Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

London terror attack confirmed by Met Police

13334363839114

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 869 ✭✭✭mikeybrennan


    Sitting on the fence won't get us anywhere. We need action.

    We don't need action, we need to collectively think long and hard about the future

    Police and intelligence services responding and preventing attacks is a small part of the overall picture.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭Rekop dog


    Surprised Canada with its open door policy and huge Muslim community hasn't been targeted yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,011 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Christy42 wrote: »
    Curbing immigration will not stop this. The scum will find ways to get in illegally and the people just trying to find a better life will suffer added to this the fact that most terrorists are home grown means it won't stop them. In addition the economy would suffer horribly. The UK has a low birth rate and needs plenty of workers to balance out the number of people retiring every month. Only way to get them is immigration.

    Controlled immigration will help. The UK needs to be honest with itself that immigration is something that is deliberately engineered by the host country to achieve a positive result for the host country - not as some sort of global scholarship.

    Secondly, its a tangent, but people given the option will always prefer a smaller, greyer population and all the problems that brings than a larger, multicultural population and all the strife, violence and tension that brings. Its not as if open borders immigration is even necessary - youth unemployment is a significant issue across the EU. There is no shortage of labour, and automation means there will be even less demand for unskilled labour in the future. The signature of open borders immigration is heavily armed soldiers and paramilitary police units regularly patrolling the streets of Europe's cities today.
    No what is needed (aside from counter terrorism operations which I am presuming are well funded) is to cut off the finance. Everything comes from money. Those that convert more extremists need to eat. Propoganda ads require money and they need weapons to keep up their struggle in the middle east. Any nation supporting them needs to be made a pariah. Instead we seem to just give them more weapons. Cut off the finance and they will fall. Once ISIS stops being a thing. Attacks in their name will stop.

    That's not true. This attack was carried out in the UK with 3 knives and a white van. I would imagine the terrorists are nominally British. The propaganda ad were carried by social media.

    None of this requires a budget of billions. It just requires bitter, angry fanatics already located in the target countries.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 161 ✭✭Allah snackbar


    Christy42 wrote: »
    Or dressing a certain way? In addition it depends on the context for a lot of the above. Plenty of legalise weed groups tend to encourage people to flout the law. Encouraging people to dress differently simply describes all fashion trends.

    Maybe leave it at those who encourage violence against the general public?

    You know what I mean when I say dressing a certain way , I'm referring to the way Islam makes women inferior by dressing them up and covering themselves , or maybe that's something you approve of as it's their culture

    There's a big difference between smoking a joint and believing in a paedophile prophet who advocates the butchering of non believers


  • Posts: 12,762 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You forgot dumping them at sea

    No I didn't :D

    "Throw them in the sea"

    Probably a bit too gentle against , "Dump them in the sea"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,673 ✭✭✭AudreyHepburn


    I think I'm going to bow out of the discussion for a little while, I don't want to end up saying things I'll regret out of frustration.

    I've clearly annoyed and antagonised a lot of posters and I do apologise for that, it's never my intent when I post.

    I won't apologise for holding the opinions I hold but I do apologise if I came across as stupid or hysterical because of them.

    I will be back, I'm just in need of a break. This is an emotive subject and maybe I should have kept my opinions to myself for a while until the initial anger and upset died down.

    Moderators apologies for any problems caused!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,011 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Rekop dog wrote: »
    Surprised Canada with its open door policy and huge Muslim community hasn't been targeted yet.

    There has been Islamic terrorist attacks in Canada and by Canadians. Its far less common and smaller scale, but its happened.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,434 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    DeanAustin wrote: »
    I agree we can't just continue as we are. It's clearly not working.

    But "getting tough" won't fix the problem in itself. There is no actual fix to this and terrorist attacks will be a fact of life for a generation at least.

    Personally, I think at some stage in the future, governments will have to engage in dialogue with the leaders of Islamic extremists to solve this problem. That's not possible now because the movement seems to be so fragmented and, understandably, it's not politically acceptable to even contemplate talking to them.

    Leaders ?

    The leaders are those funding them Saudi Arabia and wealthy Saudi families.

    This terrorism isn't actually about religion or god or anything else it's geo politics.

    Wealthy individuals whom it assists their goals to have a non cohesive Europe, fear amongst their populace.

    There are numerous reasons and whilst the fool on the ground might believe he is doing this for Allah the people who put him their are far more intelligent on what that action does .

    Money greed politics.


    Result.


  • Posts: 12,762 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Rekop dog wrote: »
    Surprised Canada with its open door policy and huge Muslim community hasn't been targeted yet.

    Would that be the same Canada that stopped bombing ISIS in 2016?

    http://m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/8700124


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭fergiesfolly


    I've read the word "watchlist" umpteen times recently and whenever a terrorist attack happens in Europe and I can't figure out what that entails.

    Are these people being actively investigated?
    Seems unlikely, as surely they would be caught before they have a chance to strike.
    Are they simply on a list of people who have traveled to, and returned from a country with strong terrorism links?
    What's the point of that, when thousands of completely innocent people may do the same.

    Are European governments completely wasting their resources when dealing with this Islamic terrorism threat?
    I'm genuinely baffled as to what's going on in our security agencies.
    I have little faith in our governments ability to stop the threat and am starting to really worry for this continent over the coming couple of decades.

    I also have a niggling fear that some European governments may use (or abuse) the ongoing situation to curb civil liberties of all of its citizens and god knows where that will lead us.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    tigger123 wrote: »
    You can't legislate against this kind of attack happening, or do anything to prevent it unfortunately. They took a van and started stabbing people ffs.

    It's an unfortunate part of modern life in the West.

    Delighted the police took the steps they did to deal with these scumbags.

    Capitulation. At least one imminent attack a week is foiled in europe recently. I don't get the mentality of 'nothing can be done'. Something is being done every day by people who would argue otherwise. The fact that multiple attacks are still happening despite this, despite France being in a state of emergeny etc. that should chill anyone as to the scale of this problem. But don't forget, we couldn't possibly do anything different, and don't forget, peanut allergies.


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's why people are on the watchlist though, they have been investigated and fo7nd not to have broken any laws. Some are saying jail and deport anyone on the watchlist regardless if wether they have broken a law
    RoboKlopp wrote: »
    So tell me your suggestions then. What would you do with people on watchlists?


    *tumbleweed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    listermint wrote: »
    Leaders ?

    The leaders are those funding them Saudi Arabia and wealthy Saudi families.

    This terrorism isn't actually about religion or god or anything else it's geo politics.

    Wealthy individuals whom it assists their goals to have a non cohesive Europe, fear amongst their populace.

    There are numerous reasons and whilst the fool on the ground might believe he is doing this for Allah the people who put him their are far more intelligent on what that action does .

    Money greed politics.


    Result.

    The government of Saudi Arabia is funding the Islamic terrorist campaign?


  • Posts: 12,762 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    I also have a niggling fear that some European governments may use (or abuse) the ongoing situation to curb civil liberties of all of its citizens and god knows where that will lead us.

    And its going to be welcomed with open arms by a lot of people, if this thread is to be believed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 Tomatoheadfred


    "Nothing can be done!"

    As millions enter Europe completely unvetted. It's absurd. Islamic terrorism is a wholly imported problem and the results of Europe's disastrous immigration policies of the past few decades and years.


  • Posts: 12,762 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "Nothing can be done!"

    As millions enter Europe completely unvetted. It's absurd. Islamic terrorism is a wholly imported problem and the results of Europe's disastrous immigration policies of the past few decades and years.

    Do you honestly think that it has nothing to do with the bombings from the US and UK in the middle east?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,434 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    DeanAustin wrote: »
    The government of Saudi Arabia is funding the Islamic terrorist campaign?

    The government of Saudi Arabia is funding many terrorists campaigns they are like the US of the 80s and learnt it from the best.
    They are also funding opening wahibist mosques across Europe which allow these places to open and a speech of hate to be glued to the more impressionable minds in them.

    The Saudis are not friends we take their friendship for the oil but all this comes with it.

    This doesn't have religion at its core it's deeper than that.its money and it's geopolitics .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    By inflating the state security services to Orwellian levels which, as history has repeatedly shown us has always produced great results. My "Uncle" in London was spouting this claptrap only last week.

    It's often the only way to put down an insurgency .

    Great article here.

    The primary duty of a state is to protect its citizens. Nothing else. Not policing alleged hate speech, not giving moral support to drug addicts, not investigating idiotic microaggressions. But to provide security to those who pay taxes. If and when a state fails to do that, the citizens take up arms themselves. And you can take it from me, you don’t want to see that in your country


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,371 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    "Nothing can be done!"

    Who are you quoting there?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,165 ✭✭✭Captain Obvious


    You asked me a question and I answered! Stop moving the goalposts! Don't know the case of about semitex but yes full investigation of family and friends!

    The thing with the semtex reveals most of the "close the borders" brigade for what they really are. Here we have evidence of extremist republicans planning a deadly campaign and the usual folks from terrorist related threads are nowhere to be seen. Nobody calling for the border with NI or the UK to be closed, nobody calling for their friends and families to be blamed, nobody calling for republicans to be interned for their views. The reason being that they know it wouldn't work and it would be a complete overreaction. But somehow it will work with muslims.
    You know what I mean when I say dressing a certain way , I'm referring to the way Islam makes women inferior by dressing them up and covering themselves , or maybe that's something you approve of as it's their culture

    What about catholic nuns? Don't they dress in a similarly concealed fashion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    listermint wrote: »
    The government of Saudi Arabia is funding many terrorists campaigns they are like the US of the 80s and learnt it from the best.
    They are also funding opening wahibist mosques across Europe which allow these places to open and a speech of hate to be glued to the more impressionable minds in them.

    The Saudis are not friends we take their friendship for the oil but all this comes with it.

    This doesn't have religion at its core it's deeper than that.its money and it's geopolitics .

    Is that something you know to be a fact or an assumption on your part?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    The thing with the semtex reveals most of the "close the borders" brigade for what they really are. Here we have evidence of extremist republicans planning a deadly campaign and the usual folks from terrorist related threads are nowhere to be seen. Nobody calling for the border with NI or the UK to be closed, nobody calling for their friends and families to be blamed, nobody calling for republicans to be interned for their views. The reason being that they know it wouldn't work and it would be a complete overreaction. But somehow it will work with muslims.



    What about catholic nuns? Don't they dress in a similarly concealed fashion.

    What about. What about. What about.

    If that Semtex had been used there might have been calls to intern, and we still have special powers in ireland to arrest people for being members of proscribed organisations - which is a form of internment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,434 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Irish nuns are now 2 a penny. There are others taking over.

    Other nuns?

    Where have you heard this?

    Are these new others in the convents or schools

    Why haven't I heard about this in the papers

    Read all about it read all about it .others taking over


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 491 ✭✭Romantic Rose


    The thing with the semtex reveals most of the "close the borders" brigade for what they really are. Here we have evidence of extremist republicans planning a deadly campaign and the usual folks from terrorist related threads are nowhere to be seen. Nobody calling for the border with NI or the UK to be closed, nobody calling for their friends and families to be blamed, nobody calling for republicans to be interned for their views. The reason being that they know it wouldn't work and it would be a complete overreaction. But somehow it will work with muslims.



    What about catholic nuns? Don't they dress in a similarly concealed fashion.

    Irish nuns aren't 2 a penny now and at least they were allowed to have some kind of thought process of their own. Not live under their husbands rule.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭tiger55


    When is enough enough .

    The folks in Yemen are probably thinking the same thing. May is finished.
    Its Saudi Arabia doing the attacks in Yemen.  OK lets just saw we banned their weapons sales, they would just make homemade weapons like Assad does, and that would make things 100 times worse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭Rekop dog


    Awkward looking minute of silence at Edgbaston


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,371 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    The terrorists with the semtex found the other day are hardly getting a mention.
    If they were Islamic rather than Republican terrorists, people would be calling for a state of emergency to be called.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,434 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    DeanAustin wrote: »
    Is that something you know to be a fact or an assumption on your part?

    I assume you can use your internet search engine. Because should I bother grabbing many links you will no doubt brush them aside as if Saudi money isn't awash through the middle East funding this nuanced 'religious' resurgence.

    It's almost as of the Saudis know the oil won't last forever and having other regions in disarray around them will assist and power grabs .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    "Nothing can be done!"

    As millions enter Europe completely unvetted. It's absurd. Islamic terrorism is a wholly imported problem and the results of Europe's disastrous immigration policies of the past few decades and years.

    I don't think any right minded person would disagree with more control over immigration.

    However, even if you stopped all immigration, which is not going to happen but for the sake of argument let's say it did, you wouldn't stop these attacks.

    No one is saying "nothing can be done". Things can and are being done. But you can't stop every single attack and some of the suggestions on here to "get tough" would just marginalise and radicalise more people.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,631 ✭✭✭✭Hank Scorpio


    DeanAustin wrote: »
    Is that something you know to be a fact or an assumption on your part?

    Saudis and Qatar are funding ISIS, it was confirmed in Wikileak emails written by Hillary Clinton during her time as Secretary of state

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/hillary-clinton-wikileaks-email-isis-saudi-arabia-qatar-us-allies-funding-barack-obama-knew-all-a7362071.html

    The memo says: “We need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to Isis and other radical groups in the region.”


Advertisement