WW XII - Simpsons Mafia

sKeith · 24-05-2017 10:48PM

gufc21 wrote: »

I said 7.30 qb said 9.15, i got it into my head and ran with it. Then keith came out 30 min before and i had him for a wolf backed in a corner given the time and post

what the hell hufc? i'm skinner, how the hell does you plan afect me! please explain.

Lord TSC · 24-05-2017 10:50PM

sKeith wrote: »

gufc wanted to paint big target signs on them. he only conned though.

sKeith wrote: »

-*conned one*-

Thing is, while I agree he's being way too pushy about it, they already have me. I'd guess I'm to be lynched tomorrow so they can go after QB next. So they don't really need other roles, do they?
Like feel I'm missing something but there's an obtuseness about saying it. Trit, if you say you're thinking I should drop it, so be it, I'll defer to you for now.

Guffy · 24-05-2017 10:52PM

sKeith wrote: »

what the hell hufc? i'm skinner, how the hell does you plan afect me! please explain.

Says you.... are you not meant to be multiquoting posts, wolf?

Barney92 · 24-05-2017 10:53PM

Lord TSC wrote: »

I think, at this stage, it's less about reveals, and more about seeing can we catch people not telling consistent stories. Barney, for instance, has tied themselves to a story now. If there's contradictory stories presented, it gives us something to examine.

Exactly, anything contradicting my story would really not look great for me at this stage.

sKeith · 24-05-2017 10:53PM

Lord TSC wrote: »

Thing is, while I agree he's being way too pushy about it, they already have me. I'd guess I'm to be lynched tomorrow so they can go after QB next. So they don't really need other roles, do they?
Like feel I'm missing something but there's an obtuseness about saying it. Trit, if you say you're thinking I should drop it, so be it, I'll defer to you for now.

There was a small chance that you were confirmed good, but not marge, you call out pter for reaction.

sKeith · 24-05-2017 10:57PM

sKeith wrote: »

There was a small chance that you were confirmed good, but not marge, you call out pter for reaction.

btw, by the time you were confirmed good wiggum was recieving full roles, so you are 100%.

Barney92 · 24-05-2017 11:04PM

sKeith wrote: »

There was a small chance that you were confirmed good, but not marge, you call out pter for reaction.

Little chance of that really though. They'd backed up the Marge claim a few times after the main encounter I believe.

Guffy · 24-05-2017 11:07PM

Barney92 wrote: »

I reckon he still has something to say.

Apparently not

tritium · 24-05-2017 11:10PM

From what i can figure

Skeith thinks gufc is an undercover wolf

Skeith has also posted lots of theories about clan simpson.

Barney has now come forward as maggie which puts some of these to bed

Skeith continues to claim sKinner

My initial thought is sKeith my or may not be right on gufc but hes not playing as a wolf.

Whether he has more to add only he knows

raze_them_all_ · 24-05-2017 11:15PM

I still think the Simpsons reveal should of been left till just before the munch. Now the evils have a list of characters they can munch . At least if we waited they'd have to guess tonight

Guffy · 24-05-2017 11:16PM

tritium wrote: »

From what i can figure

Skeith thinks gufc is an undercover wolf

Skeith has also posted lots of theories about clan simpson.

Barney has now come forward as maggie which puts some of these to bed

Skeith continues to claim sKinner

My initial thought is sKeith my or may not be right on gufc but hes not playing as a wolf.

Whether he has more to add only he knows

Whats your thoughts on sk?

The_Valeyard · 24-05-2017 11:16PM

Leave the wolves guess

Barney92 · 24-05-2017 11:17PM

I'd have found it hard to reveal just before the munch. I've no problem with any other Simpsons waiting till just before then though.

The_Valeyard · 24-05-2017 11:40PM

Wonder if the wolves will figure out who I am

sKeith · 24-05-2017 11:43PM

trit: ah i see now what caught your attention so much, it was the little detail i added. yes, i would have been good if i had of picked any name except for avork! i got into writing my next sentence and went, ah crap, avork was pre qb lynch, so my whole ruze went up in flames. I have no idea on b & l , even if the detail tweeked you interest.

tritium · 24-05-2017 11:43PM

The_Valeyard wrote: »

Wonder if the wolves will figure out who I am

??

quickbeam · 24-05-2017 11:59PM

I'm back!

Funny how Raze and PJ didn't like the 9.15pm idea but both only said so AFTER the deadline. It's not like it wasn't known - Gufc posted it about a dozen times.

Now ...

Barney92 wrote: »

I've answered this already Trit. Unveiling bart could lead to an unnecessary death, and lisa I'm still waiting on but I can out them at any stage.

You answered similar to Gufc but I'm not getting it. You know the identy of Bart and Lisa, and you know who's died, therefore you know if they're still alive. How would saying if Bart (or Lisa) is still alive lead to an unnecessary death?

Further, Bob's chance of winning is purely based on AVOIDING killing Bart. Yes, he'll get to take out another player if he hits Bart, but then he himself dies, ergo loses. I'd say the only disadvantage of having Bart revealed is that it gives Bob a greater chance of avoiding munching him, and therefore winning the game (in as much as an SK really ever has much of a chance of winning - it's a tough role to play).

Guffy · 25-05-2017 12:04AM

quickbeam wrote: »

Further, Bob's chance of winning is purely based on AVOIDING killing Bart. Yes, he'll get to take out another player if he hits Bart, but then he himself dies, ergo loses. I'd say the only disadvantage of having Bart revealed is that it gives Bob a greater chance of avoiding munching him, and therefore winning the game (in as much as an SK really ever has much of a chance of winning - it's a tough role to play).

Duh, how did i miss that?

tritium · 25-05-2017 12:06AM

Didnt but needed qb back in play to take it any further.

Barney, can you comment please?

raze_them_all_ · 25-05-2017 12:21AM

quickbeam wrote: »

I'm back!

Funny how Raze and PJ didn't like the 9.15pm idea but both only said so AFTER the deadline. It's not like it wasn't known - Gufc posted it about a dozen times.

Now ...

You answered similar to Gufc but I'm not getting it. You know the identy of Bart and Lisa, and you know who's died, therefore you know if they're still alive. How would saying if Bart (or Lisa) is still alive lead to an unnecessary death?

Further, Bob's chance of winning is purely based on AVOIDING killing Bart. Yes, he'll get to take out another player if he hits Bart, but then he himself dies, ergo loses. I'd say the only disadvantage of having Bart revealed is that it gives Bob a greater chance of avoiding munching him, and therefore winning the game (in as much as an SK really ever has much of a chance of winning - it's a tough role to play).

I didn't like it as it's another target for wolves to hit. Also with only Marge revealed we had a good chance of a double kill thus wasting a munch.

I am shattered left my place in Springfield at 6 and only got to my relatives place in Shelbyville now. I realise with Marge out it makes no difference as wolves will probably eat lord. Then you are no longer invunerable so the reveal has no impact as their is now a voting block.

Guffy · 25-05-2017 12:40AM

There will be 2/3 deaths tomorrow. It would have been from the known group (after reveals). The judge should have come out too, i just didnt think of him tbh.

I believe mrs flush is carl, but shes the only one that's fluid to the unkown as far as im concerned as the "trick" thing could be a trick in itsel, but tbh the lack of a counter has her safe imo. Trit has become moveable also depending on Keith's faith, although it would have been bloody unlucky that the one or 2 dead villys at that stage were krusty. Im still 80% sure of them.

The reason i wanted "moe" to come out is cause he's already dead. I though d/s might have tried to imply the role earlier, when he said he thought i was moe, but knew it was a very long shot for anyone to claim that role. Mick was moe, i wanted to use this info, along with the info QB would have provided to narrow down how many simpsons could be dead and identify them, ie. We know none of this mornings kills were simpsons. Apologies if i came across pushy but i guess i was trying to be part of the narrowing down to 5 or 6.

Have a look back and look at the people who panicked a little at the thought of a reveal. Iirc chagan was one, as was barney and keith. Why wait till the last half hour to raise the objection keith? You tried to create panic and uncertainty at the last minute.

I had a whole paragraph in there about barneys claim but i think ye have him sussed, or more arent taking it at face value without some verification.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvuoh7WGvtc

raze_them_all_ · 25-05-2017 12:45AM

So Barney dies tomorrow

if we are lucky the bad teams mess up and only take out 1. Two if we have been unlucky with kills

sKeith · 25-05-2017 01:11AM

gufc . if this is true^ then i'm sorry. you were acting very wolfie all today.

Barney92 · 25-05-2017 01:13AM

Fine qb, I know if Bart and Lisa are alive or dead or not. I was trying to answer in the best way I thought how, hoping you might pick up what I was trying to do. You know what the story is. I would think you know why I did what I did.

sKeith · 25-05-2017 01:13AM

i didn't even have you on my ffa's. You just came outta nowhere been all wolfie. I thought you were the panicing wolf.

Barney92 · 25-05-2017 01:15AM

gufc21 wrote: »

There will be 2/3 deaths tomorrow. It would have been from the known group (after reveals). The judge should have come out too, i just didnt think of him tbh.

I believe mrs flush is carl, but shes the only one that's fluid to the unkown as far as im concerned as the "trick" thing could be a trick in itsel, but tbh the lack of a counter has her safe imo. Trit has become moveable also depending on Keith's faith, although it would have been bloody unlucky that the one or 2 dead villys at that stage were krusty. Im still 80% sure of them.

The reason i wanted "moe" to come out is cause he's already dead. I though d/s might have tried to imply the role earlier, when he said he thought i was moe, but knew it was a very long shot for anyone to claim that role. Mick was moe, i wanted to use this info, along with the info QB would have provided to narrow down how many simpsons could be dead and identify them, ie. We know none of this mornings kills were simpsons. Apologies if i came across pushy but i guess i was trying to be part of the narrowing down to 5 or 6.

Have a look back and look at the people who panicked a little at the thought of a reveal. Iirc chagan was one, as was barney and keith. Why wait till the last half hour to raise the objection keith? You tried to create panic and uncertainty at the last minute.

I had a whole paragraph in there about barneys claim but i think ye have him sussed, or more arent taking it at face value without some verification.

If it makes anything any better for you, I knew moe was dead already. It was really the only thing that made sense when you know the roles I do. Either mick was moe or someone who claimed is lying.

sKeith · 25-05-2017 01:19AM

as for the 30 mins before, the road from springfield elementary to home was uncharacterictically jammered and thats when i got home.

Barney92 · 25-05-2017 01:29AM

raze_them_all_ wrote: »

So Barney dies tomorrow

I do hope not. Although if the wolves don't munch me I'll know I'll be able to convince you that I'm Maggie.

raze_them_all_ · 25-05-2017 01:33AM

Barney92 wrote: »

I do hope not. Although if the wolves don't munch me I'll know I'll be able to convince you that I'm Maggie.

No Barney humble. If now is dead Barney dies 24 hours later. Sorry for the confusion lol

raze_them_all_ · 25-05-2017 01:34AM

**** you auto correct

WW XII - Simpsons Mafia

Comments