Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What things does society do now that will shock people in 100 years?

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭pragmatic1


    Another vote for eating meat and the way we treat animals. That's why I never turn down the offer or opportunity of eating a filet steak.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    K.Flyer wrote: »
    In about 100 years I see smoking and alcohol consumption almost non-existent as its eventually realised the disastrous effects both have on society and the economy.

    Also alcohol is haram.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    Tails142 wrote: »
    I think we will look back at the direct provision centres much like the Magdalene laundries, many of them are in fact in the same buildings. People will wonder how it was let happen, were the general public aware of what happened.

    They won't be able to comprehend the ewwww immigrants stigma/feeling.

    Much of the anti immigrant notions of people fleeing war in syria/libya will be looked back on and people will wonder why wasn't more done to help. They will probably make films like schindler's list telling the stories of the few people that are helping now.

    There will probably be tourist attractions in central Africa, much like the killing fields in cambodia, and just like there, people will visit and wonder why did the world let the genocide happen, why didn't any of the major world players step in to prevent it or help.

    But we just bury our heads, close our front doors in the evening and try to get in with life as best we can and deal with our own problems, small in comparison

    What's going on in central Africa?

    Its more likely that the future will look back at is as being too liberal on immigration. The trend on immigration isnt to accept it

    If the future is hostile to the present politics of the west it will more likely be to the invasions of the middle East.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,098 ✭✭✭conorhal


    There's one of those alarm bell terms and here's a guy that makes an utter fool out people who use it.


    Were you 'triggered' by my post? :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    The assumption that 100 years from now will be less religious than now or more liberal is a mistaken extrapolation of the last 100 years in the West. That process has clearly reversed even in the West and the rest of the world isn't liberal.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 869 ✭✭✭mikeybrennan


    Mutant z wrote: »
    How we sold our cultural identity down the river, all in the name of multiculturalism.



    when was multiculturalism ever a project.more a byproduct of immigration ,slavery etc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,801 ✭✭✭Jurgen Klopp


    That given all of history, people still thought it was possible to have superstates the size of empires and not only that to expected each nation with different cultures to be controlled in a one fits all type of solution. Especially with encouraging of multiculturalism which despite the hopes of its proponents, ends up encouraging even more separate movements

    I can actually see nations getting smaller with lots of break away states like we have seen in Central and Eastern Europe

    For instance nevermind Scotland or Wales, you have many areas such as Catalonia or Basque in Spain and Flanders in Belgium

    I fully believe we will see Muslim breakaway states forming from what is now France, Belgium, Netherlands and most likely Sweden


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,115 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    conorhal wrote: »
    Virtue signalling.
    conorhal wrote: »
    'triggered'

    Don't forget to shoehorn in 'SJW', 'snowflake', 'cuck', 'libtard' 'cultural Marxist' and all the other meaningless terms that have bubbled up from some internet sewer. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭Mirror game


    Nations will shock people, and the idea that you could somehow have equality while still holding onto the archaic notion of imaginary lines on a map to divide people. It is competitiveness between nations that destroys the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    Nations will shock people, and the idea that you could somehow have equality while still holding onto the archaic notion of imaginary lines on a map to divide people. It is competitiveness between nations that destroys the world.

    More nonsense. The future isn't some utopian sophomoric dreamland. The future will either have more nations or the same. Scotland could be one of the new nations pretty soon.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭snowflaker


    Scotland won't exist as an independent country any time soon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭Mirror game


    More nonsense. The future isn't some utopian sophomoric dreamland. The future will either have more nations or the same. Scotland could be one of the new nations pretty soon.

    On the surface nationalism and patriotism creates division between people as classes, as races , economic frontiers and so on, this will always bring about war and hardship. This is very obvious, I don't see how you could see it otherwise.
    But if you look at an individual, nationalism is the outcome of a craving to identify with something greater than yourself. The greater being the family, the group, the race, any idea really. This identification is a form of self expansion. When someone lives in a narrow circumstance in a town or village they're nobody but when they identify with something greater and call yourself a Muslim or Christian or Irish then there is a sense of gratification.
    You must know this you must feel it. I can assure you that this psychological need for identification with the greater is a form of inward poverty and I can also assure you that self expansion in this way will only breed destruction.

    When people substitute religion for nationalism or nationalism for religion or any other idea, it just leads to misery. More and more people are seeing this illusion for what it is. It's just a substitution one idea for another and seeing this brings about a real intelligence and freedom people won't go back to crazy notions about religions, nations, political systems etc. You yourself may end up getting disillusioned with your own ideas. Where to then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,098 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Don't forget to shoehorn in 'SJW', 'snowflake', 'cuck', 'libtard' 'cultural Marxist' and all the other meaningless terms that have bubbled up from some internet sewer. ;)

    Yup. Triggered as fuk. :pac: To your safe space batcave!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    Not speaking Chinese or Russian the only two spoken dialects in the western hemisphere. No flying cars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,098 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Not speaking Chinese or Russian the only two spoken dialects in the western hemisphere. No flying cars.

    Where's my damn hover-board and AI sexy sexbot?, Both Back the the Future and Blade Runner promised me these things by now. The future sucks and is frequently wrong, so Ive lost all faith in this thread bar it's comedic value in 20yrs time when I show my grandkid Marty McConorhal, on his virtual reality holo watch, how really naive and stupidly optimistic we were in 2017.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭leggo


    I think about this stuff all the time. Some things that I think, like cars and physical money, have already been said. I think within 100 years (maybe even 20) we'll be paying for stuff with our fingerprint or something along those lines. I also think we'll be close to travelling long distances by apparition by then, if not there completely. The more Harry Potter means of doing this, for me, the better. I'd love to pop to Australia through my fireplace.

    I think sexuality will be something future generations look back at us and laugh about. It's a totally human and societal construct when you think about the need we have to 'label' each other currently. I think people will kiss, **** and marry whomever they want and laugh about how the world used to cut themselves off from half of human kind sexually, and even persecute those for being different. That's not to say everyone will be bi, for sure there'll still be people who are traditionally straight and gay and just go for one gender (that's just natural) but they'll laugh at how we specifically had to label and differentiate ourselves for no particular reason. Teenagers, for example, will just naturally experiment with both by default (as opposed to starting out assuming they're straight and then realising/'coming out', as is the case now) before either going one way or dipping in and out of either side as they go on.

    Handwriting is something that, even within the next 20-50 years, will just cease to be a thing and will amaze younger people when they learn about it. It's already becoming redundant sure.

    Medically, it wouldn't surprise me if we'd found a way to double our life expectancy by then. Some say humans are on the cusp of realising the possibility of immortality, but the world simply isn't sustainable for that, so while we may find a way to turn the likes of cancer into about as serious an illness as the common cold in the future, evolution dictates that new ways to kill us will come along. That doesn't mean that we can't prolong our lifespan significantly, though in doing so that will cause other unforeseen issues such as reducing individual wealth or increasing the poverty gap. Ideally it'd be the former to satisfy the needs of the many but I fear it could be the latter just given human nature. But 'poverty' will mean something else with how quickly technology is coming along, so hopefully not world hunger but merely everyone living a fairly basic lifestyle except for the 1%.

    I think it's simplistic and utopian to see the future bringing down stuff like nationalism, racism etc. That's just not respecting and learning lessons from world history, or even today's current events. I'm sure many in the 30's and 40's thought we'd be rid of fascism and racist dictators by now, but the biggest superpower has just elected one while Putin remains all-powerful in Russia. These things tend to be cyclical and people will always find a way to differentiate and persecute each other, it's just that the reasons for doing so will change. By 2117, America could be run by a Muslim or Latino dictator who persecutes a white minority, for example. The future won't provide an answer to all of humanity's problems, you can't see it that way. Technology will improve, and vastly, but with that simply a new set of problems will crop up. The wheel keeps on turning.

    Lastly, for now, Christianity will have all but died or at least been reduced to a tiny minority religion practised in certain areas of the world. This process is already underway, though the differences will only be seen generationally. Again, that's not to say that organised religion will die out, people will always need to find a new way to moralise life and rationalise death, but what the word religion will mean may differ massively. For example I love reading about how celebrities like Oprah or sports stars are often worshipped as deities today. You also look at Gwyneth Paltrow and her cult of 'wellness' for example...is that a form of religion? Perhaps that's what religion will be in Western society: mass-marketed produce telling people how to live and adding meaning to their lives, rather than a need to believe in an all-powerful deity. It's fascinating to think about really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,499 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    A lot of the pseudo science which is currently being propagated by the Regressive Left.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    On the surface nationalism and patriotism creates division between people as classes, as races , economic frontiers and so on, this will always bring about war and hardship. This is very obvious, I don't see how you could see it otherwise.

    Plenty of nationalisms don't lead to wars. Scottish nationalism won't. Often what does cause conflict is multi national states, like Yugoslavia. From that new nations come to be.

    But if you look at an individual, nationalism is the outcome of a craving to identify with something greater than yourself. The greater being the family, the group, the race, any idea really. This identification is a form of self expansion. When someone lives in a narrow circumstance in a town or village they're nobody but when they identify with something greater and call yourself a Muslim or Christian or Irish then there is a sense of gratification.
    You must know this you must feel it. I can assure you that this psychological need for identification with the greater is a form of inward poverty and I can also assure you that self expansion in this way will only breed destruction.

    You kinda got personal there - I am everybody else in the world have some poverty of spirit that leads to nationalism but you've seen through the delusion.
    When people substitute religion for nationalism or nationalism for religion or any other idea, it just leads to misery. More and more people are seeing this illusion for what it is. It's just a substitution one idea for another and seeing this brings about a real intelligence and freedom people won't go back to crazy notions about religions, nations, political systems etc. You yourself may end up getting disillusioned with your own ideas. Where to then?

    So if people replace nationalism with religion or any other idea it's bad. Therefore any replacement is always bad.

    The world isn't getting less nationalistic. It's getting more nationalistic and more religious - only the west is an outlier here. Thems the facts. There are more nations now than in the 19C. Or early 20c.

    Sophomoric nonsense about how you would wish to have no nations is just that. There's never even an explanation of what replaces nations. What government (if any) will there be? Whose laws? What's the culture?


  • Posts: 745 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sam Kade wrote: »
    Not another vegan :rolleyes:

    I eat meat. Do you think my predictions will be wrong?


  • Posts: 394 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You've a very simplistic view of the education system if that's your view. Education has changed massively over the past 20 years.

    Your first video was about kindergarten, yet you're talking about an alternative to medicating kids (for adhd)? Kids under 7/8 would rarely find themselves sitting still for over an hour, at least not on the sense that you're suggesting. And I have never come across anyone under the age of 7 that has been medicating for adhd. It may happen, but it certainly is not the norm.

    The fact of the matter is that we do have a diverse education system that caters for kids with differing needs, temperaments, talents and intelligences. The Irish education system is actually quite highly regarded internationally, which may disgust those of you who love to complain about it.

    People judge the education system on their experiences, which is absolutely ludicrous. I don't know how old you are, but I know that education has changed hugely since you've gone to school.

    I am a teacher and I know of a number of children on ADHD medication under the age of 7.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    leggo wrote: »
    I think about this stuff all the time. Some things that I think, like cars and physical money, have already been said. I think within 100 years (maybe even 20) we'll be paying for stuff with our fingerprint or something along those lines. I also think we'll be close to travelling long distances by apparition by then, if not there completely. The more Harry Potter means of doing this, for me, the better. I'd love to pop to Australia through my fireplace.

    I think sexuality will be something future generations look back at us and laugh about. It's a totally human and societal construct when you think about the need we have to 'label' each other currently. I think people will kiss, **** and marry whomever they want and laugh about how the world used to cut themselves off from half of human kind sexually, and even persecute those for being different. That's not to say everyone will be bi, for sure there'll still be people who are traditionally straight and gay and just go for one gender (that's just natural) but they'll laugh at how we specifically had to label and differentiate ourselves for no particular reason. Teenagers, for example, will just naturally experiment with both by default (as opposed to starting out assuming they're straight and then realising/'coming out', as is the case now) before either going one way or dipping in and out of either side as they go on.

    Handwriting is something that, even within the next 20-50 years, will just cease to be a thing and will amaze younger people when they learn about it. It's already becoming redundant sure.

    Medically, it wouldn't surprise me if we'd found a way to double our life expectancy by then. Some say humans are on the cusp of realising the possibility of immortality, but the world simply isn't sustainable for that, so while we may find a way to turn the likes of cancer into about as serious an illness as the common cold in the future, evolution dictates that new ways to kill us will come along. That doesn't mean that we can't prolong our lifespan significantly, though in doing so that will cause other unforeseen issues such as reducing individual wealth or increasing the poverty gap. Ideally it'd be the former to satisfy the needs of the many but I fear it could be the latter just given human nature. But 'poverty' will mean something else with how quickly technology is coming along, so hopefully not world hunger but merely everyone living a fairly basic lifestyle except for the 1%.

    I think it's simplistic and utopian to see the future bringing down stuff like nationalism, racism etc. That's just not respecting and learning lessons from world history, or even today's current events. I'm sure many in the 30's and 40's thought we'd be rid of fascism and racist dictators by now, but the biggest superpower has just elected one while Putin remains all-powerful in Russia. These things tend to be cyclical and people will always find a way to differentiate and persecute each other, it's just that the reasons for doing so will change. By 2117, America could be run by a Muslim or Latino dictator who persecutes a white minority, for example. The future won't provide an answer to all of humanity's problems, you can't see it that way. Technology will improve, and vastly, but with that simply a new set of problems will crop up. The wheel keeps on turning.

    Lastly, for now, Christianity will have all but died or at least been reduced to a tiny minority religion practised in certain areas of the world. This process is already underway, though the differences will only be seen generationally. Again, that's not to say that organised religion will die out, people will always need to find a new way to moralise life and rationalise death, but what the word religion will mean may differ massively. For example I love reading about how celebrities like Oprah or sports stars are often worshipped as deities today. You also look at Gwyneth Paltrow and her cult of 'wellness' for example...is that a form of religion? Perhaps that's what religion will be in Western society: mass-marketed produce telling people how to live and adding meaning to their lives, rather than a need to believe in an all-powerful deity. It's fascinating to think about really.

    Absolutely everything there is wrong. Except the fingerprint thing which we can do now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭leggo


    Absolutely everything there is wrong. Except the fingerprint thing which we can do now.

    It's a thread about predicting what the world will be like in 100 years. The only way you can be wrong is to say that a prediction is wrong. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    A lot of the pseudo science which is currently being propagated by the Regressive Left.

    So I work in America a lot of the time. In the National Renewable Energy Lab. You clearly haven't met a Republican if you think the left are anti'science.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    leggo wrote: »
    It's a thread about predicting what the world will be like in 100 years. The only way you can be wrong is to say that a prediction is wrong. :pac:

    Predictions can't just be pulled out of your arse. Christianity is still growing - just not in Europe. It will continue to grow particularly in sub Saharan Africa, where the population is expected to be 4B in 100 years. Islam is growing even faster.


    The idea then that we will all be gender fluid isn't going to apply to the world. Even the west is more likely to get more conservative if any thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,419 ✭✭✭ToddyDoody


    I'd say thay'd piss themselves at our male and female bathrooms, dressing rooms, schools, sports leagues, construction industry etc.

    It'll be all mixed and our current practices will seem fairly immature.

    Also, I'd say we might do away with the sewerage system and use a set amount of water that the household technology can purify and re-circulate.

    You'd like to think the suicide stats would leave them gob smacked.

    The fact that royal families actually meant anything.

    Voting will surely be done online. As will sex.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,419 ✭✭✭ToddyDoody


    Absolutely everything there is wrong. Except the fingerprint thing which we can do now.

    Donald Trump says:

    "WRONG!"

    "You're an idiot"

    "WRONG!"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,194 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Kivaro wrote: »
    Without a doubt in 100 years from now (hopefully less) our descendants will be "aghast" at the notion that so many people were conned by organised religion. There is no excuse in modern times for people with access to verifiable information and knowledge to still continually believe in the archaic notion that there is a most merciful diety above us who demands complete devotion and praise and in return he/she will supply humanity with the most cruel evils imaginable like newborn babies with cancer.

    Epicurus figured it out 300 years before the immaculate conception:
    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
    Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
    Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
    Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?

    No mention of Islam there Jack, how's that?

    Isn't it organised religion as well?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,194 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Not doing enough to stop the killing of endangered species like elephants and tigers for instance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 619 ✭✭✭NinetyTwoTeam


    I think tattoos will die out considerably amongst modern Westerners, most fashionable things go in cycles and they're overdone at this point. Most people regret them within 10 years anyway.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    ToddyDoody wrote: »
    Donald Trump says:

    "WRONG!"

    "You're an idiot"

    "WRONG!"

    What's Donald trump go to do with anything?

    Your ideas are equally wrong.


Advertisement
Advertisement