Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Refugee Quota Poll

  • 05-08-2017 1:09pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭


    Just vote any comments are old news .zzzzzzz

    Edit Again for Mod Note: The poll has been changed at the request of the OP, please be aware that any votes cast before the changes are now applied to whatever the new option is; this is unavoidable. You can probably change them yourselves if you want.

    How many refugees should Ireland accept? 22 votes

    Less than 4,000
    0%
    More than 4,000
    36%
    MyPeopleDrankTheSoupWibbsodyssey06Ulysses GazeAtlantic DawnYamanotoRobertKKFraR 8 votes
    None
    13%
    17larssonTom Mann CenturiaPure tashte 3 votes
    Should asylum seekers be allowed to work after one year
    36%
    barry75blarney_armyvan_beanocdebyesto24DontThankMeSSr0Ban hullaballoo 8 votes
    ...Atari Jaguar
    13%
    circadianmartingriffrgossip30 3 votes


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    Why are we not actually solving the housing crisis rather than using it as an excuse for refugee policies?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    Samaris wrote: »
    Why are we not actually solving the housing crisis rather than using it as an excuse for refugee policies?

    Migrants who come from the EU do have the money to buy houses so most are renting . There is a shortage of houses to rent as a result .


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    I...do not get your poll options. What happened to the simple various numbers options + Atari Jaguar? We should take...income tax number of refugees?

    Also, what do European migrants have to do with accepting refugees who are not generally originally from the EU. X is causing an issue, how much should we punish Y to make up for it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    Samaris wrote: »
    I...do not get your poll options. What happened to the simple various numbers options + Atari Jaguar? We should take...income tax number of refugees?

    Also, what do European migrants have to do with accepting refugees who are not generally originally from the EU. X is causing an issue, how much should we punish Y to make up for it?

    I need to edit this but no option


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    Migrants who come from the EU do have the money to buy houses so most are renting . There is a shortage of houses to rent as a result .

    Migrants from the EU are NOT refugees.

    And neither are they the source of the housing crisis. The housing crisis has been going on for decades (before we had an influx of immigrants). It's just that some people (like yourself) have only seem to notice it now, and then blame foreigners - it really says a lot about where this thread will go.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 69 ✭✭FraR


    More than 4,000
    Zero. Refugees aim to flee a particular country, not travel through numerous safe countries to get to a European country with generous welfare.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,528 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    Most confusing (and confused?) question and poll, ever!

    OP, maybe outline your thinking on your question and we might get a hint as to what you're actually asking?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 69 ✭✭FraR


    More than 4,000
    dotsman wrote: »
    Migrants from the EU are NOT refugees.

    And neither are they the source of the housing crisis. The housing crisis has been going on for decades (before we had an influx of immigrants). It's just that some people (like yourself) have only seem to notice it now, and then blame foreigners - it really says a lot about where this thread will go.

    So the fact that 700k plus foreigners moved to Ireland over a fifteen year period had no affect on the housing crisis?

    Good one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    dotsman wrote: »
    Migrants from the EU are NOT refugees.

    And neither are they the source of the housing crisis. The housing crisis has been going on for decades (before we had an influx of immigrants). It's just that some people (like yourself) have only seem to notice it now, and then blame foreigners - it really says a lot about where this thread will go.

    I never said EU migrants were refugees . I asked a simple question and it seems like I am on the chopping block . You have the solution which is to relax immigration rules and allow more regardless I take it .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    HeidiHeidi wrote: »
    Most confusing (and confused?) question and poll, ever!

    OP, maybe outline your thinking on your question and we might get a hint as to what you're actually asking?

    This is the first time I tried to do a poll and cannot edit it !!! I would delete the whole lot but cannot .


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    dotsman wrote: »
    Migrants from the EU are NOT refugees.

    And neither are they the source of the housing crisis. The housing crisis has been going on for decades (before we had an influx of immigrants). It's just that some people (like yourself) have only seem to notice it now, and then blame foreigners - it really says a lot about where this thread will go.

    Huh?

    5 years ago we had too many houses.

    There was houses for rent everywhere.

    Fast forward the economy back on track with an increase in population and here we are.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    This is the first time I tried to do a poll and cannot edit it !!! I would delete the whole lot but cannot .

    Could you make a new one and the mods might delete this?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,489 ✭✭✭Yamanoto


    More than 4,000
    D) 1983 Ford Cortina


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭CeilingFly


    FraR wrote: »
    So the fact that 700k plus foreigners moved to Ireland over a fifteen year period had no affect on the housing crisis?

    Good one.

    And 1.3 MILLION Irish born people live in other countries.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    IlikeOP wrote: »
    We breed like fcuking rabbits!

    Tbf rabbits are cute


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    CeilingFly wrote: »
    And 1.3 MILLION Irish born people live in other countries.

    More Irish born should emigrate to make room .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭Autochange


    zero


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Samaris wrote: »
    Why are we not actually solving the housing crisis rather than using it as an excuse for refugee policies?

    We've accepted tens of thousands of asylum seekers from Nigeria and Pakistan which I don't understand, if they were told to go home in the morning you'd solve the crisis in 24 hours by freeing up tens of thousands of houses. You can't keep housing an unending flow of migrants and not expect it to have an impact on the housing market, it's inorganic growth that's a destabilizing factor.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    CeilingFly wrote: »
    And 1.3 MILLION Irish born people live in other countries.

    So what's your point? Most of them are in the UK, US, Canada and Oz where they have applied for visas. How that translates to owing half of Nigeria a gaff I'm unsure, perhaps you can explain it to me?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    This is the first time I tried to do a poll and cannot edit it !!! I would delete the whole lot but cannot .

    Report your post and ask a mod to fix it for you in the message


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    Report your post and ask a mod to fix it for you in the message

    Done


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    Done

    Now we play the waiting game


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,528 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    conorhal wrote: »
    We've accepted tens of thousands of asylum seekers from Nigeria and Pakistan which I don't understand, if they were told to go home in the morning you'd solve the crisis in 24 hours by freeing up tens of thousands of houses. You can't keep housing an unending flow of migrants and not expect it to have an impact on the housing market, it's inorganic growth that's a destabilizing factor.

    Tens of thousands? Really? Can you provide a source for that? I tried googling it but couldn't find any statistics relating to country of origin, or the numbers which I frankly just don't believe. Maybe I'm wrong though.

    How many of those whom we've accepted are now working and contributing to the economy? Could we do without their contributions which will be propping up our public expenditure?

    How many of those two particular nationalities you've singled out came in other than through the asylum system do you know?

    It's not just about physical houses.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭CeilingFly


    conorhal wrote: »
    So what's your point? Most of them are in the UK, US, Canada and Oz where they have applied for visas. How that translates to owing half of Nigeria a gaff I'm unsure, perhaps you can explain it to me?
    Because there's a certain amount of uneducated scum who are inherently racist and stupid.

    They don't understand that emigration works two ways.

    There are Irish people in almost every country in the world, yet the racist scum that thankfully are in the minority here, have an issue.

    Funny the same scum probably have family living in other countries - that's how stupid they are


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    HeidiHeidi wrote: »
    Tens of thousands? Really? Can you provide a source for that? I tried googling it but couldn't find any statistics relating to country of origin, or the numbers which I frankly just don't believe. Maybe I'm wrong though.

    How many of those whom we've accepted are now working and contributing to the economy? Could we do without their contributions which will be propping up our public expenditure?

    How many of those two particular nationalities you've singled out came in other than through the asylum system do you know?

    It's not just about physical houses.

    Google, it's not hard. It tells me that there are over 17,000 Nigerians in Ireland despite handing out visas in the hundreds and they have a 40% unemployment rate. No very productive migrants.


  • Registered Users Posts: 103 ✭✭Pure tashte


    None
    FraR wrote: »
    Zero. Refugees aim to flee a particular country, not travel through numerous safe countries to get to a European country with generous welfare.

    Do the refugees themselves actually get to decide? I thought it was an EU initiative, they can't keep them all in refugee camps in Greece, so the rest of the EU countries (except Hungary and a few other central European ones) decided to take in a certain amount? I don't think it's a case of migrants from the Middle East and Northern Africa thinking "Let's go to Ireland to get the dole".

    As long as they are properly vetted, I think it's a good thing that Ireland is taking in 5000 refugees. A lot of young families with young children have been brought in as is, and it's not as if it's a big enough number to cause huge social or economic problems. There seems to be efforts to integrate them started, like the bus that brought the refugees from Ballaghadereen to the Mayo Roscommon match in Croke Park last weekend.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    CeilingFly wrote: »
    Because there's a certain amount of uneducated scum who are inherently racist and stupid.

    They don't understand that emigration works two ways.

    There are Irish people in almost every country in the world, yet the racist scum that thankfully are in the minority here, have an issue.

    Funny the same scum probably have family living in other countries - that's how stupid they are


    The only people that don't seem to understand how immigration works seem to be those that can't quite grasp what a visa application is for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    Now we play the waiting game

    I wonder can you block comments and just have a poll only .


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    Seems like people really don't get the difference between "migrants" (as a phrase relating to people moving from one country or politically controlled zone to another) and "refugees" (as in relating to people fleeing from threatening circumstances in their home country), but be that as it may, if people haven't gotten the difference over the past ten years, they probably won't now.


    Mod: OP, PM me what options you want, I think I can edit the poll for you. But without direction, my instinct is to change all the options to Atari Jaguar :P


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    The poll makes no sense......no Atari jaguar option?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,528 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    conorhal wrote: »
    Google, it's not hard. It tells me that there are over 17,000 Nigerians in Ireland despite handing out visas in the hundreds and they have a 40% unemployment rate. No very productive migrants.

    So 60% are working?

    And "no very productive migrants "? Really?


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,752 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    More than 4,000
    FraR wrote: »
    Zero. Refugees aim to flee a particular country, not travel through numerous safe countries to get to a European country with generous welfare.

    The problem with that is should Greece and Italy be burdened with all the refugees?
    I mean just look at one's passport if from an EU country, we are like a state in the US and we nearly have a country called the EU as we are citizens of the European Union. We all work together to better the EU.
    Ireland has a housing problem but if people are cleared in Greece as being genuine and a non threat, we can't just say to Greece, it is your problem deal with it.
    All 28 soon to be 27 countries work together and that is fair.

    The travelling through other countries was stopped, given it was proven to be a security threat to the EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    HeidiHeidi wrote: »
    Most confusing (and confused?) question and poll, ever!

    OP, maybe outline your thinking on your question and we might get a hint as to what you're actually asking?

    It has been edited unfortunately comments have to be allowed .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    Has anyone mentioned the poll? Tis a bit odd.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    KERSPLAT! wrote: »
    Has anyone mentioned the poll? Tis a bit odd.

    Whats odd ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    The poll is still pretty odd, yeah.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    More than 4,000
    The Housing Crisis is a deliberate set-up by a number of vested interests to make money from the Irish crack-cocaine addiction to owning property. And in some cases multiple properties. It drives up the price of housing to buy and also to rent.

    And wait until The Soldiers of Bankruptcy get back into power. They will just amp up the market with steroids in the form of tax breaks for developers.

    But to blame all this on Refugees is nonsensical. This is our own faults for voting politicians in and then not holding them to account.

    But in terms of refugees, I'd be in favour of taking in the most persecuted group of refugees from Iraq only.

    The Yazidi Christians.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    RobertKK wrote: »
    The problem with that is should Greece and Italy be burdened with all the refugees?
    I mean just look at one's passport if from an EU country, we are like a state in the US and we nearly have a country called the EU as we are citizens of the European Union. We all work together to better the EU.
    Ireland has a housing problem but if people are cleared in Greece as being genuine and a non threat, we can't just say to Greece, it is your problem deal with it.
    All 28 soon to be 27 countries work together and that is fair.

    The travelling through other countries was stopped, given it was proven to be a security threat to the EU.

    All countries are not working together and oppose taking in asylum seekers especially Eastern Europe .
    Fleeing war and persecution was the basis for refugee status.The consensus now appears to be economic persecution is acceptable .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    Whats odd ?

    It's odd that you can't see an issue with it.

    One of the answers in your poll is actually another question!

    C) Should asylum seekers be allowed to work after one year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    KERSPLAT! wrote: »
    It's odd that you can't see an issue with it.

    One of the answers in your poll is actually another question!

    C) Should asylum seekers be allowed to work after one year

    Do I just delete it and start another thread and new poll with that question ?

    How would you change it ?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    More than 4,000
    RobertKK wrote: »
    The problem with that is should Greece and Italy be burdened with all the refugees?
    No nation should IMHO. If it were down to me I'd be cutting off the supply in the Mediterranean and other routes and certainly wouldn't be sending taxpayer funded glorified ferries to bring them into the EU. Importing so many people the vast majority of whom are young men from cultures very different to European culture(and yes it does exist) is importing more problems that it solves. Show me any nation in Europe* where the busted flush thought experiment that is "multiculturalism" hasn't caused problems and increasing ones. It's beyond daft a policy.


    *namechecking the US/Canada/Australia are silly comparisons on all sorts of levels. They're nations founded on immigration/colonisation and have their own problems that are all too clear to see. The Irish diaspora is yet another silly comparison. 1) those who were "refugees" in the past were going to nations inviting immigrants in 2) they didn't receive social welfare 3) those moving today are able to work in the job markets of the places they're going to.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    All countries are not working together and oppose taking in asylum seekers especially Eastern Europe .

    Well, yes, and it's pretty counter-productive and short-sighted (and selfish) of them. But it's down to exactly the sort of attitudes already displayed in the very basis of the thread - whataboutery about EU migrant workers for one, attempting to solve an unrelated crisis by seeing what can be taken from the refugee group, since they have the least rights and can be most easily abused, the panic that more brown people means the end of white society and all the other bollockry.

    It results in some countries having to bear a disproportionate amount of the cost of the problem - which is not the fault of individual refugees either - which results in enclaves that will not integrate, rejection and suspicion of individual people that naturally enough makes them less able to integrate even without packing them together like sardines and demanding that they then become Greek/British/whatever...somehow. It results in damage to the economies of the individual countries, especially ones that are struggling anyway, like Greece, and it risks the cohesiveness of the EU.

    But people are short-sighted. Why are you surprised that other countries do it too?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    Do I just delete it and start another thread and new poll with that question ?

    How would you change it ?

    Just use the tag below:

    [Delete poll]

    And then start again. Should work


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    More than 4,000
    Samaris wrote: »
    Well, yes, and it's pretty counter-productive and short-sighted (and selfish) of them. But it's down to exactly the sort of attitudes already displayed in the very basis of the thread - whataboutery about EU migrant workers for one, attempting to solve an unrelated crisis by seeing what can be taken from the refugee group, since they have the least rights and can be most easily abused, the panic that more brown people means the end of white society and all the other bollockry.

    It results in some countries having to bear a disproportionate amount of the cost of the problem - which is not the fault of individual refugees either - which results in enclaves that will not integrate, rejection and suspicion of individual people that naturally enough makes them less able to integrate even without packing them together like sardines and demanding that they then become Greek/British/whatever...somehow. It results in damage to the economies of the individual countries, especially ones that are struggling anyway, like Greece, and it risks the cohesiveness of the EU.

    But people are short-sighted. Why are you surprised that other countries do it too?

    Why though?

    They never invited the refugees to come in. Merkel did.
    If Germany invited them in and is now "overrun" with them, is that not her fault?

    Why should the rest of the EU take in a bunch of Non-EU citizens if they don't want to?

    Why should the rest of the EU pay for Germany's decision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    ...Atari Jaguar
    KERSPLAT! wrote: »
    Just use the tag below:

    [Delete poll]

    And then start again. Should work

    You don't offer a suggestion on how it should be edited ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    You don't offer a suggestion on how it should be edited ?

    You're very demanding!

    Try post the below, should give you the option to edit then

    [Edit poll]


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    Because basic humanity for a start.

    Yes, there's limits and there's things that need to be done. But the whole "Ban them all, they add nothing to the state and I'm alright jack so I don't give a flying if thousands die" is selfish nonsense. The argument seems to be "if you support immigration you support unfettered immigration and you're a liberal idiots" versus "if you don't support immigration you want to ban everyone and you're a right-wing racist". Most people who want to argue "yes, we have a duty to take in refugees, as other countries have always done, including for us, but there is a massive crisis at the moment and countries need to work together to deal with it" get shouted down.

    It'll be interesting to see how the argument changes when Ireland is being badly impacted by climate change and could start producing ...oh dear, economic migrants to deal with it. I suspect it will change quite sharply around that point. We'll probably manage to keep it up when it's only the Spanish, Portuguese, Greeks, Italians etcetera being affected, because why should we have to take in our neighbours? But eventually it'll hit us too. Not sure where we'll go. North, I assume.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    More than 4,000
    Samaris wrote: »
    Because basic humanity for a start.

    Yes, there's limits and there's things that need to be done. But the whole "Ban them all, they add nothing to the state and I'm alright jack so I don't give a flying if thousands die" is selfish nonsense. The argument seems to be "if you support immigration you support unfettered immigration and you're a liberal idiots" versus "if you don't support immigration you want to ban everyone and you're a right-wing racist". Most people who want to argue "yes, we have a duty to take in refugees, as other countries have always done, including for us, but there is a massive crisis at the moment and countries need to work together to deal with it" get shouted down.

    It'll be interesting to see how the argument changes when Ireland is being badly impacted by climate change and could start producing ...oh dear, economic migrants to deal with it. I suspect it will change quite sharply around that point. We'll probably manage to keep it up when it's only the Spanish, Portuguese, Greeks, Italians etcetera being affected, because why should we have to take in our neighbours? But eventually it'll hit us too. Not sure where we'll go. North, I assume.

    The difference is, Irish people are educated and go to these countries to work.

    The vast, vast majority of refugees that are entering Germany have little to no education, are barely literate in their own languages and speak no German. And their own Government are now saying up to 75% of them will still be unemployed after 5 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,969 ✭✭✭enricoh


    CeilingFly wrote: »
    Because there's a certain amount of uneducated scum who are inherently racist and stupid.

    They don't understand that emigration works two ways.

    There are Irish people in almost every country in the world, yet the racist scum that thankfully are in the minority here, have an issue.

    Funny the same scum probably have family living in other countries - that's how stupid they are

    Question : why do we owe half of Nigeria a free gaff and anything else welfare can provide?
    Answer : racist scum, stupid, also uneducated!

    Well that clears that one up then!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 69 ✭✭FraR


    More than 4,000
    HeidiHeidi wrote: »
    So 60% are working?

    And "no very productive migrants "? Really?

    Only 40% of Africans in Ireland are employed.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement