Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Werewolf XV - Greendale Community College

1545557596070

Comments

  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    I would have thought on a possible list of reasons for no sk kill would be, in order of probability

    1) they died.

    2) they were blocked (ACB, ABs)

    3) inactivate player missed votes

    Given that the first one is the most likely should we not go with that and focus our attention to the wolves. And I know i know thats exactly what ye think a sk would say but if there is a kill tomoro we can revisit it.

    We have a good lynch target in me if the sk kills tomoro from ACB, or else the wolves blocked them with ABs if thats the case they will leave them alive to help kill off the village. So the sk only chance of winning is to start killing the wolves


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Conor WW wrote:
    If we all decide who we are going to vote for in a pre vote so to speak. As in we all say who we are going to vote for on the thread by eight. Then we see who gets the most votes and everyone votes for that person. It means that we get a sort of vote result and also means we find Jeff. If everyone votes on the thread and then we vote for the winner the only way we don't lynch that person is if they are evil Jeff. What do people think?


    I'm in favour but we have no way of verification that people are telling the truth in their vote.

    My vote is currently on Steve anyways just to have things in the open (obviously I haven't cast it yet)


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,936 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    If we all decide who we are going to vote for in a pre vote so to speak. As in we all say who we are going to vote for on the thread by eight. Then we see who gets the most votes and everyone votes for that person. It means that we get a sort of vote result and also means we find Jeff. If everyone votes on the thread and then we vote for the winner the only way we don't lynch that person is if they are evil Jeff. What do people think?

    I fully endorse this approach.
    While we know we can't trust that everyone will vote the way they say they will, it at least gives us some chance to identify important information.
    Assuming that all villagers will vote as they say they will, we should at least be able to identify a clear Evil Jeff or possibly a wolf bandwagoning. I think we are fairly certain the wolves have a max of three votes? Bad Abed being gone? I am not sure if we were fully able to discount Pierce from being turned?? can anyone recall?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    ACB losing thier power gives evil jeff a gauranteed 2 lives so it could be a rebalance


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Liam WW wrote: »
    I don't deserve to be on the list :(
    I have been on posting today. Just had a bad day yesterday and was down 70% in my posts, but stuff happens like!

    Eva posted after we were told she was gone? I don't get it? Having a brain fart obv. Is she just opting out?

    6 posts in last 24 hour period (4 short)
    have you given an ffa today? contribute.


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    No we don't but we have more villagers than not at the moment so they shouldn't really have a motive to lie about who they vote for. So say if we as a village decide to vote for Angus or whoever. Then if Angus doesn't get lynched we would know they are Jeff. Unless for some reason we decided to not follow through on the plan. But if we decide to go for it it means that villagers have to be honest with their votes and then commit to voting for who the overall village decides. Otherwise it's useless.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    knowing the bad press this may i draw way, i feel this is something that needs to be discussed:

    so far we dont know anything, the only that we can possibly garner from so far is that the SK might be dead cost only 1 kill morning 3 (today).

    this be due to:

    SK dead
    was blocked by ass bandit
    was blocked by boobs
    missed the order
    double up on the kill order by wolves and SK

    basically with so many unknowns, a discussion of a role reveal should be had.

    maybe britta chooses 2 for her backroom, and the info can be relayed. i dunno, something. i feel like we're flying blind.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,936 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    No we don't but we have more villagers than not at the moment so they shouldn't really have a motive to lie about who they vote for. So say if we as a village decide to vote for Angus or whoever. Then if Angus doesn't get lynched we would know they are Jeff. Unless for some reason we decided to not follow through on the plan. But if we decide to go for it it means that villagers have to be honest with their votes and then commit to voting for who the overall village decides. Otherwise it's useless.

    I really don't see why villagers would not be honest with their votes. It's counter village if they do lie.

    We have no other means for trying to discern patterns and gather information. For all we know the priest and seer have been killed.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    I would have thought on a possible list of reasons for no sk kill would be, in order of probability

    1) they died.

    2) they were blocked (ACB, ABs)

    3) inactivate player missed votes

    Given that the first one is the most likely should we not go with that and focus our attention to the wolves. And I know i know thats exactly what ye think a sk would say but if there is a kill tomoro we can revisit it.

    We have a good lynch target in me if the sk kills tomoro from ACB, or else the wolves blocked them with ABs if thats the case they will leave them alive to help kill off the village. So the sk only chance of winning is to start killing the wolves
    Henry WW wrote: »
    knowing the bad press this may i draw way, i feel this is something that needs to be discussed:

    so far we dont know anything, the only that we can possibly garner from so far is that the SK might be dead cost only 1 kill morning 3 (today).

    this be due to:

    SK dead
    was blocked by ass bandit
    was blocked by boobs
    missed the order
    double up on the kill order by wolves and SK

    basically with so many unknowns, a discussion of a role reveal should be had.

    maybe britta chooses 2 for her backroom, and the info can be relayed. i dunno, something. i feel like we're flying blind.

    I forgot about the double kill sigh........... must read back through franks posts to see why both teams might have focussed in on him


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,936 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    knowing the bad press this may i draw way, i feel this is something that needs to be discussed:

    so far we dont know anything, the only that we can possibly garner from so far is that the SK might be dead cost only 1 kill morning 3 (today).

    this be due to:

    SK dead
    was blocked by ass bandit
    was blocked by boobs
    missed the order
    double up on the kill order by wolves and SK

    basically with so many unknowns, a discussion of a role reveal should be had.

    maybe britta chooses 2 for her backroom, and the info can be relayed. i dunno, something. i feel like we're flying blind.
    the problem there is britta can't be sure who she picks to go into backroom. She could easily select a wolf or god forbid.. two wolves. or a wolf and roled villager who then gives themselves up.

    Britta doesn't really help us at all unless the Katie suggestion happens.


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,936 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    I forgot about the double kill sigh........... must read back through franks posts to see why both teams might have focussed in on him

    if Frank was SK woudl he have got his kill if he was a munch target?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Conor WW wrote:
    No we don't but we have more villagers than not at the moment so they shouldn't really have a motive to lie about who they vote for. So say if we as a village decide to vote for Angus or whoever. Then if Angus doesn't get lynched we would know they are Jeff. Unless for some reason we decided to not follow through on the plan. But if we decide to go for it it means that villagers have to be honest with their votes and then commit to voting for who the overall village decides. Otherwise it's useless.


    I'm totally in favour of it Conor, don't get me wrong. But even getting FFAs is like pulling teeth so far. If we come to a consensus I'm happy to vote for the candidate.

    But there are many on thread who have not declared any votes so far. Yesterday was a wash but I'm concerned about Friday's vote. At least 10 players STILL have not said who they voted for that day so why should I (or we, as a village) believe them suddenly stating their intentions now?

    I will be voting for Steve UNLESS a consensus is decided upon.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    I really don't see why villagers would not be honest with their votes. It's counter village if they do lie.

    We have no other means for trying to discern patterns and gather information. For all we know the priest and seer have been killed.

    Exactly, that's why I suggested the idea in the first place. It will only bot work if villagers lie and there's no need for them to do so.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    Exactly, that's why I suggested the idea in the first place. It will only bot work if villagers lie and there's no need for them to do so.

    so who you gonna vote for?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    I need Jake and his spreadsheet now. Who has not said who they voted for on Friday thus far?

    These are the people we need to look at in my humble opinion


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    #VoteDay3 I'd like to vote Ewan

    wont be voting until 8-9 though.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    I need Jake and his spreadsheet now. Who has not said who they voted for on Friday thus far?

    These are the people we need to look at in my humble opinion

    i didnt say who i was voting for. in fact i cant even remember who i voted for.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    if Frank was SK woudl he have got his kill if he was a munch target?

    That could depend on the timing orders put in.... although

    Serial killers don't operate on a fixed schedule, they kind of just kill randomly you know?!

    not fully sure what that menas.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    That could depend on the timing orders put in.... although

    Serial killers don't operate on a fixed schedule, they kind of just kill randomly you know?!

    not fully sure what that menas.

    i think it means to avoid the above situation, and a situation of SK being lynched.

    i think in another universe this may have caused some problems/controvery.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Henry WW wrote:
    i didnt say who i was voting for. in fact i cant even remember who i voted for.

    Huh? There's been 2 votes for lynch thus far. I assume you voted for Orla last night.

    Gabriel was lynched Friday. Did you vote for him? If so, why? If not, who else did you suspect.

    This is a suss response.

    I voted clearly and it can be found on thread.

    Lynch 1: Steve
    Lynch 2: Orla

    You're gone to the top of my list with just one post


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    i think it means to avoid the above situation, and a situation of SK being lynched.

    i think in another universe this may have caused some problems/controvery.

    ok so we could discount the evil team killing the sk? so we could say frank was 100% not the sk


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Unless Steve starts interacting he is next for modkill. 3 posts in past 24 hours. come on steve, speak up, ffa, who you voting for, who you voted for on friday, who you suspect, you owe us 7 more posts!

    you know, i don't think katie has answered you question yet.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Huh? There's been 2 votes for lynch thus far. I assume you voted for Orla last night.

    Gabriel was lynched Friday. Did you vote for him? If so, why? If not, who else did you suspect.

    This is a suss response.

    I voted clearly and it can be found on thread.

    Lynch 1: Steve
    Lynch 2: Orla

    You're gone to the top of my list with just one post


    dont be so dramatic. orla last night was who i voted. friday night, i cant remember. i even pm'd the mods so they could tell me. no response yet.

    but why would this put me top of your list? if i was bad why would i say it? it seems like you are trying to sling some mud to see if anybody will take the bait. a rather wolfish tactic


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭Fiona WW


    My 2 votes so far were

    fri - gab ( unready declared it here)
    Sat - orla

    if there is a max 4 wolfs and an sk, that leave 5 from 17 who we cant trust to vote for who they declare.

    but that gives us around 70% we can trust, given a) we have a clear choice of who to pick, b) the majority of us are onoine to declare our votes and actually vote.

    its surely worth doing to try find evil jeff


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,830 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    I voted for my frenemy.....

    Broke my heart......


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    dont be so dramatic. orla last night was who i voted. friday night, i cant remember. i even pm'd the mods so they could tell me. no response yet.

    but why would this put me top of your list? if i was bad why would i say it? it seems like you are trying to sling some mud to see if anybody will take the bait. a rather wolfish tactic

    I asked the mods too. They haven't responded to me either to that question.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Henry WW wrote:
    but why would this put me top of your list? if i was bad why would i say it? it seems like you are trying to sling some mud to see if anybody will take the bait. a rather wolfish tactic

    It was two votes man. We can't even change them. If you didn't vote Gabriel then who the hell did you vote and why. You're at the top of my list for tossing a frivolous vote for a reason you can't even remember.

    Blending in with the crowd much.

    Voting Henry tonight.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,258 ✭✭✭Clodagh WW


    I voted Derry and Orla.

    I'll admit the Derry vote was a result of wrongfully thinking Isla had seer checked him. TBF Derry pointed that out but I had nothing else to go on and was caught for time.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Phil WW wrote:
    I asked the mods too. They haven't responded to me either to that question.


    You're an exchange student which gives you a pass. But it's two votes.

    If you're invested in the game you remember two votes. Henry is so suss right now


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    It was two votes man. We can't even change them. If you didn't vote Gabriel then who the hell did you vote and why. You're at the top of my list for tossing a frivolous vote for a reason you can't even remember.

    Blending in with the crowd much.

    Voting Henry tonight.

    'i can t remember who i voted for'

    'blending in with the crowd'


    this do not go hand in hand. this is making you look pretty bad


Advertisement