Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Truck driven into crowd in Stockholm - No Speculation

1212224262732

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 882 ✭✭✭moneymad


    Much better to use the US system and lock up the nearest black kid.

    Or shoot him, whichever.
    were you dropped on your head as a young fella?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Depp


    Much better to use the US system and lock up the nearest black kid.

    Or shoot him, whichever.

    so black people being shot by police in america has relevence to terror attacks in sweden/marine le pen being racist how exactly?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    Yes, really.

    Would you call someone a "big buck n!gger"? My father-in-law did.

    Just words, right?
    WTF? I think you need to put down the drink and go to bed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,767 ✭✭✭SterlingArcher


    Yes, really.

    Would you call someone a "big buck n!gger"? My father-in-law did.

    Just words, right?

    So now its your father in law? Man you just surrounded by racist.

    You sure you are not an sjw? Because you made up a whole backstory about a racist dad and your poor mother fighting the good fight . Then changed the character mid way like a shoddy B movie to father in law from the old south, thats deep in the closet. .

    because has all the hallmarks of an sjw. Talking random jibberish to make a point, crying racist, pretending you care about a minority, seeking attention.

    Like I said. the other poster may have used incorrect terminology. But his words were at least honest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,540 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    pangbang wrote: »
    I don't personally say that, but genuinely....do you want to tell me whats wrong with it? Why is coloured bad? Why is black good? Why is white bad? etc!

    Theres nothing inherently wrong with it, its a descriptor. There are plenty of words that ARE bad in meaning. Again, why is it only people in western/European countries that are so hung up about other people? I can safely say its doubtful they give a **** a about you in their countries.

    Its this kind of insane over-thinking that turns people against each other. The word police!

    The whole "the term coloured person is bad, please use person of colour instead" thing has a real Judean People's Front vs the People's Front of Judea buzz to it.

    Let's just say it as it is - it's "OK" to mention somebody is a minority of some sort when it is a good news story but not when it is a bad news story.

    Both seem like an offence against common sense to me but we are where we are.





    I'm reading this thread from back to front.... can anyone short cut me back to the last relevant discussion about a terrori... double plus ungood person in Sweden?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,995 ✭✭✭take everything


    Feckin Atheists again probably.

    My money is on those buddhist fundamentalists


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,540 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    WTF? I think you need to put down the drink and go to bed.

    I've seen a good few posts from zubeneschamali over the years and I never noticed anything.. off ... about them previously. The "my dad had dementia, ipso facto nationalism is evil" is certainly a new theme as far as I can see.

    What a strange turn this thread has taken.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,540 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    I've seen a good few posts from zubeneschamali over the years and I never noticed anything.. off ... about them previously. The "my dad had dementia, ipso facto nationalism is evil" is certainly a new theme as far as I can see.

    What a strange turn this thread has taken.

    Curiouser and Curiouser! It was actually his father in law. Well, depending on the post.
    Or his father AND his father in law?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    I'm reading this thread from back to front.... can anyone short cut me back to the last relevant discussion about a terrori... double plus ungood person in Sweden?
    Haven't caught up with the whole thread myself, but the derailment if it is one started with this post.

    Some Swedes were planning a demonstration, "not against the the terror attack, but against the xenophobia it might spawn."

    Naturally people started debating what the response to terrorism should be, and that includes Le Pen and a restriction on immigration, or a very liberal approach such as the Swedes'.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=103162598&postcount=511


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,540 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    Some great posting by yourself Mountainsandh, working my way back along now. Depp and Ulysses Gazele too. Sorry if I've left anyone out.

    Seems like honest straightforward posting being choked by people seizing on semantics, dancing around points to maintain the doublethink and blindly declaring policies or viewpoints as evil because they are a bit too common sense and based in reality rather than fluffy happy land.

    I fell into the trap myself with one posters comments. At first glance they seem racist or whatever because we have been conditioned to think that way about certain facts or ideas. But when you dig down it's just reality. The same reality that we've been encouraged to suspend for some warm fuzzy virtue signalling.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,540 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    Beyondgone wrote: »
    I'm not the one complaining about pictures of a little girl some lunatic ran down with a lorry. But they do say burying your head in the sand is comforting. :) There weren't many complaints about that little boy on the beach. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, right? :confused:

    Careful now! The truth and logic can be very unpalatable and inconvenient and distressing for some!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20 Master mariner


    Looks like the police in Sweden having a hard time arresting suspects,while being stoned at the same time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,540 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    Sounds like these immigrants don't want to be in Sweden at all! They must be horrifically mistreated if they feel that they must throw rocks at a very moderate police force investigating a terrorist attack double plus ungood incident.

    Maybe an oil rich Islamic country could organise a refugee program to liberate them from the hell they are being held in against their will!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,947 ✭✭✭20Cent


    So right wing people.

    What's your solution?
    Hearing a lot of criticism of Swedens approach but not many solutions.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭blinding


    20Cent wrote: »
    So right wing people.

    What's your solution?
    Hearing a lot of criticism of Swedens approach but not many solutions.
    1st :Stop immigration for a period of 10 years and see how that effects the situation . We have tried the open doors immigration and if that was working we would not be desperately looking for solutions .

    2nd : The strongly enforced banning of any religion that does not respect the right of other religions / or non religions to exist.....

    There are extreme forms of Islam that call for all non believers in their cult to be murdered . These should be banned and any followers of such cults should be sent to countries (if their are any ) that follow that particular sky fairy .
    No economic or other interaction should take place with such countries.

    These two reforms should be adopted immediately and if the current politicians do not adopt them I recommend that voters choose politicians that will adopt them...

    3rd ; Any religion that does not accept that the law of the land holds above their sky fairy laws should be banned.........


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭MRnotlob606


    There needs to be more regulation of mosques. . And being on a watch list should mean, being on a watch list. Look at what happened with London, the guy was known to authorities, as what happened at the Berlin Christmas Market at countless other attacks.

    These attacks are going to continue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20 Master mariner


    How about helping the refugees where they are,so they can build up their country for starters.
    Looks like that is what they want.
    The asylumseekers are here for a new life and taking advantage of the situation,this has to stop.We cant save the whole world,refugees should be 1 priority.
    Stop helping the asylumseekers coming over from North Africa,this will only lead to more human smugglers making money,and more people drowning, and more problems in Europe with integration.
    Europe isnt prepared for a mass immigration at this scale.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,540 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    20Cent wrote: »
    So right wing people.

    What's your solution?
    Hearing a lot of criticism of Swedens approach but not many solutions.

    As callous as this may seem under the circumstances.... I'm more concerned about not blindly following them down the road they've been and less concerned about where and how the Swedes are going to manage a u turn.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 369 ✭✭Ineedaname


    blinding wrote: »
    1st :Stop immigration for a period of 10 years and see how that effects the situation . We have tried the open doors immigration and if that was working we would not be desperately looking for solutions .

    2nd : The strongly enforced banning of any religion that does not respect the right of other religions / or non religions to exist.....

    There are extreme forms of Islam that call for all non believers in their cult to be murdered . These should be banned and any followers of such cults should be sent to countries (if their are any ) that follow that particular sky fairy .
    No economic or other interaction should take place with such countries.

    These two reforms should be adopted immediately and if the current politicians do not adopt them I recommend that voters choose politicians that will adopt them...

    3rd ; Any religion that does not accept that the law of the land holds above their sky fairy laws should be banned.........

    Ban Islam? That's the best you can come up with?

    Tell me how exactly would you enforce this?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,540 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    How about helping the refugees where they are,so they can build up their country for starters.
    Looks like that is what they want.
    The asylumseekers are here for a new life and taking advantage of the situation,this has to stop.We cant save the whole world,refugees should be 1 priority.
    Stop helping the asylumseekers coming over from North Africa,this will only lead to more human smugglers making money,and more people drowning, and more problems in Europe with integration.
    Europe isnt prepared for a mass immigration at this scale.

    Indeed - help 10 people at a safe remove from the problem but still close by to get back in and rebuild their country once it is safe.

    Rather than spending the same money to drag one guy all the way to mayo and feed/clothe/house him here while he attends a fas course on manual car washing.

    Or a stepping stone qualification in engineering/medicine/architecture. Whatever people believe themselves is the more likely occupation if any.

    Wouldn't the doctors and engineers be better placed educating people in the camps so the rebuilding effort could be more effective?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭blinding


    Ineedaname wrote: »
    Ban Islam? That's the best you can come up with?

    Tell me how exactly would you enforce this?
    I said ban extreme forms of Islam .

    Islam that respects that other religions / non religious can exist and that respect Primacy of the Law of the land is okay by me .

    I did say that Any cults/religion /other ideology that does not respect the above should be banned .

    I did not say that moderate Islam should be banned .

    Read the post slowly and try to understand it before you jump in like a jihadi.......:eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    20Cent wrote: »
    So right wing people.

    What's your solution?
    Hearing a lot of criticism of Swedens approach but not many solutions.

    Wtf is this right wing/left wing bull****? There is a sane middleground aswell which thankfully most people appear to be in.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 263 ✭✭CoolHandBandit


    http://news.sky.com/story/norway-suspect-held-as-bomb-like-device-found-in-oslo-10831164

    Only last night and looks like a close call. Europe needs to wake before it's too late. It may already be too late.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,947 ✭✭✭20Cent


    http://news.sky.com/story/norway-suspect-held-as-bomb-like-device-found-in-oslo-10831164

    Only last night and looks like a close call. Europe needs to wake before it's too late. It may already be too late.

    Too late for what?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,947 ✭✭✭20Cent


    blinding wrote: »
    I said ban extreme forms of Islam .

    Islam that respects that other religions / non religious can exist and that respect Primacy of the Law of the land is okay by me .

    I did say that Any cults/religion /other ideology that does not respect the above should be banned .

    I did not say that moderate Islam should be banned .

    Read the post slowly and try to understand it before you jump in like a jihadi.......:eek:

    Banning a religion doesn't sound practical or even how would that be enforced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭Will I Am Not


    ChikiChiki wrote: »
    Wtf is this right wing/left wing bull****? There is a sane middleground aswell which thankfully most people appear to be in.

    No way man. If you don't support uncontrolled immigration you're right wing. Is this your first day on the internet?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    20Cent wrote: »
    Banning a religion doesn't sound practical or even how would that be enforced.

    Stop taking in refugees just to throw them into ****hole suburbs with no amenities, no aspirations and no hope.

    If the Left are really truly serious about integration, and not hypocrites, then these refugee families need to be living side by side with middle class families to build aspiration. The kids need to be going to middle class schools and mixing with middle class kids.

    To me it's vital that this is done because otherwise you're going to get more situations like we have seen throughout Europe. No go areas, violence in these suburbs, high unemployment etc.

    Taking refugee families in may make people "feel good" but that is only half the job done.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭blinding


    20Cent wrote: »
    Banning a religion doesn't sound practical or even how would that be enforced.
    If I started a cult or lets say some subset of christianity that called for the death of all non believers in my cult and that was not willing to accept the primacy of the law of the land should it be banned .

    If my cult supported suicide bombers against those that do not follow my rules should this cult be banned .

    Moderate Islam is fine with me . No probs....

    Government should declare what is acceptable and what is not with regard to religions .

    Most important if you do not except Primacy of the Laws of the Land then you will not be allowed to practice you unacceptable religion / sky fairy worship....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,236 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    How about helping the refugees where they are,so they can build up their country for starters.
    Looks like that is what they want.
    The asylumseekers are here for a new life and taking advantage of the situation,this has to stop.We cant save the whole world,refugees should be 1 priority.
    Stop helping the asylumseekers coming over from North Africa,this will only lead to more human smugglers making money,and more people drowning, and more problems in Europe with integration.
    Europe isnt prepared for a mass immigration at this scale.

    I really dont think it is possible to help refugees in Syria to build up their country right now

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    blinding wrote: »
    1st :Stop immigration for a period of 10 years and see how that effects the situation . We have tried the open doors immigration and if that was working we would not be desperately looking for solutions .

    2nd : The strongly enforced banning of any religion that does not respect the right of other religions / or non religions to exist.....

    There are extreme forms of Islam that call for all non believers in their cult to be murdered . These should be banned and any followers of such cults should be sent to countries (if their are any ) that follow that particular sky fairy .
    No economic or other interaction should take place with such countries.

    These two reforms should be adopted immediately and if the current politicians do not adopt them I recommend that voters choose politicians that will adopt them...

    3rd ; Any religion that does not accept that the law of the land holds above their sky fairy laws should be banned.........

    1) How has the US been doing with stopping illegal immigrants coming from Mexico?

    2+3) Historically, can you point to a time where banning a religion has resulted in good things?


Advertisement
Advertisement