Truck driven into crowd in Stockholm - No Speculation

A Little Pony wrote: »

The argument on Western policy and using it as an argument works fine until the people who hate those countries end up travelling to those very countries to live in. Why would you travel to a continent if you hate it so much? Couldn't possibly be part of a bigger agenda.

Where does the " hate " come from

why do 2nd generation Muslims , born and bred in the UK/France/etc , then decide to drive a car/truck etc into ordinary civilians

WHY , ask yourself ,

These people are radicalised to act , WHY ?


think it through .....

Deleted User wrote: »

It's not for speculation.

To be fair I only seen that after he posted it.

Even then, if it's not for speculation on this specific event, what is the point of this thread?... "RIP to the victims xx" posts? Condemning all Muslims? The right VS left debate? Swedish politics?

BoatMad wrote: »

The "ISlam Threat " will recede when the wests violent involvement in the ME ends

Was sweden that big on violent involvement in the ME?

Still its nice to know that this is all our fault and that the perpetrators dont have any agency or choice in the matter, theyre just empty vessels reacting to us...

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

Was this a Muslamic attack?

I must confess this is a bit of middle class smugness we could probably do without, I rewatched that interview some months ago and looking back its clear the guy was talking about islamic rape gangs. Of course all we see is some working class pleb muddling up his words, the wretch, not like it was his female compatriots that ended up the victimof these rotherham style gangs.

And round and round we go! one of these threads every couple of days now! Islamic terrror has been the one constant since the beginning of the 21st century!
This will only get worse.
Rip to today's victims, I feel sorry for the Swedish people their lefty governments have left these animal migrants come in and cause chaos it is now a basket case of a country. It should be an example to other European countries on what not to do with regards to migrants.

Irish Praetorian wrote: »

Was sweden that big on violent involvement in the ME?

Still its nice to know that this is all our fault and that the perpetrators dont have any agency or choice in the matter, theyre just empty vessels reacting to us...

because of the Wests involvement in the ME, including the violent over throw of serval states and a completely illegal invasion etc , Then you a situation where the west ( US ) allowed the deposed Sunnis to be persecuted by the ****es , which directly led to the rise of ISIS

This type of action radicalises people , That true in Northern ireland , as it is in any situation. For the vast majority that radicalisation leads to nothing, For some , it leads to violent - reaction . ( for comparisons, see history of IRA, etc )

A Little Pony wrote: »

Why do they consider themselves Muslims before British or French or German or Irish?

whether they are British Muslims , or Muslim British is largely irrelevant. The events surrounding their religion and the ME have radicalised people that see the west as the main cause of the problems

BoatMad wrote: »

We have four types immigrants

(a) EU nationals, we cannot force anyone to learn anything , we can certainly offer support etc, but we cant force it

(b) Legal Immigrants from outside the EU. This is actually a very small number

(c) Illegal immigrants , again a small number

(d) Asylum seekers, being processed to legal stay or deportation


Illegals are deported.

The rest will assimilate over time as their kids go to school

Remember teaching them english just not let them assimilate , the westminster driver spoke the mother tongue .

The language issue is irrelevant

The "ISlam Threat " will recede when the wests violent involvement in the ME ends

I disagree.

While it's certainly not helping, it's not a particularly big driver.

One of the big drivers is the fact that everyone's a fùcking victim these days, that everyone's part of a giant victim parade. These memes are spread through the arts, the university system and the media.

If you're a women, it's those evil men keeping you down.

If you're black, its those evil white men keepin you down.

If you're fat, its those evil skinny cùnts keeping you doen.

If you're gay, it's those evil hetrosexuals keeping you down.

If you're Richard Spencer alt right, it's the Jews and The Cathedral keeping you down.

If you're Muslim: it's those who go against the will of Allah and the non-believers who are keeping you down.

Islam is a victim religion allowed to grow and prosper in a victim culture.

So, you're a Muslim in a European country. You look different from the native population. You are statistically likelier to be poorer, unequal, all of that kind of thing. You'll find it harder to get on the ladder due to a plethora of factors. Then Islam comes along and says:

"It's not your fault, its the fault of the infidels over there."

So with this mentality, and with the observable fact that humans stick to those similar to them, you have groups pooling together. That group starts looking after their own goals and interest and when the gaps between groups are too large, you get madness.

The middle east stuff is a driver, an excuse for whats going on, but it's not the issue here.

BoatMad wrote: »

nonsense , utter nonsense . Islam is at its base a peaceful religion , The Catholic church , now that was different, it killed all around it

You are joking right?? The Quran, a book written by a savage warlord paedophile.

The Backwards Man wrote: »

Yep, terrorism sickens me to the pit of my stomach, the cowards that perpetrate it, and the cowards that are complicit in it getting the result that was desired. All extremists want the same things, fear, division and suspicion, matters not what 'side' they are on, it's all the one side when you boil it all down

I see this attitude as gaslighting tbh. It's an attempt to shut people down by claiming or intimating that they are being "hysterical". The same with the whole 'calm down idiots, don't you know we're safer than ever' argument. Then we have the people who bring out stats on car accidents or whatever. It's all bollox.

The fact that armed soldiers are deployed on the streets of Europe is a testament to the fact that we are not safer than ever. The fact that these kinds of incidents are happening with increasing frequency shows that it is a problem. The fact that there have been mass sexual assaults in Europe is a problem. That there has been an increase in homophobic and anti Semitic attacks is a problem. Why are people pretending that these things arent happening? How is that helping?

What Isis and their ilk want is to hurt and kill people. That's it. Ignoring or downplaying the problem isn't going to make it stop.

Help!!!! wrote: »

So what you're saying is that Muslims are too stupid to differentiate America/Britain from Sweden/Ireland. So its just easier to blame everyone for what happened in the ME. Here was me thinking you were just another Muslim apologist :rolleyes:

I have read enough to see that " terrorists" dont fall out of the sky. They often start as ordinary people that are radicalised by either direct experience or family experience or just what they see as a great wrong being perpetrated. Many people are radicalised but dont go as far as violent action , but there is a minority that do. This is just as true in Northern Ireland as it is in the ME.

For a radical , hitting back against the " west " is sufficient.

I dont apologise for violent attacks, but dont think simply labelling people as " terrorists " without accepting that there is a whole linkage that cant be ignored is sufficient either

Its all connected together.

What Isis and their ilk want is to hurt and kill people. That's it. Ignoring or downplaying the problem isn't going to make it stop.

Im glad people like you were not involved in the Northern Ireland peace process

Radical Muslim terrroism is directly related to events in the ME. Perhaps if we were seriously sorting that out and brining peace to the region , instead of aerial bombing, we might start to remove the issues that cause European muslims to radicalise in the first place

The fact is that if there wasn't such an influx this wouldn't be happening, it'd be like leaving your front door open on a busy street, not everyone is bad but you know a certain percentage of the population would take the opportunity to rob you blind

BoatMad wrote: »

because of the Wests involvement in the ME, including the violent over throw of serval states and a completely illegal invasion etc , Then you a situation where the west ( US ) allowed the deposed Sunnis to be persecuted by the ****es , which directly led to the rise of ISIS

This type of action radicalises people , That true in Northern ireland , as it is in any situation. For the vast majority that radicalisation leads to nothing, For some , it leads to violent - reaction . ( for comparisons, see history of IRA, etc )

Again, this seems to be completely missing the point - if it was the US that caused the damage, why is it newly radicalised individuals seem to turn on anyone they can get there hands on? Gays, Yazidis, Hindus, Muslims of the wrong religious stripe? I didn't see the IRA make a big deal of targeting say Germans, for not boycotting the UK. This line of argument seems completely unsustainable. At best, the contention seems to be, 'better hope your Muslim communities get whatever they want, otherwise they will go crazy and start lashing out at everyone' - not a particularly kind argument I think it should be said.