Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Lions 2017 [MOD WARNING IN OP]

17879818384150

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,422 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Wouldn't be shocked to see an all Welsh backrow now, given the injury status of Stander and SOB.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,196 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Daly, Ha'porth, Williams all played this week I guess so Hogg has to start at 15? Maybe Seymour too, I can't remember which wingers are available.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,058 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Daly, Ha'porth, Williams all played this week I guess so Hogg has to start at 15? Maybe Seymour too, I can't remember which wingers are available.

    I'd say a possible back three of Hogg, Seymour and Watson. I reckon Te'o will be at 12, 13 may be between Payne and Joseph, Payne needs the gametime.

    Half back is less clear. Sexton, Farrell and Biggar all played last week. I can't see Farrell playing in this one given he also played in the Champions Cup final, so either Sexton or Biggar. Sexton doesn't have much gametime and the Lions will want him to find form quickly. Scrum half may depend on Webb's fitness. Laidlaw may get the start.

    Possible backline

    15 Stuart Hogg
    14 Anthony Watson
    13 Jared Payne
    12 Ben Te'o
    11 Tommy Seymour
    10 Jonathan Sexton
    9 Greg Laidlaw

    Marler, Best and Sinclair have had a couple of weeks off so should make the front row. I expect Henderson to start alongside maybe Alun Wyn who had a period out before the semi final. The other second rows have had a fairly heavy workload lately. Faletau will probably start at 8 alongside Warburton. I assume the management will be keen to get SOB on the pitch asap and given the 3 potential test Blindsides all played at the weekend I guess we could see Warburton at 6 and O'Brien at 7. The other possibility may be to stick Moriarty at 6. I have no idea if he can play there, but most No.8s can generally do a job there.

    Possible pack

    1 Joe Marler
    2 Rory Best
    3 Kyle Sinclair
    4 Iain Henderson
    5 Alun Wyn Jones
    6 Ross Moriarty/Sam Warburton
    7 Sam Warburton/Sean O'Brien
    8 Toby Faletau

    But that is based on who has played a lot recently and who hasn't. Gatland and co may take a completely different strategy to their selection meeting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Joe Marler, Mako Vunipola, Jack McGrath,

    Dan Cole, Tadhg Furlong, Kyle Sinckler,

    Rory Best, Jamie George, Ken Owens

    Iain Henderson, Maro Itoje, Alun Wyn Jones, George Kruis, Courtney Lawes

    Taulupe Faletau, James Haskell, Ross Moriarty, Sean O'Brien, Peter O'Mahony, CJ Stander, Justin Tipuric, Sam Warburton

    Conor Murray, Rhys Webb, Greig Laidlaw

    Dan Biggar, Owen Farrell, Jonathan Sexton

    Jonathan Davies, Robbie Henshaw, Jonathan Joseph, Jared Payne, Ben Te'o,

    Elliot Daly, Leigh Halfpenny, Stuart Hogg, George North, Jack Nowell, Tommy Seymour, Anthony Watson, Liam Williams

    A lot will be unavailable if those players are all rested.

    McGrath, Best, Furlong, Henderson, AWJ, SOB, Warburton, Faletau;
    Webb, Sexton, Seymour, Henshaw, Joseph, Watson, Hogg

    Owens, Marler, Cole, Lawes, Tipuric, Laidlaw, Biggar, Payne


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Why would Saracens players be rested?

    Also, Lawes was playing this weekend for Northampton.

    I'd expect guys like AWJ and possibly SOB to play next week. They're guys who have a chance of being involved in the first test and also don't have much game time of late.

    Webb is grand. He'll start I would think.

    I'd also put the house on Warburton starting. .

    I'll have a guess at McGrath, George, Sinkler, AWJ, Kruis, SOB/Itoje, Warburton, Faletau, Webb, Biggar, Watson, Henshaw, Joseph, North, Hogg.

    I think they'll be eager to get Payne involved but they'll want to keep something in reserve for the Blues game to get their defence right.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Buer wrote: »
    Why would Saracens players be rested?

    Also, Lawes was playing this weekend for Northampton.

    :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,058 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Buer wrote: »
    Why would Saracens players be rested?

    Also, Lawes was playing this weekend for Northampton.

    I'd expect guys like AWJ and possibly SOB to play next week. They're guys who have a chance of being involved in the first test and also don't have much game time of late.

    Webb is grand. He'll start I would think.

    I'd also put the house on Warburton starting. .

    My thinking is that Saracens players played a Champions Cup final and a league semi final in successive weeks, so yes they had this weekend off but they have still had a lot of high intensity rugby recently. It was a major factor in their defeat to the Chiefs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    bilston wrote: »
    My thinking is that Saracens players played a Champions Cup final and a league semi final in successive weeks, so yes they had this weekend off but they have still had a lot of high intensity rugby recently. It was a major factor in their defeat to the Chiefs.

    I'd say the hangovers and interrupted preparation were as big a factor. Farrell and Itoje could see their game time managed but others like Kruis, Vunipola and George have had limited pitch time this year so I'd say they've strong chances of being involved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    https://twitter.com/maroitoje/status/869159795932012548

    An extra large lion for an extra large chungfla


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Of all the people on that tour, Haskell is gonna whip that the second his back is turned.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭D14Rugby


    https://twitter.com/maroitoje/status/869159795932012548

    An extra large lion for an extra large chungfla

    I'd say he's happy it's big, harder to nick and I'd say there's a fairly big fine for losing it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 854 ✭✭✭RoundBox11


    These guys have some really nice Lions videos.

    They make some great points in this one about selecting combinations rather than only on form (i.e Stuart Hogg might not be selected) because of the short time between really tough games on this tour.

    https://youtu.be/8N3vRiXYywk


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Buer wrote: »
    Of all the people on that tour, Haskell is gonna whip that the second his back is turned.

    And I'd imagine Itoje could then beat the living piss out of Haskell, right in front of the entire squad of players and coaches, and there wouldn't be a single witness statement outside of, "he fell".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    A good read on everything that went wrong in 2005: http://www.bbc.com/sport/rugby-union/40069682


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    A good read on everything that went wrong in 2005: http://www.bbc.com/sport/rugby-union/40069682

    Good old Woodward. Still unwilling to take any of the responsibility.


  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 43,704 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Christy42 wrote: »
    Good old Woodward. Still unwilling to take any of the responsibility.

    yep...

    he outlines all the issues and then says "you cannot be prepared" ....
    ermm obviously you can Clive, you just fcuked it up big time !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    It omits my favourite Lions 2005 story. The coaching staff became completely paranoid the week of the first test that NZ were spying on their training sessions and had stolen their line out calls.

    They changed all of the calls about 5 days before the first test. Nobody knew the calls properly and the Lions got absolutely cleaned out at the set piece. They had spent 5 weeks learning the calls up to that point.

    Lunacy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,772 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    No mention of the split camp either. Instead he was just too nice. Bless.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Can we ban any talk of the 05 tour? The mere mention of it makes me want to hurt people!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    molloyjh wrote: »
    No mention of the split camp either. Instead he was just too nice. Bless.

    There was another article that the Telegraph did which pieced together a rake of interviews with players and Andy Robinson. It's car crash stuff. They all come pretty clean about how disjointed things were.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/93084647/lions-tour-the-inside-story-of-the-blackwash-the-worst-lions-tour-ever

    They're very complimentary about the NZ team but you get the impression that the test squad (those 23-25 players) were totally miserable.

    They might be praising Campbell but they also brush over the PR rubbish. Refusing to let Geordie Murphy say he went for a beer to clear his head after a game in his published tour diary. They made him publish that he went for a walk.

    Or after it was clear Henson wasn't to be involved in the opening test, they staged a PR photograph (without the knowledge of Henson) of himself and Woodward having a pleasant chat leaving training to make it look like all was well.

    Woodward completely lost the run of himself on the tour.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,950 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Buer wrote: »
    There was another article that the Telegraph did which pieced together a rake of interviews with players and Andy Robinson. It's car crash stuff. They all come pretty clean about how disjointed things were.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/93084647/lions-tour-the-inside-story-of-the-blackwash-the-worst-lions-tour-ever

    They're very complimentary about the NZ team but you get the impression that the test squad (those 23-25 players) were totally miserable.

    They might be praising Campbell but they also brush over the PR rubbish. Refusing to let Geordie Murphy say he went for a beer to clear his head after a game in his published tour diary. They made him publish that he went for a walk.

    Or after it was clear Henson wasn't to be involved in the opening test, they staged a PR photograph (without the knowledge of Henson) of himself and Woodward having a pleasant chat leaving training to make it look like all was well.

    Woodward completely lost the run of himself on the tour.

    You've probably all heard this recently as well, but apparently O'Driscoll and Hickie only trained once together during the whole tour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    molloyjh wrote: »
    No mention of the split camp either. Instead he was just too nice. Bless.

    Kiwis have always though of Woodward as a bit of a pompous git (still do...), and his decision to appoint a PR manager was extremely poorly viewed. People were like "WTF do you need a PR manager for? It's just a rugby tour not a political campaign". I know Kiwis can be ridiculously one-eyed about NZ rugby players and the ABs, but people genuinely have a soft spot for the Celtic countries, and mixing and mingling in NZ is definitely the way to make a Lions tour a success. There is complete aversion to any hint of class-ism in NZ, and the "Mother England vs the uncivilised Colonials" attitude will quickly backfire in NZ. The tour was further derailed by the BOD incident - nowadays definitely NZ would be down to 13 men, but the accusation that NZ in a premeditated manner deliberately set out to maim O'Driscoll was very poorly received too.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    if exact same thing happened to umaga by two of the lions how do you think kiwi's would have reacted?


  • Posts: 12,548 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    if exact same thing happened to umaga by two of the lions how do you think kiwi's would have reacted?

    By winning the match convincingly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    if exact same thing happened to umaga by two of the lions how do you think kiwi's would have reacted?

    They would have bitched and moaned and bitched and moaned and bitched and moaned. They would have questioned why they're involved in Lions tours. They would have brought it up for a few years afterwards.

    And Lions fans would have completely downplayed it and accused the kiwis of being bitchers and moaners and being soft. Just like anyone else really.

    Everyone would take that blatant act of thuggish play the same way. There's always a large element of fans blindly defending their national team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    if exact same thing happened to umaga by two of the lions how do you think kiwi's would have reacted?

    You're missing my point entirely CFH. I'm not even going to go down the route of rehashing the whole thing.

    My point was the PR side of it from Woodward and his PR man. I'm not even referring to the fans.

    I have zero interest in wasting time debating the 2005 tackle on this forum. It was a bad tackle, the players should have been sent off, they should have been cited if they hadn't been sent off.

    If other people feel like talking about it. Again. Then so be it.

    NB. to answer your Q, Kiwi fans would have reacted exactly like Lions fans. Whether Henry and his coaches would have acted like Woodward and his staff is a moot point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Jeez, don't be a sook.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    If Hayes had started the tests, 3-0 Lions was guaranteed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    If Hayes had started the tests, 3-0 Lions was guaranteed.

    The Lions never lost a game that Hayes played in for them


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    The Lions never lost a game that Hayes played in for them

    Exactly IBF. Ligind.


Advertisement