off lightly, I was expecting much worse tbh.

    I'm not one of these who welcome extreme weather conditions, I like my house undamaged and my family safe and able to get to school or work. For those who claim it was overhyped and no worse than a usual winter storm, count yourself lucky.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    I got pretty lucky too, the far west coast slithered by more or less untouched (bar Kerry) it seemed. I was expecting it to be much rougher, but overall, I am not complaining that there's not, for instance, a roof tile embedded in the car or a tree in the living room.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,428 ✭✭✭✭gimli2112


    LordSutch wrote: »
    Is it safe to come out now?

    Carnage on the commute into work, in Dublin. Leaves and twigs everywhere.
    Talking to family in the South East though and they didn't have such a good time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,568 ✭✭✭BillyBobBS


    Have to say im pretty surprised on the ride to work this morning in Dublin didn't see a single tree down and not that many branches etc...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭coffeyt


    I know it's often said after tragedies that relatives of victims may read boards and be aware of this before posting and that this is brushed off.
    However I know for a fact that a relative of the Tipperary man who died is an active member of boards who actually posted on some of the storm threads yesterday morning.
    Can I please ask people to think about this before making statements about any of the three deaths that sadly happened yesterday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭qwerty ui op


    Today is a day for anyone who can fog a mirror to go;
    cleaning hard to get windows
    fixing roofs
    using chainsaws.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭Nettle Soup


    LordSutch wrote: »
    Is it safe to come out now?

    No...don't come out until global warming is over. That's the advice.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    rob316 wrote: »
    I'm very thankful for social media yesterday it really was a life saving platform. While I was sitting in my tall terraced well sheltered city centre house in cork I was doubting the severity of it but I could see the carnage unfolding on Twitter, Facebook etc and heeded the advise to stay in. I'm sure lots felt the same.

    I feel like a lot of the people posting here saying it nothing out of the ordinary must have been in very sheltered houses and streets. I remember a few years ago being caught in a gust as a pedestrian that almost pulled me out onto a road in front of traffic (it wasn't forecast to be that windy). When I got home, it didn't sound very windy from inside the house at all.

    I totally agree with you, Met Éireann and social media did wonders at putting across the message that it was very dangerous indeed out there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    clean up time, today

    a few loose branches on the front lawn...but a big massive tree down on the back lawn :(

    have to fork out for the tree surgeon, ah well no one was injured


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭erica74


    Got absolutely blown out of it yesterday. I left work at around midday as I'm on a motorbike and the wind was really starting to pick up. Got blown around a bit on the drive home but not as bad (for me) as Darwin in 2014.
    Got home and the electricity went out at around half 12 and still not back.
    The wind was wild in Waterford from around 2pm until around 6pm. Then it eased a bit but still had the occasional big gust in the middle of a constant very strong wind until around 9pm.
    Quite wet but the wind was the big problem.

    Lots of trees down and general debris all over the place.

    What an awful day for the families and friends of the deceased. A really shocking and sudden way to lose a family member.


Advertisement